Like this site? Help us to make it better.


13Bikes Intuition Beta Road Bike



Good value aero road bike, but let down by poor brakes and front end stiffness

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

13 bikes is Halfords' new in-house bike brand, with the Intuition Beta Carbon sitting one rung below the top of the range. With claims of a sub-1kg frame weight and wind-tunnel optimised shaping, the Intuition Beta Carbon looks like great value at £1400, seeing as it comes with a full 105 drivetrain.

The whole Intuition range is based on the idea of bringing aero road bikes down to a more realistic price point. This has involved developing both the frame and wheels using computer simulations, before validation at the R. J. Mitchell wind tunnel in Southampton. The result is a frame that includes many of features seen on other aero road bikes: deep downtube, level top tube, dropped seat stays, internal cable routing and hidden brakes.

Speaking to head designer Justin Stevenson, it turns out that the reason for the brake placement is not so much about directly reducing drag by hiding the callipers, but more that allows increased freedom in the design of the frame itself. The seat stays can be made thinner and placed lower, while the top tube can be slimmed down as it no longer needs to house an exit port for the brake cable.

The callipers themselves are sourced from TRP, with a side-pull up front and a centre-pull used under the bottom bracket. Though they certainly look the part, the actual braking performance was poor, very poor. Power was okay at the upper end, but it took took a great deal of effort to be able to make use of it. Modulation and feel was non-existent giving me little confidence to brake late and let the bike run. Dave Arthur had similar problems with TRP brakes on the Colnago VR-1 he tested last year /content/review/135609-colnago-v1-r-frameset; a change to Colnago's own brakes made all the difference in that case. Whether it's the brakes themselves or the combination of brake and the amount of cable pull the cable routing allows is up for debate.

Hidden brakes using the direct mount style aren't inherently poor, and may even be an improvement if Shimano's latest offerings are anything to go by, so I can only assume that fault lies between the TRP callipers and the cable routing. Whatever the cause, in my opinion the braking feel requires urgent attention to improve it in future models.

One disadvantage that is due solely to the brake position is that they are perfectly positioned to trap grit, mud and whatever else the road throws up. The front brake in particular proved particularly keen to get jammed up with leaves, which wasn't ideal given the autumn test period.

Anyway, moving on from the brakes.

Up front, 13 chose to slim the head tube by using a 1 1/4in lower headset bearing diameter instead of the more typical 1 1/2 in. In addition to the aero benefits, 13 were concerned that the ride might be overly harsh in this area and the slimmer tube would help to counter that.

After riding the bike, I can't help but feel that this was a mistake. The front end stands out as having poor torsional stiffness, I could feel it flex even while just track-standing. Go out of your way to throw it about in a full-on sprint and it really does feel flexy. Judging by the popping noises coming from the headset when performing the highly scientific clamp-the-wheel-between-the-legs-and-twist-the-handlebar test, it looks to me like it's the fork steerer tube which is doing the flexing.

The result is handling which is vague and imprecise, making it hard to really attack tight corners and twisty downhills. Combine the with the poor braking performance and it means the Intuition is not at all at ease on technical stretches of road, and you end up tiptoeing about until the road opens up again.

When it does open up, the Intuition Beta is undoubtedly a fast bike. The stock deep section wheels start singing once you get over 25mph and the bike as a whole starts to come alive. The low front end and flattened handlebar tops mean that you can really get down in a faux time trial position and challenge yourself to see how long you can hold on to 30mph. In contrast to the front end, stiffness around the bottom bracket and chain stays is what you'd expect from a bike with racing ambitions, and there's no hint of wasted power when seated.

Though the aero touches steal the limelight, the use of a 27.2mm post and the skinny seat stays indicate that comfort hasn't been forgotten in the quest for reduced drag. Comfort isn't something that particularly stands out when you swing a leg over the Intuition, but then maybe that's a compliment seeing as how aero road bikes have a reputation for being harsh. An immediate improvement in comfort can be had by swapping the stock 23mm Vittoria Rubinos for something wider and more supple (there are no clearance issues for 25mm tyres). These are solid, dependable training tyres but slow and very 'dead' feeling.

