- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Hyde Park Corner 2.JPGSurvey finds strong support for calls for cyclists to be registered
A new survey from the market research firm YouGov has found strong levels of support for compulsory registration of cyclists – even apparently among cyclists, defined as people who confirmed they have ridden a bike in the past year.
The survey follows the petition launched by motoring lawyer Nick Freeman – who styles himself ‘Mr Loophole’ for his history of getting often high-profile clients cleared of driving-related offences, often on technicalities – urging that cyclists being licensed.
Conducted among 1,888 adults in Great Britain, the survey found that six in 10 respondents (60 per cent) backed the idea of cyclists being made to wear numbered tabards so they could be identified, with around half (31 per cent) expressing “strong support.”
71 per cent of people who voted Conservative at the 2019 general election supported the proposal, compared to 55 per cent who voted Labour. While response rates across socio-economic groups and regions were broadly similar, support rose steadily with age – from 45 per cent of 18-24s to 72 per cent of those aged 65 and above.
Just 28 per cent of people said they were against the idea, and only 15 per cent strongly opposed it – sentiments most likely to be held by Labour or Lib Dem voters, men, and younger people.
Among people who have cycled in the past year, 51 per cent were against the notion of having to wear a numbered tabard, of whom 37 per cent were strongly opposed – but a surprising 42 per cent were in favour, with 15 per cent expressing strong support.
Freeman also wants cyclists who have broken the rules of the road to be subjected to penalty points on their driving licence, should they possess one – something backed by 70 per cent of all respondents, and 58 per cent who had ridden a bike in the past year.
While the YouGov survey suggests strong support for Freeman’s proposals, his petition - posted more than six weeks ago – has only attracted 6,332 signatures at the time of writing.
That’s less than two thirds of the 10,000 votes required that would oblige the government to respond – and more than 90,000 short of the 100,000 needed before the Backbench Business Committee would even consider the issues raised in the petition for debate.
Helpfully, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport Baroness Vere of Norbiton reiterated the government’s position just last month in response to a written question from Lord Berkeley, patron of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Cycling & Walking.
> Minister repeats there is no prospect of requiring cyclists to be licensed as ‘Mr Loophole’ lawyer Nick Freeman continues to push his petition
https://road.cc/content/news/minister-no-prospect-requiring-cyclist-be-l...
He asked the government “what assessment they have made of the possible (1) advantages, and (2) disadvantages, of introducing a licensing system for cyclists.”
In response, the minister said: “The government considered this matter carefully as part of the cycling and walking safety review in 2018, and has no plans to introduce such a system.
“Cycling brings many benefits, particularly in terms of health and the environment, and the government is keen to encourage rather than restrict it.
“Cyclists must respect the rules of the road as set out in The Highway Code and enforcement of cycling offences is a matter for the police.
“The introduction of a licensing system would be likely to deter many people from cycling and the costs and complexity of introducing and administering such a system, would be likely to outweigh any road safety or other benefits,” she added.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- Simon E 1 sec ago
A selfish c**t with a history of drug use (and possibly drunk), who was already banned from driving, was speeding in Prestatyn....
- chrisonabike 15 min 44 sec ago
Well - I drive there seldom but actually to drive *around* it (outside rush hour - agree that can be a different story) isn't a drama (because ring...
- Sriracha 1 hour 30 min ago
A life ban would make no difference - he was already banned at the time of the offence. Perhaps, when they add a ban to those already banned it...
- Ridethewind 2 hours 11 min ago
I'd choose the Wilier. I already have their cheapest with Campag, but I covert their most expensive with Campagnolo. I'm not a racer, just like...
- chrisonabike 2 hours 20 min ago
Link didn't work for me, did you mean eg. here:...
- imajez 2 hours 29 min ago
On our quiet side road, a car crashed thrrough a 1.2m high and very thick stone wall, drove over the garden before badly denting the sold stone...
- shiggy 3 hours 18 min ago
Kent Outdoors is NOT a Canadian company. It was based in Ohio USA until moving to Utah....
- RoubaixCube 4 hours 6 min ago
Don't know how long you've been dish soap to wash your drive chain but dish soap and aluminium dont mix. It causes galvanic corrosion
- mattyb95 4 hours 5 min ago
Just collected it this week and that's exactly the end result, it's had the insides of the slit smoothed off and in the meanwhile I bought a Hope...
- Rendel Harris 4 hours 38 min ago
Well it pretty much does, a 70kg rider on an 11.6kg bike will need to put out 384W to climb a 10% gradient at 15km/h, to do it at the same speed on...
Add new comment
52 comments
60% of fewer than 2000 people...despite inexplicable national news coverage and TV and radio puff pieces. Shouldn't the headline be 'Survey finds miniscule support for calls for cyclists to be registered.'
So people want the government involved with someone riding a freaking bicycle. I will never understand the sheep who want to have every aspect of their lives controlled by politicans.
I will happily wear one. Once every uninsured, untaxed, speeding, close passing, and otherwise law or rule breaking carist is removed from the UK roads.
Or, you could encourage cycling...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-europe-57944428
Was that a YouGov poll of Daily Mail Readers?
