Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Suspended sentence for impatient driver who knew he'd caused cyclist's crash but said it was 'karma'

Ralph Keemer failed to stop and showed no remorse for triathlete who ended up needing surgery

A Surrey driver who grew impatient with a cyclist and caused her to crash has been handed a 14-month suspended sentence. Ralph Keemer, 59, told police he knew that triathlete Laura Fidler had fallen from her bike but didn’t stop, saying it was "karma".

Surrey Live reports that on August 5, 2018, Fidler was riding along Bridge Road in Chertsey, avoiding potholes on her nearside, when Keemer came up behind.

The driver became impatient and honked his horn several times. He then pulled alongside Fidler, verbally abused her and then steered towards her, braking sharply as his front wheel hit the kerb.

Forced to brake hard, Fidler went over her handlebars and landed on her head and shoulder. She  suffered injuries that police described as "GBH level".

PC Marin Garvanonic, who investigated the crash, said: "The incident resulted in the victim having to have surgery on her shoulder, despite which [it] will never return to its pre-injury condition. As a semi-professional triathlete, this has been absolutely devastating for her.

"Keemer admitted in interview that he knew his actions caused the accident, even though there was no contact between his car and the bike. The officers who interviewed him were also stunned when he further admitted that he knew the cyclist had fallen from her bike but despite that, still did not stop.

"He also said several times that what had happened to her was 'karma' and showed no remorse or compassion.

"The case also serves as a timely reminder to motorists to give cyclists as much room as they would when overtaking a car when passing them."

Keemer had earlier pleaded guilty to causing serious injury by dangerous driving, failing to stop at the scene of a collision, failing to report a collision and driving a vehicle without an MOT.

As well as the prison sentence, which was suspended for two years, he received six points on his licence and was banned from driving for 30 months, after which he must pass an enhanced driving test.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

45 comments

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
2 likes

That's OK Legs, easy mistake to make, what with some of the hysteria surrounding going after "our troops" you'd think they had only been killing evil brown foreigners rather than innocent white british citizens, who pray to exactly the same god.  Oh and ensuring that the terrorist groups  had an incredible recruiter which prolonged the troubles and made them far, far worse.

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

Legs, the troops on Bloody Sunday shot innocent British lads, not Irish.  

BTBS would that be Killer Driver Helen Measures?

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

ktache wrote:

Legs, the troops on Bloody Sunday shot innocent British lads, not Irish.  

Of course.  My mistake......

Avatar
atgni | 4 years ago
5 likes

I've requested a sentence review.
Feel free to do the same.
https://www.gov.uk/ask-crown-court-sentence-review

Avatar
janusz0 replied to atgni | 4 years ago
0 likes
atgni wrote:

I've requested a sentence review.
Feel free to do the same.
https://www.gov.uk/ask-crown-court-sentence-review

Thanks for that, it was very simple to add another request.

Avatar
cycle.london replied to janusz0 | 4 years ago
1 like

janusz0 wrote:
atgni wrote:

I've requested a sentence review. Feel free to do the same. https://www.gov.uk/ask-crown-court-sentence-review

Thanks for that, it was very simple to add another request.

It says something about only certain crimes being eligible, like rape, murder etc. 

Ah, well.  Can't hurt.  Just e-mailed them.

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
5 likes

It would be a shame if someone would document his potential illegal driving over the next 30 months, especially in the next 2 years, which the court may view rather badly.  Karma ?

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will replied to ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

ktache wrote:

It would be a shame if someone would document his potential illegal driving over the next 30 months, especially in the next 2 years, which the court may view rather badly.  Karma ?

Now to me, that truly is karma in action. Could this be something the cycling community took charge of... lets see if this chap is playing ball or not? 

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... | 4 years ago
6 likes

To understand this, cf what I wrote on 'Anti-cycling agenda' fifteen minutes or so ago.

In any other domain of British life, someone who caused this level of injury through recklessness, and who then showed so little remorse or concern for the victim, would be looking at an immediate custodial.  

But cars are different.  The state considers them essential for the creation of and maintenance of wealth and prosperity, and the people consider them as essential for 'freedom of movement'.  

It's cultural.

This will not change in my lifetime, no matter how many public campaigns, no matter how many petitions and no matter how many 'die ins' in front of City Hall.  

Avatar
TedBarnes replied to Legs_Eleven_Worcester | 4 years ago
5 likes

Legs_Eleven_Worcester wrote:

To understand this, cf what I wrote on 'Anti-cycling agenda' fifteen minutes or so ago.

In any other domain of British life, someone who caused this level of injury through recklessness, and who then showed so little remorse or concern for the victim, would be looking at an immediate custodial.  

But cars are different.  The state considers them essential for the creation of and maintenance of wealth and prosperity, and the people consider them as essential for 'freedom of movement'.  

It's cultural.

This will not change in my lifetime, no matter how many public campaigns, no matter how many petitions and no matter how many 'die ins' in front of City Hall.  

