Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Channel 5 documentary next week asks if cyclists are “Scourge Of The Streets”

Programme looking at so-called “war of the wheels” airs next Tuesday evening

Next week, Channel 5 is screening a documentary called Cyclists: Scourge Of The Streets? and if the advance publicity is anything to go by, describing it as a look at a so-called “war of the wheels,” it’s unlikely to be sympathetic to people on bicycles as well as being far from the first programme to examine a perceived “us versus them” mentality between those using different forms of transport to get around.

The broadcaster has commissioned the documentary from Firecracker Films, whose past productions include Big Fat Gypsy Weddings, Mums Make Porn and The Sex Clinic, according to C21media.net.

The website says: “With increasing numbers of people in the UK choosing to cycle rather than drive, tensions between cyclists and motorists are on the rise.

“The producers say the doc will ask whether all cyclists are rule-breakers and road-hoggers, not adhering to the same laws as everyone else, or if motorists have just as much to answer for.”

Realscreen.com provides a bit more detail, saying that the documentary “will provide an unfiltered look at the enduring war between cyclists and motorists in England.

“The film will meet a variety of characters, from the cabbies of London and the residents of Surrey who no longer feel safe driving on local roads, to the cyclists patrolling the UK’s highways and law enforcement officials attempting to make the roadways a safer place for everyone who uses them.”

Executive producer Elspeth O’Hare of Firecracker Scotland, quoted on Realscreen.com, said: “This documentary promises to be an eye-opener for drivers and cyclists across the country,” said Firecracker Scotland’s O’Hare in a statement.

Of course, it’s impossible to judge the programme until after it airs next Tuesday evening, and it could be that it will be a well-balanced piece of reporting that highlights the dangers cyclists face on a daily basis from other road users.

More likely, we fear, is that it will help reinforce misconceptions held by many motorists about cyclists and how the law applies to them, as well as continuing the tribal narrative seen in past programmes such as the 2012 BBC documentary, The War On Britain’s Roads.

> Truth the first casualty in BBC's War on Britain's Roads?

In its listing for the programme, which will be broadcast at 9.15pm next Tuesday 9 July, Channel 5 says simply: “There is growing tension between two wheels and four.”

The documentary is already receiving criticism on Twitter due to its title, with this tweet attracting more than 100 retweets and 400 likes on the social network.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

51 comments

Avatar
brooksby | 4 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
peted76 replied to brooksby | 4 years ago
2 likes
brooksby wrote:

And as if by magic:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2019/jul/08/channel-5s...

Oh goodness, it sounds as bad as we thought....  

FFS 

Avatar
brooksby | 4 years ago
1 like

Apparently its going to feature Dave Sherry for the cyclists, and then Every Single Piece Of Dashcam Footage Ever showing (some) cyclists doing stupid things on the roads to explain why Cyclists are Evil.  I'm not entirely convinced its going to be a balanced piece of broadcasting...

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

I have a small adiction to Police Intercepters, catching wrong'uns, in motor vehicles mostly, Bettany Hugh's The Nile has been excellent, and their art stuff (when it is on) is excellent, done on the cheap so just shots of the picture, with voiceover.  I watch it more than ITV, except for ITV4 in the month of July.

Avatar
brooksby replied to ktache | 4 years ago
1 like
ktache wrote:

I have a small adiction to Police Intercepters, catching wrong'uns, in motor vehicles mostly, Bettany Hugh's The Nile has been excellent, and their art stuff (when it is on) is excellent, done on the cheap so just shots of the picture, with voiceover.  I watch it more than ITV, except for ITV4 in the month of July.

My twelve years old daughter has a more than small addiction to Police Interceptors and it's something she actually chooses to watch whenever the opportunity arises.

However, I think it's the only programme we watch on any of the Channel 5 channels...

Avatar
barstep | 4 years ago
0 likes

Does anyone still watch Channel 5?

Avatar
nigel_s | 4 years ago
2 likes

"Cyclists, scourge of incompetent drivers with anger management problems." -- probably wouldn't attract so much attention, I guess.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to nigel_s | 4 years ago
1 like
nigel_s wrote:

"Cyclists, scourge of incompetent drivers 

98.5% of them, then.  

Avatar
peted76 | 4 years ago
3 likes

It'd be a real bummer if someone posted the production company email addresses online, I'm sure someone might send 'em a stern telling off and all... 

