Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Coroner blames Smart motorways

Private Eye piece re: the loss of the motorway hard shoulder.  (Or the ripped out / never installed in the first place protected cycle lane.)

"There's no chief inspector of roads. Nor is there a roads equivalent of the air, rail and marine accident investigation bodies"  The article recounts for contrast  how Network Rail didn't replace some post and wire fencing, (supposedly) leading to a cteenager getting onto the tracks and being injured - NR were fined for this.

"A senior Coroner said last month she would consider referring a smart-motorway death to the CPS" and recounting that the Sheffield Coroner had written to Grant Shapps asking for a review of of smart motorways."

A few thoughts for a cold Sunday:

  • 'We must use every square foot of roadspace  - none can go to waste'
  • The apparent regulatory gap is a "turn a blind eye" - overall responsibility has nowhere to land, the whole thing in effect a massive game of Chance
  • what would the road accident investigation branch focus on: would it say "ooo, that's a dangerous road", would it focus on  nudging "driver behaviour", or would it call it and "say large numbers of people are just not fit to drive a motor vehicle"?

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

1 comments

Avatar
ktache | 3 years ago
2 likes

Or that any form of enforcement of the law in relating to illegal speeding, with the siting of speed cameras, can only be considered with multiple incidents involving fatalities.

Can you imagine the outcry if aviation or rail approached illegal behaviour in this manner, that there MUST be multiple cases of deaths before even enforcement was thought about, at one location at that.

Latest Comments