All agreed. 

However, one small part of the current culture which should be possible to change is the approach of the CPS.

The CPS decided to charge him with: "causing serious injury by dangerous driving, failing to stop at the scene of a collision, failing to report a collision and driving a vehicle without an MOT". 

This is despite evidence of pre-meditation (honking horn, verbal abuse), that he deliberately steered towards the kerb, that he caused a GBH level of injuries and that his subsequent comments re Karma again reinforced the evidence that his actions were deliberate. 

Dangerous Driving replaced the old offence of Reckless driving. That is how I think most people see it - it's not about causing something deliberately. Yes, they may have been deliberately driving like a dick, they may have realised the chance of a crash or other incident was very high, but they didn't deliberately set out to actually crash or injure someone else.

Whilst you could argue (Devil's advocate/defence lawyer) that he only meant to scare not to actually injure, he was still (at best) reckless as to the possible consequences of his actions. On my very rusty understanding of criminal law, would usually be seen as sufficient as far as intent is concerned. I don't think it could be difficult to prove that he must have appreciated that his actions had the possibility of causing these sorts of injuries. 

So, why* was this not charged as an intentional attack i.e. GBH?

 

I would be genuinely interested in a comparison between sentencing for equivalent offences such as GBH, as opposed to sentences handed out for causing serious injuries by dangerous driving. For a start, I doubt a sentence for GBH would have been suspended.

 

*rhetorical question - it's because the CPS think dangerous driving will be easier to prove and/or have a cultural blind spot that anything done whilst driving must be viewed as a driving offence. 

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to TedBarnes | 4 years ago
0 likes

TedBarnes wrote:

So, why* was this not charged as an intentional attack i.e. GBH?

For the same reason that the CPS routinely decides not to prosecute armed officers who kill suspects, even when the latter are unarmed.   And that is because no jury would convict.   

In death by dangerous driving cases, it's the 'there but for the grace of God go I' syndrome.  We all drive, and we all drive like self-entitled twats.  

And so, who among us is going to send someone to prison when all he did was maim a cyclist for life, for god's sake?

It's the 'them and us' effect.  Look at all the people protesting about a soldier being held accountable for shooting an unarmed Irish Catholic or two.  Fuck the Catholics, they shouldn't even be in Britain, m8!  And as for them brown skins out in Afghaniland, eh?   Free Marine A, awight!  Fuckin' liberty, innit?

Sorry, did you say something?

Avatar
meursault | 4 years ago
5 likes

I would like to see a change in the law that includes a lifetime driving ban. There appears to be some cultural ideology that we have an inalienable right to drive a car. Why is that? Imagine how a potential lifetime ban would change drivers behaviour. I am a car driver and cyclist.

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will replied to meursault | 4 years ago
2 likes

meursault wrote:

I would like to see a change in the law that includes a lifetime driving ban. There appears to be some cultural ideology that we have an inalienable right to drive a car. Why is that? Imagine how a potential lifetime ban would change drivers behaviour. I am a car driver and cyclist.

For me, this is probably the single biggest thing that could be done to change driver behaviour.  If there were no exceptions, things would change.

I've also said before that another option would be to take people licences not for any fixed term, but until such a time they can pass an advanced driving test. In theory, if there is a mis-carriage of justice, or someone needs to drive for whatever reason, they can get their licence back quickly and, assuming they are competent, easily. However, I am sure that many of our problem drivers are those that scraped through their test in the first place. 

Finally, why not utilise the driver tech used by insurers as a way of punishment / monitoring of convicted motorists. Your sentence is a lifetime driving ban suspended, on the basis of three years close driver monitoring... change your behaviour or lose it forever. 

Avatar
burtthebike | 4 years ago
3 likes

Shock news!

Sunday Times to print full apology and a retraction for making cyclists out to be less than human and fair game for anyone who can't hate people because of their colour, sex or religion any more.

Avatar
PRSboy | 4 years ago
3 likes

Yes that's what I don't get.

To my mind, the driving offence and the intent to cause harm should be dealt with separately, regardless of whether its with a car, iron bar, or knife.

Avatar
burtthebike | 4 years ago
7 likes

Police: "The case also serves as a timely reminder to motorists to give cyclists as much room as they would when overtaking a car when passing them."

Judge:  "Sorry, what?  You heard the driver, it was karma."

Why is using  vehicle as a weapon considered to be less serious than a knife or a gun?

I'm sure the next election will be fought on the real issues, like when the government is going to carry out the thorough review of road law that it promised a generation ago*.

 

 

* May be an element of hyperbole, but not much.

Avatar
brooksby replied to burtthebike | 4 years ago
3 likes

burtthebike wrote:

Police: "The case also serves as a timely reminder to motorists to give cyclists as much room as they would when overtaking a car when passing them."

Judge:  "Sorry, what?  You heard the driver, it was karma."

Why is using  vehicle as a weapon considered to be less serious than a knife or a gun?

