- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Cyclist on A590 (via Cumbria Police)‘Give cyclists space when passing’ say police after releasing dashcam footage of 70mph collision …driver got six penalty points
Cumbria Police have urged motorists to give cyclists at least 1.5m of space when overtaking after releasing footage of a van driver clipping a cyclist while driving at 70mph. The driver responsible admitted driving without due care and attention and was handed six penalty points and asked to pay £350 in fines and costs.
- How to choose the right bike camera
On Wednesday July 24, at around 12.50pm, a 62-year-old cyclist was riding westbound on the A590 dual carriageway when he was hit by a passing van driven by 30-year-old Christopher Gadsden.
Police said the van hit the cyclist’s right elbow before a second impact between the cyclist and wing mirror.
The cyclist was knocked unconscious and ended up in the carriageway.
He suffered a fractured elbow and numerous lacerations and bruises on his body and face. He has no memory of the collision.
Police Constable Simon Smith said: “As the van approached the cyclist, the driver made no attempt to slow down or make adjustments to his course.
“The cyclist suffered serious injuries as a result of the collision. Thankfully there was an off-duty constable from Lancashire and an off-duty fireman from Cumbria Fire and Rescue Service were quickly able to come to the man’s aid.”
Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.
Latest Comments
- Hirsute 1 hour 23 min ago
Radar tells me their closing speed, if they are slowing and how far away. Then I decide to say a prayer. The change of light pattern is incidental.
- lonpfrb 1 hour 43 min ago
Quite so, which is why our village 20mph zone covers the whole residential extent. Of course, enforcement is another thing..
- lonpfrb 2 hours 9 min ago
No, that's very doubtful while proper testing would be fully destructive.
- TheBillder 2 hours 55 min ago
In that £1000 exactly scenario, beginners should probably be made aware that pedals will be extra.
- don simon fbpe 3 hours 23 min ago
What's wrong with dropping down on to the Millenium Bridge, or the swing bridge, then the brief, but satisfying climb back up the hill? #training....
- chrisonabike 4 hours 4 min ago
The relatives might of course disagree, but in general I'd countenance a relatively light sentence* if only we could fix it so that those who...
- ktache 4 hours 43 min ago
Id forgotten that I got a second hand set of project two's for my getting to work bike over twenty years back.
- Veganpotter 5 hours 40 min ago
My bet is that all these tires popping off are from people with bad pressure gauges or they're simply just putting too much air in on purpose. ...
- chrisonabike 6 hours 56 min ago
David9694 - you were right! These new autonomous vehicles really are conspiring to run out of control!...
Add new comment
54 comments
I remember that when the Blackwater Valley relief road was new I took a very late night journey back home along it after spending an evening with a friend in Guildford. It was glorious, smooth and straight, with very few inclines, unlike the rolling countryside that the smaller roads go through. Generally better drivers than on the small roads too, and a large hard shoulder to use if they didn't bother to make full use of the second lane.
Some interesting discussion here about, whilst the cyclist had every right to be on a dual carriageway, whether it's a good idea or not. Yes, if you get knocked off, it's the inattentive driver's fault; however, those drivers are out there now and aren't going to go away. I always remember a good quote....."you may be right, but you'll be dead right".
Well, that's a curious way of dealing with health and safety issues.
If I may paraphrase: We've got a situation here with some known issues, but rather than attempting to reduce the danger, we'll just blame the people who get injured for having poor judgement.
What's sad here is, no cyclist should have to use roads like this. Sadly often it's the only choice.. or you basically have to double the distance.
I'm not sure many people want to be cycling on a 70mph dual carriageway.
Where exactly was he on the a590? Without knowing that it's hard to say what alternatives there were.
‘Twas ere. Just after the first bridge that goes over the road from M6 junction towards the lakes.
Even if we knew all the circumstances of the rider, the alternatives are irrelevant. The driver wasn't paying attention and probably speeding.
I used to be one of those people who thought cycling on any road was far too dangerous. As my recent close pass proves, you don't need to be on a dual carriageway to get close passed at speed.
The only thing that really is different about these sorts of roads is the volume of traffic, which increases your chances of coming across a driver like that, it's just probability - the tw@t per hour ratio goes up.
2609C6B5-1A3E-4F42-A19A-9A01C7BEED8C.jpeg
I've used the Cumbria police contact form
https://www.cumbria.police.uk/Contact-us/General-Enquiries/General-Enqui...
To ask why they do not reference the fact that the van was speeding, and also asked why a speeding driver with dreadful hazard perception and vehicle control was not charged with dangerous driving.
Not wishing to teach anyone to suck eggs but my "tactic" on a road like this, and I do try to ride them as infrequently as possible, but it is to weave about and employ a lot of looking over the shoulder.
