Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Daily Mail adds “bus lane bedlam” to “cycling chaos” in its lexicon of trigger phrases for its readers.

Bus lanes join bike lanes and LTNS on newspaper’s hit list as it reacts to government’s new bus strategy

Bus lanes are set to join bike lanes and low-traffic neighbourhoods as the latest target for opponents of government efforts to reduce car dependency and get people to switch to more sustainable forms of travel such as cycling, walking and using public transport – with the Daily Mail adding “bus lane bedlam” to “cycling chaos” in its lexicon of trigger phrases for its readers.

Yesterday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced the government’s new bus strategy for England outside London – including promising “hundreds of miles of new bus lanes, and with a promise of “more frequent, reliable, easier to use and cheaper bus services.”

The key aspects of the strategy are:

simpler bus fares with daily price caps, so people can use the bus as many times a day as they need without facing mounting costs

more services in the evenings and at the weekends

integrated services and ticketing across all transport modes, so people can easily move from bus to train

all buses to accept contactless payments

Hundreds of miles of new bus lanes will make journeys quicker and more reliable, getting people out of their cars, reducing pollution and operating costs.

“Buses are lifelines and liberators, connecting people to jobs they couldn’t otherwise take, driving pensioners and young people to see their friends, sustaining town centres and protecting the environment,” Mr Johnson said.

“As we build back from the pandemic, better buses will be one of our first acts of levelling up.

“Just as they did in London, our reforms will make buses the transport of choice, reducing the number of car journeys and improving quality of life for millions.

“The fragmented, fully commercialised market, which has operated outside London since 1986, will end,” he added. “We want to see operators and local councils enter into statutory ‘enhanced partnerships’ or franchising agreements to receive the new funding and deliver the improvements.”

The strategy will also encourage cities and regions across the UK to move towards emission-free buses, including ending sales of diesel buses, with West Midlands Mayor Andy Street highlighting that people living in the region are in favour of greener buses.

“Buses are the backbone of public transport in the West Midlands, carrying more than 250 million people every year,” he said, pointing out that the strategy “will enable big city regions such as ours to ensure buses remain at the heart of our future transport plans.

“Residents here want clean, decarbonised buses that are affordable and continue to remain reliable and punctual, and that’s what the new strategy laid out today will deliver,” he added.

The strategy was also welcomed by the Local Government Association, which represents local authorities across the country.

Its transport spokesperson, Darren Rodwell, the Labour leader of London’s Barking & Dagenham Council, said: “We are pleased the Government is investing in improving local bus services, and it is good this strategy recognises the important role of councils.

But he added: “We would urge government to also plug the £700 million annual funding gap councils faced before the pandemic in providing the concessionary fares scheme, which would help to protect local routes and reverse the decline in bus services.”

The use of bus lanes is governed by Highway Code Rule 141, which says:

Bus lanes. These are shown by road markings and signs that indicate which (if any) other vehicles are permitted to use the bus lane. Unless otherwise indicated, you should not drive in a bus lane during its period of operation. You may enter a bus lane to stop, to load or unload where this is not prohibited.

Typically, cyclists are permitted to use bus lanes, as are licensed taxi drivers, although precise rules vary by local authority.

The Daily Mail’s report on the Prime Minister’s announcement came under a headline that left readers in no doubt where the newspaper – which previously opposed the now-removed cycle lane close to its offices on Kensington High Street – stands on the issue,

“Now for bus lane bedlam!,” the headline trumpeted. “After cycling chaos, now Boris Johnson finds £3bn for 'clean, green' revolution to put THOUSANDS more buses on British roads (and keep motorists off them).”

The £3 billion the government is providing, however, was first announced in February last year as part of a £5 billion package for 2020/21-2024/25 that also includes £2 billion for active travel, including cycling and walking.

The newspaper said that “the strategy, which reverses much of Margaret Thatcher’s 1986 deregulation, risks angering motorists, who could face longer journeys” and also highlighted a recent judicial review that found that guidance from Mayor of London Sadiq Khan on emergency schemes including cycle lanes and LTNs was “unlawful” (the decision is being appealed).