 

Ruth Palmer, Head of programming, C21Media Events:  ruth [at] c21media.net

Jason Olive, Head of Television  jason [at] c21media.net

Mark Rowland, Chair of C21Media mark [at] c21media.net

Andrew Chitty, Chair of the Board of Directors, andrew [at] c21media.com

 

 

Avatar
peted76 | 4 years ago
3 likes

I wonder if BTBS will get a positive answer to that very damning letter sent to C5, we must live in hope I suppose.

All of thus furore I fear is exactly what the C21Media (producers) will want, it'll equate to extra viewers and will help their production company to get more programmes. If it gets banned (fingers crossed) then they'll probably get just as much publicity, which might end up 'worse' for us as the title is the catalyst. They are in a win win here, and typically, us cyclists are in a lose lose situation. 

 

 

 

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 4 years ago
5 likes

What happened?

Maybe persecution complex? A backlash to the "war on the motorist" as frequently quoted in MSM and illustrated in terms of the taxes that motorists face, perceived harassment from parking wardens and a general feeling that drivers are not getting a fair deal as they sit in yet another traffic jam caused by congestion or roadworks. Then they see cyclists whizzing past, clearly enjoying themselves more, looking fitter "not paying anything" and, it has to be said, a noticeable number of cyclists in urban environments do take liberties with pavements and red lights*. We all know it's bullshit, but to many drivers who are ignorant of the benefits of cycling, that has to boil your piss.

*No more than drivers using their phones which is a factor in many serious collisions, but you know..cyclists eh?

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Mungecrundle | 4 years ago
2 likes

A slight correction:

 

Mungecrundle wrote:

motorists ... sit in yet another traffic jam caused by congestion or roadworks  themselves

Avatar
brooksby replied to mdavidford | 4 years ago
4 likes
mdavidford wrote:

A slight correction:

 

Mungecrundle wrote:

motorists ... sit in yet another traffic jam caused by congestion or roadworks  themselves

Remember: two cyclists riding side by side is selfish and evil, whereas a single motorist sitting in their two tonne car which is significantly wider than those two cyclists... That's just normal.

Avatar
RMurphy195 | 4 years ago
7 likes

I grew up with bikes in the 50's and 60's - its what we did in those days, bikes gave us kids the freedom and ability to go out and explore, we enjoyed the freedom of it all and just loved cycling. As a 13 and 14 year old I went out with my friends on our 3-speed uprights - after school, in the evenings, maybe a 10 mile round trip along the country lanes to Elmdon to watch the planes, all in perfect safety. Cycle across from Small Heath to Sutton Park as a twelve year old with my mates - just a routine fun thing to do.

In my early 40's I was getting a bit unhealthy, so I bought a bike. Joy!

Now knocking on 70 and still enjoy riding - but - when did cycling become something that a section of the community thinks is anti-social or whatever?

When did my hobby, and the thing that as a by-product keeps me healthier than most of my contemporaries, become so unpleasant occasionally?

When did headlines and TV programs start to have this type of subject?

In my teens - and even in my 40's many years later -I simply do not recollect any of the unpleasantness I experience almost every time I go out. Nor the plethora of potholes and dangerous road surfaces for that matter.

What happened?

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to RMurphy195 | 4 years ago
2 likes
RMurphy195 wrote:

In my teens - and even in my 40's many years later -I simply do not recollect any of the unpleasantness I experience almost every time I go out. Nor the plethora of potholes and dangerous road surfaces for that matter.

What happened?

These two happened:

http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/290667/slide_290667_2312214_fre...

Avatar
stonojnr | 4 years ago
4 likes

driver who crashed into a passing freight train at a level crossing spared jail,claimed he was being pursued by angry cyclists...

https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/james-wheeler-suspended-sentence-trimley-lev...

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to stonojnr | 4 years ago
3 likes
stonojnr wrote:

driver who crashed into a passing freight train at a level crossing spared jail,claimed he was being pursued by angry cyclists...

https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/james-wheeler-suspended-sentence-trimley-lev...

 

If you read this piece:

http://media.btp.police.uk/r/16554/dad_banned_from_driving_after_crashin...

It says that people were angry with him and throwing rocks because he nearly hit a pedestrian. Given that he then crashed at a rail crossing, you have to ask how low his standard of driving actually is.

 

Avatar
PRSboy replied to OldRidgeback | 4 years ago
3 likes
OldRidgeback wrote:
stonojnr wrote:

driver who crashed into a passing freight train at a level crossing spared jail,claimed he was being pursued by angry cyclists...

https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/james-wheeler-suspended-sentence-trimley-lev...

