Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“They will just not listen nor learn”: Council proposes all-out cycling ban in town centres to tackle “nuisance within communities”

UPDATE: “New measures will enhance protections and I make absolutely no apologies,” says North Lincolnshire Council leader, invoking controversial order for consulting on a cycling ban

North Lincolnshire Council has cited “zero tolerance to anti-social behaviour” as it suggests a complete cycling ban in parts of Brigg and Scunthorpe town centres that could come into effect from next year.

The consultation, which ends on March 27, has proposed “no cycling or riding a motorised scooter” in a number of streets of the two North Lincolnshire towns, under the Public Space Protection Order (PSPO).

A PSPO, according to the council, enables them to take action against “anti-social behaviour” and “protect vulnerable people by targeting those who continue to be a nuisance within communities”.

The council already has a PSPO since October 2021 that an officer can ask a cyclist to dismount if they ride in the pedestrianised areas of the town centres. Now, it seems that are trying to get rid of cyclists from these areas completely.

North Lincolnshire Council leader Rob Waltham said: “Residents are fed up and we are fed up with that small minority of people who think the rules do not apply to them.

"We have taken a zero-tolerance approach to anti-social behaviour, and we have spent a great deal of time - and taxpayers' money - to crack down on these people already. Despite this, they just will not listen nor learn.

Waltham said that the council had to go back to the 2021 order and strengthen it further so they could be able to fine people if they are on a bike in the prohibited areas. Since the introduction of the PSPO in 2021, thousands of fines have already been issued for public order offences and littering.

Cllr Waltham added: “This PSPO has enabled us to protect vulnerable communities by targeting anyone creating a nuisance or putting themselves and others in danger - the new measures will enhance those protections and I make absolutely no apologies for doing so.

“We are committed to keeping North Lincolnshire peaceful and safe and the strengthening of the PSPO is a significant part of this.”

> “Why is cycling discouraged?” asks councillor as Stafford introduces ban when renewing its PSPO

Besides being keen to banish cyclists from town centres, the council is now also proposing a ban on drinking alcohol (or even being in possession of an open bottle), as well as loitering or begging in almost the entirety of Scunthorpe.

In neighbouring North East Lincolnshire, a similar PSPO ban on cyclists in Grimsby’s town centre has been in place since 2019, with over 1,000 fixed penalty notices issued as of last year targeting “anti-social and dangerous” behaviour.

Victoria_Street_West,_Grimsby_-_DSC07296.JPG

Victoria_Street_West,_Grimsby_-_DSC07296.JPG, by Will Bolton

One target for such behaviour was 82-year old Barrie Enderby, who was fined £100 for slowly cycling through the city centre. To his credit, Barrie did have a scorching reply for the council: “Stick it up your a*se”.

The move drew a lot of ire from residents, as unhappy locals complained that council officers are not imposing the cycling ban in pedestrianised zones fairly and rather than cracking down on anti-social behaviour they are seemingly "targeting" people "they can get away with doing so”.

These orders have also been criticised by Cycling UK for the way in which they target cycling as a whole rather than only those who cause a danger or nuisance through the manner of their cycling. 

In February last year, cyclists in Bedford also came together to protest a 'discriminatory' ban on cycling in the town centre using a PSPO, with residents pointing out the irrelevance of these bans.

> Bedford cycling ban to remain despite consultation showing most people want it scrapped

As recent as January this year, Hammersmith and Fulham Council also proposed a £100 ban on cyclists using the Thames Path, along with banning e-bikes and e-scooters.

In Brigg and Scunthorpe, cyclists already can be slapped with a £100 fine if they fail to get off their bikes when asked by a police officer, with the penalty cost likely to rise if unsuccessfully disputed or not paid and taken to Magistrates' Court

In Brigg, the proposed areas to stop cycling are the Market Place and the adjoining parts of Wrawby Street and Bigby Street, while in Scunthorpe, the no-pedal zones extend all the way along the High Street till Church Square, as well as adjacent roads like Market Hill and Jubilee Way.

The council said that all comments will be analysed and considered before a final decision is made on the proposed changes.

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

78 comments

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Sriracha | 1 year ago
1 like

Homogeneity of modes is good! One of the biggest failings in UK public space design* is not making separate spaces for cycling and walking (which should be clearly recognisable ). We know this because wherever there is lots of cycling that is what they do, the more so where the more cycling.

