Home
GPS has revolutionised the way we navigate and record our bike rides, but it can sometimes be infuriating...

GPS bike computers have revolutionised the way many of us navigate and record our rides but they have their downsides and pitfalls. Here are some of the issues we've experienced and heard about.

How does GPS work?

GPS – the Global Positioning System – is a satellite-based system owned by the US government. It provides geolocation to a GPS receiver, such as a GPS bike computer, anywhere on the planet. 

GPS satellites orbiting the Earth transmit information about their position at regular intervals. GPS initially used 24 satellites but now there are 31 in orbit. Your GPS computer receives signals from multiple satellites and uses the information to calculate your position. As your position changes over time, your GPS computer can calculate your speed and record your routes. 

An artists's impression of a GPS satellite (US Government).jpg

Although we talk about GPS, devices from brands like Garmin and Lezyne take signals from GLONASS satellites too, GLONASS being the Russian equivalent. Some Garmin GPS watches now also use the EU's Galileo system which went live in 2016 and is expected to reach full operational capability this year. We should really talk about global navigation satellite system (GNSS) devices, but GPS was the first so it has become the generic term.

Manufacturers of GPS navigation devices say that adding GLONASS to the mix allows positions to be fixed faster and more accurately. This is particularly important in built-up areas where the direct line of sight to GPS satellites could be obscured. If you have the choice, using GPS alone improves battery life but it might affect your computer's performance.

From a cycling point of view, GPS allows a bike computer to measure your speed without the need to attach a magnet to a spoke and a sensor to a fork leg. It can also record the routes you've ridden which can then be uploaded to a laptop/desktop computer later on. 

Pay more money and you can get a GPS bike computer that allows you to plan and follow routes with onscreen mapping and turn-by-turn instructions, and you can chase KOMs on Strava and see your results in real time. 

It's clever stuff. We're big fans of GPS bike computers here at road.cc, but they're not perfect...

Check out 15 of the best cycling GPS units

Lost connections

While GPS computers usually record your activities pretty accurately, they can occasionally get it wrong and this is sometimes caused by a lost satellite connection. If this happens, your recorded track will show a straight line between two points rather than tracing the route you really followed, and the distance you've ridden (and any data resulting from that, such as average speed) will be given incorrectly.

Garmin Connect straight line

Environmental factors can interrupt the GPS signal between satellites and your computer. Although it's not as common as it once was, a lost connection can occasionally happen because of thick tree cover or steep terrain (when you're riding in a gorge or a mountainous area, for example), or when you're riding under a bridge or through a tunnel.  

In order to reduce the chances of interrupted communication, make sure there are no obstructions above or around your GPS computer.

Incorrect trackpoints

Another reason for bad data is that your GPS computer has recorded incorrect trackpoints – so you get a track recording that deviates from the road or trail you've really taken. 

Garmin Connect riding through buildings - 1

Tall buildings, for example, can sometimes cause weak signals to be reflected. Look back at a map of the route you've ridden and it might tell you that you spent some time riding through buildings rather than along the road. This can also affect the distance that the computer says that you have ridden and your average speed.

In some cases GPS devices are working properly but the mapping software is faulty, giving you the impression that you're riding through a field or wood when you're actually on the road.

Find out about 13 of the best cheap GPS cycling computers

Not everything is recorded

A GPS device doesn't record absolutely every movement you make. For example, with many Garmin fitness devices you can switch between Every Second Recording and Smart Recording. 

Garmin Edge 520 GPS Bike Computer.jpg

What's the difference? If you are using Every Second Recording, as the name suggests, the device will take GPS information (along with any other data on your activity, such as heart rate) every second, no matter what. 

"This recording type provides a more defined track log of an activity," says Garmin. "However, overall device memory will be filled up faster using this setting."

Smart recording, on the other hand, is designed to take up less memory.

"Smart Recording records key points where the fitness device changes direction, speed, heart rate or elevation," says Garmin. "This recording type allows the user extended recording time given that it is recording less track points.

"Smart Recording does not affect the performance of an activity as it pertains to the data being recorded such as pace and distance or heart rate. Smart Recording only affects the data that is written to the file for storage on the device and on Garmin Connect by removing data points that are essentially redundant."

Garmin Connect cornering - 1

The fact that a GPS device measures your location at intervals is responsible for the series of straight lines you can sometimes see on a bend once you've uploaded a route you've ridden. The GPS device joins a series of dots with straight lines rather than recognising your beautifully smooth cornering technique! 

Read our complete guide to Garmin Edge GPS bike computers

GPS accuracy

The US government is committed to providing GPS to certain levels of accuracy (the commitments apply to the signals transmitted from satellites rather than to the accuracy of GPS devices like your bike computer, of course). 

