Tour de France may be over, but the pro cycling shenanigans are still finding ways to sticky themselves to this live blog, much like how 31-year-old Belgian pro Dietmar Ledegen found a cheeky bottle from his team car to sticky himself to at the Tour de Wallonie.
The five-day stage-race is currently being held in Wallonia and in the second stage yesterday, Ledegen, who rides for the UCI Continental Team Baloise-Trek Lions soared too close to the sun and tested the race comissaries patience for a bit too long — over 500 metres, according to a spectator who posted footage of the rider with a not-so-clever sticky bottle.
“The worst part is that he did it over 500m, I quickly took out my phone when I saw him coming from the distance like a bullet,” wrote the Belgian cycling fan behind the Twitter account Lv_cycling.
Yesterday’s stage from Arlon to La Roche-en-Ardenne was the also the queen stage of the race, with the peloton going up and down the Ardenne hills in the punchy route. Ledegen who initally finished 104 out of 111 riders, 19 minutes down on the winner Markus Hoelgaard, has now been disqualified by the UCI for the sticky bottle.
Meanwhile, Antoine Vayer, former coach and trainer of the Festina team two decades ago, wrote: “Inspired by Cavendish and Pogacar, some riders combine [engine] power (Fr: puissance) and sticky bottles to resemble them.”
In a pro season that has been eerily devoid of many sticky bottles this year, we’ve now had two of them in the space of a week.
> "With the bottle like this, it's not correct": Giulio Ciccone hits out at Santiago Buitrago for 'sticky bottle' at Tour de France
Sticky bottles are fairly common in most races, as riders latch on to the bottle and let the team car propel them for a few extra precious seconds — but most of the times it's executed to help riders catch back on to a group or give the legs a momentary break, in a manner that's seen as acceptable in the eyes of the race commissaries.
After stage 19 of the Tour de France, coincidentally also the queen stage on Friday, the broadcast cameras caught Giulio Ciccone and Santiago Buitrago arguing over a sticky bottle, with the two also embroiled in a battle for the top 10 in the general classification at the time.
Ciccone, placed 10th with just a 34 second lead over Buitrago, going into the penultimate stage of the race, was seen having an animated exchange with the Bahrain-Victorious rider, pointing out his antics of holding on to the bottle while receiving it from the team car for longer than required.
While Buitrago's alleged sticky bottle was missed by most broadcast cameras, it looks like Ciccone and his teammates had a good view of it.
"Hey! We were three behind you, we saw everything. With the bottle like this, it's not correct. This is the Tour de France," Ciccone said to the 24-year-old Colombian, approaching him on his bike as he was sitting down and wiping away the sweat
Not particularly amused at the interaction, Buitrago hit back at Ciccone, saying: "I've learnt it from you!"
Buitrago ended up securing the 10th place in the GC at the end, pushing Ciccone out of the top 10 on the last day with a very strong time trial in which he finished 9th, just 2 minutes and 53 seconds behind the dominant Tadej Pogačar.
Add new comment
47 comments
Yes, no foaming or hypertension here. You just have to keep collecting evidence when you're lumbered with a police force as bad and cyclist hostile as this one. I think this one must be on holiday, but I expect he'll be back
BristolPost has this "article" about the Sydney Road LTN in Bath:
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/controversial-bath-ltn-eroded-trust-9435808
What's the local view? I can see how a declassified trunk road might not be the best candidate for an LTN street, but local circumstances are key.
From what I remember living in Bath, it was a street that was generally pretty quiet apart from during rush hour. I could see it becoming an LTN as a big benefit to cyclists heading to/from the canal path.
Don't know Bath that well, myself, so maybe someone else can provide some local knowledge. My view is that Bath has way too many cars for the size and layout of it, so maybe they should just pedestrianise most of it.
It was a rat run. Terribly surfaced and effectively created a "ring road" around the park there.
The road that now carries all the traffic, was widened, improved and had upgraded junctions.
Traffic is no worse for it.
The issue is, there are several, high profile and vocal individuals in Bath that oppose any and all cycling infrastructure, LTNs and believe that 15 minute cities are a global conspiracy to section us off and start The Hunger Games.
Google about the anti LTN campaigns there, you may be surprised to see a famous face or two lol
Dis1954 reckons:
Not sure if this is satire or not, it's so hard to tell these days.
Thank f**k for informed views like that
I think the 1954 part of the username provides us with a clue. I smell Gammon.
I don't see any issue with that sticky bottle...as stated it's fairly common for riders to latch on for a few seconds and that video clip is only a few seconds (no mention of speed limits) and by all accounts it was to get him back to the peloton where he finished well down in the pack.
Yeah, but he's head to toe in lycra & so probably also about to run a red light and cause an unsuspecting hack to spill coffee over themselves.
Is this how cyclists are getting up to 40mph before running red lights in London?
LOL. Indeed. Our equivalent to the team car is an Uber Eats rider on a de-restricted e "bike"
500m doesnt sound that far imo, dsq seems a bit harsh as well, I thought it was time penalty or relegation to the back, for a first offence at least, I guess we dont know if it was persistent sticky bottling.
I'd estimate that car is doing about 40 km/h so if the witness is correct that the rider hung on for 500 m that would be almost a minute, way outside the acceptable "few seconds" generally tolerated.
Where's the minute long video then? I'm guessing riders don't get disqualified on the word of a spectator?
Well, the spectator said that they took their phone out of their pocket to film them when they saw them approaching from a long distance away. Even the video shows a considerable distance travelled at extremely high speed, way beyond what any reasonable commissaire would accept. The rider would of course have a right of appeal and if they think the evidence shows otherwise they can use it but come on, even on the evidence shown there it's blatant cheating, isn't it?
Pages