Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Welsh Government says you can only cycle within walking distance of home

Updated guidance on exercise during lockdown issued

The Welsh Government has updated its guidance on exercise during the lockdown – and says that “as a rule of thumb” people should only ride their bikes within walking distance of where they live, and that “cycling significant distances from home is not considered to be a reasonable excuse for leaving it.” However, questions remain over what that distance may actually be, with no specific mention of it in the legislation or the guidance, leaving scope for confusion.

While acknowledging that “cycling is a valid form of exercise and is also a suitable way of going to work,” the Welsh Government says the guidance aims to relieve pressure on emergency services due to a rider having an accident or mechanical issue, which may also require someone else to make a journey to provide assistance.

Cyclists are also “expected to only cycle alone or with members of their household, on routes they know well, and that are well within their ability level.”

Under Regulation 8 (1) of the Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (Wales) Regulations 2020, “During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living or remain away from that place without reasonable excuse.”

The Regulations go on to define a “reasonable excuse” as including, at paragraph (b), “to take exercise, no more than once a day (or more frequently if this is needed because of a particular health condition or disability), either (i) alone; (ii) with other members of the person’s household; or (iii) with the person’s carer.”

As with similar regulations in force elsewhere in the UK, the legislation, aimed at containing the spread of coronavirus, places restrictions on the reasons people may leave their homes while the emergency continues.

> Cycling dos and don'ts in a time of pandemic – how to be a responsible cyclist

But while the legislation in England, for example, makes no reference to only being able to leave the home once per day, the Regulations in Wales do.

In common with the laws in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland, much of the regulations have been left vague, which has led to confusion among members of the public about what they are and are not allowed to do.

In particular, lack of clarity about how long one should exercise for, or how far from home – note that reference in the Regulations to “rule of thumb,” whatever that is, that we mentioned at the start of this article – leaves room for people to be found to have broken the law when they did not intend to.

And already, one of the country’s major media outlets, Wales Online, has said that it “understands” that under the new guidance, cycling within 10 miles of home would be seen as a “reasonable distance” while being 20 miles away would not – although there is nothing in the guidance itself that backs that up.

(From a cyclist’s point of view, of course, a “reasonable distance” to enable them to get back home by foot in the event of a mechanical may be determined by whether they happen to be wearing cleated shoes, or trainers more suited to a lengthy walk).

In England and Wales, the decision to prosecute criminal cases investigated by the police and other agencies rests with the Crown Prosecution Service and the application of the law resides with the courts.

However, government guidance to legislation, while not forming part of it, can be a strong influence in determining what it is seeking to achieve and, ultimately, how it should be interpreted and enforced.

Here are the paragraphs in full relating to cycling contained in the Welsh Government’s latest guidance.

Cycling is a valid form of exercise and is also a suitable way of going to work. Cycling is generally a low-risk activity but with emergency services under pressure, it is important to take steps to manage risk wherever possible. An accident or a breakdown far from home would place additional strain on health services or require a further journey to be made by someone else to provide assistance.

People are expected to only cycle alone or with members of their household, on routes they know well, and that are well within their ability level. Cyclists on shared paths should be considerate of walkers, runners and other people cycling: they should stay two metres from others, slow their pace and stop to let people pass as appropriate.

Cycling should be local, as a rule of thumb limited to travelling no further than a reasonable walking distance from home. Exercising by cycling significant distances from home is not considered to be a reasonable excuse for leaving home.20. Cycling to work, or for work, is a reasonable excuse to be outside (so long as going to work, or doing the work, is itself justifiable).

As of yesterday, 8,358 people in Wales had tested positive for COVID-19, of whom 641 died.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

83 comments

Avatar
iturner2 | 4 years ago
2 likes

If you cyle within 10 mile radius of home it easy to cycle 70 or miles e.g 20miles *3.14 plus 20 miles to and from outer radius.

Avatar
bigbiker101 replied to iturner2 | 4 years ago
1 like

iturner2 wrote:

If you cyle within 10 mile radius of home it easy to cycle 70 or miles e.g 20miles *3.14 plus 20 miles to and from outer radius.

Not if you live in the middle of a city!!!

Avatar
srchar replied to iturner2 | 4 years ago
10 likes

iturner2 wrote:

If you cyle within 10 mile radius of home it easy to cycle 70 or miles e.g 20miles *3.14 plus 20 miles to and from outer radius.

Problem is, for the lazy gelatinous oafs who come up with nonsense like "only cycle within walking distance of home", walking distance is about two hundred yards. Anything more than that and they'll jump in the car.

Avatar
sparrowlegs replied to srchar | 4 years ago
1 like

Exactly what I was thinking. When asked by some at work how far I ride I nearly always get "I'd struggle to drive that far". It's always in jest but to look at them it's perfectly believeable. 

Last year sitting on the couch doing nothing but eat and drink got you called a lazy fat bastard. This year the same person is a responsible adult. 

Avatar
Boopop | 4 years ago
4 likes

I can only walk about 2 miles before my flat feet start to hurt, and that's without cleats. On the other hand I rode 100 miles the day before lockdown started. Glad I don't live in Wales, the idea of doing the same 2 mile stretch of road for over an hour is not hugely appealing.

Avatar
Rich_cb | 4 years ago
2 likes

Good to see the Labour government have their priorities in order.

Days after abandoning their testing target they have clamped down on cyclists.

Avatar
Welsh boy replied to Rich_cb | 4 years ago
15 likes

My wife works in the NHS, daily coming into contact with Covid patients without being issued with appropriate PPE. The Welsh Government allow that. I want to go out on my bike on quiet country roads away from people. The Welsh Government won't allow that. 

