Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Lorry driver who claimed cyclist Julian Barlow should have given way to him jailed over his death

Changed plea the day before trial following report by his own defence team

A Grimsby lorry driver has been jailed for two years after admitting killing a cyclist by careless driving, reports the Yorkshire Post. Mervyn White, 64, gave police a variety of excuses for hitting Julian Barlow and also said the cyclist should have let his lorry through.

White hit and killed 49-year-old Julian Barlow, known as Jules, on July 27, 2014, when he drove his 18-tonne articulated lorry onto a roundabout at the junction of the M62 eastbound and A19 Selby Road at Whitley, near Goole.

Richard Walters, prosecuting, said White failed to give way to Barlow and proceeded onto the roundabout without stopping, his speed never lower than 19mph.

"Mr Barlow was wearing a red top and cycling in a completely appropriate manner, and was visible for some time. The defendant simply pulled straight out and [Barlow] went underneath the vehicle."

White initially denied the charge and claimed he had been blinded by the sun but changed his plea the day before the trial as a result of a report commissioned by his own defence team.

The York Press reports that in a police interview, White said he had been taught to keep the lorry moving whenever possible at roundabouts to save fuel.

He also said that Barlow should have let the lorry through, adding “it takes two to tango”. The Honorary Recorder of York, Judge Paul Batty QC, described this as a “deeply unpleasant” phrase.

White told police he had been blinded by the sun, but Walters said it had been proven that the sun wasn't a factor.

White also tried to blame the position of his mirrors and the A-frame on his vehicle. However, he later conceded that he had been driving the same model of vehicle for the previous four or five years. The prosecution said this would have made him aware of any defects or shortcomings.

White was jailed for two years and given a three-year driving ban.

Acting traffic sergeant Zoe Billings who led the investigation said:

“This was a horrific and preventable collision which has left Jules’ wife and friends bereft and broken. Jules was an experienced cyclist, who paid particular attention to the maintenance of his bike and his own safety.

“Despite the fact that the investigation uncovered dashcam footage of the incident, which clearly showed that White’s careless driving was the cause of Jules death – he chose to plead not guilty until the day before the trial, forcing Jules’ wife to go through a long court process and extending the hurt and agony for her further.

“I hope that today’s sentence can provide some small comfort to Wendy and thank her for the tremendous courage she has shown throughout the investigation.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

31 comments

Avatar
A V Lowe | 7 years ago
1 like

One fundamental piece is missing here and I'm appealing for that information from anyone who might have it - or a picture post crash of the truck at the scene.  Someone gave the keys to that truck to that driver. That person holds the operators licence issued under conditions prescribed by the Goods Vehicle (Licensing of Operators) Act - legislation in place to regulate the operation of vehicles over 7.5T GVW with the key objecting to 'prevent harm' arising from those operations and that responsibility tracking back to the directors and the named and formally qualified Transport Manager, responsible fr ensuring the both trucks and drivers are fit to go out on the road each day.  Anyone with that detail is welcome to DM/PM me here or via @BCCletts on twitter

There is in any organisation a corporate 'culture' that presents itself in their business ethics, attitudes to safety, staff empowerment etc, and in the road transport industry you will seen a wide divergence in how driving safety is managed. Travel on a National Express coach, and before the driver can start the ending they have to take a breath test - EVERY TIME , whilst Gibson Direct (a bus operator in Renfrewshire) had one of their drivers pulled over after a school bus journey and found to be 3 times over the drink-drive limit. Surely something that a depot manager should have spotted and at the very least checked on. This also begs a further question of the local authority placing the contracts to operate school buses, often with smaller operators, and assessing the tenders purely on price.  There is a term 'due diligence' that essentially sums up the delivery of a duty of care in doing business, any business, where a client placing contracts will check out the contractors. For Renfrewshire schools I'd be reviewing ALL the school bus contracts, and making sure that the operators have a robust check on driver fitness - both from the legal and illegal substances consumed, and permanent health issues, noting the case of Harry Clarke the bin lorry driver.   

Thus a company can through its operating culture encourage the thinking process we see here in the way this driver put forward 'excuses' for failing to observe road signs, and observe the presence of other road users.  Often this becomes apparent when you check back against the O Licence history, and CyclingUK has managed to get operators with appalling histories of non-compliance, who in turn have let drivers out with their trucks to kill and maim eventually called to account and banned from holding an O Licence or working as a Transport Manager.  Curiously (?) many either fail to turn up at the hearing or surrender their O Licence, the latter often linked to a fresh application for a 'phoenix' company with relatives providing new principals.

