Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Live blog: "Empty" cycle lanes; Student to try and everest Dundee Law; UCI introduces sock height rule for 2019 + more

All the cycling news from this site and beyond…

The live blog isn't always quick to load. Please be patient and if you really don't think it's going to appear, try refreshing the page.

 

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
Bentrider | 5 years ago
1 like

UCI obviously just ratifying "The Rules"

Avatar
burtthebike | 5 years ago
2 likes

Shouldn't that tree have a sign "Merry Christmas to all cyclists"?

Avatar
MrB123 | 5 years ago
2 likes

Would the student's Everest attempt qualify if he's riding a circuit rather than up and down the same hill?

Avatar
mike the bike replied to MrB123 | 5 years ago
2 likes

MrB123 wrote:

Would the student's Everest attempt qualify if he's riding a circuit rather than up and down the same hill?

 

I'd hate to see this young man waste his efforts on an attempt that won't be ratified so let's hope he's read the rules.

 

Avatar
Mackadoo replied to mike the bike | 5 years ago
1 like

mike the bike wrote:

MrB123 wrote:

Would the student's Everest attempt qualify if he's riding a circuit rather than up and down the same hill?

 

I'd hate to see this young man waste his efforts on an attempt that won't be ratified so let's hope he's read the rules.

 

 

Proper everesting can’t be done in a circuit, you have to go up and down the same hill, but if it’s for charity who cares!

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to mike the bike | 5 years ago
0 likes

mike the bike wrote:

MrB123 wrote:

Would the student's Everest attempt qualify if he's riding a circuit rather than up and down the same hill?

 

I'd hate to see this young man waste his efforts on an attempt that won't be ratified so let's hope he's read the rules.

 

He wouldn't qualify for the grey stripe if he was doing circuits up the hill and down the other side

everesting.cc wrote:

– Rides must only focus on one hill or mountain per ride (e.g. you can’t base yourself in one location and ride multiple hills). You cannot ride different routes on the same mountain. If there are 4 routes, that means there are 4 possible ‘everestings’ (think of it like the North and South face of Everest).

– Rides cannot be loops. The descent must be via the same road unless you are prevented from doing so (e.g. one-way street or one-way trail). This is to prevent kinetic gain sometimes afforded by a loop, or an ‘easier’ descent.

but he might just be interested in the donations and the challenge. Agree that i'd hope someone's had word with him if he does want it to count officially as an everesting though, i'll have a look and see if I can find him...

Avatar
StuInNorway replied to fukawitribe | 5 years ago
1 like

fukawitribe wrote:

 

I'd hate to see this young man waste his efforts on an attempt that won't be ratified so let's hope he's read the rules.

 

He wouldn't qualify for the grey stripe if he was doing circuits up the hill and down the other side

everesting.cc wrote:

– Rides must only focus on one hill or mountain per ride (e.g. you can’t base yourself in one location and ride multiple hills). You cannot ride different routes on the same mountain. If there are 4 routes, that means there are 4 possible ‘everestings’ (think of it like the North and South face of Everest).

– Rides cannot be loops. The descent must be via the same road unless you are prevented from doing so (e.g. one-way street or one-way trail). This is to prevent kinetic gain sometimes afforded by a loop, or an ‘easier’ descent.

 

Given there's only one road up "The law" itself he has to go up and down that, but depends where he's starting from and I would guess that to get height that may be down at almost sea level by the river Tay.. Dundee is known as a veritable rats nest of one way systems thet they build (from memory) in the late 80s and early nineteys . .  it's rumoured some locals that went shopping in 1994 are still trying to find their way out the one way system in the centre of town.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to mike the bike | 5 years ago
8 likes

mike the bike wrote:

I'd hate to see this young man waste his efforts on an attempt that won't be ratified so let's hope he's read the rules.

You mean his socks might be illegal?

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 5 years ago
5 likes

Just been looking at the plans for the Chorlton route. Slightly annoying that there isn't a zip file with all the PDFs rather than multiple clicks to get to each one in turn, but...

Initial thoughts are that its promising. One comment I have is that the ramps on Copenhagen style bus stops need to be less severe than the one in the example photo.

//secure.manchester.gov.uk/images/copenhagen677.jpg)

 

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 5 years ago
12 likes

Now we sorted socks out I think we need to move on to sunglasses.

//keyassets.timeincuk.net/inspirewp/live/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/06/WATSON_00001362-588-e1433513209890.jpg)

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 5 years ago
1 like

That tree is First Street, Manchester outside Junkyard golf. It's quite short but is was quite handy for turning left from Whitworth St onto Albion St (especially when lights at the junction are on red!).

I used it all the time when commuting to/from Piccadilly (well, from - its useless from the other direction)  

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 5 years ago
2 likes

Yep I saw that about sock heights on the Cycling Weekly website, what a load of horseshit. I mean, the excuse about riders getting marginal aerodynamic gains comes across as utter drivel with regard to socks.

In BMX we have other stupid rules foisted on us from the UCI, like racers not being allowed to wear jeans any more.

Avatar
daccordimark replied to OldRidgeback | 5 years ago
2 likes

OldRidgeback wrote:

Yep I saw that about sock heights on the Cycling Weekly website, what a load of horseshit. I mean, the excuse about riders getting marginal aerodynamic gains comes across as utter drivel with regard to socks.

In BMX we have other stupid rules foisted on us from the UCI, like racers not being allowed to wear jeans any more.

The aerodynamic gains from long socks are well documented and the UCI are just making sure riders in time trial stages don't end up looking like a lot of the UK's domestic testers with socks up to their knees!

Mark.

 

Avatar
RobD replied to daccordimark | 5 years ago
5 likes

[/quote]

The aerodynamic gains from long socks are well documented and the UCI are just making sure riders in time trial stages don't end up looking like a lot of the UK's domestic testers with socks up to their knees!

Mark.

[/quote]

But long socks are available simply and cheaply to anybodt that wants them, so it's not like they'd be getting an advantage that others wouldn't be able to get such as with custom made handlebars etc

Avatar
henryb | 5 years ago
13 likes

UCI introduces sock height rule for 2019

I think it's great that the UCI have solved all the important problems in regulating pro cycling and can now move on to trivial stuff like this

Latest Comments