Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Kensington & Chelsea Council refuses to reinstate High Street cycle lane

Labour councillors condemn “completely bonkers” decision as London Cycling Campaign calls on Grant Shapps and Sadiq Khan to intervene

The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (RBKC) has refused to reinstate the emergency cycle lanes on Kensington High Street in a decision condemned by Labour councillors as “completely bonkers", while the London Cycling Campaign (LCC) has called on Transport Secretary Grant Shapps and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan to intervene.

The lanes, one on either side of the street and used by up to 3,000 cyclists a day, were removed in early December, less than two months after they had been installed and despite protests from campaigners and nearby schools among others.

Senior councillors at the Conservative-controlled borough have now voted unanimously not to reinstate the lanes but instead to “Develop plans to commission research” – although not before the summer – which could potentially “lead to a feasibility study in the longer term.”

Prior to last night’s meeting, the volunteer-run campaign group Better Streets for Kensington & Chelsea said that all four options being discussed by the council’s leaders were “poorly constructed and misleading,” adding that the one eventually chosen was the “kick the can down the longest road we can find” option.

“The first part of this option is to not re-instate the lanes now,” the group said. “Very obviously, there is no reason whatsoever that the temporary scheme cannot be re-instated while longer term considerations take place – indeed, that is the obvious thing to do, which we have consistently advocated. We are extremely concerned that the option has been misleadingly framed in this way.”

But council leader Councillor Elizabeth Campbell said at last night’s meeting: “It’s pretty clear the consensus is we will not be reinstalling a temporary cycle lane."

In response, Labour opposition leader Councillor Pat Mason said: “Any argument that says we can’t have cycle lanes because it will cause too much traffic congestion is completely bonkers.

“We are going to have to do this under our climate change policy that we passed in January 2020.”

In a statement released last night, LCC Healthy Streets Campaigner Clare Rogers said, “The cycle tracks, even though they were only in for a few weeks, proved a crucial safety measure for thousands of people daily, both on a strategic east-west route for London and for local trips such as families riding to school, on what was, and now is again, the most dangerous road in the borough for cycling.

“Kensington and Chelsea is clearly incapable of behaving as a responsible local authority for this highway, or following its own policies on road safety and the climate emergency.

“The Secretary of State for Transport and Mayor of London must address boroughs like this one, that act against or ignore government, regional and their own policies,” she added.

The council insists the decision to remove the lanes – in response to which, Prime Minister Boris Johnson reportedly went “ballistic” – followed what it claimed were complaints from local businesses and residents.

However, it turned out that some people objecting lived far outside the borough and even abroad, and a Freedom of Information request found that the council’s head of news had edited what was supposedly an independent press release from the Kensington Business Forum.

> Council officer edited business group’s press statement on removal of Kensington High Street bike lane

The local authority also claimed that the lanes created congestion and hindered the emergency services – even though an independent study found that traffic jams had worsened following the removal of the lanes, partly due to illegally parked cars.

> Motor traffic journey times increase after Kensington cycle lanes removed

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

16 comments

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
1 like
Avatar
ktache | 3 years ago
2 likes

The excellent RantyHighwayMan has an interesting take on consultation

https://therantyhighwayman.blogspot.com/2021/03/turn-it-on-its-head.html

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to ktache | 3 years ago
2 likes

ktache wrote:

The excellent RantyHighwayMan has an interesting take on consultation

https://therantyhighwayman.blogspot.com/2021/03/turn-it-on-its-head.html

He's great at looking at the issues from a different angle. I'm a fan.

Avatar
Jem PT | 3 years ago
0 likes

It's almost as if RBKC want TfL to take over the running of this road - they're certainly going the right way about it.

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
3 likes

Quote:

Senior councillors at the Conservative-controlled borough have now voted unanimously not to reinstate the lanes but instead to “Develop plans to commission research” – although not before the summer – which could potentially “lead to a feasibility study in the longer term.”

or...

Quote:

“But the plans were on display…”
“On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”
“That’s the display department.”
“With a torch.”
“Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”
“So had the stairs.”
“But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”
“Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

 

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes

brooksby]</p>

<p>[quote wrote:

Senior councillors at the Conservative-controlled borough have now voted unanimously not to reinstate the lanes but instead to “Develop plans to commission research” – although not before the summer – which could potentially “lead to a feasibility study in the longer term.”

or...

Quote:

“But the plans were on display…”
“On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”
“That’s the display department.”
“With a torch.”
“Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”
“So had the stairs.”
“But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”
“Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

If this is a competition, the second is more credible.

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
3 likes

Quick before the new laws come in.  Peaceful protest with a cycling related rolling road block

Avatar
alexb | 3 years ago
6 likes

What did you expect from a council that has no shame and whose decisions already killed so many people in the Grenfell fire?

It's about time TFL stepped in and took over the High Street. Although that's then a poison chalice for Khan.

Avatar
Kendalred | 3 years ago
8 likes

History will not judge these people kindly. Unfortunately it will be of no consequence to them, given that the majority of them will be elderly enough to be pushing up the daisies...sorry, concrete, by the time climate change actually affects their corner of the planet.

Despicable reactionary nimby cocktards.

Avatar
Brauchsel | 3 years ago
7 likes

Does anyone with a better understanding of the law than me know whether this would be amenable to a judicial review challenge?

While councils do have the right to implement policies as they see fit, as I understood it their decisions have to meet the Wednesbury test of not being ones which no reasonable public body could reach. It seems here that they have ignored some cogent evidence that their decision to remove the lane has had results opposite to their stated reason for doing so, i.e. improving traffic flow for motorists. 

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
6 likes

They need on street parking

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
3 likes

Remember folks:

"Lanes will get jammed and outdated pretty quickly. Which is expensive and means putting residents at risk
Cycle lanes are dangerous because they are mixing slow and fast traffic and different directions. "

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
5 likes

One would hope that several cyclists with possibly unreliable cars or prone to flat tyres don't all decide to drive that route, rather than cycle, and suffer a break down.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
8 likes

“Develop plans to commission research”  JHC, that is the weasel words phrase of the century right there.  So they are considering about promising to think about possibly doing something about maybe getting someone sometime to look at having research done on a subject which has already been exhaustively researched.

Then they follow it with “lead to a feasibility study in the longer term.”  Presumably long after their rotten borough is six feet under water due to climate change.

“It’s pretty clear the consensus is we will not be reinstalling a temporary cycle lane,” only if you talk exclusively to Kensington and Chelsea tractor drivers.

Surely even a member of Boris the Liar's party would be embarrassed by this?  All councillors who voted for this appalling travesty of their sworn duty to do the best for their constituents should resign immediately, but being hypocrites like their boss, they won't.

I wonder when the BBC's Chief Environmental Correspondent will produce an article exonerating them.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
8 likes

The councillors that approved this non-decision should be held personally responsible for any subsequent collisions that would have been prevented by having the lanes. It's a known danger and they're allowing it to continue being dangerous - that's not acceptable in my book.

Avatar
Bungle_52 replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
2 likes

Yes minister! Sir Humphrey would be proud of them.

Latest Comments