Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

More mobile phone use behind the wheel – but prosecutions for it are down

RAC asks whether technology could play a greater role in catching offenders

Data released by the Ministry of Justice last month show that last year just 17,414 prosecutions were launched in magistrates’ courts for drivers using their phone at the wheel, down by 47 per cent from 32,571 in 2009. This is despite Department for Transport figures from 2014 which indicated that more people were observed using a mobile than in 2009.

A 2014 Department for Transport (DfT) study found that 1.6 per cent of drivers in England were observed using a mobile, up from 1.4 per cent in 2009. Drivers were also found to be more likely to be using their phones to text or look at the internet than to make calls.

Despite this, the RAC reports that fewer motorists are being prosecuted for using their mobile phone while driving than ever before. Currently, offenders face a fine of £100 and three penalty points, although earlier this year it was reported that could be doubled to six points and a £200 fine.

The RAC’s annual Report on Motoring found that over a third (34 per cent) of drivers rank the dangers of talking, texting or using the internet on mobiles behind the wheel as one of their top concerns. A spokesman for road safety charity Brake has previously said that the fall in the number of motorists being fined may be due to a "decline in policing resources".

RAC head of external affairs Pete Williams said:

“There is still an enormous gulf between what the law states – that handheld mobile phones should not be used behind the wheel – and what motorists see happening on our roads. Drivers are routinely using their phones at red traffic lights, or even while on the move.

“We have already highlighted the large reductions in the numbers of full-time roads policing officers affecting many police forces. On average across the country there was a 23 per cent cut between 2010 and 2014 – meaning there are 1,279 fewer officers patrolling our roads. Sadly, therefore, there are now far fewer police to enforce a law that is designed to protect all road users and pedestrians.

“With budgetary constraints, roads policing officer numbers are not going to dramatically increase in the near future, but we believe that now is time to halt the decline and stop further year-on-year cuts. We also look to the Government to propose other means of enforcing the existing law. Can technology play a greater role in helping catch offenders?”

We’ve previously reported how a new type of vehicle-activated sign (VAS) that can detect when drivers are using their mobile phones is to be tested in Sussex. However, the VAS cannot currently record the driver's details, which means it will not result in any prosecutions. The manufacturers told road.cc that they have not as yet been asked to develop such a facility.

“The goal for ministers and policy-makers is surely to make the use of mobile phones at the wheel as socially unacceptable as drink-driving,” said Williams. “With this the number one road safety concern for motorists, coupled with official data showing fewer people are being caught, there will be an overwhelming frustration that too many drivers are simply getting away with it.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

25 comments

Avatar
Yorkshie Whippet | 9 years ago
1 like

What is the point of increasing penalties when the chances of getting caught are about the same as a snowball in hell?

Avatar
hampstead_bandit | 9 years ago
1 like

Lets not kid ourselves - nothing is going to change until there is a comprehensive education campaign to change social attitudes and active Police enforcement - the occasional Police "blitz" will do nothing to change driver behaviour.

You have a much higher risk of receiving a parking ticket or speeding ticket from an automatic camera, than being caught using a hand held celluar device or tablet? 

Motorists have realised this, and routinely ignore the law with deadly consequences for anyone outside of the vehicle.  If you use cycle lanes you will often see vehicles turning across oncoming cyclists and will often see the driver clutching a phone to their head, especially with the private hire drivers. 

Socially? It does seem unacceptable, based on my daily observations on the large number of motorists using hand hell devices whilst driving in London. 

//ep1.pinkbike.org/p6pb12363067/p5pb12363067.jpg)

I rode home tonight at 7pm across London and saw a huge number of drivers clutching / tapping away / making calls on hand held devices; sitting above the height of the driver cabin on a bicycle lets you see very clearly, at a glance, what the motorist is doing. 

With a bright secondary light mounted on my helmet, I saw a number of motorists quickly fumble their phones to hide them, perhaps assuming I was Police.  

Will anything change with Police cutbacks looming? Very doubtful...

Avatar
Simon E | 9 years ago
2 likes

Bigger fines etc aren't really the answer, like drink-driving it needs a social campaign and enforcement that will change behaviour.

Mobile phone use is considered much like speeding; so many people do it, journos and libertarians have whined on about it so much (esp. Gatsos) that there is a widespread feeling that it's not a real law. In some of the 30mph roads in Shrewsbury I'd estimate that nearly half of the drivers are doing at least 40mph (when they're not stuck in a queueing. Suckers). Even my thoroughly decent, unflinchingly honest parents both felt that being caught doing 38mph along a street in Bangor wasn't fair.

If this attitude is so ingrained how  can we expect hamstrung, poorly resourced traffic cops to turn the situation around?

@ Simmo72, could you have avoided the oil if you weren't gawping at your gadget? At least you didn't mindlessly aim 2 tonnes of steel at another person at 35mph.

Avatar
bikebot | 9 years ago
5 likes

So working for myself, most days I'm lucky enough to work form home.  Around about 4pm I'll usually have to take a short walk up the road to drop off the days post.

During the summer I got into a habit of counting the number drivers looking at their phones as I walked back, over a distance of about 200m on the main road.  Lowest count was 5, highest was 20.

