Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Surrey resident launches campaign against closed-road cycle events

“No one has consulted me," says clay-pigeon biz owner, complaining about noisy "lycra louts" with RideLondon in his sights...

A Surrey resident has launched a campaign demanding that the county council not run closed-road events such as the RideLondon 100 sportive, which, he says, turns Surrey roads into a “cycle track”.

An online petition, Stop Surrey Being Turned Into a Cycle Track, was launched by Ian Huggins, 68, from Esher four days before the August 3 RideLondon-Surrey 100. Two weeks later it has garnered 826 signatures. In 2011 the population of Surrey was estimated to be 1,135,500.

Mr Higgins’ primary concern appears to be the effect on local businesses, including his own weekend clay pigeon shooting set-up. He also complained that "lycra louts" rode the route in advance of the event, making lots of noise.

He said: “Last year we were confined to barracks for two days and now I have been told I can’t leave my home unless I leave before 5am or after 7pm.

“No one has consulted me, no one has asked if I mind.”

In a story on GetSurrey.com several other residents voice their objections to the event. They accuse Surrey County Council and the RideLondon organisers of running the event without public consultation and without formal assessment of the impact on individuals and businesses.

Council and organisers were “riding roughshod” over those affected by turning the ride into an annual event, said one objector, Ian Mason, 59, from West Byfleet.

Former county councillor Ian Lake said: “I am incensed by the whole thing. The consultation has been poor, it is a vanity project.”

“People didn’t really mind last year when it was the Olympics and roads were only closed for a short time. This year, the barriers have been up for the last few days and caused a huge amount of inconvenience.”

A spokesman for Surrey County Council told GetSurrey: “We’ve been working with the organisers to ensure everything is done to minimise disruption, with the help of leaflets, drop-in events and the GoSurrey.info website, and to make sure vulnerable people are looked after and emergency services aren’t hampered.”

Event organiser Hugh Brasher of London Marathon Limited was unavailable for comment at the time of writing, but his office have has said he will respond as soon as he’s able.

Here’s the unedited full text of Mr Huggins’s petition:

Apart from the obvious dangers to cyclists,Surrey roads are not suitable.Surrey County Council have, without consultation,decided it would be a great idea to use Surrey as a race track. This in it's self is a thoughtless act but far more importantly residents and numerous businesses are being effected by road closures. This prevents residents of Surrey from leaving their own property and going about their normal business. The road closures were a necessary inconvenience during the Olympic Games but now it looks like Surrey County Council are to make this an annual event. This is all very well but residents of Surrey are pestered and annoyed by cyclists ( practising months in advance of the event ) who ride the route in very large numbers from very early in the morning shouting at each other (have you tried talking whilst riding your bike?) and riding in large groups sometimes three and four abreast or in strings of riders making it virtually impossible for the poor old motorist, many of whom are elderly, to overtake.Traffic violations are common and it is only a matter of time before there is a major accident with the possibility of the loss of life. It will of course be the motorists fault. Have Surrey County Council considered the number of heavy goods vehicles using the roads. The route chosen is all enclosing and no provision has been made for vehicular crossing points. So to facilitate a bike ride many Surrey residents are to be confined to their homes from 5 am until 9 pm.

Surrey versus cyclists

The popularity of the Surrey hills with cyclists has become a source of complaints for locals in the last couple of years. In July Councillor David Preedy told the BBC that local councils were exploring ways in which events could be regulated.

Councillor Preedy, who leads the Lib-Dem group on Mole Valley District Council, said the main problem was the “sheer number” of cyclists.

“Every weekend there are hundreds and hundreds of cyclists and then on top of that, big organised events,” he said. “The pressure on residents is just getting too much, they’re feeling imprisoned, they can’t get out.

“A lot of them, particularly in Box Hill, are older people who feel intimidated driving through large numbers of cyclists.”

In April, Mark Davis, chief executive of Vachery Triathlon organiser Brave Events, said that a meeting he called to discuss road closures for the event was hijacked by protesters.

He alleged he was threatened outside and said others there reported incidents to the police - despite the council agreeing to the road closures. He also said that the event would bring £10 million to the local economy over the next three years.

Mr Davis said: “How many events bring top sports people and that sort of money into the area? You can’t believe how selfish people are because they don’t like cycling. Nobody is going to be trapped. People aren’t going to be stranded on an island.”

Brave Events subsequently changed the event to have partially-closed rather than fully-closed roads.

Fortunately, not everyone in Surrey fails to recognise the money visiting cyclists spend in the local economy. In July, the National Trust painted three logos on the Box Hill climb, reading  ‘I love cycling’; ‘I love amazing views’; and ‘I love tea and cakes’.

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

108 comments

Avatar
gazpacho replied to zanf | 10 years ago
0 likes

.

Avatar
alexholt3 replied to gazpacho | 10 years ago
0 likes

Retirement is a luxury very few can afford nowadays.