It commits to broadcasting the GPS signal in space with a global average user range error of less than or equal to 7.8 metres with 95% probability. Actual performance exceeds that specification, and your GPS device might be getting signals from GLONASS satellites too.

Lezyne Mega XL -1.jpg

As well as the user range error, the readings you receive on your GPS bike computer will depend on satellite geometry and things like signal blockage (see above) atmospheric conditions, and the design features and quality of your computer (both the hardware and the software). There will always be a margin of error in the accuracy of any device's recording.

Incidentally, during the 1990s GPS accuracy was intentionally degraded for civilian (as opposed to military) use across the world, but this was ended in 2000.

Check out GPS cycle route planning made easy

You might get some questionable altitude readings

You might think that if your device knows whereabouts you are in the world it should be able to give your elevation based on that, but GPS isn't that good for calculating altitude, especially if reception is poor. That's why GPS bike computers have an in-built barometric altimeter. This uses changes in air pressure to calculate changes in altitude. The issue here is that temperature and weather can also change air pressure, affecting the readings.

Wahoo Elemnt Bolt GPS bike computer.jpg

Apps like Strava have elevation correction features. ​However, if your device has a barometric altimeter Strava won't make this elevation correction because, as long as it has been calibrated correctly, the data collected in that way will probably be more accurate. 

Go to our GPS reviews to find out what you should buy

Small errors add up

Errors caused by the factors mentioned above can add up so you might find that if you go for a ride with friends you all get marginally different recorded data from the various bike computers and smartphones used. You could find that the distance, average speed and total elevation gain measurements given by your computer are different from those of somebody else's when in reality you've done exactly the same ride. 

You might also ride exactly the same route on different days and get different distance and elevation data. GPS discrepancies are likely to be small in most cases but they're certainly possible. 

Check out the GPS computers that the pros are using

Battery life

GPS measurement consumes a lot of battery power and following a GPS route on screen takes even more. Bear in mind that the GPS computer's runtime published by a manufacturer will usually be the best case scenario. Garmin, for example, gives a runtime of up to 15 hours for the Edge 520 and up to 20 hours for the Edge 1030, but in typical circumstances they're likely to need recharging sooner than that.

The runtime of any GPS computer will see you through the vast majority of rides you're likely to do, but you might need to equip yourself with an extra battery pack for something like an ultra-long Audax ride or multi-day touring. 

Garmin Charge Power Pack - 1

Garmin has a Charge Power Pack, for instance, that plugs directly into an Edge 1030 to provide up to 24 hours of additional battery life. You can use it on other compatible devices via a cable. 

Read our review of the APC Power Pack

They can sometimes freeze/crash

GPS devices can sometimes do weird, infuriating things. Internet forums are full of people saying that their bike computer froze or crashed for no good reason. Some are more prone to it than others so do some research before deciding what you want to buy.

A non-functioning GPS is always annoying and sometimes a real problem. A computer that fails suddenly when you're relying on it for navigation could see you in the middle of nowhere without knowing which way to turn.

They might send you down unsuitable roads

If you can plan routes on your GPS computer you'll be able to tell it whether you want to stick to paved roads or whether you want to ride trails too... but this doesn't always work.

Garmin Cycle Map, for instance, is built on OpenStreetMap (OSM) information. OSM is a collaborative project to create a free editable map of the world – the mapping equivalent of Wikipedia. If an unpaved road is incorrectly labelled as a paved road on there, the routing software will take its word for it, so you could find yourself on a rocky bridleway when you were hoping for smooth tarmac.

Mat has in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. We send him off around the world to get all the news from launches and shows too. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now pushing 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

19 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter [4079 posts] 7 months ago
23 likes

Important warning for other cyclists: I bought myself a U2 branded GPS device and it's just been awful - the streets have no name and I still haven't found what I'm looking for.

 

Avatar
Organon [341 posts] 7 months ago
2 likes

I see, so Garmin Smart Tracking explains why some local club rider scoffed that I said I had better GPS on my phone when he had a 'Garmin.' I also explains why he had about 11 data points to my 40+ on a segment and was missing about 25% of the segment.

Avatar
chuckd [8 posts] 7 months ago
4 likes
HawkinsPeter wrote:

Important warning for other cyclists: I bought myself a U2 branded GPS device and it's just been awful - the streets have no name and I still haven't found what I'm looking for.

 

You win, Peter. I quit the internet after that one.

; )

Avatar
r.glancy [31 posts] 7 months ago
3 likes

99.9% of these issues are Garmin device related. 