 

If you read this piece:

http://media.btp.police.uk/r/16554/dad_banned_from_driving_after_crashin...

It says that people were angry with him and throwing rocks because he nearly hit a pedestrian. Given that he then crashed at a rail crossing, you have to ask how low his standard of driving actually is.

 

The link to the East Anglian Daily is interesting... possibly because its finding other relevant stories, but there are no less than 10 articles about serious accidents, fatalities and other incidents involving cars or lorries.  Not one is about a cyclist causing an accident.  It would seem easy to see who's the scourge.

I wonder what the C5 'researchers' would have to say about that.

 

Avatar
maviczap replied to stonojnr | 4 years ago
0 likes
stonojnr wrote:

driver who crashed into a passing freight train at a level crossing spared jail,claimed he was being pursued by angry cyclists...

https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/james-wheeler-suspended-sentence-trimley-lev...

All I can say is that it wasn't me chasing him, but I know that lane very well and it's a dead end, but it is used by a lot cyclists for a gravel track. it's possible he made them angry, as it's only wide enough for a car, perhaps he tried to get past when it wasn't possible?

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 4 years ago
12 likes

Somewhat lengthy but this is what I have sent to CH5, I have sent it to Jeremy Wright and also to the head of OFCOM Sharon White, her email is 

sharon.white [at] ofcom.org.uk and JW email is huntj [at] parliament.uk

Dear sir/madam, I wish to address a rather serious matter with respect to your future programme broadcast named 'cyclists, scourge of the streets' which is due to be aired Tuesday 9th July on Channel 5.
It is somewhat concerning that you choose to firstly make such a programme given the current anti cycling/hate filled climate that costs lives of those that ride cycles, not to mention the thousands of serious injuries, the vast majority of which (according to the police STATS19 figures) are the direct cause of an at fault motorist.

It is even more concerning that you have chosen to broadcast such at all and to add insult to injury use an inflammatory title accusing a group of people of being a 'scourge of the streets', this is tantamount to inflaming hate toward an out group. You would not contemplate making a programme called 'Muslims/Black men scourge of the streets' or 'Gay white men, scourge of nightclubs' or any number of groups of people being described/highlighted in this manner, it would be shut down instantly even if it was ever made and never make a public airing, even if you had clear evidence of such which you do not with regards to people on bikes.

So, why have you chosen to target a clearly vulnerable group in society, one where the evidence is already clear that people who cycle ARE NOT a scourge on the street, in fact are the group that causes the LEAST harm on the streets including that from pedestrians!

We already know that from the last government review (Dept for Transport Cycle Safety Review 2018) led by Laura Thomas, that people on bikes have been at fault for only four deaths in the last 7 years, this figure is in fact FEWER than at fault pedestrians who collided into a person on a bike causing their own death. The number of at fault serious injuries to pedestrians when there is a collision between them and a person on a bike paints a similar story. This is the reverse to the situation with regards to motorists who according to the police (via STATS19) are the biggest at fault group for deaths and serious injuries on our roads and streets, this amounts to tens of thousands of deaths and serious injuries EVERY YEAR ... ON OUR STREETS!

Additionally this does not even include the fact that on UK streets, people on foot are involved in thousands of assault crimes, a significant portion of which are using weapons such as knives, this dwarfs even the tiny fraction of at fault cyclists who cause serious injury or death, by multiple factors, as is the case also when it comes to motorists causing harm ON OUR STREETS!
This suggests that your programme breaches Section Five of the OFCOM Broadcasting code with respect to accuracy, the fact you have even posed the question when the evidence is already clear from the government that cyclists are NOT the scourge on our streets suggests that you are impartial as well as avoiding the facts as given by the government, this again is a breach of section five of the OFCOM Broadcasting code.

As you are well aware there is a distinct and well known amount of anti cycling/anti cyclist feeling in the UK, we already know that programmes and media articles such as yours stir up that hatred even further and by targeting a vulnerable out group you directly cause further division, anger and hate which in turn results in greater harm to that group, (those that chose to go about their lawful business by cycle) as well as the increased fear on a daily basis, particularly when programmes such as yours will be short on facts and have plenty of speculation and hearsay. Therefore your programme would also be in breach of Section Three of the OCOM code of 'Crime, Disroder, Hatred and Abuse'.
Therefore I ask you to desist from broadcasting the programme named on the basis that it breaches at least two aspects of the OFCOM Code of conduct, that it is socially irresponsible and that the title/programmes central focus is already proven to be inaccurate by the UK government and UK police as I have mentioned previously.

