Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“I was new, I didn’t know the rules”: Delivery cyclists urge colleagues to follow rules as 37 riders issued £100 fines for cycling in city centre

While the public has welcomed the fines, Just Eat and Deliveroo riders have claimed that they weren’t informed of the cycling ban, with some riders just barely days into their jobs

While penalties for cyclists riding through pedestrianised areas in the town centres have become more and more common in the last couple of years, with councils using the infamous Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) to fine cyclists, delivery riders have urged their fellow workers to follow the rules, after it was reported that 37 Just Eat and Deliveroo cyclists have been fined £100 in Canterbury this year.

While other councils such Grimsby and Colchester have made the most headlines for issuing fines to cyclists, the Canterbury City Council had previously announced its intentions of using the PSPO rule to clamp down on “reckless” food delivery cyclists because of the risk they are perceived to pose to pedestrians in parts of the city.

Cyclists haven’t been allowed to ride through pedestrianised parts of the city such as St George’s Street and St Peter’s Street between 10:30am and 4pm every day for several years now.

However in January Canterbury City Council issued a new Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) in a bid to crack down on aggressive driving, cycling through pedestrianised areas and excessive noise. The current PSPO is scheduled to be in effect until at least January 7, 2027.

And now, 37 Fixed Penalty Notices (FPN) have been issued to cyclists by enforcement officers working with Kent Police since the beginning of the year, with Daily Mail reporting that tourists and shoppers were complaining of having to dive and dodge couriers on the high street.

> Cyclist ordered to pay £500 for riding bicycle through town centre as councillor claims hefty fine is "great result for our enforcement teams"

However some delivery drivers who have been hit with the fines were unaware they weren’t allowed to ride through the city centre, with a few even in their first days of the job.

Tariqul Islam, a Deliveroo rider was handed a £100 fine barely a week into his job after riding through pedestrian areas outside the permitted hours. “One day I was on the high street at the wrong time and a city council officer called me over and talked to me about the rules,” the 36-year-old said.

“I told them it was unknown to me but they said it's my responsibility to know and gave me a fine. I respect the rules and I agree it was my fault. So after four days, I earned the money to pay the fine and since then I have been following all the rules.

“It's a good job delivering food, but when it puts other people at risk of harm it’s not good, so I call on all delivery persons to follow the law and be respectful.”

> Residents call for delivery riders to wear numbered jackets to track down cyclists riding dangerously

Another Deliveroo rider, 29-year-old Shagor Shafi, also found himself in a similar predicament when he didn't know the city centre rules. He said: “I was new, I didn’t know the rules. The council guy stopped me and said, ‘You can't ride on a bike here’. I’m very careful now and just walk my bike through the high street.’”

Just Eat worker Zia Zia has managed to avoid being slapped with a fine so far, but urged other delivery riders to know and follow the rules.

Deliveroo_Rider_Taking_The_Lane_In_Bristol_(32611782273)

 

The response from the public towards this move from the council has been positive, reports Daily Mail. 63-year-old Sarah Lockyer, said: “I think the important thing is that pedestrians are protected, given the rights that they should have - to walk in what is mainly a pedestrianised area and to feel safe doing so.

“We get a lot of visitors to the city and they assume that they're not going to bump into traffic, or traffic’s not going to bump into them.”

> “Why pick on a lone female cyclist?” Cyclist slapped with £100 fine – for riding on a cycle path

A Deliveroo spokesperson said: “We regularly engage with riders and local authorities to help keep riders and other road users safe, including working with Canterbury City Council. 

“We will issue targeted communications to riders in the Canterbury area to help drive awareness of these rules.’

A JustEat spokesperson said: “At Just Eat, we expect all couriers delivering on our behalf to act respectfully and responsibly at all times. We provide guidance to our independent restaurant partners and self employed contractors to ensure they follow the rules of the road.

“If we are ever made aware that a courier delivering on our behalf has acted in a way that does not uphold the standards we hope to deliver, we will of course take action as appropriate.”

> Canterbury City Council to clamp down on “reckless” food delivery riders

Just yesterday, it was reported that another cyclist found themselves on the receiving end of a hefty bill of £500 for riding through the town centre, with the North East Lincolnshire Council continuing to enforce a controversial cycling ban in Grimsby and warning that cyclists will be "rightly punished" and face "repercussions" if they "have not followed the rules".

The council has been particularly notorious for the many fines it has levied on cyclists, perhaps the most famous, or infamous coming all the way back in 2022 when there was backlash from locals after a Grimsby pensioner was fined £100 for cycling through the town centre, with some accusing the council officers of targeting "old and slow" riders while ignoring youths "racing up and down".

Barry Enderby, the 82-year-old cyclist, became somewhat of a cult hero amongst cyclists and road.cc readers after he told North East Lincolnshire Council he would "rather go to prison than give them £100" and they could "stick it up your a*se" after he was fined for breaching a PSPO.

Since then, the Colchester City Council has also come under scrutiny for its utilising of “rogue” wardens who were accused of “lying in wait” to catch cyclists riding on the pavement, after two riders were fined £100 for briefly mounting a footpath to avoid navigating a notoriously busy roundabout and its “thick and fast motor traffic” — a penalty described by one of the cyclists involved as “unjustified” and “a bit farcical”.

Since the start of this year, 62 cyclists have been fined £100 each in Colchester by wardens employed by the Waste Investigations Support and Enforcement (WISE) agency, an external organisation subcontracted by Colchester City Council and at least 20 other local authorities across the UK where PSPOs are in place.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

48 comments

Avatar
biking59boomer | 1 month ago
3 likes

Bottom line, if the sign says No Cycling it's no cycling. There are No Cycling signs at either end of our city centre which are blatently ignored, mostly by speeding delivery riders.

