Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Arrest made after Sussex cyclist injured in serious assault

Rider sustained "significant" head injuries in assault by driver who is believed to have hit him with metal bar...

Sussex Police have arrested a man after a cyclist sustained “significant head injuries” when he was allegedly assaulted by a motorist with what is believed to be a metal pole.

The incident happened at around 4.50pm on Paddockhurst Road, Turners Hill, West Sussex.

Officers say that the driver of a black Mercedes passed the cyclist then got out of his vehicle and assaulted him.

The cyclist, a man aged in his 40s, was taken to the Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton.

Police subsequently arrested a 28-year-old man from East Grinstead on suspicion of grievous bodily harm with intent.

Investigating Officer Detective Inspector Jon Robeson said: “This is a fast-moving investigation with officers able to make a swift arrest.

“The victim has suffered significant head injuries and is currently in hospital receiving medical treatment.

“Did you witness the incident? We would like to hear from anyone who witnessed the alleged assault or has dash cam footage of the incident.

“You can report information to us either online or by calling 101 quoting serial 1042 of 13/04.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
wtjs | 2 years ago
0 likes

Just prosecuting for the assault with a 'metal pole' which resulted in significant injuries would be an improvement on the usual mitigation because the victim was a cyclist 'who had looked at the driver in a funny way' or whatever.

Avatar
the little onion | 2 years ago
18 likes

why did they get out the car and hit the cyclist with a metal pole?

 

if they had just rammed them with the car, and claimed they simply didn’t see the cyclist, they would have got away with it.

Avatar
brooksby | 2 years ago
11 likes

Why on earth would some bloke driving a Mercedes also have a metal pole conveniently to hand...?

Avatar
OnTheRopes replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
5 likes

Drug Dealer or gang member?

Avatar
Runningwolf | 2 years ago
10 likes

This country has gone completely mad.  What the hell, attacking another person with a metal bar, really, what is wrong with people.  Whilst there is no detail in the article as to why the cyclist was attacked, there is just no excuse for this sort of behaviour in my view.  Hope the cyclist makes a good recovery and wishing him all the best.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Runningwolf | 2 years ago
4 likes

Runningwolf wrote:

This country has gone completely mad.  What the hell, attacking another person with a metal bar, really, what is wrong with people. 

I blame Thatcher.

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
4 likes

brooksby wrote:

Runningwolf wrote:

This country has gone completely mad.  What the hell, attacking another person with a metal bar, really, what is wrong with people. 

I blame Thatcher.

Not sure you can blame her for the war on cyclists. It's more prevalent in Australia; so the obvious suspect would be the Murdoch media pushing this.

Avatar
Bungle_52 replied to Jenova20 | 2 years ago
5 likes

I think you could make the case that "might is right" is very similar to the "greed is good" culture which Thatcher did nothing to discourage. Thus I think that "might is right" on the roads can be blamed on Thatcher even if she didn't intend it. There have recently been two reports of motorists thinking that cyclist should get out of their way and I have experienced it recently too. Just yesterday I witnessed a lorry bullying it's way through and forcing car drivers to stop. It's the same thing, my vehicle is bigger than yours so get out of my way.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Jenova20 | 2 years ago
2 likes

Jenova20 wrote:

brooksby wrote:

Runningwolf wrote:

This country has gone completely mad.  What the hell, attacking another person with a metal bar, really, what is wrong with people. 

I blame Thatcher.

Not sure you can blame her for the war on cyclists. It's more prevalent in Australia; so the obvious suspect would be the Murdoch media pushing this.

Nope - I'm pretty sure that I can blame her for every sh!tty development in this country since she decided to gut it surprise

Even Nu-Labour (which is usually held up as "but Labour can be bad") was a consequence of Blair having a secret shrine to her in his basement.

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
4 likes

brooksby wrote:

Jenova20 wrote:

brooksby wrote:

Runningwolf wrote:

This country has gone completely mad.  What the hell, attacking another person with a metal bar, really, what is wrong with people. 

