Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Video: Cyclist crashes into 140kph train - and escapes with bruises

Astonishing escape after rider ignores level crossing barriers

A cyclist who rode into the side of a Pendolino train travelling at 140 kilometres an hour astonishingly escaped with nothing more than bruises.

The incident took place in Opole, Poland, last month, reports TVN24.pl

CCTV footage showing the dramatic incident from both sides of the railway line was posted to YouTube earlier this week and has been viewed more than a million times.

The cyclist, a 26-year-old male, was reportedly fined for reckless cycling.

A picture posted to Facebook shows the damage caused to the train, which was delayed for 40 minutes before continuing its journey.

Tak wygląda pendolino potrącone przez rower. Czy ktoś z was może mi wyjaśnić, jak bardzo nieuważnym trzeba byc, żeby wjechać W BOK pociagu rowerem? PS - pendolino było trzeźwe.

Posted by Maszynista.eu on Thursday, 5 November 2015

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

26 comments

Avatar
kcr | 8 years ago
0 likes

Thanks to this retard, petrolheads have more 'proof' that we're 'reckless'

No they don't. What a daft generalisation!

Avatar
barbarus | 8 years ago
0 likes

I can't help feling that the fine for careless cycling is a bit superfluous?

Avatar
boil-in-the-bag | 8 years ago
2 likes

Compelling evidence, if ever I saw it, for covering the outside of motor vehicles with a soft, energy-absorbing layer. We could call them "motor helmets".

Avatar
griggers | 8 years ago
0 likes

I think that cyclist hadn't had enough training experience

 

Avatar
embattle | 8 years ago
0 likes

Sorry to say but the more lycra a person wears the more invinicible they believe they are, lucky for him he survived his stupidity :p

Avatar
burtthebike | 8 years ago
2 likes

Pretty conclusive proof of risk compensation, I'd say.  Would he have done that if he hadn't been wearing a helmet?

Avatar
Crashboy | 8 years ago
7 likes

Cyclist (Getting up and looking around, flapping arms up and down in exasperated gesture, rummaging for phone): "Whoa!! Stupid train! Stupid Driver! Who goes through a crossing at 140KPH?"

Train Driver: "Sorry Mate I didn't see you, and the barriers were down the lights were red, the horn went, I wasn't expecting you to try and go over..."

Cyclist (distractedly fumbling with bike computer, unplugging headphones, trying to stop deafening music with phone...)."I had right of way!"

Train driver: "What?!?  And you've got no Hi-Viz on, or lights.."

Cyclist (distractedly taking selfie of damage and uploading to social media, whilst tweeting #stupidtraindrivers...):" You should watch where you're going!"

Train Driver:" What?!?"

Cyclist (distractedly checking cycle computer / phone app has paused so as not to ruin strava times etc....) "BUT I RANG MY BELL!!! That's it! I am posting disguested rants all over the Twitterverse now in order to start multiple arguments and debates concerning road safety and cyclists Vs 'the world' and to whinge about how cyclists who ride along with shades on all the time, blaring music in their headhpones all the time and one eye on their cycle computer all the time (and who get really annoyed if they have to slow or stop for anything at all) are being victimised by everyone . Because it's not like anyone has enything else to worry about so near to Christmas and with bombs going off every other day and people being flooded out...."

Train Driver (Rasing hand to stop the barrage): "I'm pregnant and I'm wearing glasses!"

 

 

 

 

 

Avatar
A V Lowe | 8 years ago
0 likes

Train certainly not doing 140Km/h - I'll bet he had headphones on, absolutely no reaction to the approaching train, you do wonder about some cyclists actually being aware of anything happening on their journey.

Avatar
ajft replied to A V Lowe | 8 years ago
1 like
A V Lowe wrote:

Train certainly not doing 140Km/h - I'll bet he had headphones on, absolutely no reaction to the approaching train, you do wonder about some cyclists actually being aware of anything happening on their journey.

On a section of track with level crossings I'd be surprised if the rail speed limit was 100km/hr, more likely 80km/hr , although I've got NFI of Poland's rail regs.  So yes, it is a "140km/hr train" that he hit (ie a train that can go 140km/hr), but I'd be very surprised if it was going that fast.

Avatar
Dr. Ko replied to ajft | 8 years ago
1 like
ajft wrote:

On a section of track with level crossings I'd be surprised if the rail speed limit was 100km/hr, more likely 80km/hr , although I've got NFI of Poland's rail regs.  So yes, it is a "140km/hr train" that he hit (ie a train that can go 140km/hr), but I'd be very surprised if it was going that fast.

E.g. Germany does allow level crossing on tracks up to a speed of 160 km/h. any track with a higher speed limit e.g. 200 km/h requires tunnels or bridges. ( Anything above 200 km/h exceeds the limit of regular coaches and requires express trains like ICE/thalys/TGV) Local trains with a speed limit of 120/140 km/h will go at a speed close to max on long straights. So better watch out!

Avatar
boardmad | 8 years ago
1 like

No way that train was doing 140kph! #lightweight

Avatar
Kent H | 8 years ago
5 likes

More importantly, is his bike OK?

Avatar
2old2mould | 8 years ago
1 like

I bet that's a Strava segment...

Avatar
barbarus | 8 years ago
3 likes

Can't believe that bloody train driver didn't even slow down for him!

Avatar
iUpham | 8 years ago
4 likes

You would never see a stunt like that in the Pro Peleton...

Avatar
Daveyraveygravey | 8 years ago
0 likes

If, and I say if you were thinking of taking the risk of going over that crossing, would you not be going slow enough to stop, on the very slight chance there could be a train coming, given that the barriers are down?

Avatar
ron611087 | 8 years ago
4 likes

Ouch! He doesn't qualify for a Darwin award because he never removed himself from the gene pool, but he certainly deserves an honorary mention.

Avatar
34285011 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Some would say, "#bloodycyclists", and just maybe, in this example, they could be right. 

Avatar
Low Speed Wobble | 8 years ago
0 likes

Guy Fawkes' night that.

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 8 years ago
11 likes

I don't see the problem. He was clearly wearing a helmet.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to Mungecrundle | 8 years ago
2 likes
Mungecrundle wrote:

I don't see the problem. He was clearly wearing a helmet.

Compelling evidence, if I ever saw it, for compulsory helmet wearing (and third party insurance to pay for the damaged train).

Avatar
Bez replied to don simon fbpe | 8 years ago
1 like
don simon wrote:

Compelling evidence, if I ever saw it, for compulsory helmet wearing.

My Poe's law meter just blew a fuse. Please clarify.

Avatar
Bentrider replied to Bez | 8 years ago
4 likes
Bez wrote:
don simon wrote:

Compelling evidence, if I ever saw it, for compulsory helmet wearing.

My Poe's law meter just blew a fuse. Please clarify.

 

I'm sure he will, once he's removed his tongue from his cheek.  1

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to Bentrider | 8 years ago
0 likes
Bentrider wrote:
Bez wrote:
don simon wrote:

Compelling evidence, if I ever saw it, for compulsory helmet wearing.

My Poe's law meter just blew a fuse. Please clarify.

 

I'm sure he will, once he's removed his tongue from his cheek.  1

 3

Avatar
BrokenBootneck | 8 years ago
0 likes

What a nobjockey!

Latest Comments