Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Aero clip-ons for Giant Propel Advanced 1 Disc

With SUCH a convoluted bike name (and hefty price tag) you'd think there'd be a comprehensive aero  bars setup . . . well, no.

Giant have gone to the no doubt expensive trouble of designing quite fancy clip-ons for the uniquely profiled aero composite drop bars BUT, while reasonably facilitating height and left/right elbow rest adjystment have criminally neglected to allow for forward/aft adjustment of their (£79) clip-ons.

What's a poor (read - can't afford TT bike as well!) endurance triathlete to do to get that proper bikefitted elbow position instead of a rubbish and sore-after-45-mins fixed reach?

I'm having to talk to engineers at the moment for a mod/hack that will transform these clip-ons into a properly adjustable form.

If there's anyone out there who knows of any fixes for this please post. Any wonky solution considered as it seems wrong for the proprietary clip-ons to fit only the tiny minority of perfect medium or perfect large body types. 

Massive thanks in optomistic anticipation. 

G

 

This is 

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

26 comments

Avatar
Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Reckon jn46 has nailed best possible option. 

Buy the giant clip-ons for the clamp only (~£75),  remove rests and buy a pair of rests separately eg

https://www.revolverwheels.co.uk/shop/components-accessories/ergo-mantis...

while being super careful to match bolt positions on clamp (or get the undrilled rests and carefully drill myself - or someone who knows what they're doing! ).

Good luck guys.

 

Avatar
mikemjd replied to Grringo6 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Any update for you @Grringo6?

I finally got around to fitting mine to my Propel yesterday, and of course I've run into the same issue as you, pads almost half way up my arm instead of back close the the elbow. It also seems the Giant TT bars themselves are too short, if I try putting my arms in the correct position, my hands are off the front of the TT bars.

Let me know if you picked up any after maket rests, it's looking like I'll have to do the same.

Cheers

 

Avatar
Grringo6 replied to mikemjd | 3 years ago
0 likes

hey there.

sorry, no progress to report but my intention is still as above. i've bookmarked these 3: 

https://www.shopforwatts.co.uk/collections/anemoi/products/anemoi-arm-rests

https://www.revolverwheels.co.uk/shop/components-accessories/ergo-mantis...

https://www.aero-coach.co.uk/store/product/aerocoach-align-wing-carbon-a...

soooo expensive though. sounds like we're in precisely the same predicament (armrest mid-goddam-forearm) so my additional observations may be handy.

i've been out on the bike a lot trying to condition my lumbar spine for that aero position and just rested my arms on the bars (look dad, no hands) in what i consider the best position, just to get a rough idea of where these aftermarkets might sit and to make sure they'd not be so far back that my knees would hit them when out of the saddle (bearing in mind they'd be significantly elevated , obvs). worth a try to help get your head round your geometry.

my bikefit guy was awesome and confirmed stuff i'd read about the 'mantis' forearm (ie forearm angled up with hands high) position being more comfy and more aero. so not a flat/ski extension, more this 

https://www.aero-coach.co.uk/store/product/aerocoach-angles-aerobar-exte...

. . . in fact, i'm realising now that doing all this 3D guesstimation myself could be an expensive mistake. once those holes are drilled in the armrests - you've committed to the whole system. and maybe 60/40 chance of a satisfying fit?

anyway - food for thought. let me know if you pull the trigger on any of this stuff, but reckon the sensible/economical thing to do is go back to my bikefitter and do this accurately. likely to be kicking myself for a long time otherwise . . . 

 

 

Avatar
mikeyc83 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Interested to see how you get on Grringo6, i am in the same position.

Did you say you had managed to speak with anyone at Giant. I've dropped them a note. Just seems daft to create an amazing bike without the ability to accomodate more positions for tri bars.

Avatar
Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Will check out these suppliers, jn46. Excellent tip.

As you say - it's all a compromise when tt-ing a road bike because I'm trying to make one bike into 2, but agree that a happy medium and 'sufficient' comfort can be found with some patient searching . . . and bonkers expenditure unfortunately.

