Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Taxi driver who fatally injured cyclist in dooring fined £400

Judge questions why driver not charged with causing victim's death...

A Glasgow taxi driver has been fined £400 after opening the door of his vehicle “to the endangerment and injury” of a cyclist who later died in hospital of head injuries – with the judge presiding over the case expressing “surprise” the motorist did not face a charge of causing the victim’s death.

David Thompson, aged 67, had been cycling along Keppochhill Road on the evening of 20 May 2015 when Joseph Connelly, aged 54, opened the door of his cab, which he had just parked, reports The Scotsman.

Procurator fiscal depute Wendy McDonald told Glasgow Sheriff Court that Connelly “opened his door of this vehicle and the complainer has been cycling past.

“Contact has been made causing Mr Thomson, now deceased, to fall off his bike. He sustained severe head injuries and later died as a result of the fall.”

Connelly insisted, however, that the victim “didn’t hit the door, he swerved round it and lost control.”

His lawyer, Robert Sheridan, told Sheriff Celia Sanderson that the taxi driver believed at first that it had been Mr Thomson’s satchel that had hit the door. He also said that there was a private hire vehicle double parked on the bend just before Connelly’s taxi.

As a result, Connelly accepted “the responsibility was on him to go further than he would normally to ensure there was no other hazards there,” said Mr Sheridan.

While both English and Scots law share the offences of causing death by careless or dangerous driving, those only apply when the vehicle is actually being driven – meaning it is impossible to prosecute cases such as this one with a driving-related charge.

That was starkly illustrated by a 2012 court case relating to the death the previous year of 25-year-old Sam Harding, who died in North London when a driver opened the door of his car into his path, knocking the cyclist from his bike and into the path of a bus.

> Motorist found not guilty of manslaughter in connection with death of London cyclist

The motorist, 32-year-old Kenan Aydogdu, was acquitted of manslaughter by a jury at the Old Bailey, despite the prosecution saying that visibility through the windows of his Audi car was just 17 per cent of what it should have been due to a tinting film he had applied.

Rule 239 of the Highway Code says that when parking by the roadside

you MUST ensure you do not hit anyone when you open your door. Check for cyclists or other traffic.

One road safety technique aimed at reducing the number of cyclists who fall victim to being doored is to encourage drivers to employ the 'Dutch Reach' - using the hand further away from the door handle to open it, meaning they naturally look round and see any approaching cyclists. Find out more here.

 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
Dan S replied to Eric D | 8 years ago
0 likes

Eric D wrote:

Dan S wrote:

Basically we need an offence of carelessly opening the door

I'm puzzled by the distinction between Laws and Offences.

The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986
"105.  No person shall open, or cause or permit to be opened, any door of a vehicle on a road so as to injure or endanger any person. "
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1986/1078/regulation/105/made

Surely to break that law is to commit an offence.
Which offence?

Edit:

Oh - that is the offence!
It doesn't have to come under 'Careless Driving' or 'Neglience' - it stands by itself ?

Yes and no!

Technically, the Regulation simply says that you're not allowed to do something.  That's not the same as saying that it is an offence.  As it happens, a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988 does state that breaching the RV(C&U) Regs is an offence.  In the case of this Regulation, it's an offence that carries a maximum £1000 fine and no endorsement (i.e. no penalty points).

That's why I say we need an offence of doing it carelessly (or dangerously, or extending the definition of driving): I mean an offence that requires carelessness (which the Regulation doesn't) and therefore can have a greater penalty attached (it is rare to find strict liability offences such as this carrying major punishments).  Car dooring should not be something that is tucked away in the Construction and Use Regulations carrying a fine only.  Personally, I probably have more close calls with this than with people actually driving.

 

Avatar
burtthebike | 8 years ago
11 likes

Justice!  A human concept that doesn't appear to apply to cyclists.  If even the judge thought the driver should have been charged with a more serious offence, it's difficult to understand why he was only charged with the relatively minor offence.

Still, I'm sure the authorities have removed the driver's name from the list of taxi drivers.  Or would that be against their human rights?

Avatar
LegalFun replied to burtthebike | 8 years ago
3 likes

burtthebike wrote:

Justice!  A human concept that doesn't appear to apply to cyclists.  If even the judge thought the driver should have been charged with a more serious offence, it's difficult to understand why he was only charged with the relatively minor offence.

Still, I'm sure the authorities have removed the driver's name from the list of taxi drivers.  Or would that be against their human rights?

It is against his right to earn a living. Then again, he could always try a career move, unlike the poor cyclist.
I also wonder if the taxi was parked in a parking bay or whether he had abandoned his taxi on double yellows? 

Based on the amount of "advice" given to cyclists telling them to keep to the kerb, the cycle lanes encouraging kerb-side cycling and the abuse shouted by motorists Im not surprised that a cyclist has been killed by a dooring.

Pages

Latest Comments