Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Councillor slams “malicious attempt” to skew consultation into bridge closures via bogus online accounts

Fake accounts registered opposition to closure of five bridges to motor traffic in the city as part of coronavirus response

A ​councillor in Newcastle Upon Tyne has slammed a “malicious attempt” to skew the results of a consultation into the closure of five bridges to motor traffic in the Jesmond and Gosforth areas of the city, after bogus online accounts were set up to register opposition to the proposals.

The news has raised concerns among campaigners for safe active travel infrastructure elsewhere in the UK over the methods employed by opponents of such measures to try and have them overturned.

The public consultation into the closure of the bridges to motor traffic, two of which are in the Dene and South Gosforth ward, with the others being in Ouseburn, Parkland and South Jesmond, closed on Monday.

The council said on its website that a subsequent analysis of data it carried together with the platform provider found that more than 7,000 fake comments had been posted from 1,894 accounts.

The faked comments were quickly removed by the council and the consultation platform provider, as well as a further 176,036 agreements that had been used to try and build public support for the bridges being reopened to motor traffic.

Councillor Arlene Ainsley, Newcastle City Council’s cabinet member for transport and air quality commented: “It’s hugely disappointing that some people would seek to alter a consultation process by acting in this manner.

“This was a malicious attempt to disrupt a genuine conversation with the public on issues that affect people’s neighbourhoods and quality of life. To attempt to drown out the voices of people who genuinely gave us their views, either for or against the proposals, is disrespectful and will not be tolerated.

“We would like to reassure the public that we have taken swift action to remove the false accounts and representations made,” she continued. “We would also like to clarify, that the consultation process isn’t a referendum, it is about actively engaging and listening to the public on how changes in local neighbourhoods affect them.

“There are a number of factors we need to consider alongside feedback from the consultation, including responses from the emergency services, on the long-term decision on the closures and we will set out our next steps soon.”

The bridges have been closed to motor vehicles since last August under the council’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, aimed at facilitating social distancing as well as providing safer routes for people on bike an on foot.

The council says it will issue an interim report on the outcome of the consultation in the coming days, with almost 10,000 comments that remain being used to inform that process.

It adds that the closures will remain in force until a final decision has been made after taking all relevant considerations into account, including levels of traffic in neighbouring streets, changes ion air quality and any impact on emergency services.

The broadcaster Jeremy Vine, who lives in Chiswick, West London, where a small but vocal group is opposed to a protected cycleway that opened before Christmas, as well as to Hounslow Council’s plans for low traffic neighbourhoods, warned on Twitter that local authorities needed to be vigilant against such attempts to falsely influence the outcome of consultations.

Replying to him, Jo Rigby, a Labour councillor in Wandsworth, pointed out that the Conservative-controlled council there had not undertaken similar checks into the validity of responses to a consultation before it decided to remove LTNs that had been set up under emergency active travel powers.

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


eburtthebike | 3 years ago

Must be a bunch of amateurs, getting caught so easily, or perhaps they've done it before in other places and weren't caught, which seems quite likely.

Maybe they should take a leaf out of the Brexit campaign's book and use Cambridge Analytica; they've got an exemplarary record in the field.

Moist von Lipwig replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago

Their mistake was that they did it in one block in a short space of time so it stood out.

eburtthebike replied to Moist von Lipwig | 3 years ago
Moist von Lipwig wrote:

Their mistake was that they did it in one block in a short space of time so it stood out.

How do you know that?

Latest Comments