I blame Thatcher.

Not sure you can blame her for the war on cyclists. It's more prevalent in Australia; so the obvious suspect would be the Murdoch media pushing this.

Nope - I'm pretty sure that I can blame her for every sh!tty development in this country since she decided to gut it surprise

Even Nu-Labour (which is usually held up as "but Labour can be bad") was a consequence of Blair having a secret shrine to her in his basement.

Your hatred of Thatcher is apparent, but it's not a valid theory for rage against cyclists, which is prevalent in many countries, and clearly not exclusive to the UK. This makes as much sense as me blaming a certain German leader from the 1940s, because of his policies, for the current anti cycling rage... Or it could be the media, which can clearly be seen to be pushing this very narrative of a road war, to sell papers and generate clicks. But, hey, don't let the obvious perpetrator get in the way, when you can instead push your unsourced political opinions online, and blame dead people you disagree with, for things they didn't do.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Jenova20 | 2 years ago
1 like

IMO much of the state of modern Britain (that is, how Society perceives itself and how the public dislike the rest of the public) can be traced back to her time.  I wasn't commenting on other countries.

Avatar
jh2727 replied to Runningwolf | 2 years ago
1 like

Runningwolf wrote:

attacking another person with a metal bar

Just to say... the title of this article is misleading - the body of the article and police article state that it was a metal pole, not a metal bar - i.e. most likely a scaffolding pole, rather than (say) a tyre lever.

Not that makes a massive amount of difference.

Avatar
Capercaillie replied to jh2727 | 2 years ago
1 like

[/quote]

Just to say... the title of this article is misleading - the body of the article and police article state that it was a metal pole, not a metal bar - i.e. most likely a scaffolding pole, rather than (say) a tyre lever.

Not that makes a massive amount of difference.

[/quote]

But who carries around scaffolding poles in a black Mercedes, unless they plan to use them as a weapon?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Capercaillie | 2 years ago
1 like

Perhaps it was a tent pole, scaffolding poles are quite long, so unless there was a roof rack, it seems unlikely it was one of those.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Hirsute | 2 years ago
2 likes

Maybe they were a church organ repairer, using a spare pipe.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 2 years ago
9 likes

Remind me again why assaulting someone because they are riding a bike isn't a hate crime?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to ChrisB200SX | 2 years ago
14 likes

ChrisB200SX wrote:

Remind me again why assaulting someone because they are riding a bike isn't a hate crime?

Because cycling is a choice rather than an innate characteristic.

We don't need to change the laws on assault, but instead there needs to be more appetite in enforcement, especially when drivers use their vehicle as a weapon - that's not a careless driving charge (not relevant in this case though).

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
15 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

ChrisB200SX wrote:

Remind me again why assaulting someone because they are riding a bike isn't a hate crime?

Because cycling is a choice rather than an innate characteristic.

We don't need to change the laws on assault, but instead there needs to be more appetite in enforcement, especially when drivers use their vehicle as a weapon - that's not a careless driving charge (not relevant in this case though).

Doesn't have to be innate characteristic. Religions aren't innate, neither is being a Goth, but hatred of either of these can be cited as a motivation for hate crime.
And rightly so, if we are going to say that hatred is an aggravating factor in a crime. I've never understood the logic that only hating difference that we deem worthy makes a crime worse - that in itself is a form of oppression.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
8 likes

Hmmm - maybe we need to dress as goths for cycling, then?

Avatar
mdavidford replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
8 likes

Well at least you wouldn't get comments about not wearing a helmet.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like
hawkinspeter wrote:

Hmmm - maybe we need to dress as goths for cycling, then?

Learning to ride side saddle will be tricky...

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
0 likes

Captain Badger wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:

Hmmm - maybe we need to dress as goths for cycling, then?

