- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
National Cycling Centre (British Cycling).jpgUCI bars transgender cyclist Emily Bridges from debut as woman at National Omnium Championships this weekend
British Cycling has confirmed that transgender cyclist Emily Bridges will not now make her competitive debut as a woman at the National Omnium Championships in Derby this weekend, saying that the UCI has informed it that under current regulations, she “is not eligible to participate in this event.”
We will have more on this story in the morning. In the meantime, in a statement released this evening, the national governing body said:
At British Cycling, we believe that transgender and non-binary people should be able to find a home, feel welcome and included, and be celebrated in our sport.
Under the British Cycling Transgender and Non-Binary Participation policy, Emily Bridges was due to participate in the British National Omnium Championships on Saturday 2nd April. We have now been informed by the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) that under their current guidelines Emily is not eligible to participate in this event.
We have been in close discussions with the UCI regarding Emily’s participation this weekend and have also engaged closely with Emily and her family regarding her transition and involvement in elite competitions. We acknowledge the decision of the UCI with regards to Emily’s participation, however we fully recognise her disappointment with today’s decision.
Transgender and non-binary inclusion is bigger than one race and one athlete – it is a challenge for all elite sports. We believe all participants within our sport deserve more clarity and understanding around participation in elite competitions and we will continue to work with the UCI on both Emily’s case and the wider situation with regards to this issue.
We also understand that in elite sports the concept of fairness is essential. For this reason, British Cycling is today calling for a coalition to share, learn and understand more about how we can achieve fairness in a way that maintains the dignity and respect of all athletes.
Within recent years, we’ve seen huge advancements in the science and testing around elite sports, the broader scientific and understanding of human biology, developments in protection provided by the law, and crucially a greater respect for the psychological and societal challenges of those who are transgender and non-binary. This is a complex area and by uniting, we can share resources and insights.
We know that some of these conversations are happening in pockets of the sporting world, but we want to encourage all sporting governing bodies, athletes, the transgender and non-binary athlete community, the Government and beyond to come together and find a better answer.
Across sports, far more needs to be done, collectively, before any long-term conclusions can be drawn.
Below is our original article, published at 1215 today.
A transgender cyclist who was once part of the men’s Great Britain Academy Programme, and who last month won a men’s race at the British Universities Track Championships, looks set to make her competitive debut as a woman against some of the country’s top female riders including multiple Olympic champion Dame Laura Kenny at the National Omnium Championships in Derby this weekend – although some competitors are said to be afraid to speak out about her potential participation in the event.
Emily Bridges, aged 21, revealed her struggles with gender dysphoria and the impact it was having on her, including depression and feeling isolated, in an article written for Sky Sports that was published on Coming Out Day in October 2020.
She started undergoing hormone therapy last year, and her testosterone levels are now sufficiently low to allow her to compete in women’s events under British Cycling’s Transgender and Non-Binary Participation Policy.
First published in 2020, the latest version of the policy was published in January this year following a consultation last summer that attracted 600 responses.
Transgender athletes are required to have testosterone levels below 5 nanomoles per litre for a year (men generally range between 10 and 30 nanomoles per litre) before being permitted to compete against other women.
Announcing the update, British Cycling said: “Our first Transgender and Non-Binary Participation Policy was designed to be as inclusive as possible, imposing only necessary and proportionate restrictions on eligibility to ensure fair and meaningful competition, based on the most relevant available guidance.”
The governing body said that it would “continue to follow the UCI regulations introduced in March 2020, which are based on objective scientific research and driven by a desire to guarantee fairness and safety within the sport … For this reason, testosterone levels remain the primary method of determining which members are eligible to compete in the male and female categories.”
It added: “While there has been much commentary on the effectiveness of testosterone-based measures, at the current time we do not have sufficient research or understanding to update this area of our policy in a way which is relevant and appropriate for our sport.
“However, we remain committed to moving with international bodies and scientific opinion, and supporting research efforts in any way we can.”