If the Intuition Beta's wind cheating intentions weren't clear from the tube shaping, then the inclusion of deep section wheels as part of the stock package puts to rest any doubt. As is the current trend, the rims are on the wide side to offer better stability and more predictable handling across a wider range of wind angles. This seems to have worked, as I found them both fast and easy to handle in some gusty crosswind conditions.

The braking surface is aluminium and they come with their own special brake pads. That said, using standard aluminium brake blocks wouldn't cause any issue so replacements can be easily sourced. The hubs are in-house items too and I didn't encounter any issues surrounding those during the month long test period.

Although they are obviously well designed from an aero point of view, the wheels, like the frame, are let down by their stiffness, or lack of it. Each out of the saddle effort is rewarded by brake rub despite the callipers being centred and the pads set quite far out from the rim. Accelerating out of corners, there just wasn't that jump and playfulness that the best bikes and wheel combos exhibit.

At the £1400 price point, the inclusion of a complete Shimano 105 11-speed drivetrain (except for FSA Gossamer compact chainset) is a definite tick in the 'good' column. Functionally, it's difficult to tell apart from Ultegra or even range-topping Dura Ace. Ergonomically it's exactly the same too and the new 11-speed hood shape seems to really agree with my hands. It's not showy, it just works, consistently, and that's all you really need from your gears.

It's nice to see that 13 have a spec'd a genuine Fizik Aliante saddle too instead of something cheaper. Though saddles are very personal, the Aliante is a popular choice in the aftermarket and the gently curved profile is one that a lot of people get on with.

In-house finishing kit completes the package, which isn't unexpected at this price. The bars have a nice flattened shape on the tops, ideal for resting those forearms on to get properly aero, but the ergo bend of the drops and the large reach won't suit everyone. The two bolt aluminium seatpost isn't particularly inspiring, but it's easy to adjust. Not sure about the head/seatpost badge though...


There are a lot of things to like about the Intuition Beta as it's clear that the design effort that has gone into making it as aero as possible has paid off – it is a genuinely 'fast' bike in a straight line. The combination of a 105 drivetrain and a full carbon frame makes it stand out at this price point and it scores well for value in that regard.

However, the poor brakes and lack of front end stiffness are really hard to see past when assessing the bike as a whole. It's not a bike on which you can attack corners with abandon and sprint out of on the other side. If your only concern is getting from point A to point B as quickly as possible, then the Intuition Beta suits your needs, but it you want something that will put a smile on your face in the process, it falls short of the mark.

We put our criticisms of the Intuition Beta, namely the brakes and technical handling, to Halfords in order to give them a chance to respond. Following our discussions, they sent us a test bike of the next model up in the range - the Intuition Gamma - to determine if the issues might have been caused by a defective original test bike. Both the frame and brakes are identical between the two models, the only difference being that the Gamma has a Shimano Ultegra groupset.

Emphasis when testing the Gamma was placed on riding tight and twisty lanes, terrain in which I felt the original Beta to underperform. Although the feel of the front brake was slightly improved, possibly due to a better quality cable installation, overall the brakes were still poor and very difficult to modulate. Due to the reduced friction of the front brake, there was quite a difference in feel between the front and rear brakes, which made it very difficult to brake with any confidence.

As with the Beta, the front end felt vague when really attacking corners and the bike just didn't feel comfortable handling sudden mid-corner corrections. Though our negative comments from the original review still stand, so do the positives. In a straight line, the Intuition Gamma is fast and the bike as a whole comes alive at speeds over 25mph. If you want a bike on which to smash around on technically undemanding roads, then the Intuition range is a good choice for the money.


