Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

review

Albion Winter Socks

8
£20.00

VERDICT:

8
10
Brilliant socks for keeping your feet warm and comfortable throughout winter, and in cooler months
Warm
Comfortable
Great fit
Soft
Subtle good looks
A few more colours would be nice
Weight: 
61g

At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the road.cc scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Albion Winter Socks are great. They work across a wide range of temperatures, making them ideal from autumn to spring; the synthetic material is soft and stretchy, offering a sublime fit; the cushioned footbed cossets your soles; and the generous height is great for keeping ankles happy on longer legs.

If you're looking for a pair of socks to keep your feet toasty this winter – or, despite the name, much of the year – these Albions should be at the top of your list, especially if, like me, you don't like the feel of merino, as these are totally synthetic: 45% polyester, 35% nylon, 20% elastane.

In a size XXL (EU 44-47/UK 10-13), they fit perfectly on my relatively narrow size 11 feet. They're snug but not tight, the generous amount of elastane offering plenty of stretch. The socks are also available in S/M and L/XL, overall covering sizes from 3 up to 13, which is pretty wide.

> Buy these online here

The material feels soft, and in the majority doesn't feel bulky, with an almost summer weight to them. Conversely, the padded toe and footbed is very thick and luxurious, and feels like having pillows under your feet. Truly, these are the best winter socks I've ever tried for feel (and I've tested a lot).

2022 Albion Winter Socks 6.jpg

There's plenty of height to the Albion socks too, measuring about 15cm from the point at which the cushioned footbed ends on the heel, or about 20cm from the centre point of the heel (Albion doesn't actually state a length). Suffice to say, they are plenty long – some of the longest I've ever tested. If you like more coverage on your ankles/calves, or you've got very long legs, these will suit you very well. They might be a touch too long for shorter legs, mind.

Tested across a range of temperatures, from hovering above the freezing mark, all the way up to the unusually mild weather in the mid teens we've been experiencing in the UK this winter, the socks performed admirably. At the low end, I only needed a pair of thick neoprene overshoes to keep my feet toasty. At the warmer end, my feet were warm but always stayed cool thanks to the excellent breathability of the material. They weren't stinking in the slightest after a long and very wet and muddy ride around the back lanes south of Bristol, either. Top result.

Though people rave about the qualities of merino socks for retaining warmth while allowing your feet to breathe, Albion's animal-free material performs just as well, if not better. And there's very little bulk, too.

2022 Albion Winter Socks 7.jpg

Aesthetically, Albion has gone subtle but stylish, with a dual Albion logo on the footbed, and the signature logo line on the upper section. Colours are pretty limited, with black, olive/orange and this bright orange option; a couple of extra colours would be appreciated.

2022 Albion Winter Socks 8.jpg

Value

Given the excellent performance these socks offer, the £20 price tag isn't bad, especially when you consider their ability to work across a wide range of temperatures. They would also work well for all kinds of riding, including road, gravel and mountain biking, despite not being advertised as such.

> Suffering cold feet? Find out how to keep your feet warm cycling through the winter

The MAAP Alt_Road Merino Socks perform similarly to the Albion Winter Socks yet cost £5 more (and contain merino wool, which some won't like). Similarly, the Monton Pro Suutu Merino Socks are a decent option at the same price, but they're a bit bulkier.

Conclusion

Overall, the Albions are a great option if you dislike the feel that merino socks offer and you prefer to steer clear of products that use anything animal in them. Even without merino, their performance is brilliant – warm, comfortable, and a great fit.

Verdict

Brilliant socks for keeping your feet warm and comfortable throughout winter, and in cooler months

road.cc test report

Make and model: Albion Winter Socks

Size tested: XXL

Tell us what the product is for

Albion says, "Winter cycling sock constructed using a technical nylon yarn for effective warmth and moisture wicking on your longest winter rides."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Albion lists:

Padded toe and footbed for additional warmth

Albion logo line

Fabric: 45% polyester, 35% nylon, 20% elastane

Made in Italy

Rate the product for quality of construction:
 
8/10

Material feels thick and well put together.

Rate the product for performance:
 
8/10

Warm, comfortable and good coverage.

Rate the product for durability:
 
7/10

So far, so good – only washed a couple of times. One of those was after a very muddy winter ride, where the socks were caked in mud, and they came up looking like new. Slight bobbling on the footbed, but I've seen similar on other socks I've tested, which I believe is simply down to my feet moving around inside the shoes.

Rate the product for fit:
 
10/10

Perfect fit. Snug on both the foot and calf, but not too tight. Plenty of height for longer legs, or for just more coverage.

Rate the product for sizing:
 
10/10

Perfect for a size 11, in XXL.

Rate the product for weight:
 
8/10

Pretty light for warm winter socks.

Rate the product for comfort:
 
9/10

Thick and luxurious footbed is almost spongey, making it feel very comfortable underfoot.

Rate the product for value:
 
5/10

How easy is the product to care for? How did it respond to being washed?

