At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
No way, London. Holy cow what were the chances of something like this happening there? QED
Let me guess, he got banned for holding different opinions to the usual suspects?...
Interestingly I raised this article and video on Saturday, this must have been a follow up article....
Tough ask I know, but it might have been worth trying to fill in all the blanks in the article before publishing it?
Yes, true I imagine they'd have to be to sell that lot, especially as the budget ranges are down the most, from what I understand.
no punishment the court could impose would come close to what the driver has been putting himself through......
The whole hi-viz debate is littered with anecdotes and caveats....
Eben Weiss has run a couple of articles recently about a thing called a SoftRide which was a 'brilliant' idea that never caught on, a couple of...
So which sponsorship agreement would take priority, legally? The one Cavendish has personally signed, or the one the team management have signed ...
And that's the rub hey? ...