 

Avatar
jn46 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Hi guys,
A good solution could be to ditch the giant arm rests and pads and replace with something from one of the specialist UK time trial suppliers, such as aerocoach, wattshop, revolver or Matt botrill coaching. You're stuck with the giant clamps because of the aero shape of the bar obviously.
They're not cheap but will significantly improve the comfort factor and give you more adjustability. The aerocoach ones for instance are probably twice the size of the stock giant pads, which as well as allowing you to move them fore/aft more also increases the contact area on your forearms, relieving some of the pressure that causes the pain.
From experience Tri bars on road bikes are always a compromise in way or another. Bring them too far back and they impact on handling and bang your knees when standing on climbs, too far forwards and you lose power and have to use your core more (not great if you have a run to follow). There is a happy compromise it's just finding it.
The giant clip ons are really an afterthought for Olympic distance draft legal or sprint triathlons. The hardwares sound but the adjustability range in the arm rests is badly lacking by current standards and you'll unfortunately need to spend some more to get them to work for you. Any of the specialist pads would be a worthwhile upgrade. Look at a lot of the top long distance triathletes or super fast time trialists and the majority are on aftermarket arm rests. Good luck!

Avatar
Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Hey Kendalred & Fenix - Like most fore/aft adjustable clip-ons you remove the elbow rest cushion (sometimes velcro, sometime adhesive) which reveals a grid of possible hex bolt positions in the underlying elbow rest from which you select 2, depending on your preferred fit. It takes looking at these things physically to get one's head around I suspect.

You can see one example nice n clearly on the Profile Design installation vid on this page. 

https://trigearlab.com/best-aero-bars/

Also the rotational forces may be a consideration for round non-aero bars but the feature (and maddening factor) of the Giant aero bars we're discussing is that they are not round but tear-shaped. The clamps cannot rotate.

Thanks anyway, guys, and happy cycling.

Avatar
Kendalred replied to Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Ah..I see now, the elbow pad comes away from the clamps and there's a range of movement options including fore/aft and left/right. Right you are.

Avatar
fenix | 4 years ago
0 likes

If the rests aren't over the bars then you'll be putting a lot of pressure on the clamps to rotate surely ?  You could just get a longer/shorter stem to suit ?  

Avatar
mikemjd | 4 years ago
0 likes

Hi Grringo6, thanks for getting back to me.

The bars on my bike are named Giant Contact SL Aero, and these are the clip-on bars I've purchased: https://www.7hundred.co.uk/50849/products/giant-contact-aero-clip-on-cla...

As I've unboxed them already I may try them out and see what position I can achieve, at least if I run into problems, thanks to your contributions I'll know why the setup's falling short.

It's good to know the non-UK part is a potential solution, but I'm not sure that would match the shape of my bars (looking at the bars it was designed for).

That Celtman looks and sounds brutal, I'm doing my first 70.3s this year in the form of the Slateman, Snowman & Sandman tris, that's the primary reason I got the Propel.

I've seen a video on YouTube of a Propel TT fit: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gfI7kQKVmmc - what's your opinion of the position he's in? not sure if he's using the aero bars with clip-on setup, but it appears the arm rests are directly over the bars.

Hope your training goes well!

Avatar
Grringo6 replied to mikemjd | 4 years ago
0 likes

mikemjd wrote:

Hi Grringo6, thanks for getting back to me.

The bars on my bike are named Giant Contact SL Aero, and these are the clip-on bars I've purchased: https://www.7hundred.co.uk/50849/products/giant-contact-aero-clip-on-cla...

As I've unboxed them already I may try them out and see what position I can achieve, at least if I run into problems, thanks to your contributions I'll know why the setup's falling short.

It's good to know the non-UK part is a potential solution, but I'm not sure that would match the shape of my bars (looking at the bars it was designed for).

That Celtman looks and sounds brutal, I'm doing my first 70.3s this year in the form of the Slateman, Snowman & Sandman tris, that's the primary reason I got the Propel.

I've seen a video on YouTube of a Propel TT fit: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gfI7kQKVmmc - what's your opinion of the position he's in? not sure if he's using the aero bars with clip-on setup, but it appears the arm rests are directly over the bars.

Hope your training goes well!

 

Thanks - and apologies, in my haste I mis-typed and did mean, of course, 'Contact' SL & SLR. The link you include are the exact set I returned as they cannot be adjusted fore/aft. 

The other version I linked to definitely do, as per Giant spec. You can google the product number for the installation l/setup guide pdf which is clearly different from the set you have as it instructs how to adjust fore/aft.