After a couple of washes at 30 degrees, the socks still look great. The orange colour hasn't lost any of its zing.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Great fit, very comfortable under the foot and a good length to keep ankles cosy. Surprisingly warm considering they're not the thickest option, and they work well whether the temperatures are near freezing or in the mid teens. Breathability is also very good, and they don't smell after long rides, either.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

The cushioning on the sole.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Nothing.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?

They're cheaper than the recently reviewed MAAP Alt_Road Merino Sock, being £5 less, and on a par with the Monton Pro Suutu Merino Socks.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

If you dislike the feel that merino socks offer, or you prefer to steer clear of products that use anything animal in them, these are a great option. Even without merino, their performance is brilliant – warm, comfortable, and a great fit. Aesthetically, they're pretty subtle, though the orange definitely gets you noticed.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 39  Height: 6'4  Weight: 175lbs

I usually ride: Condor Italia RC custom build  My best bike is:

I've been riding for: 10-20 years  I ride: A few times a week  I would class myself as: Experienced

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, touring, club rides, sportives, mtb,

Add new comment

76 comments

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 2 years ago
6 likes

Possibly the biggest environmental benefit of this product is that £20 is such a ridiculous price to pay for socks (which aren't even for walking in...) that you can't afford too many pairs. Buying Less Stuff is often the most environmentally-beneficial option.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 2 years ago
15 likes

I rather you didn't use my post(s) as an opportunity to go trolling, thank you.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Dnnnnnn | 2 years ago
8 likes

Amen brother.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Dnnnnnn | 2 years ago
7 likes
Duncann wrote:

I rather you didn't use my post(s) as an opportunity to go trolling, thank you.

Well said sir.

Avatar
Sniffer replied to Dnnnnnn | 2 years ago
9 likes

I think that is the perfect response.  Firm, but respectful.  I liked the 'thank you'.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Dnnnnnn | 2 years ago
11 likes
Duncann wrote:

I rather you didn't use my post(s) as an opportunity to go trolling, thank you.

I think what you meant to say was...

 

..."Put a sock in it!"

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Dnnnnnn | 2 years ago
3 likes

Although the Vimes Boot Theory also works (although probably not in this case if they don't last that long) where you buy the expensive good pair and they last alot longer and alot cheaper in the long run then the 10 pairs of cheap ones you have to purchase over the same period. 

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
0 likes

Certainly true for some things, although price and durability aren't necessarily correlated (and durability isn't always the most important thing).

Being synthetic, these socks might actually last quite well, certainly compared to wool. Which would burnish their environmental and VfM credentials. I still wouldn't pay £20 though!

Avatar
Simon_MacMichael | 2 years ago
9 likes

Interesting discussion in the comments to this review, obviously we're seeing more brands making environmental and/or sustainability claims these days, which has got us thinking that a feature looking at those issues in more depth would be very timely, so keep your eyes open for that.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to Simon_MacMichael | 2 years ago
3 likes

Surprising the discussion a pair of socks can generate!

I look forward to the article - although I'm not sure you need go into much more in-depth than concluding that those who want to sell stuff (which is lots of us) will use whatever spiel works best for that purpose.

Avatar
zero_trooper | 2 years ago
5 likes

Sizing up to XXL (UK 10-13) is pretty impressive. Finding decent size socks (and footwear in general) for my 'generous' feet is the bane of my life.

And yes I know, if that's the bane of my life, I have it pretty lucky 

Avatar
Prosper0 | 2 years ago
2 likes

Who doesn't like the feel of merino? Strong opinion!

Plastic socks can only be so warm, it's nothing on real wool socks, not to mention the environmental cost of using plastic material. 

Avatar
Sriracha replied to Prosper0 | 2 years ago
2 likes

I wonder what the environmental cost of Merino wool is.

Avatar
Prosper0 replied to Sriracha | 2 years ago
3 likes

Seriously? Compared to digging up fossil fuels and going through massive environmentally damaging manufacturing processes to make single use plastic thread? 

Wool is 100% natural, 100% biodegradable and 100% sustainable, 100% in the UK, as well as being outstanding for keeping your toes warm.

Do you work for the oil/petrochemical industry per chance? 

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Prosper0 | 2 years ago
2 likes
Prosper0 wrote:

...

Wool is 100% natural, 100% biodegradable and 100% sustainable, 100% in the UK, as well as being outstanding for keeping your toes warm.

...

Is it? Isn't wool a by-product of the meat industry? in which case it isn't all of those things.

Let's just break some stuff down

100% natural - this is pretty much meaningless when it comes to any consumer product. In this case the sheep providing the wool have been farmed over millennia involving intensive selective breeding (AKA GM old skool), and wide-scale clearing of forest and subsequent supression of the same.

100% biodegradable - that's a plus. Or rather not a minus at least.

100% sustainable. for this you'd have to define what you mean by both 100%, and sustainable. As mentioned before it is a by-product of the meat industry - ie shearing lambs before they go to slaughter, and ewes throughout their useful (to humans) life before they go for dog food. As wool is so cheap in this country it is barely worth selling, and some producers are throwing it away

100% UK - AS UK wool output is in the low single digits percentage of the world market I'd say that is likely to depend entirely on what you buy.