The client issue still lingers. In one of the fatal crashes of 2013, it too 29 months to get the operator, complicit in having the driver worknig 2 shifts back-to-back, but we've never had any statement or review of the supermarket going for the lowest competent tender to deliver overnight between Bristol and their Cornish store(s).  Tellingly the case for Julie Dinsdale (Keith Bontrager's partner) is being taken right back to Tesco  rather then their contractor, and (by the look of things) noting the chain from driver to client, for ultimate liability

So please, when a bus or truck is involved in any incident, make sure you get the details of the operator (NOT automatically the livery on the truck or bus), and also who the principal client is - National Express and London Buses use many contractors operating in livery - but for buses, the law requires the operator to have their details displayed clearly on the side of the vehicle.  Trucks, and also liveried company vans don't (now) need to have this, although a few do have a discreet logo. The only way to nail this is therefore the O Licence  disc which has to show the operator name and licence number. Thus I was able to note that the plain white truck parked fully blocking the Drury Lane cycle route at The Aldwych was operated by Matthew Clarke Wholesale (and delivering a consignment which would easily have fitted on a cargo bike!)

 

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
0 likes

Enjoy the showers, prick. 

Avatar
Das | 7 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
kie7077 | 7 years ago
0 likes

2 years, for murder. surprise

Avatar
vonhelmet replied to kie7077 | 7 years ago
0 likes

kie7077 wrote:

2 years, for murder. surprise

Except it clearly isn't murder.

If you want to use the wrong words for things then pretty soon nothing will make sense.

Avatar
fenix | 7 years ago
0 likes

He's blamed everyone and everything but himself.

 

The cyclist should have given way - No - he was on the roundabout already.

He has to keep moving to conserve fuel - bollox - does he not stop at lights or T junctions too ? 

The sun was in his eyes - no it wasn't.

The design of the Lorry blocked his view - no it didn't.

 

SO the only explanation is either he ran him down deliberately or just didn't see him there.

 

I'd hope no lorry company takes him on. Surely that would put their premiums up and why take on an idiot like this - there are plenty of better drivers around. 

 

So sad. 

 

 

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to fenix | 7 years ago
0 likes

fenix wrote:

He's blamed everyone and everything but himself.

The cyclist should have given way - No - he was on the roundabout already.

He has to keep moving to conserve fuel - bollox - does he not stop at lights or T junctions too ? 

The sun was in his eyes - no it wasn't.

The design of the Lorry blocked his view - no it didn't.

SO the only explanation is either he ran him down deliberately or just didn't see him there.

I'd hope no lorry company takes him on. Surely that would put their premiums up and why take on an idiot like this - there are plenty of better drivers around.

So sad.

The only reason he gave up on all his previous explanations was that people kept inconveniently proving what rubbish they all were.  One after another.  Right up to the day before the trial, when he had nothing left to play.

Unfortunately, I know which explanation I'd probably put money on, if forced to.

He figured "might is right" and went for it.   As close (IMO) to an intention to kill as one can probably get without - er - intending to kill.

Allegedly.

Avatar
vonhelmet replied to fenix | 7 years ago
3 likes

fenix wrote:

He's blamed everyone and everything but himself.

 

The cyclist should have given way - No - he was on the roundabout already.

He has to keep moving to conserve fuel - bollox - does he not stop at lights or T junctions too ? 

The sun was in his eyes - no it wasn't.

The design of the Lorry blocked his view - no it didn't.

 

SO the only explanation is either he ran him down deliberately or just didn't see him there.

 

I'd hope no lorry company takes him on. Surely that would put their premiums up and why take on an idiot like this - there are plenty of better drivers around. 

 

So sad. 

 

 

 

Why assume he did it deliberately?  Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.  It's entirely possible that he genuinely believed that the cyclist should stop for him.  That makes him an idiot, nothing more.  The question then is why we would ever let a man known to be a high calibre idiot drive a lorry again...

Avatar
DrJDog | 7 years ago
1 like

It sounds like what he did wasn't careless at all but a completely deliberate act. I don't really know what to call him.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
2 likes

So basically his excuse for KILLING A MAN was that he didn't want to waste fuel accelerating from a roundabout. That's some consolation for the family, life worth less than a few pence of diesel.

Hopefully he'll die of food poisoning in prison because someone had been taught not to bother cooking things for that long to save money on gas.

Avatar
BrokenBootneck | 7 years ago
0 likes

Yep I did let out a few expletives when I read this! 

Avatar
Gourmet Shot | 7 years ago
3 likes

The solictor representing Mervyn White, said outside of court "that's a right fcking result......my client drives a like a twat and kills an innocent person, albeit just a cyclist so who cares, and all he gets is 2 years in prison....Fck me we lol'ed at that one...we are over the moon...the c**t will be out soon anyway so who gives a fck....the justice system in this country is ace."

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avatar
Municipal Waste | 7 years ago
2 likes

I can't understand why the sun being in your eyes is ever allowed to be a valid defence. Surely you should automatically slow down if your vision is impaired by road conditions such as a blind corner, rain, fog or sunlight? 

