Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Live blog: Climb for Costa update, Froome and Uran hit the dancefloor, catching the bus Dafne Fixed style + more

All today's news from the site and beyond.....

Our live blog can sometimes be a bit sluggish to load... if it's really testing your patience, try refreshing the page. 

 

Arriving at road.cc in 2017 via 220 Triathlon Magazine, Jack dipped his toe in most jobs on the site and over at eBikeTips before being named the new editor of road.cc in 2020, much to his surprise. His cycling life began during his students days, when he cobbled together a few hundred quid off the back of a hard winter selling hats (long story) and bought his first road bike - a Trek 1.1 that was quickly relegated to winter steed, before it was sadly pinched a few years later. Creatively replacing it with a Trek 1.2, Jack mostly rides this bike around local cycle paths nowadays, but when he wants to get the racer out and be competitive his preferred events are time trials, sportives, triathlons and pogo sticking - the latter being another long story.  

Add new comment

18 comments

Avatar
roadmanshaq | 5 years ago
0 likes

Yes because you're a fool - he literally claimed 'cars do no harm' in this same page ignoring the deaths and injuries caused by air pollution.

 

I have a right to not choke on toxic fumes and die a premature death, how about you start sticking up for yourself instead of rolling over for the death cagers like a tame dog. Scooterers are allies against the institutional ruination of our breathing gases.

Avatar
ktache | 5 years ago
1 like

I do not think brooksby is ignorant of any of the things that you accuse him of there, perhaps you should read some of his other posts.

I also don't think that the legality for escooters sits anywhere close to votes for women or the removal of the Jim Crow laws.

Segways never managed to be legal, nor did the hoverboard craze, these escooter people had better have very deep pockets, the Tory party don't come very cheap.

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
1 like

"GM are branching out and have developed a folding e-bike... and presumably after a creative block in the boardroom they're now asking members of the public to give them a hand naming it."

Has "Too lazy to walk" been taken?

Avatar
alansmurphy | 5 years ago
0 likes

I think they need seatbelts, airbags, numberplates, riders to wear helmets and Sa-vile's wardrobe... then yes.

 

Actually, having not seen them i may be wrong, but the thing that would concern me is the wheels. Are they big enough to tackle the average pavement...

Avatar
brooksby | 5 years ago
1 like

General Motors competition - I name this bike, "Fugly" yes

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 5 years ago
2 likes

Plenty of people in London on scooters of all sorts, skates, rollerblades, skateboards and even electric skateboards, all just getting on with it. Law needed to change ages ago. Anything that gets people out of their short-distance car journeys.

Avatar
Crippledbiker | 5 years ago
6 likes

These scooters have been noted to have been left in really awkward places where they've been deployed in the states - partially blocking pavements, right next to crossings, and on street corners, for a few examples.

At least with these, they're going to be a shape and size where I can easily chuck them out of my path if they're in the way of my wheelchair - Obikes etc are way too bloody heavy, I usually end up just shoving them aside.

I have no problem with them in principle - anything to help bridge that last-mile gap and coax people out of cars - but like bloody sodding sandwich boards, if they're taking up pavement in such a way as to present a navigational hazard to MI and VI pedestrians, then they shouldn't be there and should be removed, before somebody either gets hurt or, ehem, accidentally damages them with their wheelchair.

Avatar
roadmanshaq | 5 years ago
4 likes

Cue the usual late middle aged men braying about what people should be doing.

 

One less person on a toxic fume emitting mode of transport is good by me. I have no problem with the scooterers I've come across on the roads. Leave your crab in a bucket mentality alone and mob up with potential allies against the death cage lobby instead.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet replied to roadmanshaq | 5 years ago
1 like

roadmanshaq wrote:

Cue the usual late middle aged men braying about what people should be doing.

 

One less person on a toxic fume emitting mode of transport is good by me. I have no problem with the scooterers I've come across on the roads. Leave your crab in a bucket mentality alone and mob up with potential allies against the death cage lobby instead.