There's always masses of schoolkids around as well at that time of day, getting on buses and using the shops.  Zero chance of the Police doing anything about it.  They did however have the resources to deploy a safer neighbourhood team to educate cyclists about riding on the pavement.

Avatar
racyrich | 9 years ago
2 likes

Can someone remind me what's the form these days on intervening when you witness a crime being committed?
If you see a shoplifter, do you stop them? Someone vandalising property? Do you intervene in an assault? A mugging? 
What about someone driving on the pavement? Driving while on the phone.

Why do I imagine that somehow you'll be hailed a have-a-go hero for all the first-mentioned crimes and be labelled an interfering zealot for the motoring crimes.

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
1 like

the fine is not an issue, you can declare that driving on the phone is a capital offence, but unless you catch those breaking the law there really is no point! 

There is really no option but to increase road policing in the UK.  

Avatar
Airzound | 9 years ago
2 likes

Fuck the law. It's useless and redundant.

What we should be able to do is contact insurers who would in turn raise the feckers premiums or refuse to insure. To tackle uninsured drivers we need bounty hunters. They see an unisured car they can seize it and sell or crush it along with the phone toting driver. 

All vehicles should be on one public database indicating whether they are insured and by which insurer, whether they are taxed and have MOT with expiry dates.

If you see a moton driving with a phone glued to their ear you could call a bounty hunter who would be there in minutes to impound and hopefully crush the car, driver and phone.

In the meantime if the car is stationary you could bang on the roof as it scares the shit out of motons who are driving and dialing.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Airzound | 9 years ago
1 like

Airzound wrote:

... To tackle uninsured drivers we need bounty hunters.

 

I call first dibs on a set of Mandalorian armour and a blaster rifle!

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 9 years ago
7 likes

I think the law must state that use of a handheld mobile while driving is compulsory in South London. It's the only explanation.

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 9 years ago
1 like

This is easy money for someone. I'd happily film and report drivers using mobile devices for 50% of the fine.

But seriously, why not give parking wardens and other sinister Agents of the State the ability to issue on the spot tickets?

Avatar
Simmo72 | 9 years ago
1 like

About time the punishment was raised.  Media campaign to warn, then introduce immediate 1 month ban and £1000 fine.  That will deter many and make those caught think twice.  Also stick police on bikes and head cams, ride up along side traffic in rush hour and record them.  I don't care if they lose there job or have some trouble getting to work, tough.  There is a reason.

 

Of course that requries a law to be changed which seems to take forever and an adequately resourced police force...neither likely under this government.

Avatar
part_robot | 9 years ago
0 likes

Next task; fine cyclists who do the same.

Avatar
danthomascyclist replied to part_robot | 9 years ago
1 like

part_robot wrote:

Next task; fine cyclists who do the same.

Yes. Look at all the deaths on the roads caused by cyclists using their mobile phone.

Avatar
part_robot replied to danthomascyclist | 9 years ago
0 likes

danthomascyclist wrote:

part_robot wrote:

Next task; fine cyclists who do the same.

Yes. Look at all the deaths on the roads caused by cyclists using their mobile phone.

 

Don't be daft. What's wrong with fining and or otherwise attempting to stop what's clearly a dangerous and frankly stupid activity? 

Avatar
Simmo72 replied to part_robot | 9 years ago
0 likes

 

Fair enough, they are aren't killing people (that we know of) but I can guarantee there are accidents.  I came off once because I was looking at my garmin and didn't see the patch of oil.  1 separated shoulder and 3 broken ribs later and I was rather annoyed with myself for causing so much pain for something so avoidable, so I would bet all my money on phones causing a lot worse.

 

Next task; fine cyclists who do the same.

[/quote]

Yes. Look at all the deaths on the roads caused by cyclists using their mobile phone.

[/quote]

 

Don't be daft. What's wrong with fining and or otherwise attempting to stop what's clearly a dangerous and frankly stupid activity? 

[/quote]

Avatar
danthomascyclist replied to Simmo72 | 9 years ago
4 likes

Quote:

 

Fair enough, they are aren't killing people (that we know of) but I can guarantee there are accidents.  I came off once because I was looking at my garmin and didn't see the patch of oil.  1 separated shoulder and 3 broken ribs later and I was rather annoyed with myself for causing so much pain for something so avoidable, so I would bet all my money on phones causing a lot worse.

Using your logic we should also fine people who use a mobile phone whilst walking as I once slipped down some steps whilst checking Facebook. Just because some people are stupid and injure themselves, it's not really need for a national clampdown.

Until cyclists using mobile phones start regularly injuring and killing other people, fining them would just be moronic.

IDecisions should be based on evidence rather than emotions and anecdotal evidence.

Avatar
Simmo72 replied to danthomascyclist | 9 years ago
0 likes

You hit a child on a bike at 20mph whilst checking out your twatter status then there is a good chance they are going to be seriously injured or worse so yes I stand by my logic.  If you are in charge of a vehicle, pedal or motor on a public road then you should not be texting as you are not in control.  I don't give a crap if someone injures themselves, if anything good as they won't do it again (at least that is what happened in my experience) but I do care if they hurt someone else.  Maybe I just have a more finely tuned moral compass to others in society.

