Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Bec Hill Climb in crowdfunding appeal as soaring road closure costs threaten cycling event's future

Fears that event founded six decades ago could be "priced out of existence"...

One of the British cycling calendar’s best-loved events, the Bec Hill Climb, has turned to crowdfunding to try and raise £5,000 to secure its future amid concerns it may be “priced out of existence” due to a big jump in the cost of securing road closures. Organisers say Surrey County Council is adopting a "one size fits all" approach to cycling events, meaning it is seen in the same way as sportives that are on a different scale and attract greater revenue through entry fees.

The event was established in 1956 by the late Ron Beckett of Bec CC, with this year’s 60th edition, taking place at 2pm on 11 October 2015 at White Lane, near Limpsfield in Surrey. For the past 30 years, it has been organised by his son, Garry.

In an appeal for funding launched on Indiegogo, he explains that until this year, a Closed Road Order (CRO) for White Lane during the event has been secured from Tandbridge Borough Council.

Beckett says the district council “have always been happy to issue the order, and often would ‘call us’ early in the year to see if the event required assistance, rather than ‘us call them’ and jump through many administrative hoops to be granted a CRO.”

He continues: “Tandridge recognised the value of such an event coming to its area, as well as its historical significance to the Cycling Community, and were very keen to continue assisting the Bec CC in its aims.”

The CRO, he says, “came for nothing more than a quick courtesy visit to their offices, and a little printer ink for the notifications.”

Beckett says that with the help of family money, entry fees and sponsorship from the cycling industry, the event has grown in the decade since his father’s death in 2005 to “to bring more of a ‘spectacle’ to the fans in the way we delivered the event.”

That is all set to change, however, with Surrey County Council (SCC) now getting involved and telling Beckett that a CRO for the event will now cost around £3,000.

In an email from SCC’s events committee earlier this year, he was told: “As this event is a sporting event, you are required to close the road under Section 16A of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and not the Town and Police Clauses Act 1847.”

According to Beckett, besides the £3,000 cost, there is “an incredibly time consuming amount of administrative conditions to be fulfilled, plus attendance of meetings with various Council Officials & Groups with an ‘Interest’ in how the event will be organised.

“We will require not only the funding for road closure, but the club will also see an increase in administrative costs to handle all the new logistics of this.”

He adds that the “bottom line in this change of policy, is that the Bec CC Hill Climb is now in danger of being priced out of existence … It currently has NO choice, but abide by these newly imposed Highway Regulations, which incidentally have been around since 1984, and have not been deemed necessary to implement for most events until the ‘Olympic Legacy’ raised sporting profiles within Surrey!”

In his Indiegogo appeal, Beckett says that he has held a number of meetings with SCC and has explained to them that the Bec Hill Climb is not a mass participation event such as a sportive, and therefore does not have the same level of income through entry fees.

He also pointed out to the council that the event’s footprint is small, given it takes place on a country lane with limited through traffic, but says the council “still to want to use a ‘one cap fits all’ policy for pricing and administration regardless of the size and local impact of our event in comparison to larger events held within their borders.”

Some concessions have been secured for October’s event, but he says that the council has made it clear that those are for 2015 only and they want future editions to adhere to all of their event guidelines.

Beckett had already decided to step down as organiser this year and concludes: “I would like to leave the event on solid foundations for my successor to work from ... but due to this current situation, the footings are in an incredibly shaky condition.”

Here’s the event’s fundraising page on Indiegogo.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

12 comments

Avatar
mike the bike | 8 years ago
0 likes

In the spirit of Critical Mass meetings I would be inclined to run the event anyway and without informing the council. There need be no committee, no official organisers, nobody to blame, it just happens.
By the time some smartass files a complaint it will all be over and everybody will be in the pub.
If it were Gypsies running one of their horse races the police would be terrified of offending the human rights brigade and wouldn't do a thing.

Avatar
Matt eaton replied to mike the bike | 8 years ago
0 likes
mike the bike wrote:

In the spirit of Critical Mass meetings I would be inclined to run the event anyway and without informing the council. There need be no committee, no official organisers, nobody to blame, it just happens.
By the time some smartass files a complaint it will all be over and everybody will be in the pub.
If it were Gypsies running one of their horse races the police would be terrified of offending the human rights brigade and wouldn't do a thing.

+1 for just doing it. If there are no official organisers, no entry fees and no official prizes is it really an 'event' anyway?

I've been to a number of 'happenings' of this sort without any problems. They really have to get to quite a grand scale before you are likely to run into difficulties.

Avatar
DavoB | 8 years ago
0 likes

By no means justifying the cost, but they're right to not be using the Town & Police Clauses Act to close the roads - it's a really archaic piece of legislation that only really allows for closures based on processions and 'thronging' rather than organised sporting events.

Avatar
fukawitribe replied to DavoB | 8 years ago
0 likes
DavoB wrote:

By no means justifying the cost, but they're right to not be using the Town & Police Clauses Act to close the roads - it's a really archaic piece of legislation that only really allows for closures based on processions and 'thronging' rather than organised sporting events.

It's a local power granted to allow inter alia road closures for road upon which there may be an obstruction to movement, e.g. in the case of a throng or other gathering. That there is another law which also covers the same case doesn't stop it being valid, or indeed entirely appropriate given the circumstances. It's merely a choice that is made by a governing authority - in this case SCC but similarly for at least some other counties. Shame though...

Avatar
antonio | 8 years ago
0 likes

The county will probably say it is a 'cycling friendly council' to add insult to injury!

Avatar
Scoob_84 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Am I missing something here, isn't the Bec hill climb also in kent, running parallel up ise hill?

Avatar
KiwiMike | 8 years ago
0 likes

The thing to do is band together with loads of other small events and pillory the councillors from a broad front. Max out their meetings, make loads of FOI requests demanding to see the cost justifications for the fee, the true costs for every single event they support etc etc. Don't keep it to weirdy-beardy bikes, get equestrians, farms, playgroups, Harriers, parish fetes, ramblers and anyone else doing anything involving the public highway on side.

Avatar
davebinks | 8 years ago
0 likes

Does that ruling also affect the Catford Hillclimb that is on the morning of the same day, just a few miles away, but in Kent?
Is it just Surrey that is being awkward/greedy?

Avatar
zanf replied to davebinks | 8 years ago
0 likes
davebinks wrote:

Does that ruling also affect the Catford Hillclimb that is on the morning of the same day, just a few miles away, but in Kent?
Is it just Surrey that is being awkward/greedy?

I think the Catford Hill Climb is in Kent so not subject to Surrey County Council.

It could be subject to the same change in legislation though so might drop a note to Catford CC and find out.

Avatar
zanf | 8 years ago
0 likes

Its a little used road on the south face of the North Downs so the £3k cost is just so fat county councillors can sit around postulating their own existence and how much more bureaucracy they can create to sustain it.

Until this year, there was no fuss. Now its £3k and lots of hoops to jump through.

Hopefully, Garry can get it sorted.

Avatar
backflipbedlem | 8 years ago
0 likes

Hope they can keep it going!
Rode up White Lane 2 weeks ago, it's a bugger!

Avatar
Colin Canski | 8 years ago
0 likes

What would Ron Beckett want the club to do, spend lots of time and money or find another hill. My guess is, find another hill. My starter for 10; Vigo Hill.

https://www.strava.com/segments/658753

Latest Comments