Avatar
bensynnock replied to biking59boomer | 1 month ago
5 likes

Road rules are constantly ignored. I don't see the daily mail getting up in arms about drivers getting away with breaking the rules.

Avatar
E6toSE3 replied to bensynnock | 1 month ago
1 like

We're talking pavement and pedestrian area rules. Cars misbehaving on road have less immediate effect on pedestrians on pavements and precincts, especially elderly, pregnant, pushchair, wheelchair people

Avatar
IanGlasgow replied to E6toSE3 | 1 month ago
8 likes

E6toSE3 wrote:

We're talking pavement and pedestrian area rules. Cars misbehaving on road have less immediate effect on pedestrians on pavements and precincts, especially elderly, pregnant, pushchair, wheelchair people

Drivers kill a pedestrian on the pavement once every ten days. That's a pretty immediate effect.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to IanGlasgow | 1 month ago
0 likes
IanGlasgow wrote:

E6toSE3 wrote:

We're talking pavement and pedestrian area rules. Cars misbehaving on road have less immediate effect on pedestrians on pavements and precincts, especially elderly, pregnant, pushchair, wheelchair people

Drivers kill a pedestrian on the pavement once every ten days. That's a pretty immediate effect.

you're comparing nationwide figures for the one issue to a local area for the other issue.

Avatar
bensynnock replied to E6toSE3 | 1 month ago
2 likes

Cars are always driving through the pedestrian area here in Southampton, as well as on pavements. It happens far more than pavement cycling, but nobody even seems to notice.

Avatar
Oldfatgit replied to bensynnock | 1 month ago
2 likes
bensynnock wrote:

Road rules are constantly ignored. I don't see the daily mail getting up in arms about drivers getting away with breaking the rules.

Ahh ... right.

So because *they* do it, we should.

Great way to speed the spiral to the bottom.

Avatar
bensynnock replied to Oldfatgit | 1 month ago
1 like

I don't cycle on pavements. I generally prefer the road over shared cycle/pedestrian paths.

My point is that there is over zealous enforcement of rules that limit cyclist behaviour, while any suggestion that rules that apply to motorists are actually enforced brings accusations of a war on motorists. Most people don't even know what the rules are, let alone obey them.

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to Oldfatgit | 1 month ago
6 likes

I think his point is more that cyclists are constantly in the media for our "lawlessness" when cyclists fundamentally do fuck all damage vs cars and yet we never see articles about the menace of drivers and cars. All we hear from that side is "the war on motorists" and how hard done by the poor law abiding driver is. 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to biking59boomer | 1 month ago
3 likes
biking59boomer wrote:

Bottom line, if the sign says No Cycling it's no cycling. There are No Cycling signs at either end of our city centre which are blatently ignored, mostly by speeding delivery riders.

If I drove my car through there would I be prosecuted under no-cycling regulations? Bonkers!

The machines being driven by most of these delivery people are not bicycles within the meaning of the law, so why are they being prosecuted as cyclists? They should be prosecuted as motorists driving uninsured and unlicensed.

The no-cycling thing is a red herring, but it peddles the narrative that cyclists are the problem.

Avatar
mattw replied to biking59boomer | 1 month ago
2 likes

Well - no.

The country is full of fly-posted "No Cycling" signs, often put up by bodies with no authority to do so such as Town Councils.

And huge numbers with no supporting Traffic Regulation Order that makes them enforcible.

The problem then becomes that Nimby idiots or Enforcement Officer idiots then start harrassing people riding cycles who have broken no rules. It is especially a problem for disabled peole using a cycle as their mobility aid.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 1 month ago
6 likes

Dear road.cc,
It's not the case that "another cyclist found themselves on the receiving end of a hefty bill of £500 for riding through the town centre". That hefty bill was for failing to the initial £100 fixed penalty. If they carry on like this they might end up in jail - but it won't be for riding through the town centre.

Avatar
LeadenSkies replied to Dnnnnnn | 1 month ago
5 likes

Agreed, but if only it worked the same for the 30mph signs at both ends of my road, or the zigzags for the pedestrian crossing by the local school or the double yellows on my way to town. I can't think of the last time I saw any of them actively enforced.

Avatar
Backladder replied to LeadenSkies | 1 month ago
4 likes

LeadenSkies wrote:

Agreed, but if only it worked the same for the 30mph signs at both ends of my road, or the zigzags for the pedestrian crossing by the local school or the double yellows on my way to town. I can't think of the last time I saw any of them actively enforced.

But what chance do the police stand to catch registered licenced and insured motorists? Also look at the masses of statistics showing thousands killed and hundreds of thousands injured by cyclists!

Avatar
mctrials23 replied to LeadenSkies | 1 month ago
2 likes

Yep. The number of times I am about to walk onto a zebra crossing and a driver blows through it because they are paying zero attention. Our road is a 20 and people fly into it doing 30 and accellerate to 40 in some cases. Its a single lane due to parked cars and 100% an unsafe place to be doing anything more than 20. At all times of the day at the moment you can hear the boy racers flying around here breaking the speed limit. There is almost no enforcement against cars breaking the law despite what drivers would like to think. 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to mctrials23 | 1 month ago
2 likes

This was yesterday

I stopped.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Dnnnnnn | 1 month ago
1 like

As I understand it, they were still fined for the original offence (of [violating the order by] riding through the town centre). They just failed to avail of the 'discount' for paying it before it went to court.

It's like if you pay £200 for a train ticket on the day of travel when it would have been £100 if you booked in advance. You've still paid £200 for a ticket - not £100 for a ticket and £100 for not buying it earlier.

Avatar
lerrup replied to Dnnnnnn | 1 month ago
0 likes

Isn't part of the issue that they were riding an illegal electric motorbike? When are we getting a crack down on then?

Pages

Latest Comments