Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cambridge police abandon #badlyparkedbike to target poorly parked cars again

Climbdown comes after road.cc contributor threatened with arrest for trying to photograph police car parked in bike lane

Police in Cambridge have turned their attention from badly parked bikes to poorly parked cars, issuing 11 parking tickets in one street in a week -  after cyclists slammed the police’s Twitter campaign as being misdirected.

The #daftparking Twitter campaign comes after cyclists took to social media to shame drivers for parking their vehicles inconsiderately in the city following the police's #badlyparkedbikes campaign.

Five days ago road.cc’s Editor at Large was threatened with arrest after attempting to photograph a police car that was parked in a bike lane.

John Stevenson wrote: I continued to refuse to give him my details and carried on walking. The PCSO put his hands on me to try and stop me. I pointed out, probably quite loudly, that this was assault and he really needed to take his hands off me.

“He then asked me if I'd like him to call a PC who would arrest me under the Prevention of Terrorism Act for taking a photo of a government vehicle.

“Yep, that's right. Taking a photo of a police car parked badly in a public place is equivalent to planning to blow up a plane.”

A force spokesman said: "A complaint has been made in relation to this incident. As such, it would be inappropriate to pre-empt any future inquiries by commenting further at this time.”

Sergeant Ian Wood told Cambridge News: "In response to #badlyparkedbike we received a number of photos of seemingly poorly parked vehicles. #daftparking was then devised to facilitate the submission of these types of photos.

"Cambridge police started to use the #daftparking to highlight the issues around parking and to ask road users to park responsibility, and within the law, to help the city traffic flow and prevent accidents and congestion.

"Although the council have primacy for parking issues, the photos will be used to identify areas where parking is problematic, however this is not a substitute for calling 101."

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
Stumps | 8 years ago
1 like

oozaveared, well said. In certain areas we do get the Police that we deserve and i'll leave that open to your own interpretation

As for CSO's (to give them their proper name) the ones that work at the station where i work are generally spot on and do routine work which allows us to concentrate on more important matters, but due to the next round of budget cuts the CSO's will be the first to go.

Avatar
alansmurphy | 8 years ago
0 likes

Add the risk of losing my login here, your editor in chief seems like a bit of an arse. Now i am not the upholder of the law but i would suggest much of the problem came about by refusing to give details moreso than picturing the car. Walking away from them whilst they are wanting to talk to you is stupid, arrogant and ignorant at best. Shouting 'assault' is the behaviour i'd expect of a 14 year old chav.

Good luck with your complaint, if it was me adjuticating i would file it under "pompous arse"

Avatar
oozaveared replied to alansmurphy | 8 years ago
1 like

alansmurphy wrote:

Add the risk of losing my login here, your editor in chief seems like a bit of an arse. Now i am not the upholder of the law but i would suggest much of the problem came about by refusing to give details moreso than picturing the car. Walking away from them whilst they are wanting to talk to you is stupid, arrogant and ignorant at best. Shouting 'assault' is the behaviour i'd expect of a 14 year old chav. Good luck with your complaint, if it was me adjuticating i would file it under "pompous arse"

So refusing to be intimidated by a PCSO with a half baked knowledge of the law who threatens you with arrest under terror legislation for photographing a police car parked in a bike and pointing out to him when he grabs hold of you that he is committing an offence is "pompous"?

Why would you think it would be a good idea to allow that PCSO to carry on like that perhaps on people that didn't know their rights.  Why do you like petty minded bullies and why do you think the police should employ them?

I'm struggling to see how just doffing your cap and tugging your forelock helps anyone here. Letting this stuff go is not the act of a good citizen.  We get the police force we deserve.  If we want it full of petty bullies  you appraoch of giving them a free pass for every act of intimidation will work well.   

Avatar
Airzound | 8 years ago
0 likes

Coppers have actually been stopping fuckwit cyclists who ride the wrong way up Bridge and Sidney Streets this week and also nicking those for not having any lights on their bikes after nightfall. So it is not all bad, well, not that bad.

Avatar
kitsunegari replied to Airzound | 8 years ago
1 like

Airzound wrote:

Coppers have actually been stopping fuckwit cyclists who ride the wrong way up Bridge and Sidney Streets this week and also nicking those for not having any lights on their bikes after nightfall. So it is not all bad, well, not that bad.

I have nothing against this, and applaud the Police for making an effort to make cyclists safer (as long as it's the usual 'fine unless you bring receipt of bike lights to the station within a week' type of education).

What grates me is the fact that Police in Cambridge don't give a shit about poor/dangerous driving.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 8 years ago
1 like

Good to see Cambridge Police pandering to the popular vote from social media, perhaps they could open a vote line next week and raise some money at the same time.

Who will they go after once drivers have learnt how to use the internet?

Avatar
nordog | 8 years ago
2 likes

Warminster have the same problem, if the can most drivers of cars in the morning would drive into the local Tesco's for their fags & papers, they are that lazy. This lazy tractor drive covered the pavement, the path and the junction for this round-about. In facct this area is in fact a glorifid parking zone for vans, lorry & cars.

 

Avatar
RPK | 8 years ago
1 like

Community Support vs. Real Police

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwYxkZ9jTvk

Avatar
BL7 | 8 years ago
1 like

The Police are NOT the Law.  They are paid to uphold the Law.  They have to abide by the same laws of the land as the rest of us.

When you hear stories like this, it is little wonder there is a very low public faith in the Police nowadays.

Avatar
Stumps replied to BL7 | 8 years ago
0 likes

BL7 wrote:

The Police are NOT the Law.  They are paid to uphold the Law.  They have to abide by the same laws of the land as the rest of us.

When you hear stories like this, it is little wonder there is a very low public faith in the Police nowadays.

 

Not quite true, the Police have special dispensation in relation to road traffic laws, use of force etc etc.  

Avatar
Paul M | 8 years ago
7 likes

Look at the Police language:

"In response to #badlyparkedbike we received a number of photos of seemingly poorly parked vehicles. #daftparking was then devised to facilitate the submission of these types of photos. "

The bikes were badly parked.  The car parking was merely "daft" (conveying an indulgent chuckle).  Seemingly.

This is a grudging, foot-dragging non-response by a notoriously petrol-headed institution.  It's a bit like a kid, under severe pressure from its parents, saying "so-rrrrreee".

 

Avatar
monkeytrousers | 8 years ago
1 like

Should have let him call the real copper. Comedy scene situation there I feel.

Avatar
atgni | 8 years ago
5 likes

#yplac appears to work perfectly well. No need to invent new #  1

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 8 years ago
7 likes

PCSOs are often not the sharpest knives in the drawer. I had an encounter with one a few years back who threatened to bring a PC and charge me with driving the wrong way up a one way street when in fact I was driving the right way up it and he hadn't seen the signs. He became quite abusive, particularly when he realised he was wrong. I have heard similar tales from others about PCSOs and I do have strong reservations about the hiring practices for them.

Latest Comments