I await your immediate response.
 

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

Cheers HP (I have many things against the mail), shocking story, entilted driver, even claiming that he couldn't use his vehicle as a weapon because it wouldn't let him...

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

I'm not going on the mails website, what did he do?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to ktache | 4 years ago
2 likes
ktache wrote:

I'm not going on the mails website, what did he do?

How about the Grauniad:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/04/driver-faces-jail-for-road-rage-assault-of-teenage-cyclist-in-bury

tldr: he was driving inches away from the kid's back wheel and beeping his horn etc. When the kid tried to turn off down a path for safety, the driver clipped him and knocked him over. The driver then got out, assaulted the kid and then broke his own wing mirror in a huff.

Avatar
Muddy Ford | 4 years ago
3 likes

If the post below on an RAC forum is genuine and from one of the researchers working on this program then it definitely is going to be anti-cyclist and likely to create a shitstorm. I like the short response the d1ckhead who posted it received.
https://www.rac.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?26181-New-programme-for-chann...(UK)-looking-for-contributors!

Avatar
brooksby replied to Muddy Ford | 4 years ago
2 likes
Muddy Ford wrote:

If the post below on an RAC forum is genuine and from one of the researchers working on this program then it definitely is going to be anti-cyclist and likely to create a shitstorm. I like the short response the d1ckhead who posted it received. https://www.rac.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?26181-New-programme-for-chann...(UK)-looking-for-contributors!

"Hi All,

I'm posting from a television production company and we are making a new for channel 5 that looks at the dangers and conflicts involving cyclists on Britain’s road.

We’re looking for people to give the motorist side of the story and tell us about their run ins with dangerous cyclists e.g. running red lights, not using the cycle lanes, dangerously over taking or undertaking road traffic.

It’s easy for cyclists to upload their helmet cam footage but you rarely get the other side of the story, so we’re looking to speak with drivers who have had incidents with poor cyclist behaviour. It would also be amazing if anyone has recorded any dash cam encounters with cyclists.

Thanks and please be gentle as I'm new to forum!  1 "

Yeah, because the mainstream media always provides such a pro-cycling narrative...?

Twunt.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to brooksby | 4 years ago
1 like
brooksby wrote:
Muddy Ford wrote:

If the post below on an RAC forum is genuine and from one of the researchers working on this program then it definitely is going to be anti-cyclist and likely to create a shitstorm. I like the short response the d1ckhead who posted it received. https://www.rac.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?26181-New-programme-for-chann...(UK)-looking-for-contributors!

"Hi All,

I'm posting from a television production company and we are making a new for channel 5 that looks at the dangers and conflicts involving cyclists on Britain’s road.

We’re looking for people to give the motorist side of the story and tell us about their run ins with dangerous cyclists e.g. running red lights, not using the cycle lanes, dangerously over taking or undertaking road traffic.

It’s easy for cyclists to upload their helmet cam footage but you rarely get the other side of the story, so we’re looking to speak with drivers who have had incidents with poor cyclist behaviour. It would also be amazing if anyone has recorded any dash cam encounters with cyclists.

Thanks and please be gentle as I'm new to forum!  1 "

Yeah, because the mainstream media always provides such a pro-cycling narrative...?

Twunt.

Don't forget that massive law breaking crime of "Not using cycle lanes". 

Avatar
brooksby replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 4 years ago
2 likes
AlsoSomniloquism wrote:

Don't forget that massive law breaking crime of "Not using cycle lanes". 

Apparently that one attracts the death penalty...

Or turns anything short of a signed confession of premeditated murder into a Just A Terrible Accident (Tm).

One of those, anyway...

Avatar
Fishpastesarnie | 4 years ago
5 likes

Scourge of the streets? They should be looking at ar5ehole5 like this...

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7212597/Bury-company-director-M...

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Fishpastesarnie | 4 years ago
4 likes
Fishpastesarnie wrote:

Scourge of the streets? They should be looking at ar5ehole5 like this...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7212597/Bury-company-director-M...

Bloody hell, that guy deserves a lifetime ban and a few months at her majesty's pleasure.  Scum and very definitely a scourge on the streets, which I'm sure the programme will cover.

I'm pretty sure he'll get less punishment than Alliston, because although he was the sole cause of the collision, and Alliston tried to avoid it, he was driving a car.

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
3 likes

I have a bit of a habit, in that I love watching Police Interceptors, though mostly it's wrong'uns in cars.

 

Pages

Latest Comments