Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Wheelie cyclist fined £100 for dangerous cycling

Court told that Aiden Orton endangered pedestrians in Norwich city centre

A cyclist who was twice spotted by a police officers pulling wheelies in a pedestrianised part of Norwich city centre has been fined a total of £100 for dangerous cycling.

Aiden Orton, aged 24, pleaded guilty at Norwich Magistrates’ Court yesterday to the offences, committed on 5 October and 1 November this year, reports the Eastern Daily Press.

Stacie Cossey, prosecuting, said of the October incident, when Orton was riding along White Lion Street and Gentlemen’s Walk: “He was doing wheelies, with his front wheel reaching the same height as the heads of passing pedestrians.

“He was cautioned by the officer who explained that it was an offence to cycle dangerously, and that he might injure someone else as well as himself.

“To that he replied: ‘I enjoy it’.”

The following month, the same police officer saw him doing “protracted wheelies” as he rode from Gentleman’s Walk along Exchange Street, and “cycling at speed closely to pedestrians.”

Asked in court whether he had anything to say, Orton insisted: “It's really not that dangerous you know. I ride then slow down, I ride and slow down.”

Dangerous cycling is an offence under section 28 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which provides:

(1) A person who rides a cycle on a road dangerously is guilty of an offence.

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) above a person is to be regarded as riding dangerously if (and only if)—

(a) the way he rides falls far below what would be expected of a competent and careful cyclist, and

(b) it would be obvious to a competent and careful cyclist that riding in that way would be dangerous.

(3) In subsection (2) above “dangerous” refers to danger either of injury to any person or of serious damage to property; and in determining for the purposes of that subsection what would be obvious to a competent and careful cyclist in a particular case, regard shall be had not only to the circumstances of which he could be expected to be aware but also to any circumstances shown to have been within the knowledge of the accused.

Sentencing Orton, chair of the bench Cathryn Dobson said: “We are going to fine you for dangerous cycling on two occasions.

“It is reckless, and you were in a busy area of the city which is pedestrianised so the risk to others was higher than usual.”

Besides being fined £50 for each offence, Orton will also have to pay costs of £25 and a £34 victim surcharge.

The court was also told that Orton had been given a conditional discharge in December last year relating to two counts of shoplifting.

He admitted breaching the terms of the conditional discharge, but the magistrates decided to take no further action on that issue.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

37 comments

Avatar
cbrndc | 3 years ago
1 like

"(1) A person who rides a cycle ON A ROAD dangerously is guilty of an offence."

Is a pedestrian precinct a road?

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to cbrndc | 3 years ago
0 likes

Maybe not always, but in this case almost certainly yes.

http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/highways/

White Lion Street, Gentleman’s Walk and Exchange Street all showing as Norfolk County Council Maintained Roads.

Avatar
Rick_Rude | 3 years ago
0 likes

Always a point of argument the 'dangerous' thing. If I were to get kneedown on my motorbike and copper saw it I'd probably get nicked for dangerous even though it's not, it's just body positioning. Same with anything, when you're skilled it's not dangerous it just is. 

I'd think it was mad to try and do a backflip off a wall but someone more gymnastic could pull it easily. Is it dangerous? Depends. 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Rick_Rude | 3 years ago
1 like

Isn't the danger to others or rather the perceived danger they experience? So they might see 'danger' and move or act in a way that leads to them injuring themselves or having a collision.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes

Isn't that how a lot of the assault rules work?  It's not necessarily causing injury as causing the fear of injury.

Avatar
EM69 | 3 years ago
1 like

Serves him right and good to see plod doing their job, now lets see more action on dangerous driving, illegal migrants, mass demonstrations breaking covid rules, grooming gangs etc etc...  

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

The image has been taken at very high ISO, so it appears grainy. Still, as the photographer (who uploaded the photo to Flickr) hasn't been credited properly, he will remain largely anonymous.

Avatar
arowland | 3 years ago
6 likes

“He was cautioned by the officer who explained that it was an offence to cycle dangerously, and that he might injure someone else as well as himself. To that he replied: ‘I enjoy it’.”

Sad reflection on the lad's mentality that his enjoying something is the sole justification for breaking the law and endangering people.