News of Bridges’ likely participation in Derby this weekend has attracted criticism within the media, with Owen Slot, chief sports writer at The Times, writing that should she beat Kenny – five times an Olympic gold medallist, two of those in the Omnium – this weekend, it would underline the unfairness of allowing transgender women to compete in female sports events.
Meanwhile, Olympic silver medal-winning former swimmer Sharron Davies, who believes that despite reduction of testosterone levels, transgender women retain an unfair physical advantage over biological females and should therefore be excluded from women’s sport, says that she has been contacted by women cyclists who are fearful of going public with their concerns.
“British Cycling ought to be ashamed of themselves,” she said, quoted on Mail Online. “I have had quite a few of the girls very distressed on the phone. They are frustrated and disappointed.
“They are all for inclusion but not at the loss of fairness and opportunities for biological females.”
However, Bridges’ mother Sandy, writing on Twitter, said that her daughter may have to have police protection at the championships this weekend.
“This is the reality of being trans today,” she wrote. “That my daughter has to be on a police operation plan to compete in a bike race in the UK. How in any way can that be #SafeToBeMe2022.”
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- hawkinspeter 0 sec ago
So, more of a balance-sheet-death-cult then? Once your balance sheet goes into the red with no chance of redemption, they'll be coming for you. I...
- andystow 6 min 36 sec ago
I still check it occasionally for bike Twitter, and of course the World Bollard Association... but it is definitely trying to feed me some...
- SteeveB 26 min 20 sec ago
"Over a quarter of motorists in Scotland don’t know driving dangerously around cyclists could lead to driving ban " - 1 in 4 cars close passing me...
- mark1a 1 hour 6 min ago
Just checked the codes on the back of my licence (only passed a standard car test in 1988) and can drive a car up to 3500kg with any weight of...
- Cyclo1964 1 hour 6 min ago
Bar - humbug 😉
- Wingguy 1 hour 22 min ago
It certainly arrived several years too late... but it would have failed anyway, the lever feel and performance of the whole system was just awful....
- David9694 1 hour 29 min ago
I thought it amusing that there was a car parked in the opening when Google passed. Anyway, I refer you to the official list of Driver Free Passes ...
- wycombewheeler 1 hour 37 min ago
I made the mistake of attending the police station to report a crime, and they just told me to do it over the phone.
- Hirsute 1 hour 39 min ago
I need more training to prevent 48mph passes into oncoming traffic.
- Zermattjohn 1 hour 42 min ago
Saturation flow, that's what you need to refer to. Get the mayor to call TfL traffic engineers and ask what it means. He'll have his tiny mind...
Add new comment
301 comments
For those that didn't see, this short article from Wednesday is a really nice look at the people involved in this.
https://road.cc/content/blog/british-cyclings-transgender-policy-cyclist...
all too often people seem to be forgotten behind labels.
HUZZAH! We've made it people.. a Nazi reference!
Now..please @roadcc please stop the monkeys throwing pooh at each other, or at the least, move them to a dark corner of the off-topic forum where they can insult and quote faux facts and opinions to each other all day long. The original news story cannot be brought to conclusion, no one here has a suitable solution to the issue of inclusivity in sport (regardless of what they think).
I have to agree. Any topic on the trans community will always descend to a dumpsterfire.
all it would take is for transphobes to just not decide people don't exist, and it would be less of a dumpster fire. But no, can't have that.
I always like when you use that quote, which completely misrepresents things. "Transphobes" aren't claiming you don't exist, they're calling you exactly what you claim you are: "trans men" and "trans women". You also don't get to decide what you are as biology doesn't work like that.
OH now I get it!
you seem to think that I'm trans.
