Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Going tubeless

After a period of riding clinchers, I am looking to go tubeless to reduce my risk of punctures (particularly as I will be riding lots of Yorkshire cobbles in preparation for the Ronde Van Calderdale sportive), as well as save weight and improve my speed and comfort on the bike.

I just wondered what I need to make the conversion? The wheels on my Boardman SLR 8.6 are tubeless ready, so that's a start, but how straightforward is it to make the change to tubeless?

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
Dicklexic | 3 years ago
1 like

I have been using tubeless tyres for over 5 years now, and have no plans to go back to tubes. Admittedly my experience is with using only one set of wheels and one brand of tyre, so maybe I got lucky, but I have had no reasons whatsoever to doubt my choice. I did help a friend set her bike up with tubeless and had some difficulty fitting both tyres, then seating and inflating one of the tyres, but that was on some Reynolds carbon rims. Thumbs were quite sore by the time we'd finished. With my wheels they are the easiest ones to fit of ANY wheels and tyres I have ever used.

I use Hunt 4 Season wheels, and Schwalbe Pro One (summer) and Schwalbe S-One (winter & gravel) tyres. The wheels are 5 years old and I have got through I think three sets of Pro One tyres in that time. The Pro Ones are a really great tyre in many ways, but as they are so light they are not the most durable. The tread does eventually wear too thin and they are not the most resistant to cuts from glass or flint. In all those years though only ONCE have I had trouble on a ride that was complicated by the choice of going tubeless, and it was my own fault anyway. Earlier this year I had a puncture that wouldn't seal as the selant was too old, porbably about 8 months, so I replaced the sealant when I got home. I was able to pump the tyre up to about 40-50 psi and ride back carefully as I was quite close to home.

The rest of the time I've been very happy. Running 65-70/75-80 psi f/r with 28mm tyres for a 94kg rider the comfort has been great, and speed and grip are superb. Even potholes and cattlegrids are no longer a worry. I still carry a spare tube just in case, along with some tubless repair strips and a tyre boot.

Avatar
mtbtomo | 3 years ago
2 likes

So to answer what you need - possibly tubeless tape (not all tubeless ready rims are taped with tubeless tape), tubeless valves, sealant and specific tubeless (or tubeless ready) tyres for road.

I've been running road tubeless for probably 5 years now. The only combination I've had difficulty mounting are GP5000 on deep section Reynolds carbon rims. Not had a problem mounting GP5000TL to other tubeless rims. Also not had any problem mounting Hutchinson, Schwalbe, Vittoria and Specialized tubeless tyres across Hunt, Cosine (Wiggle own brand), Prime (Wiggle own brand), A-Force, Novatec, Pacenti, Mavic and Stans rims to name but a few. Sometimes it needs decent tyre levers, sometimes just thumbs to roll the tyre on to the rim. Regardless, takes between 5-10 mins per wheel without rushing.

I always use a blob or two of wood glue (Copydex etc) around the valve seat as that seems to be where I lose most air over time if it seeps air too much if I don't.

A thick water/washing up solution slapped around the rim bed helps the tyre seat when inflated. Plus one of those accumulator style air inflator cannisters such as the Airshot makes it easy to inflate and get the pop on to the rim first time every time.

I've had two punctures in those 5 years and the tyres have usually been more or less worn out and worth replacing at that point. The first one the sealant sealed enough to get me home without putting a tube in, the second was a puncture that had previously sealed but started leaking again at home.

On cobbles, I would say it is well worth the confidence it will give knowing you won't get a pinch flat, even at lower pressures than you possibly would usually. And they do ride nicely and smoothly. You can tell the difference between nice tubeless tyres and no-doubt still decent but normal clinchers that may be more focussed on durability and puncture resistance. And even if you aren't racing, if the energy savings are to be believed then why wouldn't you want to expend less energy riding with your mates?

I wouldn't go back to normal tubed clinchers.

Avatar
mtbtomo replied to mtbtomo | 3 years ago
1 like

Oh and i tend to get 12 months out of sealant. But that may be because I store my bikes in a cool and maybe slightly damp cellar.

Avatar
JaredP91 replied to mtbtomo | 3 years ago
1 like

Thanks mtbtomo for the fantastic insights, I'm definitely convinced that tubeless is the way forward for me.

Avatar
kevvjj replied to JaredP91 | 3 years ago
1 like

these are an absolute bargain at the moment for £20

https://www.merlincycles.com/schwalbe-one-raceguard-microskin-tl-easy-fo...

 

Avatar
JaredP91 replied to kevvjj | 3 years ago
0 likes

Fantastic find, £40 for a pair of tubeless tyres is an absolute steal!

