Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Councillor slams cyclists riding “at breakneck speed” on pavement, as police officers increase patrols targeting people on bikes during road closures

According to the council, there have been “many reports of people being injured or near misses” due to cyclists failing to follow diversion signs

Police in Lancashire are cracking down on cyclists riding on the pavement while road closures are in place, after the local authority claimed the footpath-using cyclists were “causing risk to public safety” by riding at “breakneck speed”.

Preston’s Riverside has been closed to traffic since April to enable the construction of new flood defences, as part of the city council’s Flood Risk Management scheme. According to Lancashire Police, since the road was closed there have been “several reports” of cyclists riding on pavements and failing to follow the Guild Wheel diversion route.

Preston City Council has also claimed that “the ongoing failure to follow the diversions is causing risk to public safety after many reports of people being injured or near misses” involving cyclists and pedestrians.

> Questions asked after another police force keen to highlight crackdown on cyclists jumping red lights

Earlier this week, local councillors, Lancashire Police, and staff from the Environment Agency spent the morning in the Riverside area, speaking to cyclists about the need to dismount on the pavement or use the diversion route.

The council added that the local Police Community Support Officer will also be increasing patrols on the Riverside, with the aim of taking “appropriate action” – such as issuing Fixed Penalty Notices – against cyclists failing to adhere to the diversions.

Preston City Council also says it will use its online channels to promote the diversions, as well as “responsible” cycling etiquette in the area.

> "We introduced him to rugby": Police boast of tackling cyclist who jumped red light

Councillor Carol Henshaw, who has campaigned on behalf of residents in the city centre to put a stop to what she calls “irresponsible cycling”, said in a statement: “Residents are concerned for the safety of the more vulnerable in the community, young children, or older residents with poor mobility that are at risk of getting hurt.

“Some cyclists using the path go at breakneck speed and there’s not enough time for people to get out of their way. It is only a small section of pathway, and it is very narrow. We are urging cyclists to be respectful of other users and to dismount for the short section.”

“Public safety is a priority,” added Preston’s cabinet member for environment and community safety, Freddie Bailey. “The pavements along Riverside are too narrow for cyclists and there have been a couple of accidents, which is not acceptable.

“It will only take a dismounted cyclist a couple of minutes to walk from Miller Park to Penwortham Old Bridge, where they can start cycling again. If a cyclist doesn’t want to dismount, then they can use the diversion route along South Meadow Lane and through Andy’s Bee Meadow.”

> Mayor promises to reassess “risky” cycle route diversion on busy “unsafe” road – but says making cyclists use narrow pavement will not create conflict with pedestrians

The crackdown on “irresponsible” cycling during roadworks in Preston comes a few months after Bristol’s mayor promised to reassess a diversion on one of the city’s main cycle routes, which redirected cyclists onto what councillors and local campaigners have described as a “risky” and “unsafe” main road, as well as forcing them to walk their bikes along a stretch of narrow pavement.

Concorde Way, a flagship cycle route which connects the north of Bristol to the city centre and is used by 1,000 cyclists a day, will be closed for at least a year to make way for the construction of a new railway station and a diversion put in place. Bristol Cycling Campaign has claimed that the plans are rushed and that the 500-metre stretch of Muller Road used by the diversion is unsafe.

However, Labour mayor Marvin Rees insisted that the “temporary closure” of the Concorde Way cycle route will not bring pedestrians into conflict with cyclists, and that the council is comfortable that “there is no better solution” to the current diversion.

Rees also refuted a Green Party councillor’s suggestion that private motorists belong at the “bottom” of the hierarchy of road users included in the Highway Code, claiming that the councillor’s language “betrayed” his attitude towards drivers and that “everyone in the road user hierarchy must share space in a safe way”.

Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

40 comments

Avatar
essexian | 9 months ago
12 likes

Police in Lancashire.......?

Are there any? I was lead to believe that the Police force had given up and gone home where traffic regulations were concerned. 

Surely this must be some kind of joke? Checks date.... hummm, perhaps not. Ah, that's it, going after the easy targets again. 

Time to defund this type of Police activity and spend the money stopping killing machines but hey.... that would be the War On Motorists and we can't have that can we.

 

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to essexian | 9 months ago
5 likes

There still are, but they are all useless. I called 999 a couple of weeks ago to report a man so drunk he could barely talk, get into his car and drive off. I followed him and called 999.....and was put on hold! He eventually turned off and I was still on hold, I couldn't follow him forever so I terminated the call. I then called 101, got straight through to Lancs plod, explained the emergency and was told I would be put on hold and the wait was currently an hour. So I put the phone down and prayed he didn't kill anyone on his way home.

But call someone a name online and they are all over it.

Avatar
Paul J replied to Rik Mayals underpants | 9 months ago
1 like

A cynic might say that investigating name calling online provides officers good cover for sitting in their office, checking their favourite social media, while nattering with colleagues over tea and doughnuts.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
8 likes

So public safety is a priority and yet they don't provide a good alternative to the cyclists using the pavement. What did they think would happen?

Avatar
Oldfatgit replied to hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
2 likes

Article mentions an alternative route that can be cycled.
It's unlikely to be along the M6.

Avatar
Pub bike replied to Oldfatgit | 9 months ago
0 likes

Thames Water have gone to great lengths to provide a heavily protected footway segregated from the road for pedestrians along the embarkment whilst works are ongoing that necessarily narrow the already narrow road alongside the slipway.    Guess what the peds do?  They walk in the road (with their dogs) where there is directional priority signage for vehicles alongside the segregated area.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Oldfatgit | 9 months ago
3 likes

Oldfatgit wrote:

Article mentions an alternative route that can be cycled. It's unlikely to be along the M6.

I don't know the area, but my default assumption is that they haven't really considered cyclists with the diversion and it's longer or busier etc.

(I'm thinking of the diversion put in place in Bristol for the building work for the Ashley Down train station - not very useful at all and that's specifically inteded for cyclists)

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
1 like

You are partly correct in your assumption. They waited until there was a kick off between pedestrians and cyclists before they did something. 

Avatar
Lycra Lout replied to Oldfatgit | 9 months ago
3 likes

You can be sure that if this is being used over the alternative, the alternative is substandard or not close enough.

Avatar
ibr17xvii replied to Lycra Lout | 9 months ago
2 likes

If only Lancashire Constabulary were as bothered about cyclists on the roads they might get more sympathy.

I know the area very well although I don't cycle it much. As Bike Phil says the diversion has only recently gone up & the signage for it is a joke.

Pages

Latest Comments