Which scooterers were these, considering they are illegal to use on the road?

Wait until someone kills an OAP on the pavement then you can talk about 'death scoots' instead of 'death cages' . There's nothing fundamentally dangerous about cars.....unless you don't control them properly. Same difference.

You'll never win against the 'death cage' lobby anyway. It's a multi-billion pound industry. Scooters....not so much.

It think the most telling part of scootering is you look like a bellend. Maybe if you're one of radical kids that pop barspins and 360 on normal manual ones. Being a cyclist puts you into a lower social grouping so god knows what using a scooter does to you unless you're a hipster.

Avatar
roadmanshaq replied to Yorkshire wallet | 5 years ago
1 like

Yorkshire wallet wrote:

roadmanshaq wrote:

Cue the usual late middle aged men braying about what people should be doing.

 

One less person on a toxic fume emitting mode of transport is good by me. I have no problem with the scooterers I've come across on the roads. Leave your crab in a bucket mentality alone and mob up with potential allies against the death cage lobby instead.

Which scooterers were these, considering they are illegal to use on the road?

Wait until someone kills an OAP on the pavement then you can talk about 'death scoots' instead of 'death cages' . There's nothing fundamentally dangerous about cars.....unless you don't control them properly. Same difference.

You'll never win against the 'death cage' lobby anyway. It's a multi-billion pound industry. Scooters....not so much.

It think the most telling part of scootering is you look like a bellend. Maybe if you're one of radical kids that pop barspins and 360 on normal manual ones. Being a cyclist puts you into a lower social grouping so god knows what using a scooter does to you unless you're a hipster.

 

What a load of garbage. Cars and other motor vehicles kill thousands a year via fumes and particulates alone. You're just completely ignorant of basic environmental health and there is no point continuing a chat with someone so clearly proud of being a blustering, anti intellectual fool.

Avatar
brooksby replied to roadmanshaq | 5 years ago
0 likes

roadmanshaq wrote:

Yorkshire wallet wrote:

roadmanshaq wrote:

Cue the usual late middle aged men braying about what people should be doing.

One less person on a toxic fume emitting mode of transport is good by me. I have no problem with the scooterers I've come across on the roads. Leave your crab in a bucket mentality alone and mob up with potential allies against the death cage lobby instead.

Which scooterers were these, considering they are illegal to use on the road?

Wait until someone kills an OAP on the pavement then you can talk about 'death scoots' instead of 'death cages' . There's nothing fundamentally dangerous about cars.....unless you don't control them properly. Same difference.

You'll never win against the 'death cage' lobby anyway. It's a multi-billion pound industry. Scooters....not so much.

It think the most telling part of scootering is you look like a bellend. Maybe if you're one of radical kids that pop barspins and 360 on normal manual ones. Being a cyclist puts you into a lower social grouping so god knows what using a scooter does to you unless you're a hipster.

What a load of garbage. Cars and other motor vehicles kill thousands a year via fumes and particulates alone. You're just completely ignorant of basic environmental health and there is no point continuing a chat with someone so clearly proud of being a blustering, anti intellectual fool.

Considering that one of the complaints often used against cyclists is "bl00dy stupid adults playing on their toys", with a failure to see bicycles as a valid form of non "toxic fume emitting mode of transport" and with a commensurate loss of status as a road user, exactly how far down the ladder do you think using an e-scooter will put you?

And, as YW rightly says, how long until some e-scooterer knocks someone down (whether or not its their fault) and the Tabloid Hounds are let loose on them...??

Avatar
roadmanshaq replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
3 likes
brooksby wrote:

Considering that one of the complaints often used against cyclists is "bl00dy stupid adults playing on their toys", with a failure to see bicycles as a valid form of non "toxic fume emitting mode of transport" and with a commensurate loss of status as a road user, exactly how far down the ladder do you think using an e-scooter will put you?