It’s not the most relaxing way to ride, and the adrenaline of thinking that each and every one of the cars/vans /lorries is going to not see you and hit you makes you super super aware, nervous and a little faster.
I believe the human eye is not well designed to notice anything which barely moves when projected to the back of the retina. If you move side to side this will help, especially if someone is looking at their phone/radio/work mate where you'd be causing the sensors at the peripheral of the eyeball to be excited (and these are mostly sensitive to movement and not colour or detail).
If someone has not decided to start taking the other carriageway from some reasonable distance then I’m more than prepared to start making my own way out of theirs.
It does help having one of those Garmin radars for riding roads like this (or in fact any roads and then employ the weaving in and out shake it all about don't trust that a mere couple of inches will work with me baby riding method (tm)).
Oh look, must be an election coming.
"Drivers who kill while on mobile phones will face life sentences"
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/04/drivers-kill-mobile-phones-w...
Nothing like the comprehensive review of road law promised all those years ago, and since courts never impose the maximum sentence, what's the point of increasing it? If only they hadn't cut all those police, they might actually catch some of the phone drivers.
Can't understand why they didn't round off the video with a picture of the emergency services attending and the cyclist in his hospital bed - that would have had more impact.
Unfortunately a lot of drivers out there think they know the rules, but are completely oblivious.
Case in point, on our local Facebook page an elderly lady posted “Did anyone else see that cyclist on the dual carriageway? I think he must have been lost, I hope he was alright. Crazy!” (Words to that effect)
This was followed up with people saying how cyclists don’t know the rules of the road etc. Until someone pointed out it was perfectly legal. The the lady said, yes, but what if I didn’t see him because they were obscured by the car in front? To which the reply was, don’t drive so close to the car in front!!
But unfortunately, these people are out there and they totally don’t realise what a menace they are.
'My personal choice is to avoid these type of roads as the speed difference would cause the rare reasonable good driver to not react in time, let alone the poor ones like in this video. '
Thing is - a good driver would have plenty of time to react, no matter the speed difference. It's not the speed difference causing the issue - it's the driver.
Most people on the roads are fat, unfit and probably have the reaction time of a sloth. The better idea is not to mix with them on that sort of road. I don't cross the road infront of cars as a ped because they should be able to see me and give me right of way.
I'm into risk minimisation when it comes to being seen, i often have the flasher on even in broad daylight, you can't rely on 'good drivers' as they are few and far between. I was driving through a town the other day and in my rear mirror I could see the bloke behind on his phone nearly the entire way through the town. I kept a running commentary of it for the front camera as I don't have rear facing one and I was expecting him to rear end me most of the time. These people aren't an exception these days, they are the rule.
Those sort of people at 70mph+ is not my sort of cycling road.
Of course you can't rely on good drivers. Nor can you rely on twinkly disco lights. You're entirely free to choose whether to ride on such a road or not. Personally I'm happy on a 70, was less so when I accidentally ended up on an Autobahn
Anyone seen any research which has been done to test what drivers 'see' in different road environments? I know the brain often uses shortcuts to speed information processing. I wonder if drivers are conditioned to expect cars and lorries on fast dual carriageways and motorways, so the brain filters out things they don't expect to see such as cyclists, pedestrians etc.
Also the closing speeds involved and the fact that 3 seconds spent with eyes off the road changing radio station could leave a driver with less time to react to a hazard.
When I did an advanced driving course I was told to 'scan' close, middle and far distance and mirrors constantly, the thinking being that you force yourself to see rather than just look.
Aye, theres' stacks and it's not just drivers, or any particular group, it's completely generic - most of what you think you see is entirely made up and you can miss the most obvious things, e.g. the invisible gorilla. Articles and research about this and perception in general is plentiful, amazing and rather scary, worth looking up.
Some as military aircrew amongst others - for the same reason.
Kind of a good reason to organise a mass ride along a dual carriageway..... on a Friday....around tea time... two lanes on a dual carriageway, yes?
The van was a Mercedes Sprinter (info obtained from nwemail) , a goods van, which should have had a speed limit on a dual carriageway of 60mph, odd that the police say it was doing 70mph yet no dangerous driving prosecution as would have been speeding, now 60mph is the speed limit for all vehicles on a national speed limit section of roads, and thats what a great deal of those twisty turny country roads we all love, which definitely don't have the sight lines of the above, let alone the extra carrigeway for overtaking. Unfortunately there are no safe roads out there, 20 and 30mph limits are routinely ignored, there are doors being opened, junctions and phone use is endemic.
For all those who might say that they wouldn't ride on that particular road, best not ride at all.
Those dangerous idiots in their huge motor vehicles get everywhere.