Frustratingly I can't quite make out the setup on the video. He looks quite appropriate and comfy and with elbows over bars but you've only got to look at the variety of positions out there as well as the popularity of eg Profile Design clip-ons (adjustable fore/aft) to see that it's a personal bio-mechanic issue. Shortening my stem length significantly alters handling and would mean I'd be too upright when on the hoods. But adjusting elbow rests aft would be ideal for both and is very common on non-aero bar setups.

Avatar
Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Hey Mikemjd - After weeks of deciphering the ludicrously complex Giant nomenclature (!) and international phone calls (I kid you not) I've arrived at a decision but not necessarily a surefire solution.

It's all about the clamps. I have the Connect SLR Aero bars (previous version of yr bike) and you have the Connect SL Aero bars. I *believe* the cross-section profiles are identical but haven't been able to verify this. I bought and then returned the clip-ons pushed in the UK. These are the square elbow rest design, and touted as 'multi-position' but are not adjustable in all 3 planes, ie, NOT fore/aft.

My only remaining lead came from non-UK, Euro Giant stores, eg, Dublin.

http://www.giant-dublin.ie/ie/contact-aero-clip-on-clamps-for-contact-sl...

These clip-ons - more of a cup-shaped elbow rest - are adjustable fore/aft although not hugely. My Edinburgh Giant stockist said they were unable to order non-UK stock full stop. I decided to just get used to the feel of my standard bike over winter and then see if Dublin will sell me these clip-ons direct come spring and my Celtman training (yikes!)

BUT . . . it's a punt as I've no guarantee the clamp profile will exactly match my bars. I suspect it's the same story for your SL bars. 

The only solution offered by Giant UK stores was replace the stem & bars to conventional/non-aero and then there'd be plenty of better clip-on options. But obviously there wld be horrific messy fiddly consequences with cabling, not to mention aero-ness and aesthetics. 

Hope this helps. Let me know if you've unearthed any more info.

Cheers

G

 

 

 

Avatar
Kendalred replied to Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Grringo6 wrote:

Hey Mikemjd - After weeks of deciphering the ludicrously complex Giant nomenclature (!) and international phone calls (I kid you not) I've arrived at a decision but not necessarily a surefire solution.

It's all about the clamps. I have the Connect SLR Aero bars (previous version of yr bike) and you have the Connect SL Aero bars. I *believe* the cross-section profiles are identical but haven't been able to verify this. I bought and then returned the clip-ons pushed in the UK. These are the square elbow rest design, and touted as 'multi-position' but are not adjustable in all 3 planes, ie, NOT fore/aft.

My only remaining lead came from non-UK, Euro Giant stores, eg, Dublin.

http://www.giant-dublin.ie/ie/contact-aero-clip-on-clamps-for-contact-sl...

These clip-ons - more of a cup-shaped elbow rest - are adjustable fore/aft although not hugely. My Edinburgh Giant stockist said they were unable to order non-UK stock full stop. I decided to just get used to the feel of my standard bike over winter and then see if Dublin will sell me these clip-ons direct come spring and my Celtman training (yikes!)

BUT . . . it's a punt as I've no guarantee the clamp profile will exactly match my bars. I suspect it's the same story for your SL bars. 

The only solution offered by Giant UK stores was replace the stem & bars to conventional/non-aero and then there'd be plenty of better clip-on options. But obviously there wld be horrific messy fiddly consequences with cabling, not to mention aero-ness and aesthetics. 

Hope this helps. Let me know if you've unearthed any more info.

Cheers

G

I'll take your word for it that these clip-ons can be adjusted backwards and forwards, but I can't see how they would, looking at them. Typically, the description is minimalist at best: 'wide-range armrest positioning' is a bit ambiguous. 

As Fenix said, moving the armrests from directly above the bars would put rotational pressure on the clamps, and may cause them to move during the hours that you'll be using them in the events that you are entering. If you have exhausted the other routes - namely a shorter stem or moving your saddle as far forward as possible (or both), then I suppose you have no choice if you want the best position.

Avatar
Grringo6 | 4 years ago
1 like

So still unresolved.

My bikefitted aero position needs my elbows nearer my body than can be facilitated by Giant's clip-ons for this bike model and that is that.

At least my definition of the problem is way more concise now !!

