- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
IAM_logo.gifIAM runs poll on cycle helmet compulsion, plus how cyclists' safety can be improved
Road safety charity the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) is currently running a poll on its website that seeks to assess cyclists’ views on the issue of helmet compulsion. It’s a topical subject for the poll, given the recent Private Member’s bill introduced to the Northern Ireland Assembly that seeks to make the wearing of cycle helmets compulsory in the Province.
Despite its name, the IAM is increasingly focusing on issues affecting cyclists, as well as providing cycle training, and last month launched a new membership category specifically for bike riders.
You’ll find the poll here. It only takes a couple of minutes to complete and is open to non-members as well as non-cyclists, but the more cyclists who respond, the more representative the results will hopefully be.
The poll isn’t a straight ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ choice between whether or not helmets should be made compulsory, with other questions asking whether you or someone close to you has been involved in an accident in which a helmet prevented injury, for example.
The final question asks your opinion on the three most important cycle safety measures, and of the choice of seven factors provided, we’re disappointed that all of them are centred on the cyclist, rather than other road users, for instance requiring cycle awareness training to be undertaken before a new driver takes to the road.
Having said that, there is a choice for ‘Other’ with a comment box alongside it, so if there are issues not mentioned that you feel deserve inclusion, feel free to do so and perhaps let us know what you’ve told IAM in the comments box below.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- Hirsute 2 hours 52 min ago
Radar tells me their closing speed, if they are slowing and how far away. Then I decide to say a prayer. The change of light pattern is incidental.
- lonpfrb 3 hours 12 min ago
Quite so, which is why our village 20mph zone covers the whole residential extent. Of course, enforcement is another thing..
- lonpfrb 3 hours 38 min ago
No, that's very doubtful while proper testing would be fully destructive.
- TheBillder 4 hours 25 min ago
In that £1000 exactly scenario, beginners should probably be made aware that pedals will be extra.
- don simon fbpe 4 hours 53 min ago
What's wrong with dropping down on to the Millenium Bridge, or the swing bridge, then the brief, but satisfying climb back up the hill? #training....
- chrisonabike 5 hours 34 min ago
The relatives might of course disagree, but in general I'd countenance a relatively light sentence* if only we could fix it so that those who...
- ktache 6 hours 13 min ago
Id forgotten that I got a second hand set of project two's for my getting to work bike over twenty years back.
- Veganpotter 7 hours 10 min ago
My bet is that all these tires popping off are from people with bad pressure gauges or they're simply just putting too much air in on purpose. ...
- chrisonabike 8 hours 26 min ago
David9694 - you were right! These new autonomous vehicles really are conspiring to run out of control!...
Add new comment
8 comments
My "Other" was for drivers to cycle as part of learning to drive, in order to experience what it's like on two wheels and hopefully know how to drive near cyclists.
"A road cyclist can easily match the speed of a restricted scooter".
And therefore helmets should be compulsory for people who pop to the shops, ride in cycle lanes, or otherwise rarely exceed 10mph.
Cycling IS NOT a dangerous activity, and is not a dangerous mode of transport. The only time I've needed a cycle helmet was when someone pulled straight out in front of me.
Still, look at how helpful compulsory helmet laws have been in the Netherlands, dong a fine job of getting a vast number of people on bicycles. Oh, wait ....
Well, I'd say it IS dangerous (there's certainly potential for serious injury), but on balance it is NO MORE DANGEROUS than all sorts of everyday activities that can result in injury (e.g. walking to the shops, cooking). People need to be conscious of the danger, but forcing them to wear safety equipment doesn't remove it. As with all those other activities where safety equipment is not compulsory, people should be able to choose whether to wear it (I do, but I can see that others want to exercise their freedom not to).
Oh, and in reply to neildmoss - I think scooter helmets should be optional too. And seatbelts in the front of cars (no seatbelt in the back means you put the person in front of you at risk). But laws often result in arbitrary distinctions between activities.
That wasn't the perspective I was thinking of at the time, but I see your point.
My take was - if I can go at 30mph on a bike without a helmet, why must a scooter rider wear one? I'm not advocating that scooter riders be allowed to ride without helmets, I'm just highlighting what I see as an inconsistency.
Just curious about the stance of those that think that helmets should not be compulsory - what do you think should be the rules for scooters?
A road cyclist can easily match the speed of a restricted scooter, so why the current difference in rules?
btw, my "Other" was to maintain awareness and anticipate the actions of all other road users.
I don't know how much influence this body has (limited I expect) but reading through their website, it seems they are at least positive towards cycling.
My 'other' comments re: safety were "Better attitudes, training and discipline from drivers towards cyclists and other road users"
Well just took part and somewhat offended that there was nothing under the list of most important steps for cycling safety referring to drivers responsibility - luckily they included an 'Other' option
Helmets shouldn't be compulsory for kids - if this was the case then as soon as a child was 16/18yrs old they would abandon helmets to prove they're not children.
Badly fitted helmets are good for nothing, helmets don't make you impervious to injury even when correctly fitted, a helmet offers nowhere near as much protection as a car, cyclists will always come off worse in a collision with anything solid.
Just my opinions