Learning to ride side saddle will be tricky...

 

You could get a stepthrough?

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Jenova20 | 2 years ago
1 like

Jenova20 wrote:

Captain Badger wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:

Hmmm - maybe we need to dress as goths for cycling, then?

Learning to ride side saddle will be tricky...

 

You could get a stepthrough?

It's the pedalling that I was worried about - need very short cranks, or just pedal on one side

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

We don't need to change the laws on assault

Oh but we do. Because until it is socially unacceptable things will not begin to change.

Avatar
Brauchsel replied to ChrisB200SX | 2 years ago
4 likes

Where does it say the victim was assaulted because he was riding a bike?

Avatar
OnTheRopes replied to Brauchsel | 2 years ago
7 likes

but  would he have been assaulted if he wasn't riding one?

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to Brauchsel | 2 years ago
3 likes

Brauchsel wrote:

Where does it say the victim was assaulted because he was riding a bike?

Where does it say that he wasn't?

Avatar
Brauchsel replied to ChrisB200SX | 2 years ago
2 likes

It also doesn't say that he wasn't assaulted because of his age, race, sex, sexuality etc. He will have been being all those things at the time of his assault just as much as he was being a cyclist. 
 

We don't know the reasons, so it's premature to say it was "because" he's a cyclist. And it's hysterical to call it a hate crime if it turns out that was the reason. 
 

None of which is to distract from this sounding like a horrible crime, for which the perpetrator should be jailed for many years. Attacking someone with a metal bar is considerably worse than hating cyclists. 

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Brauchsel | 2 years ago
4 likes

Brauchsel wrote:

It also doesn't say that he wasn't assaulted because of his age, race, sex, sexuality etc. He will have been being all those things at the time of his assault just as much as he was being a cyclist. 

You are of course correct, we don't know enough to make a full conclusion

But it's not an unreasonable hypothesis. More reasonable than age or sex.

Brauchsel wrote:

We don't know the reasons, so it's premature to say it was "because" he's a cyclist. And it's hysterical to call it a hate crime if it turns out that was the reason. 

To the letter of the law again you are correct - being a cyclist is not a legally protected characteristic.

However if it is the case that horrific crimes such as this are motivated by hatred of cyclists, it's hardly hysterical to call that out. I don't accept the logic that irrational hatred of someone leading to grievous physical attack due to their chosen mode of transport is any more acceptable than any other irrational hatred leading to grievous physical attack.

Brauchsel wrote:

None of which is to distract from this sounding like a horrible crime, for which the perpetrator should be jailed for many years. Attacking someone with a metal bar is considerably worse than hating cyclists. 

Indeed. Attacking someone with a metal bar is considerably worse than hating anyone. The issue here is not either-or; it is (if our original hypothesis is correct) attacking someone because you hold an irrational hatred.

Why does hatred make a difference? That is of course a wider question. It may be that a much wider pool of people is at risk of random attack by the hating individual, which in turn causes a de facto limitation on the freedoms of that group as a whole . I'll let you come to your own conclusions (I presume that you believe that irrational hatred is relevant, otherwise why make the distinction between hatred of cyclists and hatred of other out-groups?)

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to Brauchsel | 2 years ago
2 likes

Brauchsel wrote:

It also doesn't say that he wasn't assaulted because of his age, race, sex, sexuality etc. He will have been being all those things at the time of his assault just as much as he was being a cyclist. 

We don't know the reasons, so it's premature to say it was "because" he's a cyclist. And it's hysterical to call it a hate crime if it turns out that was the reason. 

You can't know someone's age, "race", sex, sexuality, etc just by looking at them. But it is clear that he was cycling, therefore a cyclist, which is literally all the driver would have known about him before the attack.
Who is saying he was assaulted because he was a cyclist? It's hysterical to say someone is calling this a hate crime when they are not. I think you might want to untangle your knickers  3

 

Pages

Latest Comments