Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Government urged to increase cycling spend as consultation closes

Businesses and campaigners warn that without cash, Cycling & Walking Investment Strategy won’t work

Businesses and campaigners have urged the government to providing meaningful funding for cycling as the consultation closes today into the draft Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy (CWIS) – and warn that without it, the goal of doubling cycling levels over the next 10 years is impossible to reach.

Their comments come on the same day that the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group – whose 2013 report, Get Britain Cycling, recommended a minimum spend of £10 per person per year – holds an inquiry into the CWIS, including hearing expert evidence.

The draft CWIS was slammed by campaigners when it was published in March, with British Cycling’s Chris Boardman said it is “not worth the paper it’s written on” without funding.

> Boardman: Government's cycling strategy “not worth the paper it’s written on”

The sustainable transport charity Sustrans describes the current level of spend, which it puts at £1.35 per person per year, as “pitifully low,” and says that while billions are spent on roads, “cycling and walking projects remain woefully underfunded.”

In a report published today, Sustrans says that according to its calculations, £8.2 billion – or £17.35 per person per year – will have to be spent over the next 10 years if the government is to meet its target of doubling the levels of cycling over the next decade.

According to the Sustrans report, at that level of spend there would be an economic benefit to the country of £61 billion, with a cost/benefit ratio of eight to one.

Meanwhile, Sky, Halfords and Santander are among 40 businesses belonging to the #Choose Cycling network launched by British Cycling last year to have written a joint letter to transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin warning that the government risks wasting a “huge opportunity” to transform walking and cycling.

In the letter, they call for:

• Better places to cycle, meaning a programme of building segregated cycle lanes in towns and cities across Britain

• Smarter investment in cycling by setting aside a greater proportion of the roads budget and budgets from related transport and infrastructure programmes

• Stronger leadership at national (Transport Secretary) and local level to ensure cycling is integrated in all infrastructure and devolution programmes to normalise cycling as a means of transport.

British Cycling policy adviser Chris Boardman, who chairs the network and will also give evidence at today’s APPCG enquiry, said: “If I were presenting the government’s cycling investment strategy as a workable proposal for any of the businesses in the #ChooseCycling network, I would be laughed out of the room.

“It is simply not possible to make cycling the ‘natural choice’ for short journeys by investing less than £1 per head – less than the cost of a cup of coffee. As the government run the country, I’d hope they know this.

“The longer cycling gets treated as an afterthought or a charity case, the longer we are missing out on a unique opportunity to create a healthier, happier and more active nation,” he added.

“This is no longer just something that people who already ride bikes want to see happen, this is something that 70% of people in Britain agree with and increasingly, as we have seen today, businesses across all sectors.”

Also giving evidence today will be Sustrans policy director, Jason Torrance, who said: “Government has made a bold pledge to double cycling but has simply not provided the financial means to achieve this and to reap the many benefits.

“Redirecting money from the currently allocated to the government’s £15 billion road building programme would cut pollution and improve health.

“Government needs to use the strategy to work in partnership with local authorities and the business sector to tackle chronic local problems such as pollution, congestion and obesity by investing in cycling and walking solve many of these problems cheaply.”

Also speaking to MPs at the APPCG inquiry this afternoon will be transport minister, Robert Goodwill.

APPCG co-chair Ruth Cadbury said: "The Cycling and Walking Strategy is a first for Government, so it is to be welcomed and deserves proper scrutiny.

"Our inquiry will seek to be assured that the Government is able to meet its laudable aim of making cycling “the natural choice for shorter journeys or as part of a longer journey”.

“We will want to establish if the Government’s proposed funding of £300m is enough to meet their targets for greater rates cycling in the UK."

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


Wolfshade | 7 years ago
1 like

Policy by itself, if it does not have funding, is dead.

There are two solutions to the congestion that snarls its way through our cities, filling the air with pollutants.

One is short term, the other longer and more sustainable.

We cannot just build more roads as they will then in turn become over capacity and gring to a standstill. We need to get more people cycling if we have a chance of reducing car usage. We can already see in cycle friendly cities that with good infrastructure you reap benefits of rejuvinated spaces, reduced congestion and a healthier populace, but that is not going to happen at £1 per head.

HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago

Boardman's comments are intelligent and to the point as usual. If you state a strategy for cycling, then allocate a pitiful level of funding which guarantees that it will not be achieved, it's not honest.

I almost feel sorry for Robert Goodwill. It appears that Osborne is sabotaging cycling in England, but Goodwill has to front up and try to explain away the government's excuse for an investment strategy.

The CWIS was published on Easter Sunday. Unless there are some compelling reasons I'm not aware of why it was released on a public holiday when everyone is out of the office, it would appear to be a cynical damage limitation strategy. It tells you how much faith those involved have in their investment strategy. This kind of cheap PR trick might win a tiny political advantage for 5 minutes, but it isn't going to help restore faith in the integrity of politics in this country. 

Latest Comments