Avatar
Spangly Shiny | 3 years ago
2 likes

My tubeless experiment has ended. After what must now be around 5 years running tubeless (going as far back as Schwalbe Ultrimos)I have decided to revert to tubes. 
My reasoning is the pure faff of running tubeless, with the sealant refill every 2 months (it does not last 3) and the sheer time expended should you need to fit that emergency spare tube (an hour to scrape the sealant off the inside of the tyre). 
I worked out that it takes me around 3 -4 minutes elapsed time to swap out an inner tube and get going again whereas last weekend I spent an hour by the side of the road fitting the emergency spare. Checking the inside of the tyre I spotted 2 accumulations of latex indicating 2 punctures that I escaped but that would have taken less than 10 minutes to fix. 
I know that it is said that running tubeless eliminates the risk of snakebite flats however in over 50 years on tubed tyres and tubs I never once had a snakebite flat.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to Spangly Shiny | 3 years ago
1 like

Why on earth are you scraping the sealant out?

2 months sealant replacement seems low as well.

Avatar
Spangly Shiny replied to Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
0 likes

Scraping the sealant out in order to fit the emergency inner tube because the sealant had dried out.

Sealant dries up in less than 3 months in my experience.

Avatar
Chris Hayes | 3 years ago
1 like

My experience of Vittoria tyres is that they tend to be comfortable and fast, but cut up easily on UK road surfaces: hence punctures.  Continental tyres (I use both 5000TL and 4000IIs on different bikes) have given me more protection, but you asked whether moving to TL would help prevent punctures.  

Having experimented with TL over the past year I'd say that changing an inner tube by the roadside is a pretty quick fix anyway if you're leisure cycling. TL tyres are expensive and far from problem free (especially if you're trying to fit them to alloy wheels that require rim tape) - and you can get some cracking deals on Conti 4000s and Vittoria Pave's at the moment... much better tyres than you're using and less than £30 a tyre.  I'd try that first - especially if you only have one bike / set of wheels... it took me nearly 6 hours to fix a leak during the lockdown and it really messed up my day!

 

 

Avatar
JaredP91 replied to Chris Hayes | 3 years ago
0 likes

I must admit, the benefit of the multitude of punctures I have experienced recently does mean I've become increasingly efficient at changing flats. I did look for some bargains on the Conti GP4000 tyres, but all sites I have visited state they are discontinued. Do you know anywhere still selling them?

Avatar
Chris Hayes replied to JaredP91 | 3 years ago
1 like

...seriously, if you have to pay full price just buy them.  Conti 5000s will cost you £80, sealant £10, valves £15, tape £10... and the faf....  I think wiggle have Vittoria Paves on sale at £21... I'm going to get some. 

Avatar
JaredP91 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Thanks all for the great advice and useful links 👍

I did have a question around compatibility. I know there is no industry standard for tubeless tyres at this time, making fitting a bit hit and miss. How can I find out which tyres are compatible with my specific rims? For reference, I'm running Boardman Alloy tubeless ready wheels.

Avatar
Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
1 like

This is worth a read;

https://road.cc/content/feature/what-they-dont-tell-you-about-tubeless-2...

As is this;

https://thecycleclinic.co.uk/blogs/news/living-with-tubeless-tyres

You won't save weight and it's debatable if you will feel the difference, except in your wallet!

Fitting them may go seamlessly, but be prepared for it not to.

You will need to revamp your 'on bike repair kit' to include a tyre patch, tyre worms, an applicator tool, a valve core remover tool, some sealant to top up if it's all blown out, possibly different/ stronger tyre levers, CO2 inflator and cartridge(s) and possibly a pump (CO2 will re-seat the tyre should it unseat or you need to remove it, but may prevent your sealant from working for a subsequent puncture, so you may need to seat the tyre with CO2 then re-inflate with air from a pump). It all depends on how far you ride - locally you could take a chance on getting home with the CO2, but a long way from home you will probably want the protection in case of another puncture.

You will obviously need the correct tyres, valves (ideally with a removable core), and may need to change or renew your rim tape. You will need sealant, an applicator for the sealant, possibly a shock pump or CO2 to get the tyres to seat, and may need some stronger tyre levers in your workshop as the tyres can be very tight to fit and snap normal tyre levers.

So all in all, quite a change which will cost, at least initially. So it depends on how often you puncture as to whether it works out saving you money or not over the longer term.

PP

Avatar
kevvjj replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
2 likes

You don't need to carry anymore than a 'tubed' bike. I run tubeless. If I get a puncture that won't seal I simply put in a spare tube and pump it up with my pump. Same equipment I carried when running tubes. 

Avatar
Pilot Pete replied to kevvjj | 3 years ago
4 likes

Which is all well and good if you have a tyre and rim combination that are easy enough to get off/ on roadside. Due to lack of design standards some tubeless rim/ tyre combinations can be an absolute pig to install/ remove due to being so tight. Good luck 'just popping a tube in' and trying to get the bead back on without pinching the tube if you have a tight combination. Even more so on a cold, wet winter ride....