Good value aero road bike, but let down by poor brakes and front end stiffness test report

Make and model: 13Bikes Intuition Beta Road Bike

Size tested: 56

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Frame: Aero optimised carbon fibre

Fork: Carbon fibre, 1 1/8" to 1 1/4" tapered steerer tube

Headset: FSA Orbit CF

Stem: 13 RS, 100mm(S) 110mm(M) 120mm(L) 130mm(XL)

Handlebars: 13 RS Aero, 400mm(S) 420mm(M/L) 440mm(XL)

Seatpost: 13 RS Alloy 27.2mm with 350mm offset

Saddle: Fizik Aliante Delta MG - Manganese Rails

Front brake: TRP T822 Side Pull

Rear brake: TRP T820 Centre Pull

Shifters: Shimano 105 5800

Rear Mech: Shimano 105 5800

Front Mech: Shimano 105 5800

Cassette: Shimano 105 5800 11-28

Chain: Shimano 105 5800

Chainset: FSA Gossamer Compact 50/34t, 170mm(S) 172.5(M) 175mm(L/XL)

Bottom Bracket: FSA PF6000 PF30

Rims: 13 RS Aero Deep Section Carbon Fairing

Hubs: 13 RS 18/24 hole

Tyres: Vittoria Rubino Pro III 700x23c

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

The Intuition range of bikes are centered around the idea of bringing aero road bikes down to a more realistic price point. According to 13 bikes, they are in a "class of their own, when it comes to giving savvy riders a real performance and excitement edge"

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

Both the frame and fork seem well finished.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

Carbon fibre used for both.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

Parallel 73 degree head and seat tube angles on the size 56cm model tested. The numbers are all fairly standard for a road racing bike. See website for full geometry for each size.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

The bike has a slightly longer reach than is perhaps more usual, with the 56 tested having an effective top tube of 565mm. The 160mm head tube length is about standard for a road racing bike.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

The bike was comfortable enough to complete long rides on typical UK roads, even if this wasn't a characteristic that particularly stood out.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

The bike was stiff through the bottom bracket, but lacked front end stiffness. This made the handling a little vague and not particularly confidence inspiring.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

It was efficient so long as you stayed in the saddle and kept the upper body relaxed.

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so, was it a problem?

A small amount, but not a problem.

How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive? Quick handling, but not the most precise.

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

The bike was fast and stable when up to speed, but didn't inspire confidence in more technical situations.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

The thin seat stays had the biggest impact of comfort.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's stiffness? would you recommend any changes?

The fork and frame just weren't stiff enough which impacted on the handling and the cornering ability.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's efficiency? would you recommend any changes?

The wheels were stable in all wind directions and were notably fast.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:

Good in the saddle, bad when out of the saddle.

Rate the bike for acceleration:

Despite the reasonable weight, it just didn't feel responsive.

Rate the bike for sprinting:

Lack of front end stiffness hurt sprinting abilities.

Rate the bike for high speed stability:

The bike felt great above 25mph.

Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
Rate the bike for flat cornering:

Not confidence inspiring at all.

Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
Rate the bike for climbing:

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:

Excellent 105 drivetrain.

Rate the drivetrain for durability:
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
Rate the drivetrain for value:

Tell us some more about the drivetrain. Anything you particularly did or didn't like? Any components which didn't work well together?

You can't go wrong with 105, especially at this price point

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels and tyres for performance:

Fast wheels, but again, lacking in stiffness. Tyres are cheap, but decent enough for training.

Rate the wheels and tyres for durability:

No issues during the test period.

Rate the wheels and tyres for weight:

For stock deep section wheels, they weren't the usual anchors.

Rate the wheels and tyres for comfort:

Rubino's aren't the most supple tyre.

Rate the wheels and tyres for value:

Tell us some more about the wheels and tyres.Did they work well in the conditions you encountered? Would you change the wheels or tyres? If so, what for?

The wheels perform well from an aero point of view and a great value considering the overall bike price. However, they do suffer from a lack of stiffness which leads to brake rub when out of the saddle.


