Germany’s Urwahn has updated the technology behind its 3D-printed Softride steel frames, “achieving improvements of up to 30% in weight, stiffness, innovation, and cost”, it says – so let’s take a look.
2025 Urwahn Stadtfuchs rider - 1 (credit: Urwahn)
Urwahn has been 3D printing bikes for a few years; it's at the heart of what the brand does. We reported on the Urwahn and Schmolke collaborative road bike back in 2020, for example, and our friends on ebiketips covered the Platzhirsch, a 3D-printed e-bike with smart lighting and fully integrated cables, later that year.
> Urwahn & Schmolke team up for striking 3D printed steel bike
Putting the 3D printing to one side for a moment, the first thing you notice about Urwahn’s design is the lack of a seat tube. Or half a seat tube. Or a combined seat tube and seatstays. However you want to describe it, what’s the idea?
2025 Urwahn Softride 2.0 complete bike (credit: Urwahn)
Urwahn says that its Softride design “elastically suspends the rear wheel and guarantees noticeable ride comfort without sacrificing bottom bracket stiffness”. It’s our good old friend vertical compliance, then.
There are a fair few bikes out there without seat tubes, including the Baldiso One that we told you about a couple of months ago.
Now Urwahn says, “By combining state-of-the-art Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) technology with innovative engineering, a new generation of Softride steel frames has been developed, achieving improvements of up to 30% in weight, stiffness, innovation, and cost.”
2025 Urwahn Stadtfuchs riding - 1 (credit: Urwahn)
Urwahn says it has developed its new frame platform, with the working title Softride 2.0, in collaboration with fellow German companies Trumpf (no relation!) and H+E.
“The additively manufactured frame components are produced using LPBF technology, a process that utilises high-powered lasers to selectively melt fine metal powders, resulting in exceptionally high material density and precision,” says Urwahn.
2025 Urwahn Softride 2.0 drive system (credit: Urwahn)
“The advantage of this method lies in the complete design freedom it offers, enabling the creation of complex structures with internal cavities that would be impossible to achieve using conventional manufacturing techniques. Through topology optimisation, load paths have been enhanced, leading to increased stability while simultaneously reducing weight.”
Topology optimisation? That just refers to the most efficient material distribution to maximise performance while minimising the amount of that material required.
Urwahn says that as well as saving material, the efficiency of the production process has been improved.
“The new Softride steel frame has been specifically designed to meet the requirements of the additive manufacturing process,” it says. “Trumpf provided the cutting-edge machinery and material parameters, while H+E, as an experienced partner, established the entire process for serial production and contributed valuable feedback to optimise the frame design. Urwahn consolidated all insights and integrated them in line with its own development requirements.”
That’s a namecheck and a big pat on the back for all involved, then, but what’s the benefit of using this tech?
2025 Urwahn Softride 2.0 carbon drive (credit: Urwahn)
“A key advantage of LPBF technology is the precise control over layer construction, allowing for fine-tuned mechanical properties of the final product,” says Urwahn.
“The use of high-alloy steels and specially developed alloying additives has resulted in an extraordinary combination of strength and elasticity. Additionally, the additive manufacturing process reduces post-processing steps such as welding or extensive mechanical machining, significantly enhancing efficiency.
“The result is a milestone: the innovative Softride steel frame combines the lightness of aluminium with the aesthetics of a modern monocoque carbon frame.”
2025 Urwahn Waldwiesel (credit: Urwahn)
Okay, that’s enough of the PR spiel. The top and bottom of it is that these three companies reckon that they’ve quickly worked together to produce “a true revolution on two wheels” in the shape of the new Softride steel frame.
If you’re interested, you can go through a UK retailer like Cycle Race in London. Urban and gravel options are available, with and without electrical assistance.
Check out loads of other Bikes at Bedtime here.
www.urwahn.com
Add new comment
18 comments
Something like an eeslik seatpost would just work better. But I suppose they should be commended for trying new manufacturing and designs that may push future designs forward.
