Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Campaigners hit out at removal of pop-up cycle lane in Birmingham

Facility was installed during coronavirus pandemic at cost of £256k – with a further £167k spent ripping it out

A campaign group in Birmingham has criticised a decision by the city’s council to remove a cycle lane that was put in place on the A47 Nechells Parkway at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, with the total cost, including its recent removal, coming in at £430,000.

That sum was revealed following a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by community group Better Streets for Birmingham, reports Birmingham Live.

In response, Birmingham City Council said that the pop-up cycle lane had cost £256,000 to plan and install, and £167,103 to remove and resurface the carriageway.

In an open letter published on its website, Better Streets for Birmingham said it was “extremely disappointed” at the news that the lane was to be removed, and that it was “hard to understand why this decision has been taken” coming as it does ahead of the publication of the Birmingham Transport Plan delivery plan.

“Last week, we recently attended a very enjoyable LCWIP [Local Cycling and Walking Investment Plans] workshop to help shape our city’s future cycling network. It was fantastic to see the future network map develop.

“This week, we have been extremely disappointed to learn that the A47 pop-up cycle lane has been closed and is being demolished without any consultation.

“In these cash-strapped times, when we are continually told that we do not have the finances to afford the active travel infrastructure this city so desperately needs, we question the use of our limited funding on removing existing infrastructure. It seems even more egregious, given the infrastructure served an area of relative deprivation, that we should remove it during a cost of living crisis.

“Furthermore, to remove infrastructure funded from a previous Active Travel Fund (ATF) tranche seems remarkably short-sighted. We are concerned that this will negatively impact Birmingham’s schemes in future tranches, including ATF4. The Council has created a record of delivering and subsequently dismantling ATF schemes, whereas other local authorities in the region have delivered and kept quality infrastructure.

“We find it hard to understand why this decision has been taken now, in the run up to the publishing of the Birmingham Transport Plan delivery plan. It is also difficult to see how this decision delivers on the Route to Zero aspiration.

“We know that we are not able to build all the active travel infrastructure we require in one go. We therefore have to slowly build the network out. This will result in sections that are initially underused, which was one of the reasons given for the dismantling. As the sections are expanded and joined to other parts of the network, as was seen during the trip to the continent with Adam Tranter, their usage will increase. Instead of removing, we ought to be iterating cycling infrastructure.

“We sincerely hope that this decision will be reversed,” the group added. “Failing that, we hope that the wide ranging disappointment will be remembered to ensure that we don’t lose more valuable safe cycling infrastructure again.”

Adam Tranter, West Midlands cycling and walking commissioner, said that the removal of the lane “sends out th wrong message” at a time when active travel needs to be encouraged.

“I’ve said before I think the decision from Birmingham City Council to remove the A47 cycle lane was a step back in terms of our shared ambition to make cycling and walking the natural first choice for short journeys,” he said.

“It certainly sends out the wrong message and the costs associated with its removal clearly outweigh the cost of maintaining the lane.

“I’m keen to move forward and support the city council on getting safe infrastructure in this area of Birmingham as quickly as possible,” added Tranter, who said he would be undertaking a site visit soon with Councillor Liz Clements, Birmingham’s cabinet member for transport.

Simon joined as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment


eburtthebike | 1 year ago

I think CUK is going to need a full time lawyer to cope with the demand for legal action for illogical, stupid, downright farcical removal of valuable facilities by idiot councils.

RGN007 replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago

In Trafford, the vote was against the very poorly thought out temporary cycle lanes so a lawyer to gets one's own way, hopefully would fail.
I am pleased that hopefully better thought out ones are going in their place and has support.
The " lip service" temporary cycle lanes were in stupid places, even where one bollarded off existing one exists, but blocked off where no cyclists were coming off the M60 but heavy traffic was.
On the A56, the cones were stop, start, stop, start with a queue to Stretford tip in the middle. Traffic was directed into the left lane to exit at left fork further along, but was temporarily then forced into the right lane, then back across the usually disused empty cycle lane to fork left. This was far more dangerous to any cyclists than it was before. It's a very wide pavement there with little reason for pedestrians so ideal as a joint dual pedestrian/cycle route with permanent markings and priorities.
The cones have created frustration and animosity by being in stupid places, rolling around, kicked into road, contributing to anti-cycling rather than compromising both ways on roads that basically were never designed for both as other countries were more thoughtful in the past.

Latest Comments