Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

UCI president David Lappartient tells Sir Dave Brailsford to keep his mouth shut after “insult”

Team Sky boss said UCI chief of having a "local French mayor mentality"...

UCI president David Lappartient has told Sir Dave Brailsford to keep his mouth shut and accused the Team Sky boss of insulting France’s mayors and its population.

Last month, before Chris Froome was cleared in the anti-doping case relating to his adverse analytical finding for an excessive amount of the anti-asthma drug salbutamol, Lappartient had repeated his view that it might be better if the defending champion did not race the Tour de France while it remained unresolved.

Race organisers ASO were set to exclude Froome from this year’s race but last Monday the UCI confirmed that the case was closed after the World Anti-doping Agency advised it that no anti-doping rule violation had happened, leaving him free to race.

Reuters reports that on Sunday, Brailsford, in reference to Lappartient – who defeated Brian Cookson in the UCI presidential election last September – said: “I gave him the benefit of the doubt when he started.

“I thought, 'OK, he is new to the job, he obviously doesn't quite understand the responsibilities of a presidential role.' I think he has still got the local French mayor kind of mentality.”

As it happens, since March 2008, Lappartient has been mayor of Sarzeau, the town in Brittany where yesterday’s Stage 4 of the Tour de France started.

But before becoming UCI president, the 45-year-old also spent nine years in the same position at the French cycling federation, and four with the European cycling federation.

Monday’s Stage 3 team time trial, which started and finished in Cholet, saw Team Sky’s riders booed as they negotiated the 35.5 kilometre course, as Froome had been at last Thursday’s team presentation.

It was perhaps with that in mind that Lappartient said of Brailsford yesterday: “When you have his level of popularity, you'd do better to keep a low profile.

“Who hosts the Tour de France stages? The French mayors. So it’s an insult to all the 35,000 French mayors and to French people in general,” he added.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

22 comments

Avatar
theDoctor | 5 years ago
0 likes

Yeah - but why? I get the implication of the "local French mayor kind of mentality" statement but on what basis is Brailsford making this comment?

Some have said above that Brailsford is on the right lines so can they inform me, please?

Avatar
alansmurphy | 5 years ago
1 like

Ahhh Burke, it's nice to have a new anti-Sky moron along...

 

Brailsford is correct, and timely given the Tour starting from Lappartient's home brown envelope / jiffy bag soil...

Avatar
iandusud | 5 years ago
7 likes

Let's remember that the only reason there has ever been any question over whether or not Chris Froome should be riding is because there was a leak at the UCI, for which Lapartient is ultimately responsable. The UCI rules state that a rider with an AAF should be allowed to continue riding until the end of the investigation, so when Lapartient was suggesting that Froome shouldn't ride he was suggesting a course of action contrary to the rules of the UCI, of which he is president, the organisation that caused this whole cock up in the first place by leaking this info. Surely as presidident he should be defending the UCI's rules and processes and not riding rough shod over them. I am certain that he would not have behaved this way if it was a French rider who was concerned. He needs to get his house in order, man up about the leak and find out where it came from.

BTW having lived in France for over 20 years I totally understand Brailsford's comments and think they are probably very accurate, however I don't think they were at all helpful.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to iandusud | 5 years ago
1 like

iandusud wrote:

Let's remember that the only reason there has ever been any question over whether or not Chris Froome should be riding is because there was a leak at the UCI, for which Lapartient is ultimately responsable. The UCI rules state that a rider with an AAF should be allowed to continue riding until the end of the investigation, so when Lapartient was suggesting that Froome shouldn't ride he was suggesting a course of action contrary to the rules of the UCI, of which he is president, the organisation that caused this whole cock up in the first place by leaking this info. Surely as presidident he should be defending the UCI's rules and processes and not riding rough shod over them. I am certain that he would not have behaved this way if it was a French rider who was concerned. He needs to get his house in order, man up about the leak and find out where it came from.

BTW having lived in France for over 20 years I totally understand Brailsford's comments and think they are probably very accurate, however I don't think they were at all helpful.

This is true and it is right that we are never made aware of how many other AAFs have Froome's name on.

Avatar
iandusud replied to don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
6 likes

[/quote]

This is true and it is right that we are never made aware of how many other AAFs have Froome's name on.

[/quote]

Or how many AAFs have names of other prominent riders.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to iandusud | 5 years ago
0 likes

iandusud wrote:

This is true and it is right that we are never made aware of how many other AAFs have Froome's name on.

[/quote]

Or how many AAFs have names of other prominent riders.

[/quote]

Exactly, everyone treated equally, I think that if anything comes out of this as a positive, it's that riders can be sure that they won't be judged until they've had a fail trial, even if details are leaked prematurely.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to iandusud | 5 years ago
3 likes

iandusud wrote:

Let's remember that the only reason there has ever been any question over whether or not Chris Froome should be riding is because there was a leak at the UCI, for which Lapartient is ultimately responsable. The UCI rules state that a rider with an AAF should be allowed to continue riding until the end of the investigation, so when Lapartient was suggesting that Froome shouldn't ride he was suggesting a course ok of action contrary to the rules of the UCI, of which he is president, the organisation that caused this whole cock up in the first place by leaking this info. Surely as presidident he should be defending the UCI's rules and processes and not riding rough shod over them. I am certain that he would not have behaved this way if it was a French rider who was concerned. He needs to get his house in order, man up about the leak and find out where it came from.