Buy a Wahoo bolt and forget the worries  3 

Avatar
alansmurphy [2285 posts] 7 months ago
4 likes

I love my wahoo and my black and white tv for watching the snooker - c'mon Higgins!

Avatar
froze [114 posts] 7 months ago
0 likes

I looked at a lot of different GPS units that had turn by turn directions for touring purposes, and I heard a lot of complaints, the biggest issues was battery life, and life of the actual unit itself being 3 to 4 years on average from what I could tell from reading.  What I found though is that NONE of the cycling reviews ever mention Garmin Etrex 30 and a couple of others that are similar, these units do have turn by turn directions, the battery life is around 25 hours on AA batteries, and from what I've read the reliability of the units are far more then the bike specific ones.  I'm pretty sure I'll be going with an Etrex or something similar as soon as I study more about them.

Avatar
fukawitribe [2892 posts] 7 months ago
0 likes
froze wrote:

I looked at a lot of different GPS units that had turn by turn directions for touring purposes, and I heard a lot of complaints, the biggest issues was battery life, and life of the actual unit itself being 3 to 4 years on average from what I could tell from reading.  What I found though is that NONE of the cycling reviews ever mention Garmin Etrex 30 and a couple of others that are similar, these units do have turn by turn directions, the battery life is around 25 hours on AA batteries, and from what I've read the reliability of the units are far more then the bike specific ones.  I'm pretty sure I'll be going with an Etrex or something similar as soon as I study more about them.

They do get reviewed, but the emphasis is mostly on navigation - they have no ability to connect to most of the sensors that might be of interest to the more training oriented or nerdy users, so that limits the appeal to many. As a straight digital map with a few extras, they seem to be reasonably well regarded, they're just somewhat lobotomised outside of that usage.

Avatar
davidjks [3 posts] 7 months ago
0 likes

There is also an altitude problem with Wahoo and Ride with GPS where the later is used to plot routes. There is a differrence in the sampling which means that the Ride with GPs can give different climbing figures on planned routes to those recorded on the actual device. The difference is not insignificant and can be as much as 25% short on Ride with GPS compared with Wahoo.

Avatar
froze [114 posts] 7 months ago
0 likes
fukawitribe wrote:
froze wrote:

I looked at a lot of different GPS units that had turn by turn directions for touring purposes, and I heard a lot of complaints, the biggest issues was battery life, and life of the actual unit itself being 3 to 4 years on average from what I could tell from reading.  What I found though is that NONE of the cycling reviews ever mention Garmin Etrex 30 and a couple of others that are similar, these units do have turn by turn directions, the battery life is around 25 hours on AA batteries, and from what I've read the reliability of the units are far more then the bike specific ones.  I'm pretty sure I'll be going with an Etrex or something similar as soon as I study more about them.

They do get reviewed, but the emphasis is mostly on navigation - they have no ability to connect to most of the sensors that might be of interest to the more training oriented or nerdy users, so that limits the appeal to many. As a straight digital map with a few extras, they seem to be reasonably well regarded, they're just somewhat lobotomised outside of that usage.

Well since it's not going to be used for training I'm find with that.  But I think the Garmin Touring Plus (note I said I think) isn't made for training.  The Etrex 35 seems to have everything I need.  Of course since I've been studying these things I found out that most people that tour do not rely on these GPS things exclusively, they also use good old fashion paper maps supplied by Adventure Cycling, so they can reference two different things to get a better idea of what's going on.  

I'm not done researching these Etrex type of units, there are other models to like the Oregon, Montana, GPSMAP 64, not sure why they have to have so many models, probably to confuse the crap out of the consumer.  Anyway I need to check into all of those before I make a decision.

Avatar
Xenophon2 [112 posts] 1 month ago
0 likes
froze wrote:

I'm not done researching these Etrex type of units, there are other models to like the Oregon, Montana, GPSMAP 64, not sure why they have to have so many models, probably to confuse the crap out of the consumer.  Anyway I need to check into all of those before I make a decision.

 

GPSMAPS 64S is almost totally unsuitable for bike riding.  It's designed for trekking, there's no easy way to safely mount it on a bike, short of getting a RAM-mount.  It's also heavy.  Other than that it's good, screen is perfectly legible and if you don't need performance data it's more than enough.  On fully charged high-capacity batteries and with the screen on average backlighting (you don't need any backlight during the daytime, only at night) it lasts 10 real hours.  I actually mounted it on a bike for a year and got along fine but together with the RAM-mount, it added 600 grams easy.  Just after two years, my unit simply died on me.  It was out of warranty but, I contacted Garmin anyway and they told me to ship them the unit and they'd give me a quote.  Two weeks later I received a parcel that contained a brand new unit, together with a note saying that mine had a factory defect and was replaced for free.  After another year I caved and got myself a 1030.