Avatar
Doctor Darabuka | 4 years ago
3 likes

Good grief, now I'm really confused.  I live in England 9 miles from the Welsh border.  If I cycle 12 miles in that direction it's hard to tell if I'm following "Government Guidance" or not.

Avatar
Welsh boy replied to Doctor Darabuka | 4 years ago
3 likes

Don't go bringing your English germs into our country đŸ˜·. I live about 16 miles from the border so it is just too far for me to escape the madness which is the Welsh Government, to justify their existence they have to take what already works and tweak it slightly so they can sit back and feel good about themselves having "improved" things.

Avatar
Simon E replied to Welsh boy | 4 years ago
1 like

Welsh boy wrote:

Don't go bringing your English germs into our country đŸ˜·.

Steady on! Like the doc, I'm an exile living 7 miles on the 'wrong' side of the border and I always look forward to crossing it to ride in the country (and county) where I grew up.

This is a very disappointing statement by the Welsh government. I wonder why they have specifically made this statement aimed at cyclists, who apparently may need to walk home. FFS.

BTW a large proportion of the patients in the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital live in mid-Wales; and a number of staff too, I believe.

Avatar
Sriracha | 4 years ago
13 likes

"...aims to relieve pressure on emergency services due to a rider having an accident or mechanical issue,..."
I'd love to see some actual figures to back up these nostrums. In all my years I have never been to A&E following anything to do with cycling. How high up the admissions list is it, and what measures have they already taken to mitigate all the higher factors?

If they are really that worried about cyclists clogging up the NHS then the logical thing would be to get more bikes on the road - every one is a other car less on the road to cause the injury.

Avatar
essexian replied to Sriracha | 4 years ago
3 likes

I have once after being attached by a van driver whilst walking back to my bike after a cake stop.

 

We should ban all vans from the road to save injuries then. Actually that's not a bad idea as with less traffic on the road, already poor driving standards have dropped further.

Save the NHS...ban vans.

Avatar
geraldfox | 4 years ago
16 likes

Same in Scotland, however I've heard they regularly walk 500 miles.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to geraldfox | 4 years ago
12 likes

And have been known to walk 500 more. For a necessary journey of course

Avatar
David9694 replied to Captain Badger | 4 years ago
5 likes

Simply to be the man who walked a thousand miles to fall doon at your door?

Avatar
srchar replied to David9694 | 4 years ago
5 likes

David9694 wrote:

Simply to be the man who walked a thousand miles to fall doon at your door?

I think you'll find that's not considered a reasonable excuse for leaving the house.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to srchar | 4 years ago
0 likes

Awww come on, 'ave an 'art Ossifer!

Avatar
slow_going | 4 years ago
3 likes

It's not completely clear to me from the above if this relates only to situations where 'exercise' is the reason for leaving home at all.

I mean, if the reason you are leaving your house is that you are going to neccessary work that cannot be done from home, and the reason that you are cycling that journey is that your journey to work is 'further than a reasonable walking distance from home', is that ok because it is sperately covered under 'Cycling to work, or for work, is a reasonable excuse to be outside (so long as going to work, or doing the work, is itself justifiable)'?

 

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to slow_going | 4 years ago
0 likes

This is my plan tomorrow, I will be taking a very scenic route though.

Avatar
Grub | 4 years ago
8 likes

I'm not normally moved to post comments, but can't help but throw my 2p worth in on this one....

I live in Wales and can't help thinking this leaves too much room for uncertainty. What we've again got is the actual legislation (as previously and in e.g. England) containing no clear limits and then various statements having to be made (when people rightly ask the question) of what that might mean in practice, which are 'interpretations' and naturally vary. For example, is 10 miles "reasonable walking distance"? Is 15 miles OK? Is that as the crow flies or by road?

I'm all for sensibleness in terms of riding at the moment and have been trying to keep it that way (in my opinion). Arguably restricting people to relatively close limits to home (especially in more populated areas) actually just keeps people that bit more on top of each other.

I know there is a need for some sacrifice at the moment. However, cycling does a lot of people a lot of good. Not everyone can afford or has the option to buy indoor trainers. It does seem there has been a bit of a 'singling out' of cyclists over the past few months and I can't help feeling that these new developments (particularly given the interpretability of them) will potentially continue to fuel that.

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

To be fair, this does seem to be relatively good advice as a rule of thumb.

My hourish route, admittedly mostly off road doesn't take me much more than 4km from my home.  Easily walkable.  (Wouldn't want to and carry my full toolkit on any length ride)

The most I have ever walked with an unrideable bike was 8 or 9 miles.  10 would be doable, very tiresome but acheivable.

But that's me, my bicycle and a mechanical.  An INCIDENT, requiring attendance of the emergency services could occur anywhere, even right outside my front door.  Some could be because of my own incompetence, but the worst injuries I have had have been caused by motorists, and I have as much chance to be hit in the road outside my home as anywhere.  Distance is moot.

Avatar
alchemilla | 4 years ago
10 likes

What nonsense! Surely they mean you can only walk a reasonable walking distance from home? You can't compare the distances covered by cycling and walking. They just need to say " keep your distance from others and cycle well within your capacity". No one should be out pushing the barriers, but if 50 miles say is well within what you normally ride, then what's the problem? We each have to assess the risk for ourselves, keeping in mind the reason for the guidelines and what our plan B would be if the unexpected happens. Remember cycling is a safe activity.

Avatar
keirik replied to alchemilla | 4 years ago
4 likes

It's moronic advice from an increasingly irrelevant body of knobs.
I live in North Wales, but only 1/2 mile from the border with England, so my ride today in Wales will be a round trip of about a mile. Luckily in the middle of that I'll be in England and will be having a more sensible ride of about 25 miles. All still local and around the Chester area, but without the pointless random restriction

Pages

Latest Comments