BTW having lived in France for over 20 years I totally understand Brailsford's comments and think they are probably very accurate, however I don't think they were at all helpful.

Nailed it!

Given the UCI leak and suggestion contrary to UCI rules.( Will leaks like this be heavily fined under GDPR now?) It's definitely for the UCI President to "Fermé la bouche!"

Avatar
Crampy | 5 years ago
2 likes

Watching these two argue is like watching a wasp trying to land on a particularly spikey cactus.

Someone will get stung and I dont really care who.

#gofroomedog

Avatar
A440 | 5 years ago
2 likes

Time to get rid of Team Sky and the excesses they represent.

And remember: Anybody but Froome!

Avatar
Beecho replied to A440 | 5 years ago
10 likes

A440 wrote:

Time to get rid of Team Sky and the excesses they represent.

And remember: Anybody but Froome!

I really do my best to keep out of all this, chiefly as I loathe the mudslinging within our ranks: yes, disagree and debate, but keep it civil y’all. However... Anybody but Froome?

Oh fuck off...

And FWIW I would love Tom D to win, or Bardet (though I can’t see that).

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to A440 | 5 years ago
1 like
A440 wrote:

Time to get rid of Team Sky and the excesses they represent.

And remember: Anybody but Froome!

I really quite like your logic. It sort of reminds me of some of the sillier bits of usenet in the'80s

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet replied to A440 | 5 years ago
2 likes

A440 wrote:

Time to get rid of Team Sky and the excesses they represent.

And remember: Anybody but Froome!

Tour de fixed gear, wine and sandwiches, cotton jerseys and legendary breakaways. Need to get things back to way they used to be like in the Coppi days when you banged down a load of amphetamines and pasta and that was just on a training ride to get a loaf of bread.

Team Sky actually represent what cycling should be but the UCI is unable to foster. Teams with decent sponsorship that can keep riders in a decent fashion. The UCI needs to sell the image of the sport as something to sponsor but because they can't keep their house in order then leaks like the Froome one damage the sport.

Avatar
RobD replied to A440 | 5 years ago
4 likes

A440 wrote:

Time to get rid of Team Sky and the excesses they represent.

And remember: Anybody but Froome!

I'd be more inclined to say anyone but Nibali, somehow he manages to avoid the suspicion his miraculous recoveries and visits by his 'magic accupuncturist' should have attracted.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to RobD | 5 years ago
0 likes

RobD wrote:

A440 wrote:

Time to get rid of Team Sky and the excesses they represent.

And remember: Anybody but Froome!

I'd be more inclined to say anyone but Nibali, somehow he manages to avoid the suspicion his miraculous recoveries and visits by his 'magic accupuncturist' should have attracted.

You obviously have proof to support your claims, if not you're risking the wrath of  members for unfairly accusing a rider of doing something naughty. They'll be on you like a ton of bricks, I expect, there'll be lots of name calling and abuse as they defend this Nibali chap.

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to don simon fbpe | 5 years ago
1 like

don simon wrote:

RobD wrote:

A440 wrote:

Time to get rid of Team Sky and the excesses they represent.

And remember: Anybody but Froome!

I'd be more inclined to say anyone but Nibali, somehow he manages to avoid the suspicion his miraculous recoveries and visits by his 'magic accupuncturist' should have attracted.

You obviously have proof to support your claims, if not you're risking the wrath of  members for unfairly accusing a rider of doing something naughty. They'll be on you like a ton of bricks, I expect, there'll be lots of name calling and abuse as they defend this Nibali chap.

His transformation was quite remarkable, more so than this recent Giro, but he was tested repeatedly because of that and they came out OK - so any unfounded accusations are just that. Go Nibs. If due process is followed I personally don't give a rats arse who is in the firing line - it didn't with Froome which is why we're having this conversation.

Avatar
Hamster | 5 years ago
4 likes

The UCI President should remember: "It is better keep silent and be thought a fool..."

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 5 years ago
7 likes

Brailsford isn't wrong though, local mayor's only look within their small area, they fail to look at the bigger picture, basically calling him a narrow minded fuckwit in a role that's basically a title/figurehead role for someone who isn't really capable of doing the job/roles required.

Avatar
Burke replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 5 years ago
4 likes

BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

Brailsford isn't wrong though, local mayor's only look within their small area, they fail to look at the bigger picture, basically calling him a narrow minded fuckwit in a role that's basically a title/figurehead role for someone who isn't really capable of doing the job/roles required.

You pretty accurately described Brailsford. A narrow-minded fuckwit who doesn't seem to care how Sky wins.

Avatar
billymansell | 5 years ago
8 likes

Lappartient's fiefdom has been shown corrupt and his power and control shown lacking.

Has Laparttient found out who leaked the confidential information and have they been dismissed? Or are we not allowed to ask?

Avatar
Burke | 5 years ago
8 likes

Appears Mr. Brailsford has an "Armstrong" kind of mentality.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to Burke | 5 years ago
2 likes

Burke wrote:

Appears Mr. Brailsford has an "Armstrong" kind of mentality.

That sort of talk will get you into trouble in these parts. It's just a good job that Mr Bailsford and Team SKY have never put a foot wrong, otherwisew it'd be hypocritical.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 5 years ago
1 like

Children, please!

Latest Comments