Of course the reason the UK does it this way is we're still *specifically designing* for not much active travel and very little of it cycling.

* Apart from still having the goal of all carriageways being "maximum capacity of *motor* traffic consistent with safety"

Avatar
belugabob replied to Sriracha | 1 year ago
1 like
Sriracha wrote:

I'd tend to agree, fully pedestrianised areas work precisely because of the homogeneity. People are accustomed to, and surprisingly good at, navigating on foot amongst a throng of other randomly wandering "brainless sheep". It's nice to give the brain time off. Add other modes of travel, particularly at greater speeds and lesser nimbleness, and that simple, relaxed ease evaporates.

My local sheep are rubbish at avoiding each other - in fact, they tend to head unerringly towards each other, like Exocet missiles

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to ShutTheFrontDawes | 1 year ago
1 like
ShutTheFrontDawes wrote:

I'm split on this. On the one hand, if an area is truly 'pedestrianised', then it feels sensible for vehicles of all types to be banned, do that pedestrians can wander round like the brainless sheep so many of them are. On the other hand, it seems daft to fully 'pedestrianise' an area if there are still roads which a cyclist could very naturally safely use.

There have been several studies in European cities which have pedestrianised centres with cycling, and they all showed that there was very little, if any, conflict between the two modes.  Making cycling illegal because of a few anti-social cyclists is punishing the many for the sins of the few.  As others have pointed out, using that principle, cars would be banned everywhere.

Avatar
Boopop | 1 year ago
9 likes

Good luck disabled cyclists. Some use normal looking bikes but struggle to walk and potentially can't drive either. North Lincolnshire Council seemingly does not care about these people.

https://wheelsforwellbeing.org.uk/campaigning/my-cycle-my-mobility-aid/

Avatar
chrisonabike | 1 year ago
2 likes

Lincolnshire - one of the most rural counties.  They absolutely have a driving focus there.  TBH even the roads are not a focus of safety.  Lincolnshire is proud of not having motorways...

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
14 likes

So, cycling is now an anti-social behaviour is it?

Personally, I'd consider that driving around and just allowing your exhaust fumes to poison the air is far more anti-social and that's without considering such anti-social behaviour such as pavement parking, threatening other road users, noise pollution etc.

Avatar
Kendalred | 1 year ago
18 likes

I Presume they will be seeking to ban all motor vehicles from all roads due to persistant breaking of the speed limits?

Thought not.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Kendalred | 1 year ago
7 likes
Kendalred wrote:

I Presume they will be seeking to ban all motor vehicles from all roads due to persistant breaking of the speed limits?

Thought not.

You beat me to it: clearly we'd better ban all motor traffic from the motorway network, because some people drive their cars above the speed limit...

Avatar
NotNigel | 1 year ago
6 likes

It's almost like you can't be a nuisance unless you've got a bike or scooter..

Avatar
AltBren replied to NotNigel | 1 year ago
1 like

Sounds like experience! Have you been trying your best?

Avatar
Legin | 1 year ago
7 likes

and people don't think we have authoritarian government!

Avatar
AltBren replied to Legin | 1 year ago
6 likes

We got downgraded recently, we're now considered hostile and authoritarian. Great eh

Avatar
Marin92 replied to Legin | 1 year ago
1 like

this isn't a government decision

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Marin92 | 1 year ago
3 likes
Marin92 wrote:

this isn't a government decision

The government (ha, ha, ha) set up the legislation without making it impossible for some biased councillors to impose their prejudices on otherwise legal activity: maybe they could revise the legislation to make it sensible.

Avatar
Legin replied to Marin92 | 1 year ago
6 likes
Marin92 wrote:

this isn't a government decision

government with a small g, so it very much is a government decision. My comment applies across the spectrum of government.

Avatar
Jetmans Dad replied to Marin92 | 1 year ago
1 like
Marin92 wrote:

this isn't a government decision

Councils are quite literally "local government". 

Avatar
leaway2 | 1 year ago
8 likes

It would be interesting to see the number of injuries due to cycling in previous years before the restrictions were introduced.

Avatar
essexian replied to leaway2 | 1 year ago
8 likes

....And those injuried by motor vehicles over the same time would be great.

Pages

Latest Comments