Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Chris Boardman says it’s “ridiculous” for government to continue building roads

British Cycling policy advisor claims it’s “not logical or sustainable” to continue to favour cars over other modes

Chris Boardman, policy advisor to British Cycling, says it’s “ridiculous” that the government is spending billions of pounds on building roads instead of making walking and cycling a priority.

In an interview with the Radio Times ahead of this weekend’s Prudential RideLondon, in which he is participating, the former world and Olympic champion said it was “not logical or sustainable” to continue to favour cars over other forms of transport.

He said: "Seeing something on the scale of RideLondon is an impetus for change. It puts pressure on politicians to make cycling more accessible.

"It infuriates me that it's so hard to get the government to fund and prioritise something that has no downsides. Instead we're building more roads while car traffic's dropping. It's ridiculous.

"The logical thing is to make cycling and walking your preferred transport. You make sure that streets prioritise people over vehicles. You legislate and fund accordingly.

He added: "Walking, cycling, public transport, taxis, private cars. In that order. At the moment it's almost totally the other way round. It's not logical or sustainable."

Boardman, who besides his world and Olympic titles also wore the leader’s yellow jersey in the Tour de France and held the UCI Hour record, also said that despite the high profile cycling currently enjoys due to Britain’s sporting success, his main aim was to get people to adopt bicycles as an everyday mode of transport.

Earlier this year, he was at the House of Commons to help launch British Cycling’s ten-point #ChooseCycling manifesto.

 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

78 comments

Avatar
Critchio | 10 years ago
0 likes

Another 10-15 years and over 50% of the population will be clinically obese. The government have the power to act and address this issue by funding and promoting cycling to make it safe and enjoyable for all. The government, like every one before it will never act until its too late, then they'll have to spend billions more trying to rectify their lack of action now.

I walked into my opticians for an eye check up a couple of weeks ago. It was busy. All 14 waiting chairs were occupied. Ages from a girl aged about 18 to a pensioner in his 60's. Every single one of them was horribly overweight, I kid you not.

That was shocking and its not until you see something like that that you realise this country has a big obesity problem. We see an overweight person so horribly fat that they can't walk and we chuck a mobility scooter at them rather than prescribing an exercise program and advice on portion control.

CB has it right.

Avatar
IanW1968 | 10 years ago
0 likes

He's not arguing against road infrastructure or even motorised traffic - it doesn't have to be one or the other, although thats a frequently used argument by people running out of well reasoned ones.

Avatar
dxp | 10 years ago
0 likes

Boardman for Prime Minister!

Avatar
Nixster | 10 years ago
0 likes

Getting a bit carried away here aren't we?

If we need to answer the question 'does the country benefit economically from having a road network' stop for a moment and think what our economy would look like without it. Points of reference would include those countries without one such as large parts of Africa, the less developed parts of Asia, etc etc.

Not many people there buying hipster fixies, dutch bikes or custom hand built 953 steel frames are there?

As it happens I agree with the sentiments of Sir Chris in respect of re-prioritising road space in urban areas but let's not go down the 'what have the Romans ever done for us' pathway with such enthusiasm. Although they did kick off the road network...

Avatar
seven replied to Nixster | 10 years ago
0 likes
Nixster wrote:

If we need to answer the question 'does the country benefit economically from having a road network' stop for a moment and think what our economy would look like without it.

Which would be an excellent point if anyone was actually arguing for getting rid of the road network, or saying that it's somehow economically ineffective. The problem isn't the roads, it's the excessive use of private motorised transport.

Avatar
IanW1968 | 10 years ago
0 likes

No matter how strong the rationale, voices of reason even CB's are seen as a bit bonkers.

"The real hopeless victims of mental illness are to be found among those who appear to be most normal. "Many of them are normal because they are so well adjusted to our mode of existence, because their human voice has been silenced so early in their lives, that they do not even struggle or suffer or develop symptoms as the neurotic does." They are normal not in what may be called the absolute sense of the word; they are normal only in relation to a profoundly abnormal society. Their perfect adjustment to that abnormal society is a measure of their mental sickness. These millions of abnormally normal people, living without fuss in a society to which, if they were fully human beings, they ought not to be adjusted.”

Pretty difficult to compete with the car and finance marketing machinery telling you what you want is a car, you want it on finance and you want it now and anything else is abnormal especially when those industries have government in their pockets.

Good Luck Chris but I would prefer it he played his cards quietly and sought real power first.