Hmm, it won't allow much seat post adjustment. And if there had been a more gentle curve rather than a massive stress concentration, then it'd make more sense. If comfort is the issue, then one of those slightly spring seatposts would do the job as well and without the threat of metal fatigue over the longer term. The weight saving for the lack of a downtube isn't worth it.
And no, I wouldn't want a bike with that name either.
Might as well call the next model MUSKF. This will fail and you can blame the name.
I don't see why, the Trumpf name has had a proud reputation as a market leader in the production of laser cutting machines for years; long before the advent of der orangenfarbener Furz as a national figure in the US of A.
Im dubious this is anything new apart from "because we can".
Its perfectly possible to, indeed, preferential to design the kind of compliance in with regular tubes at larger scale.
Ultimately the limiting factor for "buzz-killing" flexibility is not the flexibility of the material but the damping required for the rebound. Im willing to be proved wrong but Im betting even the 3-d printing cant generate a sufficent difference between compression and rebound in a material like steel.
There is a reason that when presented with this problem nearly everyone has opted for a damped softtail design. See Moots, Dekerf and others from late 90's MTB, and Pinarello from the 2010's Dogma K8s for Paris-Roubaix.
And, to your point, now that we've finally figured out how pneumatic tires work, and learned that skinny hard tires are actually slower than wider softer ones, this endeavor is really rather pointless. Ride comfort is determined almost entirely by tire pressure, on a bicycle without movable suspension components, so there's no reason to laser-print frames like this versus just running ~33+mm tires.
Not with the materials that are used in bicycle construction. In order to make a double-triangle frame vertically flexible during use as a bicycle, it'd have to be so weak that it would not last an acceptable length of time. In particular, such a frame would have to be weaker than a peumatic tire. In practice, commercially-produced bicycle frames are two orders of magnitude stiffer in the vertical plane than inflated tires are, so rigid frames will never contribute to ride comfort or compliance.
Letting one's tyres down by a few PSI to get more comfort grip and speed won't sell more bikes though.
My 2 cents. My road bikes with 28mm tires at 55-60 psi and cane creek / redshift components are more comfortable than my rigid mtb with 60mm tires at 24-28psi.
Then you should unlock the fork on your mountain bike, because it'll have about 4 or 5 times the travel that your stem does, and far superior rebound control. Who on Earth rides a rigid MTB and complains about the comfort? Even a mediocre fork costs half what those Redshift parts do, and works miles better.
But that aside, I excepted bicycles with movable suspension components, and that's exactly what Redshift calls those parts.
Finally, the spring rate of the stem is going to be stiffer than that of a 60mm tire at 28 psi, out of necessity (stem only has 20mm of travel, tire has much more) so your claim doesn't hold much water, and most reviews find the opposite, and typically state it's no substitute for wide tires and certainly not for a suspension fork -- to no one's surprise.
And here we have the self-proclaimed expert on everything who doesn't actually know what a rigid mountain bike is. How exactly do you propose unlocking a fork that doesn't have suspension?
Hacksaw?
If you undo those bolts at the top / back of the steerer tube you could remove the handlebars - wouldn't that make it more comfy than having all the bumps going through your hands?
Or maybe they mean "unlock" in the sense of computer game upgrade? Isn't everyone riding online now?
The fact that they're selling off the e-bike version at half price at Cycle Race leads me to suspect that there's a lot of suspicion around that these trendy LPBF frames will just break at the obvious places within 5 years and won't be repairable- I have no evidence to support the suspicion, of course
There's going to be some fairly serious sales resistance to having a bike with "TRUMPF" emblazoned on the side, isn't there?
Maybe adding a U on the end, would make a key selling point for the exact same market group.
It's a nice looking bike but yep, no way would I touch anything with a name like that. Unfortunate, but there it is.
I don't think they plan to sell them with that logo. Seems to me that was just a bike to showcase what they made and emphasize their contribution.
Maybe have TRUMPFfffffffff...