Lawyers acting for Doctor Richard Freeman have sought a fresh adjournment to his medical tribunal to enable him to help with the rollout of vaccinations for COVID-19 – but the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) rejected the request, saying it was not “proportionate or in the interests of justice.”
The BBC’s Dan Roan reports that the General Medical Council (GMC), which brought the proceedings against the former Team Sky and British Cycling doctor, had “strongly opposed” the attempt to secure a further adjournment.
Freeman has admitted 18 of the 22 charges against him, but denies the central one of having ordered 30 sachets of Testogel testosterone patches for delivery to the National Cycling Centre in Manchester in 2011 “knowing or believing” that they were intended for a rider.
> Dr Richard Freeman claims he did not know testosterone boosted athletic performance
Instead, he claims that he was bullied into ordering them by former British Cycling coach Shane Sutton, who Freeman insists was suffering from erectile dysfunction – something the Australian vehemently denies.
> Dr Richard Freeman’s “vulnerability” to Shane Sutton’s bullying could have led to him ordering Testogel says psychiatrist
The hearing is due to reconvene on Friday for closing statements from the GMC and Freeman’s lawyers, who asked for an adjournment last week due to the NHS surgery where he now practises asking Freeman to help give vaccinations against the coronavirus.
They told the MPTS: “We strongly believe that the Covid crisis position should take precedence.”
In rejecting the request for what it termed “in effect … an open-ended adjournment,” the MPTS said that a further delay would mean the hearing “"not concluding until sometime in autumn 2021 at the earliest.”
The MPTS added: “While it is undoubtedly important that Dr Freeman carries out his professional obligations to participate in the Covid-19 vaccination programme … it is entirely possible and not unfair for closing submissions to be delivered effectively by both parties in his absence.”
A spokesperson for the GMC commented: “We appreciate the pressure on doctors and health services at this challenging time. But we're mindful delayed decisions cause additional stress and we need to take a balanced approach.
“Flexible arrangements are in place so that the doctor's presence is not necessary at this stage of the hearing. This means he can continue to work while representatives make submissions on his behalf.”
The hearing has been running since February 2019, and was subsequently adjourned due to concerns over Freeman’s mental health.
> Further delays to Richard Freeman tribunal reportedly due to his mental health
Assuming there is no further delay, a decision is expected in March, with the doctor potentially being barred from practising medicine when the tribunal makes its decision.
absolutely, shes been given a bigger role in the team this year since Wiebes departure, so should get lots more opportunities like this to take...
Nobody opposes preventing anti-social behaviour, but demonising perfectly safe cycling is merely displaying their intitutional anti-cycling bias. ...
I really don't understand. Ebikes stop electrical assistance at 25kph, and any rider on a road bike can easily top that. Where I live, segregated...
Who said the conservative party were directly responsible for it? I think you're bringing your own inferences and biases again......
I usually just skim through his comments. Having read them properly I take your point.
Perhaps if the driver sees someone on the right-hand side of the road about to throw a brick at a cyclist ahead of their vehicle, but it's quite a...
Thanks Jamie, good advice, will give it a try!
I'm on Vulpine's mailing list and have just had an email saying they are 50% off - so £130.
That kind of aggression towards strangers should entail a prison sentence at least.
I went for a walk the other way around the North Willen Lake today, on the way back home there is an access road with a single lockable bollard on...