Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Immediate” safety changes announced for killer junction in Holborn

Southampton Row and Theobald's Road junction to be made safer for cyclists in wake of latest fatality...

“Immediate” safety changes aimed at providing more space for people on bikes have been announced for a junction in London’s Holborn district where several cyclists have lost their lives in recent years in collisions involving large vehicles.

The most recent death, of children’s doctor Marta Krawiec last month, led to protests at the junction of Southampton Row and Theobald’s Road by campaign group Stop Killing Cyclists and, last week, London Cycling Campaign.

> Holborn lorry crash victim named as children’s doctor Marta Krawiec

The junction forms part of the Holborn Gyratory where safety measures announced in late 2019 by Camden Council, were put on hold after under the Transport for London (TfL) Liveable Neighbourhoods programme was frozen.

The borough has today said that will bring in a number of changes with immediate effect at the Southampton Row and Theobald’s Road junction ahead of plans for “more substantial changes” being introduced in December and January.

Camden Council adds that it and TfL “will also continue to work on longer-term plans to transform roads in the area.”

The changes being “implemented quickly to respond to immediate road safety concerns” are:

Changing the southbound Southampton Row approach to the junction from three lanes to two to reduce the risk to cyclists of vehicles turning left from the current centre ahead-only lane

The current central ahead-only traffic lane will be replaced with a temporary island to separate vehicles turning left and vehicles going straight on

Amending the nearside left-turn lane so that cyclists and buses can travel straight ahead through the junction, while general traffic will only be allowed to turn left

Adding cycle boxes (advanced stop lines) for cyclists at the traffic lights on Southampton Row to provide a safe space to wait in at the front of queuing traffic

A possible extension of the cycle, bus, and taxi lane on Theobald’s Road and reduction of the bus lane on Southampton Row by 25m to maintain space for large vehicles to use the left turn lane (subject to an assessment currently taking place).

Councillor Adam Harrison, cabinet member for a sustainable Camden, said: “These immediate measures are the beginning of changes planned for this junction.

“In the last decade, too many cyclists have died on roads in Holborn. Our thoughts remain with their families, friends and former colleagues. We are absolutely determined to do all we can to make Camden as safe as possible for cyclists.

“We will work together with the local community and ward councillors, cycling groups, TfL and the Mayor of London in the coming months to agree further significant and permanent changes to this junction. Camden Council is committed to working with TfL and the Mayor to reach ‘Vision Zero’ of no deaths or serious injuries on our roads.”

 

Will Norman, London’s walking and cycling commissioner, commented: "My thoughts remain with the family, friends and colleagues of Dr Marta Krawiec.

“We're determined to make roads across London safer as part of our Vision Zero commitment to eliminating death and serious injury from the capital's roads and these immediate changes will reduce danger to people cycling in Holborn, and enable more people to cycle confidently.

“We'll continue to work closely with Camden Council to make these changes and to deliver longer term proposals to improve road safety in the area.”

The news comes as new figures from Transport for London (TfL) show that a big rise in the number of cyclists killed or seriously injured on the capital’s streets, with people on bikes now the group of road users most likely to be the victim of a fatal or serious crash.

Cyclists made up 257 of the 849 people seriously injured in road traffic collisions in London from April to June this year – around one in three of the total – and one of the 15 people killed was riding a bike, reports the Evening Standard’s Ross Lydall.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/cyclists-london-deaths-serious-in...

That represents a 50 per cent increase on the comparable period last year, when the city saw huge growth in cycling and plummeting motor traffic due to lockdown.

Compared to pre-pandemic figures, it also represents a 35 per cent rise on the same months of 2019.

Until April last year, pedestrians accounted for the greatest number of road users in London killed or seriously injured, followed by riders of powered two-wheelers such as motorcycles and motor scooters, with cyclists in first place.

Since then, people on bikes have accounted for more deaths and serious injuries, with those riding powered two-wheelers now second and pedestrians third in terms of numbers of casualties.

But TfL’s Lilli Matson, speaking to its safety committee, pointed out that so far as cyclists are concerned, “When you look at the overall rate, ie the risk per journey, it is lower.

“This reflects the fact we have seen a very large growth in the number of people cycling,” she added.