Every day's a school day. I like to think I'm a pretty decent (but not infallible) driver (though maybe even the worst drivers think the same), but I'm now wondering how many times I've driven a hire van at 70mph on a dual carriageway in ignorance of the reduced speed limit.
I very occasionally ride on dual carriageways like this - they often form part of an audax route or club ride to escape the city and get to the nice roads quicker - but I hate them, and try to avoid being the last one in the pack.
The graphic at the end of the video saying 1.5metres is a missed opportunity too - at 70mph even that is alarmingly close.
It's also 50 on a single carriageway and 70 on a motorway.
If he was really driving a Mercedes sprinter at 70, then he was 10 mph over the limit.
No mention of speeding, so was he really doing 70?
Totally agree.....there's a very similar road like that to me....loads of room to pull into the second lane and pass safely...but no they fly past at 80mph 6 inch off your elbow. I avoid the road at all costs as I prefer to be alive as opposed to being justified but dead.
I wouldn’t ride on that road either. Mainly due to the volume of traffic; it’s not pleasant as it’ll be so noisy and more cars can only mean more chances of being hit. But I can understand why you might, as it’ll be the quickest route. All other options round there will involve undulating narrow country lanes with poor surfaces.
Many years ago when I was only mountain biking, I would not have ridden on any road! I couldn’t understand why anyone would want to ride a road bike where you could drive - at least a mountain bike gets you to places inaccessible by car. Now I mostly ride on the road...
This example showed the cyclist visible from a long way off. To not notice them shows more than just due care to me. I've often encountered traffic backing up the slip road on that route. If the van driver had ploughed into the back of a queue of stationary traffic, would it have been 6 points and £350?
If they have refelectors and wing mirrors, yes.
Are mobility scooters allowed on that road?
I'd never cycle on that road. There's all sorts of stretches of road I avoid round me, mostly fast A roads and particularly anything approaching a motorway junction because drivers are either gearing up for or winding down from going fast. That looks like hell on toast.
I'm with the probably unpopular opinion of just because you 'can' do something, doesn't mean it's a good idea. Not a chance in hell I'd go on that road without some real, no other route situation.
I 'can' ride my motorbike in shorts and t shirt but it's pretty daft even though I'm entitled to do so. It's hard enough to get drivers to notice you on roads they maybe expect to see you on but once again just because drivers 'should' be paying attention for all sorts of hazards, they are probably just looking for ones with 4 wheels and metal boxes around them.
Where I am this type of road would be rated as a motorway and you're not allowed to access those on a bike or any vehicle that cannot do at least 70 kmph. But anyway, seeing this and similar videos and without wanting to start a flame war, an honest question:
Why do you guys choose to ride on such roads?? I cannot for the life of me conceive of anyone with the sense of self preservation granted to a snail riding there on a bicycle, even if allowed. In my continental eyes it's not simply possible but highly probable that an accident would happen. I'd either ride a detour or simply not use a bike at all there. Is it because there are no smaller roads, no cycling infrastructure to speak of...why?? I'm looking to understand. Honestly, if I were to show that pic to 20 cycling buddies over here, at least 18 would think the cyclist either has a death wish or is crazy. It has nothing to do with the legality: even if perfectly legal to do so, I still wouldn't ride there, rather than makeing a statement I'd make it home in one piece.
Well no outside of London there isnt much cycling infra,or what there is wouldn't help you get anywhere safely,the point is the alt route would no doubt be a twisty windy country road where drivers would drive just as fast, so is it safer to be on a road with plenty of room to pass safely,good sightlines, or a road where every corner is unsighted ?
Last month I had a car overtake me before a blind corner on one of those country roads,totally unnecessarily as they took the next left immediately (one of those exits on the bend roads),had they waited 10 secs more to overtake theyd have had the choice of drive into me or a tractor nearly head on,they didn't quite give me that much space
but I know which option theyd have taken
I understand the sentiment of your post, and to be frank, I don't think many would choose to ride on that type of road. However that is something of a moot point, as legally cyclists have every right to be there.
Now you can say just because you can, doesn't mean you should, and I suppose I'd agree, but, and for me, its a big but, in the cold hard face or reality, dual carriageways (outside of rush hour at least), provide wide, open, roads with great visability. There is no justifiable reason why you shouldn't see and be able to react to anything in teh carriageway (during daylight hours anyway).
In the crappy video above, teh cyclist is clearly visable for 5 seconds.
These road are only dangerous because drivers make them so with their lack of due care and attention.
so yes, whilst avoidance makes sense, in no way should we victim blame here. One day you may find yourself caught out with nothing but a mile or so of dual carriageway and getting home, if you want to walk across the fields thats up to you, but I personally will fight to retain my legal right to use this type of road safely when needs musts.
Pages