Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

New HGV downlighters could illuminate blind spots for cyclists

But very few haulage companies are investing in new technology that could keep cyclists safe

A downlighter system for trucks that could tell cyclists where they aren’t visible has been approved by the Vehicle Certification Agency.

The system of downward facing lights that illuminate the ground show the blind spots of large vehicles as well as aid the driver in locating the wheels when looking in the mirror.

The lights, made by Jimmy Beam Downlights, turn on at speeds below 15kmph and can be fitted on all trucks, or as standard by manufacturers, according to BikeBiz.

According to the manufacturer of the downlights, “feedback from operators and drivers has been consistent, all citing better working conditions when visibility is poor, pinpointing on-site manoeuvring, improved road presence and visibility, and easier drivers’ vehicle checks.

One of the first to trial the lights was Weedon-based haulier Dray Haul.

Its director Gavin Draper said: “Straightaway, in the yard, you could see the benefit. The halogen lights that light up the yard shine into your face and blind you, making it difficult to back into a space in a row of trailers, it’s all shadows; having the down light helped immediately, you can see everything around it.”

“Now you can see the trailers when it’s wet even though the mirrors are all misted up with the rain, and in the fog, because there is one curtain of light.”

Draper has since invested in more down lights to fit to two more trailers. “The drivers have fought over it,” he jokes.

Both he and Paul Allera, head of fleet at Fowler Welch, agreed the lights help drivers perform their walk-around checks before they set off to look at things like the lights and tyres without using a torch.

A new survey has found however that very few freight companies are investing in the new technology available to protect vulnerable road users.

Only one in five haulage companies use rear facing cameras on all vehicles, according to the survey by road safety charity Brake and fleet management and licence-checking organisation Licence Bureau found.

Only 8 per cent have side-facing cameras on all vehicles and only 12 per cent side sensors.

The survey also revealed that hands-free mobile phone kits were available in two thirds of lorry companies and in 80 per cent of car fleets.

Dr Tom Fisher, senior research and communications officer at Brake, said: "Employers whose staff drive for work have a duty of care both to their own employees and other road users.

"While not a panacea, technology can play a big part in helping them improve safety and exercise that duty, so it is disappointing to see that so many are not taking full advantage of new safety technologies on offer."

Les Owen, compliance consultant at Licence Bureau, said: "Surely it is obvious that the cost of a crash makes it sensible to consider fitting some of the safety technology items."

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
Spiffy | 8 years ago
0 likes

The truck isn’t worried about its safety, so quit putting the onus on your victims and stop driving where you can’t see.

Avatar
sodit | 8 years ago
0 likes

Interesting comments here but many people seem to be relying on the vehicle owners and vehicles for there safety!

Well how about taking responsibility for your own safety by not putting yourself in harms way. Always assume that the vehicle driver cannot see you, will not stop and yes they will pull out in front of you (SMIDSY event).

There are some tragic events out there but the blame has to be shouldered by everyone not just the driver. We all know that lorries are dangerous so why do some cyclists insist on still cutting down the sides of lorries and put themselves at risk?

Always be aware of the rule of gross tonnage and materials 90kg of bike and rider is always going to lose against 1500kg (plus) of rubber, plastic and metals.

Yes it may well be your right of way but if the twat does pull out its going to be you in the road bleeding or dead not them.

I know there needs to be improvements in HGV cycle safety but it will not happen overnight and until it does, accept it folks your safety rests on YOU nobody else.

And don't get me started on punishment overtaking and being cut up, now we are going down the road of attempted murder and each case with or without injury should be treated as such.

Be careful out there look after yourselves because nobody else will.

Avatar
tarquin_foxglove replied to sodit | 8 years ago
0 likes
sodit wrote:

There are some tragic events out there but the blame has to be shouldered by everyone not just the driver.

Why?

Avatar
Spiffy replied to sodit | 8 years ago
0 likes

"Always be aware of the rule of gross tonnage and materials 90kg of bike and rider is always going to lose against 1500kg (plus) of rubber, plastic and metals."

That's the bully mentality. Bullies have no place on the road. Stop bullying those smaller than you.

Avatar
viagro2 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Any help is good help!

Avatar
Bmblbzzz | 8 years ago
0 likes

The drivers' comments that the lights help them manoeuvre in yards and depots indicate they are a safety bonus, as those are actually AIUI the situations where most HGV accidents happen. But for indicating to cyclists where the blind spots are? I don't think that's terribly beneficial. It's best to assume the whole side and rear is a blind spot. Even if you are not in a blind spot, you can't make the driver look in his mirrors (though I get the impression most do; certainly I often see cyclists squeezing themselves down between lorry and kerb, then the lights change and — thankfuly — see the driver's head move mirror to mirror before the moves off). Besides, there's always risk compensation to consider. Cyclists who are already riding into those gaps might think this makes it ok.

Nevertheless, a good gadget overall, just not particularly relevant to cyclists.

Avatar
jollygoodvelo | 8 years ago
0 likes

I'll applaud the intention behind this - as with other similar ideas, it might help and if it just makes the driver think twice and look properly it just might save someone.

However, I can't help thinking that it's something else that responsible hauliers will fit to their trucks, costing them money, while the more 'fast and loose' don't bother and continue to be a menace.

Quite disturbed by this though:

“Now you can see the trailers when it’s wet even though the mirrors are all misted up with the rain,

Really? Are you telling me trucks don't have heated mirrors? It would seem a ridiculously simple solution...

Les Owen, compliance consultant at Licence Bureau, said: "Surely it is obvious that the cost of a crash makes it sensible to consider fitting some of the safety technology items."

Surely it is horrifically obvious that in most instances the cost of the crash is zero to the driver and the haulier, and entirely - sometimes fatally - borne by the cyclist.

Avatar
ConcordeCX | 8 years ago
0 likes

Instead of illuminating the blind spots why don't they spend some money on eliminating them?

Avatar
ChairRDRF | 8 years ago
0 likes

Despite my critical comments above, Internet Pawn: actually most cyclist deaths where there are lorries are at slowish speeds. When turning it wouldn't surprise me if thy occurred at around the 15 kph mark.

Avatar
HalfWheeler | 8 years ago
0 likes

Not sure these lights will help a lorry driver be any more attentive after a 14hr shift.

Avatar
Internet Pawn | 8 years ago
0 likes

There's little point to them if they only work below 15 kph. I imagine most collisions involving turning lorries are at speeds higher than that.

Avatar
ChairRDRF | 8 years ago
0 likes

In daylight hours? There are other technologies to be used first: closing down gap between vehicle body and tarmac (either retro-fitted or on new lorries); lower cabs on new lorries; transparent doors on new lorries or to be retro-fitted; infra-red sensors; black box devices to establish what driver was doing before incident. The engineering the highway to keep lorries away from cyclists and pedestrians. Don't forget enforcing existing laws, not having operators hiring dodgy drivers with histories of driving offences.

To see a summary of what is required, along with history of how manufacturers have not done what they could/should have done for cyclists and pedestrians, see end part of this post http://rdrf.org.uk/2015/03/02/update-cyclists-stay-back-stickers-and-hgv...

Avatar
VeloPeo | 8 years ago
0 likes

Most road safety improvements only achieve mass take ups when they're legislated for. Until the government forces them to do it, the majority won't

Avatar
jasecd | 8 years ago
0 likes

Shocking stats about the low levels of investment in safety technology. HGV's are responsible for more than 50% of cyclist deaths yet they don't seem to take their responsibilities at all seriously.

Avatar
gazza_d | 8 years ago
0 likes

Nicely illuminates most cycle lanes and ASLs as well. thoughtful

Latest Comments