Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Jail for driver who killed cyclist when still drunk from previous evening

Paramjit Singh had been drinking whisky until 3.30am before crash that killed Jordan Gregory

A driver who was still drunk from the previous evening when he killed a cyclist has been jailed for three years and four months.

The victim, 24-year-old Jordan Gregory, died at the scene of the collision in his home town of Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire.

Paramjit Singh, aged 28 and who also lives Sutton-in-Ashfield, was sentenced at Nottingham Crown Court on Friday after pleading guilty at an earlier hearing to causing death by careless driving whilst under the influence of drink.

Nottinghamshire Police says that the fatal crash happened at the junction of Station Road and the A38 at around 2pm on 9 August 2017.

Singh, who was dressed in pyjamas and slippers at the time of the collision, had drunk four whiskies before going to bed the previous evening at 3.30am and had eaten nothing on the day Mr Gregory was killed.

His breath alcohol level was 43 microgrammes per 100 millilitres of breath, against the legal limit of 35 microgrammes per 100 millilitres of breath.

He was estimated to have been driving at around 52 miles per hour, with the court being told that he sped up to get through the junction as the traffic lights changed.

Besides the prison sentence, Singh was also banned from driving for three and a half years and will be required to take an extended driving test to regain his licence.

Detective Sergeant Adam Cooper of Nottinghamshire Police’s Serious Collision Investigation Unit said after Singh was sentenced: “This collision could have been avoided had Paramjit Singh shown any respect for the law and other road users and made the responsible decision not to drive after drinking excessive amounts of alcohol.

“He was not honest with himself or the Police about the amount of alcohol he’d drunk the previous evening and was still over the limit at the time of the crash at around 2pm.

“It was agreed between the prosecution and defence that Singh was travelling at 52 to 55mph which, although only just over the 50mph limit at the location, was wholly inappropriate for a busy junction.

“His actions will impact on the family of Jordan Gregory and everyone who witnessed the collision for many, many years.”

He continued: “This case serves as a reminder to all of how drinking in the evening can still leave you above the limit the following day.

“It reminds people that if you are unfortunate enough to be involved in a serious collision as a driver, you will be held accountable for your actions. 

“I ask people to consider honestly, when driving, whether they are fit to be driving and whether their manner of driving is appropriate for the conditions. 

“The consequences can have a widespread and devastating impact.

 “I'd like to thank all those who stopped at the scene and did their best to help Jordan and also assisted with our investigation,” he added. “I would also like to acknowledge the dignity and patience his family have shown throughout our investigation."

Mr Gregory acted as carer to his mother Joanne, who said in a statement released via Nottinghamshire Police: “My life is very different now without Jordan, I miss him every second of every day. I will never see his smile again.

“We shared a very special mother and son bond which can never be broken. He was the perfect son, one that any mum could ever wish for. He was loving and kind and I feel very lucky for the 24 years that I had him for.

“He was loved dearly by all the family and we all miss him immensely. ‘I’ll will love and miss you forever my beautiful boy’. Paramjit Singh has destroyed our lives.

“We wish to thank all the people that helped Jordan and were there to comfort him. We are forever grateful and you will always be in our thoughts.”

She added: “We would like to appeal to drivers not to drink and drive. Your actions destroy lives and families.

“We also wish to thank the police and court for their support throughout this awful time in our lives.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

5 comments

Avatar
kil0ran | 5 years ago
1 like

Only just over the speed limit and just over the drink drive limit, and pleaded guilty. His brief's dropped the ball on this one, if it had gone to jury trial he'd have got off. It's only a cyclist after all.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 5 years ago
3 likes

How is being over the drink-drive limit AND driving too fast for the conditions not "far below the standard expected of a careful and competent driver"? ie only charged with careless not dangerous driving.
Why such a short sentence when the max is 14 years?
We need to make an example of these killers or those who are yet to kill will not get the message.
Case in point, driver who has already been caught and slapped on wrist, turns around to deliberately maim a cyclist with his car, but doesn't go to jail.
Some of the language used by the Police explains a lot about anti-cyclist mentality in the UK:

Captain Obvious wrote:

"It reminds people that if you are unfortunate enough to be involved in a serious collision as a driver, you will be held accountable for your actions. 

On this occasion, perhaps... but "unfortunate enough to be involved in a serious collision" I don't really see how luck comes into it, this was purely down to choices the driver made, not some unlucky series of events that unfolded before him whilst he was driving along in a reasonable manner!

Captain Obvious wrote:

“I ask people to consider honestly, when driving, whether they are fit to be driving and whether their manner of driving is appropriate for the conditions."

Fit to be driving should be considered when you consider driving, ie before you decide to drive. Also, we shouldn't need to ask drivers to consider whether their driving is appropriate for the conditions, they should all be doing that anyway!

Avatar
Christopher TR1 | 5 years ago
0 likes

How sad.

Some very noteworthy sentiments spoken by Detective Sergeant Adam Cooper. I hope some motorists do indeed take note.

Avatar
the little onion | 5 years ago
10 likes

a fair sentence. 

 

But note that this sentence and ban is only long because there was drink involved. If the driver had driven into a cyclist through anger, gross negligence, being on their phone, or similar, it would be much less. Compare and contrast this with any other driver who kills a cyclist whilst sober, but in some other way clearly unfit to be behind the wheel of a car. For those who don't know the case, compare and contrast with the killer driver Helen Measures, and the death of Denisa Perisova

 

Drink driving has become socially unacceptable. We just need other forms of dangerous driving to be similarly socially unacceptable.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to the little onion | 5 years ago
2 likes

the little onion wrote:

a fair sentence.

But note that this sentence and ban is only long because there was drink involved. If the driver had driven into a cyclist through anger, gross negligence, being on their phone, or similar, it would be much less. Compare and contrast this with any other driver who kills a cyclist whilst sober, but in some other way clearly unfit to be behind the wheel of a car. For those who don't know the case, compare and contrast with the killer driver Helen Measures, and the death of Denisa Perisova

Drink driving has become socially unacceptable. We just need other forms of dangerous driving to be similarly socially unacceptable.

Or was it the fact that the driver didn't have an anglo-saxon surname?  Or a BMW? or parents who were rich, or parents who were coppers?

You're right of course, and the fact that the driver was still drunk is the reason they received such a heavy, relatively heavy, sentence; unless some of the above also apply.  But should social approbation dictate the sentences in our courts?  or should sentences be determined by the harm caused, not the harm intended; no intention, no sentence.  But there are many cases where intent is clearly demonstrated, but the sentence is paltry, so it can't be down to intent.  So what is sentencing decided by?

Whatever, we have a laughingly called justice system where those apparenlty guiltier than others, but with a good lawyer, walk free, while the others get banged up, and some escape justice completely because they seem to have friends in high places.

Latest Comments