Avatar
Mybike [70 posts] 1 month ago
1 like
hawkinspeter wrote:

Important warning for other cyclists: I bought myself a U2 branded GPS device and it's just been awful - the streets have no name and I still haven't found what I'm looking for.

You must be David wells. Negative land. Brilliant comment

 

Avatar
Spangly Shiny [274 posts] 1 month ago
2 likes
alansmurphy wrote:

I love my wahoo and my black and white tv for watching the snooker - c'mon Higgins!

Who remembers, "And for those of you watching in black and white, the pink is next to the green,"  by Ted Lowe iirc?

Avatar
Pilot Pete [226 posts] 1 month ago
1 like

The only complaint I have for Garmin's is the way the tabs snap off when riding over a rough bit or road (which is most roads here in the UK). I’ve had it happen to an -800, a -1000 and a -1030. I had to use a racewear repair on the -800 and -1000, which means the unit now stands up prouder on my out front mount. The -1030 was only 6 months old when it happened so was replaced under warranty. The other issue with the -1030 is if you use a repair such as the raceware one it would cover the connections on the base (for extra battery). 

Considering how many years Garmin have been making GPSs with this mounting system you’d think they’d have it sorted and robust enough to withstand normal use by now. Surely it would be better to either make the tabs thicker and stronger or make them out of metal. Then the wear would occur on the handlebar mount insert, which is replaceable for a fiver.

PP

Avatar
srchar [1566 posts] 1 month ago
0 likes

I have a Garmin 520. Honestly, I wish it would die so that I could justify a replacement from a different company.  Most of the time, it works just well enough for me not to throw it into a hedge. A fifty quid landfill Android phone has better GPS, routing and mapping (and did at the time of the 520's release). Why does my Garmin take minutes to get a GPS lock when a) my phone gets GPS lock in seconds and b) the Garmin is connected to the bloody phone via Bluetooth and could get its location from the phone? It's just crap, considering what it cost.

Avatar
Sriracha [251 posts] 1 month ago
0 likes
srchar wrote:

I have a Garmin 520. Honestly, I wish it would die so that I could justify a replacement from a different company.  Most of the time, it works just well enough for me not to throw it into a hedge. A fifty quid landfill Android phone has better GPS, routing and mapping (and did at the time of the 520's release). Why does my Garmin take minutes to get a GPS lock when a) my phone gets GPS lock in seconds and b) the Garmin is connected to the bloody phone via Bluetooth and could get its location from the phone? It's just crap, considering what it cost.

I suppose the phone will download ephemeris data from the web and so have a big advantage getting a gps lock.

Avatar
Jetmans Dad [198 posts] 1 month ago
0 likes
srchar wrote:

Why does my Garmin take minutes to get a GPS lock when a) my phone gets GPS lock in seconds ...

 

I have a 520Plus and love it. Works well and hasn't given me any grief. 

As far as the question I have quoted is concerned ... your mobile phone is also getting location data based on triangulating itself with the signal from the closest cell towers. The phone can show you that pretty much instantly and then the GPS signal take over once the satellite connection has been made. 

As to why the Garmin doesn't get the location from the phone ... dunno. Not sure that would work quite as well as GPS if it is using the cell tower location. 

Avatar
Simon E [3844 posts] 1 month ago
1 like
srchar wrote:

I have a Garmin 520. Honestly, I wish it would die so that I could justify a replacement from a different company. 

Thanks for your comment. Someone local to me is selling a 520 for £80 and I thought "hmmm, perhaps it's a bargain... OTOH is it cheap because it's sh*t?"

Avatar
srchar [1566 posts] 1 month ago
0 likes
Sriracha wrote:

I suppose the phone will download ephemeris data from the web and so have a big advantage getting a gps lock.

I realise this, but the Garmin could download the same data using the Bluetooth connection to the phone, or simply get the location from the phone via Location Services. Neither method requires hardware. I don't know if non-Garmin GPS devices do this, or simply get a lock faster than the 520, to be fair to the steaming pile of...

Avatar
Jetmans Dad [198 posts] 4 weeks ago
0 likes
srchar wrote:

I don't know if non-Garmin GPS devices do this, or simply get a lock faster than the 520, to be fair to the steaming pile of...

Can't comment on the 520 as I have never had one, but if I switch my 520plus on when I start to move the bike out of the house, it is all set up, GPS connected and ready to ride before I have finished getting it outside and locking the door ... which takes maybe 45 seconds tops.

My 500 takes another 30 seconds or so beyond that to be ready to roll. 

Maybe the 520 just has older hardware.