Thanks for your ideas/chat everyone.

To the hills.

Avatar
mikemjd replied to Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Grringo6 wrote:

So still unresolved.

My bikefitted aero position needs my elbows nearer my body than can be facilitated by Giant's clip-ons for this bike model and that is that.

At least my definition of the problem is way more concise now !!

Thanks for your ideas/chat everyone.

To the hills.

 

Sorry to bump this @Grringo6 , but I've recently purchased a Giant Advanced Disc 2 (2019), along with the corrosponding aero clip-ons for Giant Contact SL Aero handlebars. The bike was purchased for 70.3 triathlons, knowing I could use it in group rides also.

I'm now wondering if I'm going to run into the same issues you've had when trying to find a comfortable position.

How did things progress for you with this bike and an aero bar setup?

Avatar
Boatsie | 4 years ago
0 likes

Grringo6, I'm with you.
I'm even more budget (less).
But when engineering modification please be careful. I wouldn't want to steer like a forklift at high speeds. I think I'll drill though my round cross bar, bolt and be done with it. A comfortable commuter.

Avatar
Boatsie | 4 years ago
0 likes

I don't think Giant are criminally neglect because the Time Trials Track bars were made to use on a fixed gear no brakes machine in a stable environment .
On road is variables. Biggest hassle I had was suicide shifts when speeds were up above 60 kmph ish. Some days due to the flow I'd have to free roll. If needed I'd speed wobble to grab brakes but without bracing near steering axle it would be near impossible.
That's really impressive that the turbulence is defused into slip stream via a tapered edge and also that the tapered edge is easier to lock lay bars onto. I have no idea if the wind shear is as strong on a modern setup; coefficient of force is reduced but speeds are increased and force is a triple exponential of speed with reference to wind.
Hence encouragement to brace torque brake a speed wobble with an easy arrangement of a fixed position.
I'm a poorer cyclist dude. I hope the high price is per accessibility restrictions of such magnificent looking bars because I don't know how to discard post usable composite products and if they were cheaper than many more would be tomorrows landfill or stock pile to recycle if such is.

Hoping you win many races bro.

Avatar
Boatsie | 4 years ago
0 likes

I'm sort of dumb man. I remembered why I didn't TT bar the aero fixie. 2 reasons.
It has sort of aero alloy bars, not a tapered edge such as carbon can produce but efficient and I target my purchases at materials that can be recycled and didn't want to ruin a good thing.
Main reason was that all grips are fore of front axle and when she's street screaming I get bucked a bit and adore having brake levers just in case.
The amount of fore weight is incredible. I like Podc reasoning.
I never raced, my opinion is via commuting but I found TT bars fantastic on long-haul and note that some fancy new cyclists often past me. But I found best comfort firm with grip far forward and where forearm/elbow saddles are meant to be use merely used to stabilize when changing position into brake grip positions. Ridden on a soft touch. She was fast enough and using descent often passing cars in an 80kmph zone but not race speed. You guys walk on tree trunks.  1 I don't understand muscle tense preferences of racers.
Eg whether saddles should brace high pressure arms or guide as a steering fulcrum brake and allow body to maximize pressure.
Yet we human. Riding will discover preferences.
As human, typical rule of thumb is strength.
60% legs, 30% torso, 10% arms

Avatar
Podc | 4 years ago
1 like

Not sure what your position is at the moment, but it might be worth looking at your saddle fore/aft position. Moving the saddle forward so that you are further forward and in effect rotated around the bb, might help as your upper body will be further forward and lower. 

Avatar
Boatsie | 4 years ago
0 likes

Thanks..
I'm corrected too.
I remember my elbows touching the bar (or near enough to touching bar, just before the bone lump if memory true).

You rock , I'm old
Probably something missing that I was told.

Hmm something to do with hold.?. Maybe hold on she's going to be fast.

Avatar
Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Thanks, Boatsie.

This is the example my pro bikefit guy gave me as a position that's bad for my purposes. As I mentioned this is a fine aero position esp for shortish TTs etc but will be agony to maintain for me (and, I suspect, even you) for 6-8 hrs because the fulcrum is the mid forearm and so - like a seesaw - requires far more muscular tone at the shoulder and wrist to maintain than if the load-bearing point were, effectively, the tip of the humerus. Try holding a plank position with weight mostly going through your elbow Vs resting your forearms on, well, I dunno. Hopefully you get the picture : )

Anyhoo, here are the principles that make sense to me esp in relation to elbow position. 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a7yIb99DSHk

Many mnfctrs do a clamp/rest that is adjustable in every plane (see above post), inc forward/aft. I'm just disappointed Giant haven't, afaics, factored this adjustment in for this bike. Boo.