Perhaps surprisingly, however, the Daily Mail’s headline was not backed up by quotes supporting its headline – quite the opposite, in fact, with Sam Tarry, Labour’s bus minister, and Mick Cash, general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union, strongly criticising the new strategy for not going far enough to reverse impact of the transport policies of recent decades.

> 10 of the most hysterical anti-cycling Daily Mail headlines

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
5 likes

Quote:

“The fragmented, fully commercialised market, which has operated outside London since 1986, will end,” 

Isn't that the fragmented, fully commercialised market that his own party created back in the day...?

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

Quote:

“The fragmented, fully commercialised market, which has operated outside London since 1986, will end,” 

Isn't that the fragmented, fully commercialised market that his own party created back in the day...?

Yes, it is.  It would appear that the tories are stealing policies directly from the Greens, without the pesky implementation part of course, just the policies.

Avatar
alchemilla | 3 years ago
1 like

How long is the funding going to be available for? Unless it's longterm, like for longer than the life of this parliament, it doesn't allow for proper planning. It will just be another scramble for cash by local authorities and some areas could lose out completely, like they did with the bike lanes. There will never be the frequent bus services needed in rural areas as they've been cut too much already.
As for low emission buses, on the radio someone said they cost £500,000 each. That £3bn won't go very far.

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to alchemilla | 3 years ago
0 likes

alchemilla wrote:

How long is the funding going to be available for? Unless it's longterm, like for longer than the life of this parliament, it doesn't allow for proper planning. It will just be another scramble for cash by local authorities and some areas could lose out completely, like they did with the bike lanes. There will never be the frequent bus services needed in rural areas as they've been cut too much already. As for low emission buses, on the radio someone said they cost £500,000 each. That £3bn won't go very far.

This is additional funding, not a fund specifically to buy buses. The bus companies and councils will still have to contribute obviously, but in their partnerships they can likely trim some of the duplication and fat. £3 billion is obviously a lot of money to fund more routes and bus upgrades for them, and it seems very unlikely they're just going to use the lot to buy 6000 buses (They'd get more than that anyway since economies of scale and discounting, etc).

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
7 likes

I'm sure that the DM will soon be using the phrase "car chaos" next time there  is a queue on the motorway, where no buses or cyclists exist.

Interesting that the BBC spent a lot of time today featuring the public transport plans, but they still appear to be able to completely ignore the cycling plans.

EDIT: heard an article on R4 news this morning (0720 approx on 17/3) about LTNs, almost completely from the view of the antis.  I'll post a link when it's available.

Avatar
Awavey replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
Kendalred | 3 years ago
8 likes

"Perhaps surprisingly, however, the Daily Mail’s headline was not backed up by quotes supporting its headline"

No need - how many Daily Heil readers get beyond the headline before their blood begins to boil?

Avatar
DrG82 | 3 years ago
10 likes

Surely the taxi driving readership of the Daily hate mail will be delighted that they can dodge the queues by using the bus lanes.

I'm still not sure why on earth a taxi is allowed to use a bus lane when they are in no way good for the environment.

Avatar
Rod Marton replied to DrG82 | 3 years ago
4 likes

I've always assumed taxi drivers were allowed to use bus lanes because they would whether they were allowed to or not.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to Rod Marton | 3 years ago
5 likes

Rod Marton wrote:

I've always assumed taxi drivers were allowed to use bus lanes because they would whether they were allowed to or not.

more likely because taxis are the form of 'public transport' most likely to be used by those making the rules.

Avatar
Awavey replied to wycombewheeler | 3 years ago
0 likes

Yep as with the debate about the TfL v LTDA case, it's back to the definition of hackney carriages again vs private hire and the public transport status Hackney carriages & access they have been granted in law.

Avatar
cqexbesd replied to DrG82 | 3 years ago
0 likes

DrG82 wrote:

I'm still not sure why on earth a taxi is allowed to use a bus lane when they are in no way good for the environment.

IIUC the thinking is that by having taxis available it is easier for people to live without a private car. The more convenient and cheaper they are (hence bus lanes) the more they can be seen as an alternative.

How well that works in practice in particular locations I couldn't say.

Latest Comments