In 2019 58% of Britons favoured capital punishment for certain crimes...that's why we have a representative democracy rather than government by plebiscite - as Winston said, it's the worst form of government except for all the others. If people want cyclist registration they're free to vote for parties that support it...
"In 2019 58% of Britons favoured capital punishment for certain crimes"
Would one of the reasons be 'being a cyclist' ?
If the survey sample solely comprised of London cabbies, I'd guess it'd be top of the list!
Well, if it stops cyclists riding at 24mph in Richmond Park, I'm all for it
And when a cyclist does this as inevitably they will, it will be no problem in knowing who it was
Clearly if that traffic light had been wearing a tabard with its registration number on, the collision wouldn't have happened.
Doesn't really matter as it simply isn't happening.
Those campaigning for cycle registration, insurance, licencing, even mandatory helmets are rarely interested in road safety except as a cover for the deception at their root. They are thinly disguised attempts to have cyclists removed from the public highway as they challenge the hegemony of the car as a practical and accesible mode of personal transport, particularly in urban environments and need to be called out as such.
Nick Freeman in particular seems to get a lot of airtime with frustratingly poor cycling advocates put forward to represent the "other side of the argument".
Mostly, the cycling advocates are pretty good, they just get less than 10% of the air time of the petrolheads.
What am I talking about; 1%.
Let's stop calling them petrolheads and start calling them what they really are, "car nerds". Dorky car nerds.
Probably car addicts would be nearer the truth. There was an AA report in the distant past which found that many people demonstrated all the behaviours of an addict when threatened with having their car taken away.
Sounds pretty dignified compared to how i'd behave if someone took my bicycle
YouGov is a load of bollox, believe me you cannot believe any of their polls, it is run entirely for the Conservative party political gain by people such as the Tory MP Nadhim Zahawi.
You don't have to dig very deep to see the buried vein of bias running through this organisation. Ony a gullible fool takes any notice of the nonsense they spout.
These surveys never seem to ask the most important question - "how much do you care about this issue?" I'm guessing that not many people on the "want cyclists to wear tabards" side care very much.
Spot on - a followup question "Where does this issue come on the list of the top twenty things you want dealt with?" might be revealing.
More to the point, they never tell you about the 97% of people who didn't care enough one way or the other to bother responding to the survey.
because thats never the point of these surveys, they dont exist to take a level headed sounding of peoples attitudes towards a specific subject, they are paid for by an organisation/group/body who simply want data that supports whatever thing they are campaigning for.
So the questions will always be tailored to support the outcome they want, and biased towards their outlook, and it gets wrapped up in a banner of respectability by Yougov, instead of it being somekind of low level surveymonkey thing, who simply provide the mechanism for collating the data.
the only Yougov poll thats free of that inherent bias of simply confirming what the survey authors want it to, is the general election poll, and note then its often more likely wrong
What about if the cyclist or driver is walking and get caught for j walking do they loose points to. Just tell the police you don't have a driver licence problem solved
The answer is for everyone to wear a numbered tabard when in a public space.
What do you mean that is a flagrant violation of your rights and privacy? If you don't do anything wrong then what are you afraid of?
How about chipping or tattooing everyone with a unique ID and increasing surveillance and tracking? That way no excuse of putting on the wrong tabard or leaving it at home.
Only a matter of time, Munge
I thought it was already done with the 5g nanobots in the vaccine.
The tracker chips are in the helmets.
The question asked was:
Would you support or oppose the following?
A requirement for cyclists to wear a numbered tabard, equivalent to a car registration plate
The question is loaded, because of course having to wear a tabard is not equivalent to cars having registration plates. However by making that equivalence the question invites the affirmative, for who would be against "car registration plates"?
The question should either have asked whether bicycles, like cars, should have registration plates. Or, whether vehicle operators should be individually identifiable through the compulsory wearing of tabards - motorists and cyclists alike.
Surely it's more akin to trade plates. I always think my attitudes tend to be quite authoritarian in a very neo liberal society, so it amazes me that the public can get behind authoritarian policies when they suit them. However, if you suggest that everybody should carry an identity card, or all cars should have a black box it would have very little support.
Registration plates identify a motor vehicle not the driver. We all know that unless vehicle owners nominate who was driving at the time of an offence, justice is rarely served. Requiring cyclists to wear an identifying tabard is the equivalent of requiring drivers to publicly display their drivers licence at all times to everyone. It's a massive over-reach.
Here in Australia we had an over-reach 5 years ago by the then NSW roads minister when he proposed law requiring cyclists to carry photo ID with fines for failing to do so. Clearly discriminatory. Fortunately that idea was scrapped before it was due to take effect. The fact it was entertained by the minister at all as the price for introducing minimum passing distance law (as were massively increased fines for cycling offences, which remain) just showed the entrenched resentment of cyclists as a whole.
Nothing good can come of these sorts of proposals, they begin life full of prejudice and only serve to perpetuate it.
I regularly get e-mails from Yougov on all sorts of issues BUT as I have filled in my profile page thingy as a cyclist I did not receive this particular one! Strange that
Pages