And, as YW rightly says, how long until some e-scooterer knocks someone down (whether or not its their fault) and the Tabloid Hounds are let loose on them...??

Thinking that you're ever going to win the public argument by appeasement is the worst fallacy there is. The suffragettes and civil Rights movement didn't get their way by meekly soliciting the media's OK and only a fool would think that method would work re rididng our society of the tyranny of the death cage.

Avatar
brooksby replied to roadmanshaq | 5 years ago
1 like

roadmanshaq wrote:
brooksby wrote:

Considering that one of the complaints often used against cyclists is "bl00dy stupid adults playing on their toys", with a failure to see bicycles as a valid form of non "toxic fume emitting mode of transport" and with a commensurate loss of status as a road user, exactly how far down the ladder do you think using an e-scooter will put you?

And, as YW rightly says, how long until some e-scooterer knocks someone down (whether or not its their fault) and the Tabloid Hounds are let loose on them...??

Thinking that you're ever going to win the public argument by appeasement is the worst fallacy there is. The suffragettes and civil Rights movement didn't get their way by meekly soliciting the media's OK and only a fool would think that method would work re rididng our society of the tyranny of the death cage.

Excuse me?

My point, I think, was that many people already think that cycling is too dangerous and wouldn't dream of cycling in with motor traffic, so how many people do you think would want to mix it with motor traffic on a scooter (even one with a LiOn battery for a motor)?

My other point was that cyclists="evil runners down of poor pedestrians" in some corners of the media, and that all that vitriol would come crashing down on e-scooterists too as soon as there was the slightest hint of "Oh, well they nearly run me down, they did!".

And as a final point, though I do take on board that we need to get people out of their cars, I'm still umming about e-bikes at present (got buzzed by one on my non-electric bike recently) so e-scooters are for me a bit of a step too far.

Final, final point, is that I'm really not sure that campaigning for cycling infrastructure or for alternatives to the motor car is truly comparable to the suffragettes or the civil rights movement.  I understand the analogy, but...

Avatar
roadmanshaq replied to brooksby | 5 years ago
0 likes

brooksby wrote:

Final, final point, is that I'm really not sure that campaigning for cycling infrastructure or for alternatives to the motor car is truly comparable to the suffragettes or the civil rights movement.  I understand the analogy, but...

Given that you exhibit complete ignorance of the harm caused by motor vehicles in pollution and maiming of normal people in their thousands, every year, I will not sweat your small minded Benedict Arnold chasing down of ebike riders and scooterers. 

 

Get your priorities right. 

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to roadmanshaq | 5 years ago
1 like

roadmanshaq wrote:

Cue the usual late middle aged men braying about what people should be doing.

 

One less person on a toxic fume emitting mode of transport is good by me. I have no problem with the scooterers I've come across on the roads. Leave your crab in a bucket mentality alone and mob up with potential allies against the death cage lobby instead.

Don't be a middle aged brayer telling people what to do, mob up with the potential allies against the death cage lobby instead, and then tell people what to do.

Avatar
Bmblbzzz | 5 years ago
0 likes

Crocs yes, but where are the pink pyjamas?!!!

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
8 likes

Those e scooters were featured on BBC R4 news yesterday, quite an extended piece, detailing all the environmental benefits etc; longer than they have spent discussing the overwhelming greater benefits of cycling in the past thirty years.  The BBC apparently has a blanket ban on even mentioning the incredible benefits of cycling, and the recent phone in on the You and Yours prog barely mentioned them, only when callers said how good they had been.

Given the overwhelming benefits of cycling, congestion, pollution, health, obesity etc, one might think that it would be front and centre of any item about those subjects, but it is never mentioned by the BBC.  If anything else had half the benefits of cycling, they would be all over it 24/7/365.

The rest of the media is barely any better.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 5 years ago
5 likes

Given their pricing I think the idea is a DOA. £1 unlock + 20p a minute. £5 for a small journey - bargain!

Just get a bike.

Latest Comments