Outstanding performance - Another plus, but  of subjective value and of no consequence to the environment

I don't know what the answer is here, but wool is certainly not a panacea

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
6 likes

I don't think Merino comes from sheep used in the meat industry as they're a bit smaller and apparently not as tasty. As far as I know, industrial meat production uses lambs rather than older mutton so I guess that Merino sheep are happy to get shorn every so often rather than getting eaten.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
4 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

I don't think Merino comes from sheep used in the meat industry as they're a bit smaller and apparently not as tasty.

This would tend to increase the environmental footprint of the wool then, as pasture (with associated environmental problems of deforestation, increased water runoff  so lowland flooding etc) has to be found for the specific production of wool, rather than it being a spinoff (ha!) product.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
4 likes
Rendel Harris wrote:

This would tend to increase the environmental footprint of the wool then, as pasture (with associated environmental problems of deforestation, increased water runoff  so lowland flooding etc) has to be found for the specific production of wool, rather than it being a spinoff (ha!) product.

Depends on whether they let the sheep roam on rocky hillsides that aren't suitable for farming on - sheep can use land that otherwise isn't used.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

...Depends on whether they let the sheep roam on rocky hillsides that aren't suitable for farming on - sheep can use land that otherwise isn't used.

The ideology that land that isn't being used for human economic activity has no actual value is one of teh key drivers of environmental degradation.

The ecosystems that are exploited to support sheep farming are still massively damaged, even if we can't see it on an afternoon stroll. The rocky hillsides are often rocky simply because the plants and trees that might otherwise cling to a niche there are destroyed by sheep whilst foraging. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
0 likes
Captain Badger wrote:

The ideology that land that isn't being used for human economic activity has no actual value is one of teh key drivers of environmental degradation.

The ecosystems that are exploited to support sheep farming are still massively damaged, even if we can't see it on an afternoon stroll. The rocky hillsides are often rocky simply because the plants and trees that might otherwise cling to a niche there are destroyed by sheep whilst foraging. 

I agree with you that land shouldn't just be valued based on farming, but I'm not convinced that rocky hillsides are that way because of wool production. I'd guess that farming sheep for food is a lot more intensive than wool production and of course people don't buy wool as often as they buy lamb. There's a similar problem with deer roaming the countryside and over-grazing areas as their numbers are growing without any big predators to keep them in check.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

....

I agree with you that land shouldn't just be valued based on farming, but I'm not convinced that rocky hillsides are that way because of wool production. I'd guess that farming sheep for food is a lot more intensive than wool production and of course people don't buy wool as often as they buy lamb. There's a similar problem with deer roaming the countryside and over-grazing areas as their numbers are growing without any big predators to keep them in check.

Is all rocky hillside rocky cos sheep farming? No clearly not.

Is all land used for sheep farming (rocky or not) catastrophically changed and degraded as a result? Yes, most definitely

You are absolutely correct on deer. See change to the landscape after wolves were reintroduced in yellowstone

https://www.yellowstonepark.com/things-to-do/wildlife/wolf-reintroductio...

The problem isn't deer roaming the countryside per se. It's human activity that results in a viciously degraded environment with no apex predators. The deer are a byproduct of our activities rather than a problem in themselves.

 

Avatar
SimoninSpalding replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
0 likes

I seem to recall that Merino sheep don't like cold n wet (ironically) so much like cashmere it is all imported into the UK. Now alpacas love UK conditions and their wool makes pretty good sock...

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to SimoninSpalding | 2 years ago
1 like
SimoninSpalding wrote:

I seem to recall that Merino sheep don't like cold n wet (ironically) so much like cashmere it is all imported into the UK. Now alpacas love UK conditions and their wool makes pretty good sock...

https://www.tellenbymerino.com/

https://www.bamford.com/uk/collections/home-grown-merino

They may not like, but they're damn well gonna put up with it!

 

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
4 likes

I was about to say the same - though its worth noting that the majority of Merino socks are not pure wool as Merino's not great in high wear areas.  Unless they are mulesed the sheep are generally treated pretty well as HP notes.  They are generally bred & farmed in highland areas so the land clearance issues are less too.

Obviously nothing involving global scale human consumption is zero impact to the planet but I think the intent of the Proaper0's post whilst it could have been phrased better doesnt warrant the giant dogpiling that seems to have followed.   Are we twitter now?

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Secret_squirrel | 2 years ago
2 likes
Secret_squirrel wrote:

the giant dogpiling that seems to have followed.

Is that sheepdogpiling?

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
1 like

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Secret_squirrel | 2 years ago
1 like

Mulesing is illegal in the UK and New Zealand though it's still used in Australia.

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

Mulesing is illegal in the UK and New Zealand though it's still used in Australia.

and I don't think this was covered in the recent trade deal with - hang on! Are you trying to create a hybrid Brexit/Animal rights thread of implosion?!

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to HoarseMann | 2 years ago
4 likes
HoarseMann wrote:

and I don't think this was covered in the recent trade deal with - hang on! Are you trying to create a hybrid Brexit/Animal rights thread of implosion?!

Avatar
Hirsute replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
2 likes

That's the road.cc episode. Squirrels and portable angle grinders !

Pages

Latest Comments