Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Lighter nights bring more child road casualties according to RAC Foundation report

With longer, warmer days, children are more likely to be out and about

A new report by the RAC Foundation, timed to coincide with the weekend clock change, reveals that the number of child cyclists hurt in July is significantly higher than it is in December. It also found that 13 per cent of all child road casualties are cyclists.

After examining child road casualties between 2010 and 2014, the RAC Foundation found that there were on average 227 under-15s killed or seriously injured in July each year, from a total of 1,733 casualties. This compared to 122 killed or seriously injured in December, out of 1,103 casualties.

Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said:

“Instinctively we think of the dark, cold months as taking the biggest toll on our children. But the opposite is true. With the longer, warmer days, children are more likely to be out and about and with that comes a rise in casualties.

“We don’t want to wrap our children in cotton wool, and walking and cycling are generally good for our health, so as adults and parents we need to lead by example whether we are driving a car, crossing the road or on two wheels.

“The more we act responsibly, the faster young children will learn and the more likely they will be to stay safe when they have to make decisions for themselves.”

Unsurprisingly, the peak hour for child road casualties is between 3pm and 4pm with higher levels also seen in the following couple of hours. Another spike is seen in the morning between 8am and 9am.

Blackpool topped the organisation’s list of areas with the highest proportion of child casualties with 30.84 casualties per 10,000 resident children. Other areas of Lancashire also fared badly. Hyndburn was second with 29.83, Blackburn with Darwen was third with 28.69 and Burnley was fourth with 28.66. Preston and Liverpool also featured in a top ten in which the North-West features heavily.

Parents feel London roads are too dangerous for children

The area with the lowest proportion of child casualties was the Forest of Dean with 8.61 casualties per 10,000 resident children, followed by Bracknell Forest and Wokingham.

Pete Williams, a trustee of the RAC’s Road Safety Awareness Charity, said:

“It is the responsibility of all drivers to be mindful of the risks of young road users and children playing around and near roads and to reduce their speed and increase their vigilance. But more needs to be done to address road safety education in schools and across the board to ensure our young people are alert to the potential dangers.

“That is why the RAC has teamed up with The Scout Association to improve the awareness and skills of their half a million members to help them keep safe and to grow up as responsible road users.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

5 comments

Avatar
stevie63 | 8 years ago
0 likes

It's a daft story, of course more kids are injured cycling in the summer there are more carrying out the activity. It's like me saying more people are injured playing cricket in July than in December, it's meaningless.

Avatar
Bhachgen | 8 years ago
1 like

As ever with these kind of reports,  the numbers are pretty meaningless without knowing how many children are out on the streets in the given area compared to similar areas elsewhere. Are parents in Blackburn 5x more likely to let their kids play out than those in Wokingham? If so then Blackburn is actually safer.

Much harder data to collect,but without it the report isn't all that helpful.

At least theyconsidered that the higher casualty figures in summer were due to more kids being out than it actually being more dangerous than in winter.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 8 years ago
0 likes

The headline reads like it's more daylight hours that kills or injures children, the fact of the matter is that it's generally drivers that injure or kill children. Correlation is not causality.

I'd be more concerned about the sheer number of casualties and why it's so much higher in July. I'd suggest driver behaviour in summer needs addressing, or at least more research.

Avatar
grumpyoldcyclist | 8 years ago
2 likes

I feel it would be better to state that the overwhelming majority (87%) of child road casualties aren't cyclists. Would give it a better sense of perspective don't you think? We should applaud a motoring organisation that states that drivers and parents should lead by example and act responsibly.

Avatar
Windydog replied to grumpyoldcyclist | 8 years ago
0 likes

grumpyoldcyclist wrote:

I feel it would be better to state that the overwhelming majority (87%) of child road casualties aren't cyclists. Would give it a better sense of perspective don't you think? We should applaud a motoring organisation that states that drivers and parents should lead by example and act responsibly.

 

So other cyclists do not have a responsibility to set an example?  Even on the kiddy carrier, my ostensibly opinionated 3 year old asks why we stopped for red light, and a circa 12 year old on his bmx doesn't.

No hating going on here, it's a minority.    Only hate sounding like a moralist.

Latest Comments