A cyclist was passed dangerously by motorists four times on one stretch of road but was told he could be prosecuted when he reported the offences to police because he cycled on a shared use path.
> Gwent Police confirm cyclist submitting close pass footage could face prosecution for swearing
Alan Robertson was riding along the A5117 which, ironically, had roadworks on it because it was having the shared use path installed.
Mr Robertson experienced four close passes on the road (which had a 30mph limit) in relatively quick succession and subsequently reported the incidents to Cheshire Police.
Mr Robertson received three emails back from the Constabulary, the first stating that one driver would face no action.
The second said that the other three motorists would get an advisory letter.
And the final email seemed to accuse the cyclist of breaking the law himself.
The officer, who works in the Road and Crime Unit, said: "Please bear in mind that all offences seen committed could be dealt with and a court if on viewing footage of a car driver committing offences and other offences are viewed could ask if they were also dealt with.
"On reviewing the footage at the end it can be seen that you cycle up the pavement via a pedestrian crossing traffic light controlled junction and then further along re-enter the correct side of the road through a coned off area (I’m afraid that it doesn’t look great when we’re trying to hold a motorist to account and a lot of this is about perception, if I’m holding one party to account I should also be others)."
> Updated – Near Miss of the Day 549: Cyclist “flabbergasted” as magistrates acquit close pass driver
Mr Robertson responded and explained his confusion and anger at the lack of any stronger action being taken against the drivers, and the implication that he could be prosecuted.
He said: "These vehicles were passing me into oncoming traffic,clearly without giving anything near sufficient space, and I'm sure your experience will tell you that they were all way in excess of the 30mph limit, even if you're not able to put a precise number on it.
"This was a long straight road in good conditions and there simply is no excuse for not being able to plan a safe pass here. Surely."
He continued: "I also take exception to your suggestion of wrongdoing on my part and I don't think my decision to enter an open section of the new shared pathway is in any way relevant at all.
"The reason I moved back into the carriageway was the path was shut and I saw a woman with a pram heading towards me. I'd suggest I actually displayed a degree of caution and consideration that perhaps you might in fact like to recognise instead of suggesting I was somehow at fault."
Biggest eBay Bicycle disaster I ever saw happened to someone else, not me: a friend asked me to find them a decent entry-level road bike, I found...
I've just had a quick look at the BC website to check and most races seem to be about the £30 mark, I think that riders, most of whom have paid...
“There is never a Plan B for cycling” Only slightly less likely than a plan A.
I liked the V1: many hours between charges, in light and camera mode. I can't see a reason to get this V3. Disappointed.
The zip broke on my Harrington.
Can I ask you for a cite on those 900mm and 1200mm numbers, please, Dave? Very geniune question - I'm trying to get to the bottom of this. It's a...
Just checking start time for Brugge -De Panne and it looks like the window shuts a little early at 8 am UK time. Looks like race starts at 10.30 am...
I suspect this has been on the cards since the early 90s, with rumoured lobbying from teams including March and Footwork.
Aha! *That* is the real reason that being able to accelerate is a "safety feature"! "In the event of fire, break glass (windscreen) and accelerate...
I'd rather take my bike to Halfords. That's something I thought I'd never say!