Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
93 comments
I pretty much agree with both of those points.
But...
There are obvious links between the Bell and Giro brands and NRA contributions.
There are obvious links between the NRA and Trump (IIRC the NRA contributed bigly to Trump's campaign, and Trump spoke at the NRA leadership conference).
I know that the second amendment runs through this debate, and is a sticking point, with or without the NRA.
And I'm under no illusion that me not buying any more Giro shoes is going to make the blindest bit of difference, but buying Sidi will make me feel a bit less dirty (until someone finds that they're ultimately owned by a holding that harvests kids' irises in Laos, or something).
!
I'd love to be able to do that with my 5 and 8 year olds, luckily we live near the prom to enjoy a decent ride together. No way could I risk them on the roads around here, too many impatient speeding drivers.
Pages