Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Government updates response to petition calling for public awareness campaign to address driver aggression against cyclists

"The Department for Transport is reviewing The Highway Code to ensure that cyclists are kept safe on the roads and make sure they are at the forefront of motorists’ minds when they are travelling"...

The Department for Transport (DfT) has updated its response to a petition calling for a public awareness campaign to address driver aggression towards cyclists. While a paragraph has been added to the top to say the DfT "doesn’t consider that a campaign along the lines specifically requested by this petition is necessary", it does now say that the department's THINK! campaign will be developing a behavioural change campaign. 

> ​Petition calling for public awareness campaign to address driver aggression towards cyclists hits 10,000 signatures

The petition, started by Helen-Louise Smith, said: "The attitude that cyclists should not be on the roads needs to end."

It called for motorists to be educated about 'dangerous, inappropriate and aggressive behaviours that can lead to the injury and even death of cyclists.'

After the petition reached 10,000 signatures last month, the government responded; however the Petitions Committee requested "a response which more directly addressed the request of the petition", after which this update was added on 13 July: "The Department for Transport is already reviewing The Highway Code to improve cyclist safety and doesn’t consider that a campaign along the lines specifically requested by this petition is necessary."

The rest of the response, published here, says: "The Government is focused on making cycling and walking safer and easier.

"To that end the Department for Transport undertook a major cycling and walking safety review in 2018.

"Following an extensive public consultation, the Department published its full response and a detailed two-year action plan on 22 November 2018.

"One of the actions identified was to review The Highway Code to create a new and improved Highway Code, to keep vulnerable road users - including cyclists, pedestrians and horse riders - safe on the roads and make sure they are at the forefront of motorists’ minds when they are travelling.

"For example, the proposed changes highlight how to avoid the dangers of close passing, and encourage people to adopt the ‘Dutch reach’, a method of opening a car door with the hand furthest from the handle, to force drivers to look over their shoulder for passing traffic. 

"On the 28 July 2020, the Prime Minister launched ambitious plans to boost cycling and walking and the consultation on changes to The Highway Code was published at the same time as part of a much broader plan into Cycling and Walking.

"The proposed changes should lead to a new and improved Highway Code, to keep vulnerable road users safe on the roads.

"The consultation closed on 28 October 2020; over 20,000 responses were received, and we are currently undertaking a full analysis of all replies."

> Minister repeats there is no prospect of requiring cyclists to be licensed as ‘Mr Loophole’ lawyer Nick Freeman continues to push his petition

The DfT say that a summary of responses to the consultation on the changes, including the 'next steps' will be published 'shortly'.

The department went on to say it 'recognised the important role education has in keeping vulnerable road users safe'.

The updated final paragraphs referring to the Department's THINK! campaign now says: "The Department for Transport recognises the important role education has in keeping vulnerable road users safe on the roads and the Department’s THINK! campaign aims to change the attitudes and behaviours behind key road safety issues, via marketing campaigns, online resources and THINK! social media channels.

"THINK! will be developing a behavioural change campaign to support implementation of these changes to The Highway Code and the overarching aims of these changes."

The petition now has 19,382 signatures and if it reaches 100,000 signatures before 16 December 2021, it will be considered for debate in parliament.

Add new comment

42 comments

Avatar
Hirsute replied to IanMK | 2 years ago
4 likes

I had that a bit this afternoon from a range rover driver. Some ridiculous coning off and traffic lights (which should have been removed for the w/e as they were only doing verge work). We were on the 'wrong side of the road' and I took the lane but the driver's offside wheels were over the white line almost touching the verge. I was waiting for some madcap overtake via a slightly wider bit of verge !

Avatar
Velophaart_95 replied to Richard D | 2 years ago
10 likes

Richard D wrote:

I don't see how a revised HWC is going to do anything to tackle driver aggression.  We were shouted at by TWO drivers at separate points on our group ride this morning, each yelling "single file!" (one was by an oncoming driver travelling in the opposite lane, the other by someone who overtook us easily on a wide B-road).

So if the fuckwits don't know what the CURRENT HWC says, how is a new HWC supposed to change anything?

 

Exactly!! It has be in the way of a public information film; just putting it in a new version of HWC is useless. The majority of motorists haven't read it since they were learning.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Velophaart_95 | 2 years ago
2 likes

Velophaart_95 wrote:

Richard D wrote:

I don't see how a revised HWC is going to do anything to tackle driver aggression.  We were shouted at by TWO drivers at separate points on our group ride this morning, each yelling "single file!" (one was by an oncoming driver travelling in the opposite lane, the other by someone who overtook us easily on a wide B-road).

So if the fuckwits don't know what the CURRENT HWC says, how is a new HWC supposed to change anything?

 

Exactly!! It has be in the way of a public information film; just putting it in a new version of HWC is useless. The majority of motorists haven't read it since they were learning.

"Charlie says..."

Avatar
IanMK replied to Velophaart_95 | 2 years ago
2 likes

You could actually make all drivers log on to a website watch a video and then answer a couple of easy questions. 20 mins max and if you don't do it you lose your license. Of course some idiots would pay their kids to do it for them.....

Avatar
Phil1966 | 2 years ago
14 likes

Whilst this petition is a starting point, without suitable penalties, nothing will change.
That’s why I’m a great believer that any driver who kills another road user, and is proven to be :-

Driving without a suitable license,
Driving without insurance,
Driving an unroadworthy vehicle,
Driving excessively fast (not just a couple of mph over limit),
Driving dangerously/carelessly,
Using a mobile phone
Etc,

Should be charged and tried for manslaughter.
All of the above are conscious decisions made by the driver, and as such, the driver should be punished accordingly.

Avatar
joe9090 replied to Phil1966 | 2 years ago
2 likes

totally

Avatar
EddiesMinion replied to Phil1966 | 2 years ago
1 like

There'd be no convictions; jurors are going to immediately see themselves in the position of the accused and won't find a guilty verdict.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to EddiesMinion | 2 years ago
0 likes

EddiesMinion wrote:

There'd be no convictions; jurors are going to immediately see themselves in the position of the accused and won't find a guilty verdict.

Not so sure. Driving drunk or on drugs can be enough to seperate jurors from potentially accused, driving without licence or insurance could be similar. MOST drivers don't do this, so wouldn't consider they could be caught for it.

Excessively fast, phone, careless you are probably right.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
19 likes

Is it just me, or have they not addressed the key point of driver aggression against cyclists?

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
14 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Is it just me, or have they not addressed the key point of driver aggression against cyclists?

Yes, you're right.  That was the first thing that struck me when I read it.  It had nothing to do with the petition, and was just a bland statement of what they've pretended to do for cyclists over the past few years, without actually doing anything.  Notably absent was any reference to the comprehensive review of road laws to make things safer for vulnerable road users.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
4 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Is it just me, or have they not addressed the key point of driver aggression against cyclists?

There was a standard email reply out from govt waffling about HWC etc. When I read it I though exactly the same thought as you

Avatar
IanMK replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
12 likes

It talks a lot about revisions to the HC, but not about how they are going to advertise the changes and certainly nothing about enforcement.

Pages

Latest Comments