Avatar
ronin | 10 years ago
0 likes

It's great that Mr Boardman says things like this, but the question is, who is listening?

Avatar
Mister Horse | 10 years ago
0 likes

Can Chris be the next Mayor of London? A bit of a commute from the Wirral....

One day a week will do, he'll serve us better than Boris.

Avatar
gazza_d replied to Mister Horse | 10 years ago
0 likes
Mister Horse wrote:

Can Chris be the next Mayor of London? A bit of a commute from the Wirral....

One day a week will do, he'll serve us better than Boris.

Only if we can then declare all of England to be London.

Avatar
Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes

CB always makes sense with these statements.

The other problem (aside from goverment policy being influenced by big business) if that society at large has been conditioned to accept the status quo. Tell the average person in the street (or in their car) that you've covered 30 miles on you bike by way of a daily commute and they'll look at you like you are mad. Come the colder/wetter months most people will be surpised that you've even taken the bike out of the shed.

Avatar
Cyclist replied to Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes
Matt eaton wrote:

CB always makes sense with these statements.

The other problem (aside from goverment policy being influenced by big business) if that society at large has been conditioned to accept the status quo. Tell the average person in the street (or in their car) that you've covered 30 miles on you bike by way of a daily commute and they'll look at you like you are mad. Come the colder/wetter months most people will be surpised that you've even taken the bike out of the shed.

And that's when I reply with: 'that's why your a fat bastard'. Excuse the French, but that is genuinely my answer. I got rid of my car 5yrs Ago, not owned one since...and guess what, my life has not changed a dot. If I need one I hire one, much cheaper.
The government should be making good the roads we have and fixing them properly, before they even think about building others FFS. I was in Pompeii a few years ago and their roads were in better nick!!!!!!!!!

Avatar
PonteD replied to Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes
Matt eaton wrote:

...Tell the average person in the street (or in their car) that you've covered 30 miles on you bike by way of a daily commute and they'll look at you like you are mad...

I've only recently started to commute to work (I know, fair weather cyclist and all that  16 ) and initially had this and was constantly trying to justify it to people, until it dawned on me that other people should be the ones who should reallt have to justify why they need to drive to work.

I had the same with using the bus (e.g. "but you have a perfectly good car at home! why are you getting the bus?"). Same thing, I don't have a good enough reason not to!

Avatar
mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes

vat on shoes, vat on cars, which makes more sense to promote if you want money? Then there Is VED, fuel duty, etc etc. Then throw in some more money for the construction industry and the vat they pay.

So what do pedestrians provide?

Avatar
HKCambridge replied to mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes
mrmo wrote:

vat on shoes, vat on cars, which makes more sense to promote if you want money? Then there Is VED, fuel duty, etc etc. Then throw in some more money for the construction industry and the vat they pay.

So what do pedestrians provide?

Given the disposable income that not owning a car affords me, I am partial to throwing a few quid to the treasury via the intake of the occasional alcoholic beverage. Those free-loading teetotallers on the other hand...

Avatar
shay cycles replied to mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes
mrmo wrote:

vat on shoes, vat on cars, which makes more sense to promote if you want money? Then there Is VED, fuel duty, etc etc. Then throw in some more money for the construction industry and the vat they pay.

So what do pedestrians provide?

Actually the VAT on shoes makes more sense because in spite of the massive income from all the other taxation mentioned it amounts to a piffling amount alongside the total costs of the road network for motor vehicles (especially including health and environmental impacts).

At least those shoes don't incur more costs for the government than they would generate in taxation - so for a government wanting money then yes tax on shoes makes most sense (that and taking Chris Boardman's advice and stop throwing money they haven't really got on motor vehicle provision)

Avatar
jacknorell replied to mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes
mrmo wrote:

vat on shoes, vat on cars, which makes more sense to promote if you want money? Then there Is VED, fuel duty, etc etc. Then throw in some more money for the construction industry and the vat they pay.

So what do pedestrians provide?

You do realise the subsidies on roads, parking, etc that cars require, not to mention ill health effects and injuries, are much more expensive than the tax take from all that?

The only people benefiting are the car manufacturers and road builders. The gov't does not make a 'profit' from car transport.

Avatar
Chickenlegs replied to mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes

Less strain on the NHS cash guzzler due to healthier lifstyles perhaps?

Avatar
keirik | 10 years ago
0 likes

He's right, but until the cycle manufacturers can match the construction and motor industries in offering jollies, freebies and cushy jobs for ex MPs and civil servants nothing will change

Pages

Latest Comments