Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Is Essex ready for RideLondon? Police defends silence over road safety issues

Exclusive: Essex police says road safety "a priority" with data-led Vision Zero plans and "Extra Eyes" team expansion...

Essex Police has defended its silence over its RideLondon 100 plans after concerns over an apparent lack of road safety engagement prior to the event, citing traffic policing cuts and pointing to ongoing Vision Zero work to eliminate road danger.

While RideLondon 100, visiting Essex for the first time in the event's nine-year history, will take place on closed roads, along with a three-day Women's WorldTour race, there are concerns over the inevitable rise in leisure cyclists inspired to cycle outside of the event on some of the country’s most dangerous roads. While campaigners recognise forces are grappling with a decade of policing cuts, criticisms over a "lack of foresight" surrounding growing cycling numbers remain. In January a 62-year-old man was killed cycling in Essex, after a collision with a driver. 

When road.cc contacted Essex Police, Essex’s Safer Roads partnership, RideLondon organisers and Essex County Council in November, no-one was able to outline any plans to tackle road danger for cyclists. In early February an Essex police officer contacted road.cc in error asking to discuss traffic management plans for a different cycling event. 

Towards the end of February Essex Police’s head of Road Policing told road.cc while the force isn’t targeting cycling safety surrounding the event itself, it is making “radical changes” to cut road danger for cyclists across the county, including:

  • Vision Zero goals to halve serious road injury and death by 2030 and eliminate it by 2040
  • Real-time data-led analysis to tackle collision trends and the most dangerous roads for cyclists, horse riders and motorcyclists
  • Targeting speeding drivers
  • Investment in its Extra Eyes camera footage submission programme, with hopes to double its three full-time assigned officers to six
  • A special Saturday court to process law-breaking road users caught on camera

Adam Pipe, Essex Police Head of Roads Policing, told road.cc he didn’t recognise the characterisation in road.cc’s November article.

“For the London ride, you can't ask any more than for it to be on closed roads because the risk is reduced significantly,” said Pipe. “More widely, there's an awful lot we're doing now and in the future.”

“We just have to recognise roads policing, not just in Essex, but nationally, we don't have lots of people. We simply don't”.

He said across Essex’s 5,000 miles of road there’s a maximum of seven traffic officers on a shift, and “that’s on a good day”.

“10-15 years ago, we would have 300 traffic officers in Essex. At its worst, we went down to 67 – and I'm now back up to 87.”

Road policing has faced swingeing cuts across a decade of austerity, losing 40% of its workforce between 2009-2018, against a 15% overall policing cut, according to Cycling UK calculations. 

Cycling UK's Duncan Dollimore told road.cc: “While roads policing numbers are down meaning there are less police on our roads, that still does not explain the lack of foresight of Essex Police in engaging with their road users."

In 2019 the government announced funding for an additional 20,000 police but experts say this will simply replace lost personnel with younger, less experienced bobbies.

“Nationally, [a younger workforce is] a bit of a problem for roads policing,” says Pipe. “But we are getting more people.”

“Extra Eyes or Op Snap, the use of technology to capture poor driving standards or road user behaviour, is the way forward,” says Pipe, with three full-time staff processing footage submitted by the public, and hopes to double that number.

In January of 66 close pass footage submitted, 19 were sent NIPs (Notice of Intended Prosecution), with 23 drivers sent advice letters, and a dedicated Saturday court to processing those cases.

10 tips for submitting good quality camera evidence to police

“Road safety is a priority for both the force and the PFCC (Essex Police and Crime Commissioner),” says Pipe. “There aren't many police forces across the country that even have that force priority, so we really are pushing the boundaries”.

Essex is also aiming for Vision Zero, a target to eliminate road death and serious injury (KSI) by 2040, with an interim target to half the current 790-800 KSIs a year to 400 by 2030. The ambition was announced in 2020, with the county's strategy launched in September 2021.

“When I started out in this role, 22 years ago, Essex recorded 1,300-1,400 KSIs a year,” says Pipe, adding the force is planning “radical changes” to achieve Vision Zero using a data-led approach to target resources to roads used by cyclists, and identify and tackle collision trends.

Rural roads see the worst collisions, and speed enforcement ties in with Essex County Council's planned speed limit reductions on some roads from 60mph to 40-50mph.

“It's going to need quite a bit of investment; it's going to need a total rethink of how we police the roads, how our partners engineer the roads, how we protect vulnerable road users”, says Pipe.