I'm sure the next election will be fought on the real issues, like when the government is going to carry out the thorough review of road law that it promised a generation ago*.

 

 

* May be an element of hyperbole, but not much.

Exactly.  The driver knew that he should give cyclists as much room as he would when overtaking a car, but has made it quite clear that he chose not to (so that he could act as an avenging angel of justice or something...).

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 4 years ago
8 likes

yet again another disgrace that he's not in prision, what the fuck is the judge playing at, it's GBH assault ffs plus he's driven off.

I hope this cunt dies a long and painful death, hopefully sometime in the next 12 months, we don't need shithouses like this stealing the oxygen from the rest of us any longer, maybe someone from the family of the victim will ensure he gets karma to knock on his door!

Avatar
Hirsute | 4 years ago
3 likes

Driven along that road many times, plenty of room apart from going over the bridge.

Why isn't he in jail ?

Avatar
ConcordeCX replied to Hirsute | 4 years ago
2 likes

Deleted:replied to the wrong thread. Sorry

Avatar
brooksby | 4 years ago
12 likes

OK, so he's avoided prison, and got a temporary driving ban and some points...  Not acceptable.

He should have had actual prison time (not bl00dy suspended sentence!), he should have a lifetime driving ban, and he probably needs psychiatric assistance too.

If he had behaved like this in any other something (field?) of life then he'd be branded an utter sociopath, and locked away for the safety of the rest of society.  But on the road?  Behind the wheel of a car?  Hey-ho: "impatient"... nosurprise

Avatar
Zebulebu | 4 years ago
6 likes

One look at this fuckwit's Facebook profile should tell you all you need to know. Gammon central. If you get curious and Google your name and this post comes up Ralph, you're a cunt.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Zebulebu | 4 years ago
3 likes

Zebulebu wrote:

One look at this fuckwit's Facebook profile should tell you all you need to know. Gammon central. If you get curious and Google your name and this post comes up Ralph, you're a cunt.

Wow!  I did take a peek and he really is the epitome of gammon.  Full of pro-military, anti-islamic, jingoistic, xenophobic crap.   I do hope not being able to drive for a few years is extremely inconvenient for him and he has to ride a bike, and then meets his alter ego in a car.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to burtthebike | 4 years ago
3 likes

burtthebike wrote:

Zebulebu wrote:

One look at this fuckwit's Facebook profile should tell you all you need to know. Gammon central. If you get curious and Google your name and this post comes up Ralph, you're a cunt.

Wow!  I did take a peek and he really is the epitome of gammon.  Full of pro-military, anti-islamic, jingoistic, xenophobic crap.   I do hope not being able to drive for a few years is extremely inconvenient for him and he has to ride a bike, and then meets his alter ego in a car.

 

I did suspect he might fit a certain stereotype, but didn't see any pictures of him.  Frankly, for me, that all gives it an element of 'hate crime'.  I suspect his hostile attitude that lead to the victim being badly injured, has a connection to his general culture and politics.

 

I doubt he'll ride a bike.  I think it's more likely he'll just drive while banned.  If he doesn't let not having an MOT stop him, why will he worry about a licence?

Avatar
RPK replied to Zebulebu | 4 years ago
3 likes

Zebulebu wrote:

One look at this fuckwit's Facebook profile should tell you all you need to know. Gammon central. If you get curious and Google your name and this post comes up Ralph, you're a cunt.

If it's the same profile I saw....

The irony of him posting a motorcycle safety awareness campaign featuring all the same dangers cyclists face.

Avatar
PRSboy | 4 years ago
7 likes

Nice guy.  Karma would mean he would spend eternity upside down in a burning car in a ditch, with endless streams of cyclists riding past... 

Avatar
pastyfacepaddy replied to PRSboy | 4 years ago
3 likes

PRSboy wrote:

Nice guy.  Karma would mean he would spend eternity upside down in a burning car in a ditch, with endless streams of cyclists riding past... 

Well hopefully the local newspaper will publish his address and someone can help assist with this albeit not eternal..

Avatar
burtthebike replied to PRSboy | 4 years ago
7 likes

PRSboy wrote:

Nice guy.  Karma would mean he would spend eternity upside down in a burning car in a ditch, with endless streams of cyclists riding past... 

I for one would stop and piss on him, but only if I knew it wouldn't put the fire out.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... | 4 years ago
15 likes

So no remorse, verbal abuse (isn't that an offense in itself, potentially?) hit-and-run, causing what I guess can be called 'life changing injuries', and apparently deliberately using their vehicle as a weapon in order to intimidate and threaten....oh and no MOT.  Seems a very light sentence to me.

 

I am not convinced the punishment would have beenthe same if it had involved, say, causing a motorist to crash and suffer serious injuries, by deliberately dropping bricks off a motorway bridge.

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
3 likes

No MOT, vehicle should never have been on the road.

Pages

Latest Comments