... But happy to be corrected.

Avatar
Boatsie | 4 years ago
0 likes

Just a thought..
I don't know your bike. I use 3 road bikes with 60 or 61cm top tubes. (I don't remember at this moment). 1 is an aero shape bike but I won't fit lay tri bars to it because it wouldn't fit my suit. It's too long and I don't see control in doing such but perfect length to me on dropbars.
My 4th road bike is 58 cm top tube. I'd like to use tri bars on that but doubt my leg strength would benefit the bikes suit change if done and I'm a cheapskate so it'll take me ages to figure out how to weld or similar.

But I think (without knowledge) if the rest was to be used as a brace aft of the shaft then with hands fore of the shaft there would be a continual counter of steerage torque rather than a brake torque and adjustment.

Best of luck..
Godspeed

Avatar
Boatsie | 4 years ago
0 likes

The picture looks perfect man. IMO.
Wow, bars have really changed yet basic principles remains same.

I used to commute a 2*40km on drop bars. When working during uni holidays , a work mate was an experienced cyclist and sold me an old one piece aero bar to assist my comfort. Old then and that was 25 + years ago.

Anyway the basic principles remains same. I don't understand the basic principles though. What I found was at first it was twitchy. You'd know that feeling; your hands extended fore and providing a greater length of lever. I didn't have cushions, I wanted some but didn't want more air turbulence. Learning to lightly rest instead. Maybe the rests are just rests.

Like kayaking and bicycle riding are very very similar, eg kick the vessel forward while the blade grips: Push your leg while your hand grips. The back rest in the vessel is a back rest. Generally we lean forward to avoid resting the back while paddling; tires less as legs are much stronger than arms.

Maybe the arm rests are forward such to maintain leverage during descents, etc.

Nice looking rests man.. Wow

Avatar
Grringo6 | 4 years ago
0 likes

Thanks, Kendalred.

OK - so, providing this img uploads, if you look at guy on white bike he's basically resting his forearm on the rests. The rests are way too far forward.  This is my problem. With the Giant (let's call it) handlebar-clamp-plus-rest-on-top-ie-excluding-bars the height of the rest is adjustable and also left/right (as you look at them)(or 'in/out' if you prefer) BUT NOT forward or backward relative to the handlebar (which the likes of Profile Design's T3+ and many others do). Here they are 

https://www.giantbikespares.com/Giant-Contact-Aero-Clip-on-Clamp-for-Aer...

(and incidentally I'm the guy in the comments on the website asking the same question, to which 'Dave' incorrectly answers, Yes!)

The img attached may be an OK aero position but is super-bad ergonomically and will quickly bring shoulder and wrist tension/pain. The ideal position for long haul events is as aero as poss but also as comfy as poss. And this is wherever these rests provide maximum support so you can maximally rest - ie, directly under the elbow in other words where the upper body is directly supported and the forearms/wrists can relax. 

I think there can only be an engineering fix but before I go down that path wanted to see if there were any alternative solutions out there. Hope this helps you picture the prob and thanks again for replying

G

Avatar
Kendalred | 4 years ago
0 likes

Not sure if I can picture what your problem is? Is it the position of the actual elbow pads/rests that you are wanting to adjust backwards/forwards - or the extensions?

If it's the elbow rests, then by design they will always be directly above the handlebar tops. Surely the only way to get them closer/further away is to change the length of the stem. Or am I missing something?

is it this?

https://www.giant-bicycles.com/gb/giant-contact-aero-clip-on-bar-clamp-f...

 

Avatar
Boatsie | 4 years ago
0 likes

I used same as welded in place. 1 bar that was bent to form 4 horns with a tiny bar welded to bridge; headset grip).
Eg same as aero profile welded onto existing bars, just different weld locations.
I apologize that it doesn't help your fit but it made a great long distance commuter. Light in middle of aero horn, no flash padding to rest on seemed to get comfortable with use.

Latest Comments