The widower of a woman killed by a cyclist on a fixed wheel track bike has called on courier firms to check all their employees and ensure their bikes are road legal.
Kim Briggs, 44, was killed by former courier Charlie Alliston, 20, last year, when she stepped into the road in front of him.
He had been riding a fixedwheel track cycle which did not have a front brake and so was illegal to use on the road.
He was jailed last week for causing bodily harm through wanton and furious driving but acquitted of manslaughter in relation to the death of Mrs Briggs, who died from head injuries sustained when the pair collided on London’s Old Street in February 2016.
Kim’s widower Matt Briggs wants companies to ensure that their staff use bikes that have front brakes on the handlebars and to issue spot checks to make sure they comply.
Mr Briggs has secured a government review into dangerous cycling with a view to creating a new offence comparable to death by dangerous driving.
He told the Express: “There are two types of fixed-brake bikes or ‘fixies’. There are those that have drill holes so front brakes can be attached and those that are Velodrome-style and don’t.
“The bike that hit Kim was one of the latter and they should simply not be on the road. It’s illegal.
“With the former, a lot of cyclists don’t bother to fit the front brakes so they can get about faster.
“When I come into central London for meetings 90 per cent of the people I see doing this are couriers. That’s why I’d like to sit down with the big courier firms and discuss ways of improving safety and ensuring the cyclists they use have road-legal bikes.
“Ideally, I’d like to see them not employ any rider who uses a bike without front brakes and to issue random spot checks at regular intervals to make sure those that do have brakes on their handlebars don’t just remove them when they think they’re in the clear.”
He also wants retailers like Evans Cycles and State Bicycle Co. to stop using images of bikes without front rakes in their advertising.
He said: “The police have a lot on their hands so I didn’t want to trouble them. I went to the source instead, the retailers.
“They’ve taken my points on board as ‘fixie’ bikes that are sold with front brakes are now shown in photos with the brakes attached. I’m just trying to find a way that’s better and safer for everyone.”
Alliston admitted in court during the trial that the bike, which he had bought second-hand the previous month, had not been fitted with a front brake to make it legal for use on the road and claimed he was unaware that it was required by law.
Add new comment
68 comments
Alliston bought his bike 2nd hand didn't he ? not via a retailer, so what does this solve exactly chasing retailers as already pointed out conform to the existing sales laws.
I don't know people spend a lot of money making their bikes lighter, removing the brakes altogether can save 200g for zero cost.
but otherwise agree.
This initially sounds like a vaguely plausible thing to say, but is nonsense. Unless your brakes are badly adjusted, their presence or absence makes no different to how fast you can cycle and, in fact, having an effective braking system allows you to enter corners faster, thus allowing greater speed overall.
"A lot of cyclists don't understand physics and think it's cool not to have a front brake", I'll accept. But thinking it makes you go faster is not even close.
I've run out of sympathy for this guy.
It's all very campaigning to say that bike shouldn't have been on the road, when neither should his wife.
He seems to be missing the point that no matter what vehicle hit her, it could have been avoided by her stepping onto the road without looking.
Tell him that on Twitter and he immediately blocks you. He really isnt interested in hearing from anyone that doesnt fully agree with his myopic stance.
His campaign reminds me of that of Leah Betts parents crusade against ecstasy/MDMA.
Despite her dying from over consuming water (because she freaked and didnt want her parents to see her 'rushing' at her 18th birthday party), her parents went on a misguided crusade to enforce a prohibition, even though they are proven not to work, and got all manner of government people on board. The result: kids still die from dodgy pills whereas the Netherlands have been running testing stations inside clubs so at least people know what theyre taking.
Again, the Netherlanders lead the way while the UK rolls out the grieving family to beat others over the head with.
Mr Briggs grief is entirely understandable and something that many of us will fortunately never encounter. However, his new campaigning stance against cyclists is already starting to appear like persecution of all cyclists for the action of one.
Under BS6102 and the equivalent EU regulation all bicycles should have separate independent brakes on each wheel at the point of sale. If the customer chooses to remove those brakes there is nothing the retailer can do. If the bicycle is made for use on a velodrome, then it will be sold as not for road use and, again, there is nothing the retailer can do once the customer has left the store or recieved the goods if purchased online. Most cycle retailers are aware of this legislation and make sure they sell compliant bicycles. What the purchaser does afterwards is difficult to control. It is not the retailers responsibility.
Getting the cycle industry to do the work of police officers is not the way forward. Better police funding from central government might be better but in the current climate that is highly unlikely.
We'll have to go abroad to buy track bikes? Or the police could apply the law on brakes that already exists?
Pages