Avatar
0-0 | 3 years ago
1 like

I'm surprised this lad keeps getting away with it, or is still alive.
https://www.youtube.com/c/LittleHarry15/videos

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to 0-0 | 3 years ago
0 likes

Yep, suprised the Police haven't been in touch like when drivers film themselves being twats. 

Avatar
blinddrew | 3 years ago
9 likes

Gentleman's walk is a really busy pedestrian area. First time warning, second time punishment seems a perfectly reasonable response.

Avatar
Jem PT | 3 years ago
4 likes

I like seeing kids pulling wheelies - it shows they're enjoying themselves. But 24 is a bit old to be doing it, isn't it? (Not that I'm jealous or anything).

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
10 likes

Agreed. Reasonable police officer and punishment. Now what about the illegal number plates and red light crashing by motorists which don't even receive a response?

Avatar
Dhill replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
3 likes

It is about his offence not that of others you fool. Remove fool as ‘HarrogateSpa’ is upset.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to Dhill | 3 years ago
5 likes

Make your point, but leave out the personal insult. An edit function is available and I suggest you use it.

Avatar
Dhill replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

Sorry I up set you. Tame compared to what goes on here at times with the passive/aggressive nature of some people. If your are a little sensitive with the term ‘fool’ You must struggle on a daily basis to cope.

Avatar
Dhill replied to HarrogateSpa | 3 years ago
0 likes

Yp thumbs up to the edit button.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
15 likes

I got no problem with this fine except gargantuan amounts of dangerous driving (caught on camera) is let off by the police every year . To be clear that police officer seemed pretty reasonable - the idiot should have listened to him 

Avatar
NZ Vegan Rider replied to EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
0 likes

Agreed. 

Good skills n all but do them away from people. 

I'm jealous = I can't wheelie ;-(

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
3 likes

I reckon he was a bit unlucky to get caught for doing that - I generally consider wheelying cyclists to be very competent at handling their bikes. Whether or not he was a danger to pedestrians though is going to be a value judgement by the police officer involved and it does sound like he (the cyclist) was being inconsiderate.

Shame - I love seeing people doing wheelies.

Avatar
ChasP replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
2 likes

I agree the danger is subjective, some pedestrians are intimidated at the mere sight of a bicycle in 'their' zone but the victim surcharge suggests more has gone on.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to ChasP | 3 years ago
3 likes

ChasP wrote:

I agree the danger is subjective, some pedestrians are intimidated at the mere sight of a bicycle in 'their' zone but the victim surcharge suggests more has gone on.

The victim surcharge isn't related to what damage was done - it's specified by law and the money is then pooled and used to provide compensation to victims of crime.

Avatar
FrankH | 3 years ago
13 likes

1st time: Don't do that, it's dangerous.

2nd time: Now you pay the £159 stupidity tax.

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
15 likes

Another nail in the coffin of the myth that cyclists are exempt from rules and regulations.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Mungecrundle | 3 years ago
6 likes

Mungecrundle wrote:

Another nail in the coffin of the myth that cyclists are exempt from rules and regulations.

Yeah, but if a driver gets caught doing wheelies in a pedestrian area they'd get fined much more and get three points on their licence.  It's a war on drivers init.

Avatar
wknight replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes

If a cyclist jumps a red light they can get points on their license too 

Avatar
schlepcycling replied to wknight | 3 years ago
2 likes

wknight wrote:

If a cyclist jumps a red light they can get points on their license too 

No they can't.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to wknight | 3 years ago
2 likes

wknight wrote:

If a cyclist jumps a red light they can get points on their license too 

I don't have a cycling licence, and I don't know anyone who has; how do you get points on a non-existent licence?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to wknight | 3 years ago
1 like

Maybe in your country where ever that might be.

Avatar
Dingaling replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes

I don't know where that might be but here in Germany a cyclist who is caught riding under the influence of alcohol (I believe at a higher level than car drivers) can lose their driving licence. I remember reading years ago that that punishment was tossed out by a court but since then it has been adopted. Not sure about points on a driving licence for running red lights..

Pages

Latest Comments