However, the figures will reportedly prompt a re-evaluation of Mayor of London Sadiq Khan’s Vision Zero plan, drawn up in 2018, and aims to eliminate road deaths in the city by 2041, with potential measures including making more roads subject to 20mph speed limits and redesigning dangerous junctions.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
mdavidford | 2 years ago
1 like

I don't understand this sentence:

Quote:

Until April last year, pedestrians accounted for the greatest number of road users in London killed or seriously injured, followed by riders of powered two-wheelers such as motorcycles and motor scooters, with cyclists in first place.

Is that meant to say 'cyclists in third place'?

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 2 years ago
2 likes

About time too...

Avatar
brooksby | 2 years ago
8 likes

I feel that their understanding of the word "immediate" differs from mine. How many years have people been saying it's dangerous there? How many people have died over how many years?

"Immediate"?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
5 likes

brooksby wrote:

I feel that their understanding of the word "immediate" differs from mine. How many years have people been saying it's dangerous there? How many people have died over how many years?

"Immediate"?

Exactly what I was thinking as I read it.

Let's hope this is the start of them taking Vision Zero seriously.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like

Vision zero immediately by 2041!  I'm not sure that even leaves time to put the tea on.

To be fair given the rate of progress in these things to date that's pretty ambitious. Since "better safety on the roads" mostly seems to have come from making cars safer for their occupants plus possibly reducing the miles travelled without motor transport I'm a little worried about the energy use impact of this.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
2 likes

chrisonatrike wrote:

Vision zero immediately by 2041!  I'm not sure that even leaves time to put the tea on.

To be fair given the rate of progress in these things to date that's pretty ambitious. Since "better safety on the roads" mostly seems to have come from making cars safer for their occupants plus possibly reducing the miles travelled without motor transport I'm a little worried about the energy use impact of this.

*chanting*

What do we want?

CHANGE!

When do we want it?

Anytime in the next twenty years or whenever's convenient, you know. No rush.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like

Bit Pythonesque there, peter  3

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
1 like

brooksby wrote:

Bit Pythonesque there, peter  3

I've been told that I look a bit like a python, or was that just a bit of me?

I found out the other day that pythons aren't venomous - I was crushed!

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

.....

*chanting*

What do we want?

CHANGE!

When do we want it?

Anytime in the next twenty years or whenever's convenient, you know. No rush.

After teh government review into road safety.....

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes

What do we want?

Gradual Change!

When do we want it?

In due course!

Credit to Kate Fox / David Hembrow where I saw it first.

Avatar
Dave Dave replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
2 likes

It's over 20 years ago I was commuting past there regularly and noted it was a ridiculously dangerous junction. 

TBH, I don't understand the kind of cyclist who would ride that way more than once. There are plenty of alternative routes in the area. Changing junctions and building cycle lanes are much more expensive than some signposts to show people the alternative routes. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Dave Dave | 2 years ago
4 likes

Dave Dave wrote:

It's over 20 years ago I was commuting past there regularly and noted it was a ridiculously dangerous junction. 

TBH, I don't understand the kind of cyclist who would ride that way more than once. There are plenty of alternative routes in the area. Changing junctions and building cycle lanes are much more expensive than some signposts to show people the alternative routes. 

It doesn't matter if you choose to avoid it, as it needs to be made safe for the public to use as it is a public road (i.e. not a motorway). I get that some roads are nicer to use than others, but often busy roads and junctions turn out to be the quickest and shortest route and that's what I often pick for cycling which is a perfectly acceptable decision. What isn't acceptable is for lots of deaths to occur at known dangerous junctions and nothing being done to fix it.

Avatar
Dave Dave replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
0 likes

"What isn't acceptable is for lots of deaths to occur at known dangerous junctions and nothing being done to fix it."

I entirely agree. But we're dealing with a system that thinks the correct response is to ban cyclists from those junctions. So what are we going to do to get somewhere? Sweep water uphill with a rake, or work with what we've got?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Dave Dave | 2 years ago
5 likes

Dave Dave wrote:

Changing junctions and building cycle lanes are much more expensive than some signposts to show people the alternative routes. 

You are Sustrans and ICMFP.

Avatar
Dave Dave replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
0 likes

You are wrong, and part of the problem.

Latest Comments