You appear to be missing out on the point that the easier fix for a tubeless tyre when out on the road is to plug the hole that won't seal, without removing the tyre. Surely this has to be preferable to fitting a tube? In this case you do need to carry different/ additional kit.

Th other thing to bear in mind with your 'just bang a tube in' approach is that your wonderful tubeless tyre may be full of thorns that sealed without you even knowing you had a puncture. You better inspect the inside of that tyre thoroughly before just banging in your only tube and inflating it....

PP

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
2 likes

Pilot Pete wrote:

Which is all well and good if you have a tyre and rim combination that are easy enough to get off/ on roadside. Due to lack of design standards some tubeless rim/ tyre combinations can be an absolute pig to install/ remove due to being so tight.

Mind you, this is true of clinchers as well. My two most hideous to remove tyre /rim combinations are Panaracer clinchers on Bontrager rims. Nightmare; bendy tire-levered, profanity laced nightmare.
TLRs from Mavic (Hutchinson) and Specialized go on the same rims a breeze, often just fingers.

Avatar
Carior replied to fukawitribe | 3 years ago
1 like

Oh plus one to this - three sets of wheels I have had were nightmares - so crappy reparto corse wheels on my entry to road biking nirone.  Fulcrum racing 3s and the worst of the lot, DT Swiss R32 Splines.  The latter are almost impossible to get back on even with the full works, soapy water, levers, everything - absolutely impossible with every tire I have tried on them.  Conversely, I have two sets of tubeless rims (Roval and Cannondale Hollowgram) that have been a synch with either clincher or tubeless.

The old compatibility and hard to get on thing is to be frank a lazy trope that's always trotted out and its kinda bollocks.  There are crappy hard to deal with clinchers and crappy hard to deal with tubuless.  Fortunately wheel manufacturers are realising that you can get a tyre to seat effectively in a rim without having them so tight that they need to be surgically removed. (Fortunately the trend toward wider rubber and wider rim beds also seems to help with this as my experience with wider rimmed aero wheels is universally better!)

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
0 likes

Surely you check the inside of a tyre before changing a tube anyway?

I'm with Kevvjj on this. I carry an inner tube and my ordinary tyre levers.

I used to carry two inner tubes as I punctured fairly frequently, now I've dropped to one as, in total, I've had one puncture that didn't seal since going tubeless 5 years ago.

I'm running Schwalbe Pro-Ones on Hunt Race Aero's.

Avatar
Pilot Pete replied to Rich_cb | 3 years ago
1 like

Rich_cb wrote:

Surely you check the inside of a tyre before changing a tube anyway?

yes, but only for the cause of my puncture. With tubeless, putting a tube in, especially if you puncture as often as you claimed you used to, you will need to check the whole tyre carefully for potentially half a dozen thorns etc that have sealed.

PP

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
1 like

I always used to check the whole tyre regardless.

If you've ridden over glass or thorns you may have several pieces wedged in, last thing you want is to puncture a fresh tube.

Avatar
njblackadder | 3 years ago
1 like

Reduce the chance of punctures? Probably. Save weight? Unlikely. Improve speed? No chance. Improve comfort? Maybe. That's my tuppence worth!!!! Good luck with it and happy cycling.

Avatar
Carior replied to njblackadder | 3 years ago
1 like

I mean - they do reduce rolling resistance which will improve speed - CRR has literally compared a tubeless vs clincher/latex 5000S.

My experience is that I have ridden some crap which appears to have sealed that otherwise would have needed to be repaired.

In terms of comfort that sort of depends on how much you're prepared to trade a pinch flat risk for comfort.  If you are someone that runs rock solid pressures to avoid pinch flats then loads of scope for dropping down pressure substantially for comfort with no pinch flat risk.  But then, if you're someone that still runs tyres at 100PSI plus and isn't seriously heavy you're probably just a retro-grouch who has no interest in change anyway.

Avatar
Pilot Pete replied to Carior | 3 years ago
0 likes

I run GP5000 and GP4000sII clincher tyres in 25mm width at 85 rear, 80 front. I don't feel I need to run them any softer as the ride is fine and grip excellent and I don't pinch flat at that. I weigh 83kg.

This is worth a read, especially for those running hookless rims with tubeless tyres who carry a spare tube 'just in case'. Be careful trying to mount the tyre with a tube in after a flat that doesn't seal - some manufacturers don't recommend it.

For example, Enve state that your are welcome to put a tube in "as long as your tyre is listed on our approved tubeless tyre list". You could argue that's a legal 'get out of any liability' issue, or more realistically that the tyre has been tested and demonstrated to not blow off the rim with a tube in. All I would suggest is that those running tubeless check before fitting a tube to ensure the wheel and tyre manufacturer don't specifically warn against it.

https://www.velonews.com/gear/tech-faq-hooked-vs-hookless-rims-tire-choi...