Avatar
BrokenBootneck | 7 years ago
1 like

Meanwhile in Hampshire, driver gets off with a suspended sentence because

a conviction and loss of license might cost him his job. http://m.dailyecho.co.uk/news/14745752.Driver_who_failed_to_stop_after_fatal_cyclist_crash_smiles_as_he_walks_free_from_court/

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to BrokenBootneck | 7 years ago
5 likes
BrokenBootneck wrote:

Meanwhile in Hampshire, driver gets off with a suspended sentence because

a conviction and loss of license might cost him his job. http://m.dailyecho.co.uk/news/14745752.Driver_who_failed_to_stop_after_fatal_cyclist_crash_smiles_as_he_walks_free_from_court/

Just a warning to sit down and consider your blood pressure before reading this.

Words fail.

Avatar
Housecathst replied to Mungecrundle | 7 years ago
2 likes

Mungecrundle wrote:
BrokenBootneck wrote:

Meanwhile in Hampshire, driver gets off with a suspended sentence because

a conviction and loss of license might cost him his job. http://m.dailyecho.co.uk/news/14745752.Driver_who_failed_to_stop_after_fatal_cyclist_crash_smiles_as_he_walks_free_from_court/

Just a warning to sit down and consider your blood pressure before reading this. Words fail.

 

honestly, somebody needs to do the world a favour and do some vigilante shit on that fuck.

Avatar
Cupov | 7 years ago
1 like

Utter scum, trying to duck responsibility and showing no respect to the victim's family.

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
8 likes

Why the f does he think the cyclist should have stopped *on a roundabout* to let a lorry out?  Basically we have someone here who believes, or claims that at some point he's been taught, that fuel consumption is more important than someone's life. Terrible.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 7 years ago
3 likes

What a vile human being.

Avatar
zanf | 7 years ago
11 likes

I'm at a loss as to how the CPS didnt pursue a 'death by dangerous driving' charge considering that they had the cam footage form his cab showing that he deliberately drove on to the roundabout, with Julian having nowhere to go:

Quote:

The collision was filmed on a CCTV camera affixed to White’s cab. Speaking at York Crown Court, prosecuting barrister Richard Walters said the lorry driver had pulled out of a motorway slip road and onto the roundabout without stopping, his speed never dropping below 19mph. Walters added that Barlow, who was cycling round the roundabout, "had literally nowhere to go."

Source

Its sickening that not only has he got a ridiculously low jail term for killing someone, but he'll have his driving licence back in a few years.

The justice system is such a fucking joke in this country that Im surprised that there are not instances of vigilantism. Maybe its only a matter of time?

Avatar
vonhelmet | 7 years ago
3 likes

Bans don't start while you're in prison, haven't done for a while now.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to vonhelmet | 7 years ago
0 likes
vonhelmet wrote:

Bans don't start while you're in prison, haven't done for a while now.

So is that definitely the case now? All I have managed to find is that the law was 'theoretically' changed in 2009, but nothing actually happened in reality, until the end of 2014, when it was announced (by Mike Penning) that he would launch a a 'review' to see if something would be done to _actually_ change the law. But haven't found if anything then happened.

I really can't make head-nor-tail of this stuff. When is a change in the law actually a change in the law?

Avatar
pakennedy replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 7 years ago
0 likes
FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:
vonhelmet wrote:

Bans don't start while you're in prison, haven't done for a while now.

So is that definitely the case now? All I have managed to find is that the law was 'theoretically' changed in 2009, but nothing actually happened in reality, until the end of 2014, when it was announced (by Mike Penning) that he would launch a a 'review' to see if something would be done to _actually_ change the law. But haven't found if anything then happened.

I really can't make head-nor-tail of this stuff. When is a change in the law actually a change in the law?

The secretary of state has to sign it into law. That's the only remaining stage. They keep omitting to do it. Everything else is in place.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 7 years ago
2 likes

3 year driving ban that starts while he's in prison...2 year sentence that he wont serve...hundreds of companies (thousands?) who will happily employ him to drive their dangerous vehicles after.

....and still, still this is an amazing victory in comparison to the usual let offs we constantly hear about...

 

Avatar
DaveE128 | 7 years ago
6 likes

3 year driving ban?! Sigh.

Avatar
bendertherobot | 7 years ago
2 likes

Taught by who? His employer? If so, where is the H&S prosecution?

Avatar
usedtobefaster | 7 years ago
5 likes

So he'll end up with 1 year in prison and let out early on remand for killing some one.

 

Time to start sharpening the pitch forks and light the torches I think

Avatar
StraelGuy | 7 years ago
10 likes

What a c*nt. Maybe he'll choose a career that doesn't involve driving dangerous vehicles when he finally gets out of jail and is allowed to drive again?

Avatar
Subotai replied to StraelGuy | 7 years ago
1 like

guyrwood wrote:

What a c*nt. Maybe he'll choose a career that doesn't involve driving dangerous vehicles when he finally gets out of jail and is allowed to drive again?

 

You took the word right out of my mouth

 

surprise

Avatar
Pifko replied to StraelGuy | 7 years ago
0 likes

guyrwood wrote:

What a c*nt. Maybe he'll choose a career that doesn't involve driving dangerous vehicles when he finally gets out of jail and is allowed to drive again?

Ironically he's probably not educated or qualified enough to do anything else for a living. God help us all.

Pages

Latest Comments