Rate the controls for performance:
Rate the controls for durability:
Rate the controls for weight:
Rate the controls for comfort:
Rate the controls for value:

Tell us some more about the controls. Any particularly good or bad components? How would the controls work for larger or smaller riders?

The long reach, ergo drop handlebars won't suit everyone, but the Fizik Aliante is a nice touch.

Anything else you want to say about the componentry? Comment on any other components (good or bad)

The brakes were very bad and significantly affected the whole experience of riding the bike.

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? It was fast, but not an especially.

Would you consider buying the bike? No.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Depends on their intended use.

Rate the bike overall for performance:
Rate the bike overall for value:

Anything further to say about the bike in conclusion?

A bike with a lot of promise if the front end stiffness is addressed and the brakes swapped for some that work.

Overall rating: 6/10

About the tester

Age: 22  Height: 190cm  Weight: 69kg

I usually ride: Canondale EVO Red  My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Under 5 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Semi pro

I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, time trialling, cyclo cross, commuting, mtb,


For 5 years, racing was my life and I went all the way from a newbie bonking after 40 miles, to a full-timer plying my trade on the Belgian kermesse scene. Unfortunately, the pro dream wasn't meant to be and these days, you're more likely to find me bimbling about country lanes and sleeping in a bush on the side of the road.

Add new comment


Bigtwin | 3 years ago

Old thread but just in case anyone is thinking of buying one of these used, I've just had one through the workshop.  It's a truly awful bike.  The brakes are appalling.  Really shockingly usless, and the thing flexes like no tomorrow.  Not in a good "comfy" way, but in a deeply shyte way.  You can stick a 13 on it, but it's basically sitll a Haulfrauds Apollo in different clothes.

stealth | 9 years ago

How does it compare with other 'budget' offerings, such as Planet X N2A or (non-aero) Pro Carbon?

andybwhite | 9 years ago

Another black bike  37

VeNT | 9 years ago

So since when is full 105 mean all apart from brakes and crank?

mtbtomo | 9 years ago

The giant dooesn't come with aero wheels though.

Doesn't sound like they're worth it though unfortunately

joules1975 replied to mtbtomo | 9 years ago
mtbtomo wrote:

The giant dooesn't come with aero wheels though.

Doesn't sound like they're worth it though unfortunately

Yeah, that's because the money is going into the frame. As the reviewed bike demonstrates, you can have good kit but if the frame is crap, what's the point! Far better to have a good frame and sacrifice a little on the components as you can always upgrade. An extreme example but think Lada Riva with fancy alu wheels, sat nav and air con vs VW polo with steel wheels and no fancy electric kit - which one do you think will drive in a way you'd be happy with?

In any case, I suspect the anyone getting the 13 bikes would want to upgrade the wheels soon anyway, cause I ca't believe they are anything like as good as some half decent aftermarket sets, so no real advantage of the giant there after all.

stealth replied to joules1975 | 9 years ago
joules1975 wrote:
mtbtomo wrote:

The giant dooesn't come with aero wheels though.

Doesn't sound like they're worth it though unfortunately

An extreme example but think Lada Riva with fancy alu wheels, sat nav and air con vs VW polo with steel wheels and no fancy electric kit - which one do you think will drive in a way you'd be happy with?

Forget a fancy satnav & aircon, I'd take a Lada Riva with a Fiat twin cam over a VW Polo any day of the week!!

Daveyraveygravey | 9 years ago

+1 for the Giant Propel. I think the Felt and Fuji aero offerings might make the Beta seem like good value, but when you take the brakes and handling into account it doesn't make much of a case for itself.

joules1975 | 9 years ago

£1400 isn't particularly astonishing value, in fact it's the same as Giant and their entry level Propel, which has 105 including the chainset, better brakes (although still TRP, they are a different type) and although still slightly flexi at the front end, nothing like what you seem to be describing. And the Giant has a lifetime frame warranty, and you can get it from loads of decent independent shops, which means it will be built for you correctly!

Latest Comments