 

[/quote]

Using your logic we should also fine people who use a mobile phone whilst walking as I once slipped down some steps whilst checking Facebook. Just because some people are stupid and injure themselves, it's not really need for a national clampdown.

Until cyclists usquote]

ing mobile phones start regularly injuring and killing other people, fining them would just be moronic.

IDecisions should be based on evidence rather than emotions and anecdotal evidence.

[/quote]

Avatar
danthomascyclist replied to Simmo72 | 9 years ago
1 like

Simmo72 wrote:

You hit a child on a bike at 20mph whilst checking out your twatter status then there is a good chance they are going to be seriously injured or worse so yes I stand by my logic.  If you are in charge of a vehicle, pedal or motor on a public road then you should not be texting as you are not in control.

So how many people have been killed by cyclists using their mobile phone?

I could walk into a child and knock them over, a bang to the head and it's game over. I could knock them into the road. Should I be fined for using my mobile phone whilst walking? I could walk into the road and knock a cyclist under a car. I hope this helps you to notice how stupid you sound. There's risk in every single activity in life. You've got to be sensible and draw a line. It's clear that you want to fine cyclists for using the mobile phone not based on logic or reason, but your own ingrained misconceptions about the dangers surrounding it. Otherwise you'd be pushing to legilsate for fining all people who use a mobile phone whilst moving. Unless I'm misunderstanding your logic?

The reality is theses deaths you're worrying about aren't happening.

It's compeltely moronic and pointless to legislate based on some made-up scenarios and anecdotal evidence.

 

Avatar
WolfieSmith | 9 years ago
2 likes

9 points and £800? I like that idea. Harsher penalties enforced are the only solution now  

 

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to WolfieSmith | 9 years ago
1 like

MercuryOne wrote:

9 points and £800? I like that idea. Harsher penalties enforced are the only solution now  

 

 

Since the risks of using a mobile phone at the wheel are probably worse than being just over the limit for alcohol, I'd say 12 points and a one year ban. The fine is irrelevant to be honest, since the hike in insurance after the period of the ban would make most people take note.

Avatar
kie7077 replied to OldRidgeback | 9 years ago
1 like

OldRidgeback wrote:

MercuryOne wrote:

9 points and £800? I like that idea. Harsher penalties enforced are the only solution now

Since the risks of using a mobile phone at the wheel are probably worse than being just over the limit for alcohol, I'd say 12 points and a one year ban. The fine is irrelevant to be honest, since the hike in insurance after the period of the ban would make most people take note.

Makes sense, drink drivers are nearly always banned, I think banning mobile users 1st time and every time would be a big deterent.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 9 years ago
2 likes

Waiting at a pedestrian crossing yesterday, a young driver came past, looking down at her phone, and therefore not looking where she was going. It's appalling driving, but it happens all the time, and there are never any police, so there's virtually no chance of her or anyone else being caught.

I would say driving and messing around with a smartphone is now reaching epidemic proportions, but so far there is no action from government or the police.

Avatar
BigManLittleHair | 9 years ago
12 likes

Like many, i'm primarily a cyclist and then an occasional driver. I cycle my kids to school and nursery 4 days a week and every day in South West London I encounter dreadful standards upon the road. The 2 user groups that accidentally and deliberately intimidate us are car and van drivers.

Yesterday approaching a set of  red lights to turn right, we're 1st, a van behind honks his horn, I have a child on my bike and a 6 yo on his, i ignore until we're in the advance box.  As i turn round to see what's up he's already honking again and shouting for us to get out of his way, it's still red... All the while on his f%@king phone. I gestured 'mobile' at him and he went apoplectic. I pointed at my kids, didn't get any empathic reaction. I am increasingly seeing the only solution as vigilante action, these people, stastically, are killers.

What does the police, local/national government do? Nothing. It's outrageous, vulnerable pedestrians, cyclists and other road users need protection, easily done by rigerous enforcement of more punative sanctions.

Avatar
danthomascyclist | 9 years ago
6 likes

Quote:

The goal for ministers and policy-makers is surely to make the use of mobile phones at the wheel as socially unacceptable as drink-driving,

 

So hand down the same punishments.

There's zero excuse for using the phone at the steering wheel. With the current penalty of 3 points, you can get caught four times before you lose your licence (which you'll probably get back if you appeal). It's beyond a joke - that's not an incentive to stop. The chances of getting caught are slim, so even if you drove around using the phone at the wheel for an hour every day, by the time you'd been caught four times your first lot of points will have already expired.

Make it 9 points, and a £800 fine. Why this still isn't resolved is beyond me - it's no secret that mobile phone use at the wheel is prolofic and dangerous. So far all lip service.

Avatar
mrmo | 9 years ago
1 like

no traffic police, is this really a surprise? 

examples, I only parked on double yellow for a minute, i was just dropping X off, the road was quiet, good visability,  etc etc etc. far too easy to make excuses. Far too little chance of getting caught.

Latest Comments