Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Smith Rebound Sunglasses



Competent and stylish multi-purpose sunglasses but quite pricey

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

With their full rim, street style design the Smith Rebound Glasses look and perform handsomely both on and off the bike. The spec is suitably high, and a two-year warranty adds further peace of mind. The optical clarity is very good and they react well in variable light, if fractionally slower in intense/sudden changes compared with others I've tested recently.

  • Pros: Contemporary street style, solid construction, effective optics
  • Cons: Expensive, slightly slower response than some to sudden changes in light

The lenses do react promptly to subtle changes in light, so despite the smoky mirror effect they didn't leave me struggling when conditions suddenly turned overcast, or when passing reservoirs and waterways on very bright days.

> Find your nearest dealer here

In very intense, sudden changes there is a small yet discernible lag – I'm talking tenths of a second but tangible – compared with the Julbo Aerospeed photochromic glasses that have been my defaults for the past year or so. The Julbos are £20 or so more, though.

Judging by a very changeable few weeks, the ChromaPop lenses appear to have a hydrophobic coating. Moderate to intense rain has slid away promptly, with only trace staining, the sort easily dismissed with a lens cloth. I've never felt inclined to apply a spray-on product, like those used on motorcycle visors.

Smith Rebound glasses-1.jpg

Polycarbonate is an obvious choice for the lenses, for its impact resistance, and although mirror finishes aren't to everyone's taste, here the polarized technology is designed to improve optical clarity, enhancing contrast and eliminating (or at least minimising) intense glare.

Their sharpness/detailing is absolutely bang on – no problems with eyestrain or tiredness, regardless of distance.

They've also made a big difference to visibility off the bike, especially when driving at motorway speeds in very intense sunlight.

> Buyer's Guide: 22 of the best cycling glasses

I don't have a particularly large head but tend to find most technical glasses fit just fine. I've found the Rebounds fitted me perfectly at every point – just as well given there's no scope for adjustment.

The carbon fibre frames and arms offer a high strength to weight ratio, while the soft rubberised gripper panels and nose pads ensure slip-free, tactile tenure. I haven't needed to give them a second thought – whether I've been trying to beat a personal best on my TT bike, or aboard my tubby tourer indulging in some green lane/dirt road fun.

Bigger jolts have shifted them, but nothing a deft touch hasn't righted – testament to the silicone gripper's tenacity and infinitely preferable to those with a vice-like grip that becomes painful given an hour or so. I've worn these for a good eight hours plus without any issues.

Though the surface area is smaller than some, I've found them to offer excellent defence against wind, midges, mud, stray stones and other airborne particles.


We only get one pair of eyes, so there's a sound argument for buying the best we can afford. I would describe the Smith Rebound as upper-mid range. You can certainly buy cheaper: street styled polarized cycling models such as FWE's Helios Revo Polarized Glasses start at £24.99, and Bloc's Hornet is £34.99.

> Buyer's Guide: 9 of the best cheap cycling glasses

Even higher up the price spectrum you can still make quite a saving: the Lazer Krypton KR1 is £74.99, and if you didn't require the same degree of civilian styling then Tifosi's Alliant Fototec Light Night Lens Sunglasses at £99.99 might prove a better fit.

You can still spend a lot more: the Uvex Sportstyle 810V sunglasses give a penny change from £200.

The Rebounds come with a protective carry case and lens cloth. The former doesn't offer the same defence as you'd associate with prescription glasses, but seems sturdier than the soft-shell types typically supplied with sports models.


Overall, the Smith Rebounds are a well-executed pair of technical glasses with wider horizons than riding; crucially, their civilian looks don't compromise performance on the bike.


Competent and stylish multi-purpose sunglasses but quite pricey test report

Make and model: Smith Rebound Sunglasses

Size tested: One size, Matte gravy, Chromapop lenses

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Smith says, "Inspired by enduro riding around the world, the full coverage Rebound is a 9 base full-rim frame in our Velocity eyewear collection. This built-for-speed style has medium coverage and features ChromaPop lenses with megol nose pads and temples for a secure fit and seamless helmet integration."

They're competent glasses that look and perform equally well on and off the bike.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

From Smith:

ChromaPop™ lenses

Megol nose pads

Medium fit/coverage

9 base lens curvature

Auto-lock hinges

Rx compatible

Lens Width 59 Nose Bridge 18 Temple Length 135

Rate the product for quality of construction:

Seem well made and have stood up to the usual everyday carelessness very well.

Rate the product for performance:

Perform well in most conditions and contexts (on and off the bike). The lenses react marginally slower to rapid changes in light compared with others I have tested/used on a long-term basis.

Rate the product for durability:

No evidence of scratches or similar damage to date, and the lenses have scored some direct hits from stones/similar thrown up along freshly treated roads.

Rate the product for weight (if applicable)

Their weight seems the going rate and I certainly haven't noticed them in a negative sense.

Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)

Silicone grippers strike the right balance between tenure and comfort. Quality of optics is sharp, so no issues with eye strain/tiredness to date.

Rate the product for value:

Certainly not cheap, but competitive relative to designs with similar spec.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

They've performed as I'd expected, and equally well on and off the bike. This might be a real draw for those wanting one set of glasses that can morph between bike and casual wear.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Street style, good optics, all-day comfort.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Slightly slower reaction to more intense light changes than some I've used.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on

Pricier than some: FWE's Helios Revo Polarized Glasses are £24.99, Bloc's Hornet £34.99, and higher up the price spectrum Lazer's Krypton KR1 are £74.99 and Tifosi's Alliant Fototec Light Night Lens Sunglasses are £99.99. Cheaper than others: the Uvex Sportstyle 810V sunglasses give a penny change from £200.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

Capable and stylish glasses that look and perform well on and off the bike, though they are relatively expensive.

Overall rating: 7/10

About the tester

Age: 45  Height: 1m 81cm  Weight: 70kg

I usually ride: Rough Stuff Tourer Based around 4130 Univega mtb Frameset  My best bike is: 1955 Holdsworth Road Path and several others including cross & traditional road

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: cyclo-cross, commuting, touring, fixed/singlespeed, mountain biking

Shaun Audane is a freelance writer/product tester with over twenty-eight years riding experience, the last twelve (120,000 miles) spent putting bikes and kit through their paces for a variety of publications. Previous generations of his family worked at manufacturing's sharp end, thus Shaun can weld, has a sound understanding of frame building practice and a preference for steel or titanium framesets.
Citing Richard Ballantine and an Au pair as his earliest cycling influences, he is presently writing a cycling book with particular focus upon women, families and disabled audiences (Having been a registered care manager and coached children at Herne Hill Velodrome in earlier careers)

Latest Comments