A new YouGov poll has found there is strong public support for building more segregated cycle lanes alongside main roads. The Independent reports that 71 per cent of those questioned supported building segregated cycle tracks along main roads in their local areas, against just 18 per cent who were opposed and 11 per cent who didn’t know.
In mounting a High Court challenge to one of the capital’s cycle superhighways, the head of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association suggested that the traffic disruption resulting from its construction was “sucking the lifeblood from London.” However, in contrast to this, the poll found that support was still over 50 per cent among all groups, even when it was suggested that construction work might delay commutes to work by five minutes.
Chris Boardman, British Cycling’s policy advisor, commented:
“This YouGov poll shows us, yet again, that the vast majority of the public want to see more cycle tracks on main roads.
“This is what people are telling their democratically elected leaders they want; meaningful resource to deliver segregated infrastructure on an ambitious scale to unlock the benefits cycling can offer our society. If this kind of evidence isn’t enough to give politicians and transport authorities the confidence to act, I don’t know what is.”
However, Chancellor George Osborne “isn’t listening to the evidence” on transport investment, according to CTC’s Roger Geffen, who says there is a complete mismatch between the Government’s stated aims for a cycling revolution and where the money is going.
The £300m allocated by the government for cycling over the next four years equates to just £1.39 per head per year – far short of the £10 recommended by cycle campaigners.
Last week, the minister for cycling, Robert Goodwill, told road.cc that decisions about cycle spending would increasingly be in the hands of local government.
“You’ll be aware that the government’s agenda is all about devolving power to local government to local people, to Local Enterprise Partnerships, and so in many ways by devolving that decision making we’re giving them the responsibility to deliver cycling infrastructure.”
Boardman said the case for more segregated cycle lanes was obvious and expressed his impatience that more wasn’t being done. “Business wants it, the public want it, the environment and the health service needs it. I really don’t understand what we are waiting for.”
Add new comment
11 comments
Bus lanes are the way forward. We get to use them and people don't see it as cycling infrastructure.
At first it's a nice idea; in practice not so. A 1 meter wide lane along the road is largely enough and much more effective. It costs much much less, less complicated, maintenance is easier, you don't have pedestrians or dogs walking on it, and riders have the same rights as other road users.
When riding, the danger rarely comes from behind or front. The real danger is at intersections and change of direction. Segregated lanes reinforce this danger at intersections.
It's not a coincidence that the picture above doesn't show an intersection. It seems so cool... except the bollards. Has anyone ridden near bollards like that? Not me. A catastrophe if something goes wrong.
nmot even close, since the cars will now drive right against the line when there is no more room, so even if yopu wheel is practically rubbing the kerb, the car will be just over two feet from you, actually likely to be less than a foot, but thats ok because you are in your lane and he is in his.
Yep keep us off the roads... Segregation isnt the way forward for me.
I agree with that for enthusiasts, but segregation works really well for casual cyclists. You just have to look at other countries to see the effect that it has on cycling numbers.
Well you ride on the road then chap. I'm guessing you are male, approx 20-40 years old? And... here's the key thing: you already ride a bike regularly?
Yep, devolving blame, centralising political credit, its nice work if you are a reptile...
That devolving power thing....
Restricting use of CCTV for parking control and adding a 10 minute grace period. Both introduced by national government against the wishes of most local authorities. Pickles was very happy to jump in, to prevent a "war on motorists".
“You’ll be aware that the government’s agenda is all about devolving power to local government to local people, to Local Enterprise Partnerships, and so in many ways by devolving that decision making we’re giving them the responsibility to deliver cycling infrastructure.”
...just as the decision over exactly which libraries and community centres to close was also devolved to local councils.
I believe, in non-politician, this is called 'passing the buck'.
sadly agree....
How selfish can cyclists be?
Everyone knows that "our" roads are the sole preserve of taxi drivers and motorists.
Well, that's certainly the case where I live.