“If you take the journey we've been on, we've come down from a hell of a high level, and that’s why we’re going for Vision Zero. We have plateaued over the last three or four years, without a doubt. But that's why we're going for the step change”.

“I know we're probably not getting it right all the time, but we've moved a hell of a lot over the last six months”.

A 2020 report by HMIC, the criminal justice inspectorate, concluded roads policing was wrongly deprioritised by forces, despite road deaths plateauing or increasing, with almost half of local crime plans omitting roads policing, and unclear national strategies to tackle road death.

Pipe concludes: “Death, serious injury on the road is not still seen as a national priority. It should be a government priority but it's not. It's only on the goodwill of a Chief Constable or PFCC to have it as their priority and we are blessed in this force to have both.

“You can’t get away from it: there is no better way of being a deterrent than seeing a marked traffic unit or unmarked traffic unit with lights flashing at the roadside.”

Duncan Dollimore, Cycling UK’s head of campaigns said: “Cycling UK sympathises with the plight of roads policing that Essex Police has highlighted. Reversing its decline has been a campaign priority for us for more than seven years, but until recently our words had fallen on deaf ears. In January, Transport Minister Trudy Harrison in response to Labour’s Lillian Greenwood seemed to indicate that roads policing could become a strategic priority again, so we’re hopeful.

"The police should use the opportunity to defuse potential conflict before it happens with clear messaging now on topics such as cycling two abreast and overtaking safely, so when Essex roads hopefully see more people cycling on them, those who are driving know not just what to expect but also how to drive safely around them.”

Add new comment

10 comments

Avatar
Hirsute | 2 years ago
0 likes

This is vision zero

NSL road,  car speed ~ 40

Driver then went on to tailgate the vauxhall for 18 seconds footage.

"this matter will be dealt with by issuing the registered keeper of the vehicle with a Driving Advice Letter explaining that the driving behaviour shown by the driver at the time fell below that expected of a careful and competent driver."

 

 

Avatar
mark1a | 2 years ago
0 likes

I did Ride Essex 100 last year starting/finishing in Chelmsford, lovely day out on a bike. Looking forward to the new RideLondon-Essex in May.

Avatar
TonyE-H | 2 years ago
2 likes

I'll believe it when I see the changes!  Whilst their extra eyes website for reporting/uploading camera footage is good (easy to use, straight forward single page submission) the outcomes are still far too varied for very similar incidents and more recently they seem to be using warning letters far too often.  On the plus side, you can actually find out the outcome of reported incidents on their website, so a step up from a lot of other forces, Met police included.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to TonyE-H | 2 years ago
1 like

They are not very interested in close passes but seem to want clear cut offences such as rlj and failing to give way at a clearly marked junction.

 

Avatar
TonyE-H replied to Hirsute | 2 years ago
1 like

I've also found that a visible 'wobble' or 'swerve' seems to make a difference as to whether or not they actually do anything.

Avatar
wtjs replied to TonyE-H | 2 years ago
1 like

On the plus side, you can actually find out the outcome of reported incidents on their website, so a step up from a lot of other forces, Met police included

If this is true, it really is revolutionary! You mean find out the actual outcome of individual incidents using the police reference? It's not just statistics, or 'the outcome is one of these several options but we're not going to tell you which' is it?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
0 likes

All I get for the last one is

URN: 090043
Status: Course or conditional offer

Avatar
TonyE-H replied to Hirsute | 2 years ago
2 likes

If you go back and check after a few months you may get more detail. Have had several updated further and show the driver was fined + points, a couple with confirmation the driver attended a course. For example :

URN: 127654
Status: Course or conditional offer
Notes: £100 3 points on licence

Avatar
Hirsute replied to TonyE-H | 2 years ago
1 like

I see

URN: 270814
Status: Course or conditional offer
Notes: Retraining course attended and completed

URN: 012996
Status: Course or conditional offer
Notes: case withdrawn - unable to take forward

Hmm, what happened there ?

Avatar
TonyE-H replied to wtjs | 2 years ago
1 like
wtjs wrote:

If this is true, it really is revolutionary! You mean find out the actual outcome of individual incidents using the police reference? It's not just statistics, or 'the outcome is one of these several options but we're not going to tell you which' is it?

Yup, was really surprised to see actual outcomes on some not just course or conditional offer but actual details saying driver was fined and received points or driver attended course.

Latest Comments