Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Police in West London fine cyclists for using mobiles – but say no resources to target drivers using handheld phones at wheel

Admission was made at meeting of Chiswick Area Forum last week, where officers were also urged to target pavement cyclists

Police in Chiswick, West London, have said they have fined cyclists in the area for using mobile phones while driving, but admit they lack resources to target motorists using handheld devices illegally at the wheel.

While there is no specific offence of using a mobile phone while riding a bike, it may be dealt with under the heading of careless cycling.

Using a handheld device while at the wheel is a specific offence, although harsher punishments introduced almost a year ago, with a fine of £200 and six penalty points, are failing to deter a huge number of motorists from breaking the law, with the RAC last year estimating that 9 million drivers were doing so.

> Up to 9 million drivers using mobile phones at wheel, according to RAC

Officers from the Metropolitan Police revealed last week at a meeting of the Chiswick Area Forum that they had been targeting cyclists using mobile phones under Operation Safeway – the controversial road safety campaign introduced in late 2014 after six cyclists were killed in the capital in the space of a fortnight – and that fines had been issued.

Among those present at the meeting last Tuesday, hosted by Hounslow Borough Council and which brings together councillors, police and local residents every two months, was Ruth Mayorcas, a cycling campaigner and Labour candidate for the Turnham Green ward in the forthcoming local elections.

Aged 64, she has lived locally for more than 40 years, and told road.cc that news of the cyclists being fined was greeted by “a general murmur of approval from the audience.”

The area has seen some anti-cyclist sentiment recently due to a small but vociferous group of opponents to Mayor Sadiq Khan’s plans for Cycle Superhighway 9, unveiled last year, which will run along Chiswick High Road on its way from Kensington Olympia to Brentford.

At the meeting, Mayorcas asked police whether they would be targeting drivers who were using their mobile phones while queueing in traffic on Wellesley Road, but was told no patrol car was available.

Asking whether an officer on a bike might be deployed instead, she was informed that funding had been withdrawn and there was therefore no such officer available.

She also received a non-committal response to her request for a close pass initiative to be introduced in the borough, which she pointed out had met with success in neighbouring Ealing as well as the West Midlands, where the initiative originated.

During the meeting, local restaurant owner David Lesniak – an opponent of the planned Cycle Superhighway 9 who has likened it to a “speedway” – asked police if they would target people riding bikes on the pavement

In response, Mayorcas pointed out to the meeting that the location that Lesniak was most concerned about was one where cyclists took to the pavement because it was dangerous to cycle on the road there.

While fixed penalty notices were introduced for that offence in 1999, official guidance laid down by Paul Boateng, a home office minister at the time, was that “The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so.

“Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required.”

That guidance was reaffirmed in 2014 by former transport minister Robert Goodwill and by the Association of Chief Police Officers.

> Transport minister: Responsible cyclists CAN ride on the pavement

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

32 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 6 years ago
26 likes

So, they're penalising behaviour that isn't an offense, but not enforcing the very clear law on not using mobiles whilst driving?

Great value we're getting from their wages.

Avatar
Username replied to hawkinspeter | 6 years ago
4 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

So, they're penalising behaviour that isn't an offense, but not enforcing the very clear law on not using mobiles whilst driving?

Great value we're getting from their wages.

 

Police respond to whatever is filling politicians' inboxes.

We have had five people killed standing at bus stops in London this January but it has hardly made the news, no one will write to their councillors about it but the same councillors will receive many emails about "speeding cyclists", "dangerous cyclists" etc. Just look at the letters published in your local rag.

The only way to combat this is to write to your councillors, your MP, your London Assemby Member (if in London), your local police, and keep writing to them.

 

Start here https://www.met.police.uk fill in your postcode and then tell them you are worried about speeding drivers and phone use by drivers.

Pages

Latest Comments