PP

Avatar
Stebbo replied to Carior | 3 years ago
1 like

Any improvement in speed whilst technically there would be small and imperceptible. To anything but testing equipment and a stop watch. Comfort is so difficult to define and open to cognitive bias once you know you have reduced the pressure and changed the tyres to tubeless. 
But as long as you are happy and enjoy riding.

Avatar
Pilot Pete replied to Carior | 3 years ago
1 like

Carior wrote:

I mean - they do reduce rolling resistance which will improve speed - CRR has literally compared a tubeless vs clincher/latex 5000S.

Unless you are racing the reduced rolling resistance is marginal and of no consequence. I ride with mates who run tubeless and the rolling resistance of their tubeless compared to others tubed makes no difference in our group rides.

For example the difference between a Conti GP5000 with a butyl tube and the TL model is 2.2 watts at 80psi. So claiming that less rolling resistance will improve speed is meaningless to the average rider unless they are doing a time trial.

https://www.bicyclerollingresistance.com/road-bike-reviews/compare/conti...

Reducing punctures would presumably be the main driving factor of choosing tubeless. If you are prone to puncturing often then they could be of real benefit. If you want to run lower pressures and risk pinch flatting on tubed tyres then again they could be of real benefit.

However, if you don't, then there are a lot of downsides due to the inconsistencies and lack of standards. The increased faff and extra/ different kit to carry, just in case that puncture doesn't seal, the fact that they are different and users need to understand and learn new techniques and do more maintenance and possibly need different tools all mean it is not clear cut for everyone.

Many of the newer breed of cyclists do little or no maintenance. Most could fix a puncture by fitting a new tube previously, but the extra requirements of tubeless make this task more difficult and for those users, if they follow a proper setup and maintenance regime, more expensive if they have to get a bike shop to do it. 

PP

 

Avatar
JaredP91 replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
2 likes

I'd definitely say reducing punctures is the main driver in my decision to consider tubeless. I have had a spate of punctures on my current 25mm Vittoria Zaffiro tyres, which came stock with the bike, and I am getting frustrated and repeated spells at the side of the road replacing inner tubes. I did consider better quality clinchers e.g. Conti GP5000 or 4 seasons, but fear even with the additional investment pinch flats and genuine punctures are still a possibility.

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to JaredP91 | 3 years ago
0 likes

JaredP91 wrote:

I'd definitely say reducing punctures is the main driver in my decision to consider tubeless. I have had a spate of punctures on my current 25mm Vittoria Zaffiro tyres, which came stock with the bike, and I am getting frustrated and repeated spells at the side of the road replacing inner tubes. I did consider better quality clinchers e.g. Conti GP5000 or 4 seasons, but fear even with the additional investment pinch flats and genuine punctures are still a possibility.

My partner's bike came with Vittoria Zaffiros as standard and the number of punctures she got was ridiculous - three within the first two weeks (I was riding with her most of the time and didn't get any). Since switching to better quality clinchers (GP4000s II), she hasn't had any. Luck might play a role but I'm sure the quality of the tyre does too!

Pinch flats are unlikely on a road bike with decent tyre pressure. They are more of a risk off-roading where you might choose to run deliberately low pressure (and generally more likely to have big drops/rocks to hit). The only time I've had a pinch flat on my road bike was when I'd attempted to pump up the tyre using a pretty terrible mini-pump and had nowhere near enough pressure in it.

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
0 likes

Pilot Pete wrote:

The increased faff and extra/ different kit to carry, just in case that puncture doesn't seal

The only thing I now bring that I didn't with tubed clinchers is a credit card-sized pack of tyre boots, and that only replaces the fiver I had in there before for pretty much the same purpose. I hear similar from pretty much every user of tubeless i've heard, some will take some sealant but not that many IME (or have mentioned it anyway).

I check for any pin-prick seal marks when I check the tyres for cuts etc (as I do with tubed clinchers), and i'll have a look at sealant every 6-9 months maybe. That latter is more faff, but it's not hard, doesn't take long and I budget it as part of the trade-off against stopping out on the road or on the trail. 

You're right it is new to many but, to be honest, I think it'd be easier to explain and do for a complete novice than fitting with inner tubes - perhaps maybe even less to go wrong, if the tyres are actually tubeless rather than TLR certainly. YMMV obviously but a lot of the old niggles with TL/TLR really aren't around any more IMO.

Avatar
Carior replied to Pilot Pete | 3 years ago
1 like

I race long distance triathlon. 2.2W per wheel, 4.4W total over 180k adds up to a lot of time!

Pages

Latest Comments