Sorry. Turns out you're clueless in more ways than one 😂
Anyone who goes to these lengths to argue the case for someone clearly has a "white knight" complex. Wait until you get into the real world, with a job and find out reality is different from your gender studies college class. Can't call everyone out there a transphobe because they don't agree with you.
ohhhhh there you go again! You're making yet more assumptions, thus time about my age. Whoops, wrong again!
im pretty aware of the world, thanks, but I can always learn more. I always hope others can learn away from a narrow, biased view as well, but don't let it bother me if they stay bigoted.
"im pretty aware of the world, thanks, but I can always learn more. I always hope others can learn away from a narrow, biased view as well, but don't let it bother me if they stay bigoted. "
So why have you come on here calling everyone who doesn't subscribe to your views bigoted, and transphobe? It obviously bothers you.
I've never seen you on here before, so I am thinking you're a troll and have only registered on here to spout your bigoted views.
Sure, Im the bigot 😂 you so silly!
You haven't paid attention then, but it's not my fault you're inattentive.
Yure not a transphobe for not ascribing to my views. You're a transphobe because yi have made repeated transphobic comments, it's not a tricky concept.
New to this thread and there's a lot to digest.
From a purely competition viewpoint I don't see how it can be considered fair for a biologically male athlete to compete in a female competition...
define fair
define "biologically male"
I'm not the Oxford dictionary nor a scientist, I was going along the lines of someone who is born a male with the accepted standards of chromosones, hormones, testosterone etc.
Also, as we are discussing the matter, are we not having to apply a certain label to allow people to understand the principles we're trying to address?
How is that?
As a lady recently replied when asked if she was a biologist "I'm not a vet but I know what a dog is!"
A cat that barks?
Someone who has their sex assigned as male at birth isn't necessarily a biological male. That's because there is no actual accepted definition of such. That's why sparrowlegs won't answer - or rather, manages to reduce the gender "woman" to "can bear children" and wonders why people are angry.
You're reducing a complex topic down, and that just doesn't do when you're dealing with peoples lives.
People aren't angry, you are. And no-one has their sex "assigned" at birth, it just is. Stop playing with biology and language and accept simple truths. I was born male, and am now an adult male. There's not a thing I, nor anyone else can do about that.
Oh, and a woman is an adult female; not a man who either thinks he is, or wants to be, a woman.
Whoops, turns out you still don't know anything
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_assignment
im not "playing", I'm being precise and with a viewpoint based on know,edge greater than herp derp o level biology, unlike yourself.
You own your transphobia! Be proud!
You dint think a couple posters got angry? Really? Wow. You're wilfully ignorant in lots of ways.
Heterophobe
Oooh, based on....?
The fact that I'm heterosexual and you've disagreed with me.
doh, not how it works. I didn't "disagree" with your transphobic views , I pointed them out.
And I pointed out that women don't have penises, which by your logic made me transphobic.
not all women don't have penises, sorry to break it to you. Your exclusion of some women from your idea on gender is what makes you, amongst other things, transphobic.
So, if anybody can be a woman anytime they please, and switch back and forth at will, then there's no such thing as a woman. How then, can transwomen be women?
Oh, and sorry to break it to you, but NO women have penises. Those humans are called men.
awww, is the transphobe failing basic logic now as well as basic humanity?
It must be true, I read it on Wikipedia. ROTFL
nice way of saying "I didn't read the citations nor do I have a counter"
rofl
btw. I notice you still haven't responded to where I proved your claim that transmen don't compete against cismen was wrong - any chance you could? Or is reading hard?
It's "observed" at birth. They like to play this "assigned" game because gender is "meaningless", yet they feel like the opposite gender. Gender roles are "offensive", yet they claim they liked things the opposite gender did as a kid, and that's how they knew they were the opposite gender.
There's a lot of well reasoned and grounded-in-reality trans activists, but they're shouted down by the crazies unfortunately.
You don't need to be a biologist to know that males and females are different and develop differently. They have different chromosones, they look different, they develop differently, and they're observably different on a biological level. There is only one observed sport where females have a genetic advantage over males, and that's long distance running.
Unfortunately science is being sidelined or called offensive by ridiculous extremist activists.
Pages