Avatar
champjohn replied to gazpacho | 10 years ago
0 likes

gazpacho you need to get out more not all oldy's are like Mr Huggins i am 69 and ride regularly and would have been doing the Silverstone 24 hour challenge in sept if the plug had not been puled stop being ageist dose not help the cause
 29

Avatar
Saratoga | 10 years ago
0 likes

Oh the irony of motorists being intimidated by cyclists...

Avatar
Nick T | 10 years ago
0 likes

Well, the constant banging of rifles from his clay pigeon business spoils my peaceful enjoyment of the general Surrey area every weekend.

I urge you to sign my petition in response.

Avatar
stuartp replied to Nick T | 10 years ago
0 likes
Nick T wrote:

Well, the constant banging of rifles from his clay pigeon business

At the risk of getting shot down in flames  3 they will be firing shotguns not rifles.

Avatar
Nick T replied to stuartp | 10 years ago
0 likes
stuartp wrote:
Nick T wrote:

Well, the constant banging of rifles from his clay pigeon business

At the risk of getting shot down in flames  3 they will be firing shotguns not rifles.

And you n'all.  3

Avatar
mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Traffic violations are common and it is only a matter of time before there is a major accident with the possibility of the loss of life. It will of course be the motorists fault

no **** sherlock, i guess he has seen all the cars speeding, parking on double yellow lines, using phones, must have been reading about the cyclists being killed in London by lorries. How many surrey residents COMMUTE to london? how inconsiderate to those around them. I don't want their car polluting the air i breath! etc etc etc

Avatar
workhard | 10 years ago
0 likes

He possibly has a reasonable case. But he put it as an angry rant. FAIL.

Long may his rants continue. Long may they fail.

Avatar
andyp | 10 years ago
0 likes

'Stop Surrey Being Turned Into a Cycle Track'

Dear Ian. Surrey isn't going to be turned into a cycle track. It will remain as a county.

Avatar
LondonCalling | 10 years ago
0 likes

I saw this petition on the very same day of the Ride London (which I did) and decided not to tweet it or put it on Facebook, so as not to give it publicity. Because they don't deserve it, and there are lots of haters out there that don't even live in Surrey and will sign up just for the sake of it.

So, it's better to ignore it, just let it die. NOt worth the aggro, really.

Avatar
TheHatter | 10 years ago
0 likes

This is a reasonable case put badly - I particularly like the complaint about noise from a clay pigeon shooting company owner.

The tone of this guys argument notwithstanding I'm not fond of closed road sportives as they understandbly inconvenience a lot of people and also propogate the idea that cars and bikes shouldn't mix.

Avatar
zanf replied to TheHatter | 10 years ago
0 likes
TheHatter wrote:

The tone of this guys argument notwithstanding I'm not fond of closed road sportives as they understandbly inconvenience a lot of people and also propogate the idea that cars and bikes shouldn't mix.

So you would be against Ciclovia because they are closed road events?

Do you also think that we should increase/improve cycling infrastructure but not at the cost of causing vehicular disruption?

Avatar
paulfg42 replied to TheHatter | 10 years ago
0 likes

Cars and bikes shouldn't mix. Our pathetic transport infrastructure means we're forced to share the roads with cars etc and are regarded as at best an inconvenience.

Maybe some car users should realise that they don't always need to use their cars.

Events like RideLondon should happen more frequently and all round the country.

Avatar
northstar replied to TheHatter | 10 years ago
0 likes
TheHatter wrote:

This is a reasonable case put badly - I particularly like the complaint about noise from a clay pigeon shooting company owner.

The tone of this guys argument notwithstanding I'm not fond of closed road sportives as they understandbly inconvenience a lot of people and also propogate the idea that cars and bikes shouldn't mix.

He does not have a reasonable case, the events with a large number of people entering have to be on closed roads because of attitudes of drivers who feel they should be able to drive where they like whenever they like and would harrass the people taking part in the event because they do not want to share the road.

Surrey is nimby central and has no cycling only dedicated infrastructure in the areas i have been.

Avatar
lolol | 10 years ago
0 likes

I particularly like the complaints about noise, from someone running a weekend clay pigeon shooting business. That wouldn't be annoying to live near at all, oh yes, it would drive you insane.

Avatar
jollygoodvelo | 10 years ago
0 likes

Don't worry Mr Huggins. With blood pressure like yours I expect you'll be dead soon. How did your petitions to stop young folk playing loud music and resisting the "occupation" of your village by John E Foreigner go?

Avatar
aslongasicycle | 10 years ago
0 likes

If the petition had been put in balanced terms, with concise argument, it would be a worry.
But the overly emotive hyperbole just serves to make him look like an angry and selfish nutter, and distances middle-ground policy makers.

Which is good.

Haters gonna hate.

Nice people gonna run huge mass participation events with consequent smiles.
 103

Pages

Latest Comments